This is from the podcast series The History Of Rome by Mike Duncan. He currently does The Revolutions podcast. www.revolutionspodcast.com/
Пікірлер: 117
@rebeccahaines98394 жыл бұрын
I love this podcast ,I've learned a lot, but I laughed when my husband heard me playing it one day and said "every time I hear this guy's voice I know someone Roman is about to get assassinated". And yeah....pretty much.
@EinFelsbrocken2 жыл бұрын
He seems to have understood the quintessence of roman politics 😄
@feral7523 Жыл бұрын
I find the Goths being unable to penetrate the fortified cities in Thrace similar to the Vikings being unable to do same in England with their boroughs. Love this series even if I arrived late!
@rockstar4503 жыл бұрын
“Ambrose did the prudent thing... and went into hiding.” I literally lol’d
@yingyang10082 жыл бұрын
Kind of amazing how long they kept the show on the road given the constant infighting
@lambrosk3790 Жыл бұрын
At first I was surprised no one “liked” this comment. Then I remembered that Rome is one big metaphor for the US. People only like bad news that their used to hearing,
@Figgy_235 ай бұрын
Yea sure, minus the military uprisings, constant border raids from foreign peoples and lack of technological advancement in economics… society, and pretty much everything else given we refer to it as “ancient” Rome…. Don’t forget the fact that Rome was an empire, you know… one guy with all the power, his word is law, the ability to persecute any religion or put any peoples to death if he pleases…. And I do say “he” as he because women had no part in anything because… ya know “Ancient Rome”. But hey, if you wanna point out people’s faults in modern politics, don’t look further! Go back 2,000 years and bring up shit that means nothing. By your logic we should assume the Russian government is a bunch of Slavic horse riders with a primitive tribal government, therefore why they’re invading Ukraine right now…. Or I can just… you know… assume it’s something else
@dizzleblackizzle6 жыл бұрын
the more and more i listen to the mismanagement of the late emperors the more i am convinced that Rome was doomed to fail.
@grahamjohnson25594 жыл бұрын
But it didn't
@bluewizzard8843Ай бұрын
Sure the whole system was doomed to fail. The early Empire relied on all powerful juggernauts. The constant failings of weak emperors we're introduced with the abolishment of the republic. Also there was no sacred acceptance of sucession so a death of a emperor meant the potential for disaster every time. Weak Administration, low loyality and the failing miltary power we're crucial downfalls for rome.
@bigbluebuttonman113723 күн бұрын
@@bluewizzard8843 The lack of a proper succession system wasn't even something that the Romans never thought about. Diocletian had actually attempted to resolve this very dumb problem that Augustus could have solved by just putting *some* sort of meritocratic succession process in place. I get that it was ancient times and that Rome had an admiration for great families during the Republican Era, but after enough emperors, somebody had to have noticed "Uh...maybe blood from Augustus doesn't make you a good emperor." Unfortunately, it seems that only one person ever really even came close to realizing this and attempting to change that cycle in an official capacity, and it blew up the moment he went away (again, Diocletian).
@rchetype70297 жыл бұрын
2:02:20 Mike's dead-pan humor is something magical.
@barnabyandanthonysofficial1497 Жыл бұрын
too bad that comment is no longer true
@theletterw3875 Жыл бұрын
@@barnabyandanthonysofficial1497 did Mike lose his sense of humor? How exactly was that statement true once but no longer?
@barnabyandanthonysofficial1497 Жыл бұрын
@@theletterw3875 @The Letter W I wasn't commenting on his humour, rather when he recorded the podcast the Indiana Jones franchise was still a trilogy but subsequently George Lucas crapped out a terrible 4th movie, now with a 5th one soon to be released.
@theletterw3875 Жыл бұрын
@@barnabyandanthonysofficial1497 I don't know how I didn't put that together on my own, thanks for the explanation without snark
@barnabyandanthonysofficial1497 Жыл бұрын
@@theletterw3875 hey no problem pal, see you on the road of happy destiny... or again sometime in the comment section!
@alroberto54633 жыл бұрын
As a writer and historian I disagree with Mike Duncan's assessment of Valentinian I. He was better than the description. Overall though, the podcast is fabulous.
@wicksinn7 жыл бұрын
It's very true, Valentinian's death is definitely very memorable and funny.
@jonathangeddes97867 ай бұрын
Not to him 😢
@dononteatthevegetals294111 ай бұрын
Oh my god, Mike Duncan predicted the new Indiana Jones. 2:01:30
@CtG-Games7 ай бұрын
This episode according to his website was released in October 2011; 3 years after the 4th Indiana Jones. So it was a joke.
@dononteatthevegetals29417 ай бұрын
What if they didn't find your remains
@LoneKharnivore3 жыл бұрын
Like Thomas Becket, you make someone a bishop and suddenly they get all religious.
@tommyodonovan38837 жыл бұрын
It is the most important part of European history; The beginnings of feudalism (Diocletion 282-302) & 800yrs of the dark ages.
@-timaeus-97817 жыл бұрын
I agree. Knowing our history is very important.
@deathsheadknight21373 жыл бұрын
IS it the most important?
@AndreLuis-gw5ox3 жыл бұрын
You just got it wrong at "dark ages"
@tommyodonovan38833 жыл бұрын
It depends..... on what *"is,*" is. P.S. The most pivotal event in human history *IS* FIRE.
@pharaohsmagician83293 жыл бұрын
@@tommyodonovan3883 Won't you philosophers stop telling us with swords at our side what is right and wrong
@biancachristie2 жыл бұрын
Ah, the phony tough and the crazy brave. Nice one, Mikey
@fiddleriddlediddlediddle3 ай бұрын
18:33 An arrogant megalomaniac throwing such a powerful hissy fit that he gets a stroke and dies is too funny.
@MegaTang12343 жыл бұрын
Once Ambrose shows up it gets to my favorite part of the late roman empire, it's politics. You know how people like to say something bad happening is like watching a car crash in slow motion? Well imagine that but with the additional factor that the passangers inside the car are fighting to see how gets to be in charge of the steering while this happens. It's so morbid yet intriguing.
@archenema6792 Жыл бұрын
30:41 The Huns did NOT have compound bows. They had composite bows, made of thin layers of shaved bone or horn held together by horse gut glue. A compound bow uses a pulley system to multiply the power of the release relative to the force needed to draw the string back.
@sipjedekat8525 Жыл бұрын
He corrects the mistake in the very next episode.
@sargentspliff7 жыл бұрын
dude thank you so much for these, you're laying the foundation for my degree xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
@-timaeus-97817 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching, glad you enjoy it. :)
@drewbaldwin9952 жыл бұрын
@@-timaeus-9781 stop acting like your the one who recorded these videos
@1987MartinT7 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: in Denmark pap means cardboard.
@sietsehofstede46895 жыл бұрын
In Dutch Pap means; Dad
@bcvetkov85345 жыл бұрын
@@sietsehofstede4689 King DADDY CARDBOARD😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣
@danielross54934 жыл бұрын
In the north of Scotland it means a succulent women's breast
@bloodofthefayth3 жыл бұрын
Card or cordboard
@annwilliams64383 жыл бұрын
In South Africa it is a word for porridge. ;) Boxed daddy porridge?
@MogofWar7 жыл бұрын
One highly plausible origin story is the Huns were steppe nomads who had integrated into Han society for some time before moving west. Their displacement westward likely stemmed from the fact that China did not encourage the complete assimilation of conquered nomads as they had use of them to bolster their own cavalry, and they quite often used their horse tribe subjects as scouts and outriders in their campaigns westward. The ancestors of the Huns were probably one of these outrider groups who found themselves either on the wrong side of a battle line with their retreat cut off, while on a western campaign, or on the wrong side of a dynastic dispute, when the government changed hands. Either way, acess to their former homeland was lost long enough for their welcome to be permanently revoked, and they had to revert to a steppe nomad lifestyle in order to survive. They most likely subsisted on the steppe for a few generations before seeking more fertile lands to the west. Even though everything Chinese about their culture had been stripped away by living on the margin for so long, they retained the technologies to wage war and continued to self identify as H-n. (Hun and Han are quite likely different westen spellings of the same word.) More importantly their population grew considerably, as the steppe is vast enough that even bleak foraging capacity could feed large numbers. (An advantage steppe nomads held for most of human history, that multiplied tenfold with the domestication of horses and cattle, and tenfold again when people learned how to ride horses.)
@-timaeus-97817 жыл бұрын
Interesting, thanks :)
@jacobsoltero28726 жыл бұрын
I heard they are Xiongu Descendants from Modu's Empire in the late 3d century early 2nd century BC around the Fall of the Qin and rise of the Han. Also I've heard they're central asian Turks and the Göktürks are they'r descendants. I think this second theory is far less likely. So your theory implies they are the Mogols Ancestors kind of? The history of the Huns always intreags me i feel we will find out one day.
@ralphstern28454 жыл бұрын
Mog of War or the Hun could have been people whom themselves were being displaced .
@stewartdalton32984 ай бұрын
This narrator is , dare I say it?, Immaculate This is why I laugh. This is my modern day, Roman , Young and the Restless, ( Bold and the Beautiful) Baa ha ha ha. Does not matter which episode that you're suggests. The narration is cool History is WHO
@Kyle_Schaff2 жыл бұрын
57:03 Prelude to the big battle
@LTrotsky21stCentury Жыл бұрын
I love how Duncan calls the Irish Famine of the 1840s a "socio-economic factor," because it shows exactly how twisted the Western History Academy is. A famine isn't a "socio-economic factor." It's usually a natural disaster. The socio-economic factor was the fact that no one in England was starving while Ireland did starve - even though England ruled Ireland at the time. Jonathan Swift wrote a book about this (among others). The famine *became* a socio-economic factor *because of the political structure of Britain* not because of a potato fungus. All too often, the Western academy looks at things in narrow isolation, avoiding any mention or talk of class and wealth structures and their decisive influence on human events.
@Timmersan Жыл бұрын
A Modest Proposal, is a Juvenalian satirical essay written and published anonymously by Jonathan Swift in 1729
@casperscott12015 жыл бұрын
The composite bit on the bow was not the revolutionary bit. They were also recurve bows
@johnmurdoch30836 жыл бұрын
I had it in my head that valentinian outlived valens..jesus i didnt expect that even if ive read roman history a dozen times.
@jonathangeddes97867 ай бұрын
Jesus died 300 yrs b4 vlens 😢
@mb77mb66Ай бұрын
Athanaric and Fritigern are the names he mentions
@steveswitzer43535 жыл бұрын
Maximus known in welsh legend as Macsen Wledig www.ancient-origins.net/history-famous-people/meet-magnus-maximus-roman-usurper-turned-welsh-hero-who-inspired-king-arthur-020932
@YawehthedragondogofEL7 жыл бұрын
The Huns used composite bows not compound bows.
@nodinitiative6 жыл бұрын
Roman Brown lol....if the Huns had compound bows. The Huns could have conquered all of Han China or all of the Western and Eastern Roman Empire.
@Maceta4446 жыл бұрын
49:26 he corrects himself.
@slavemonkey50635 жыл бұрын
lol huns with compound bows oh shit
@Grabovsky853 жыл бұрын
@@nodinitiative imagine the Mongols. Soo much worse.
@davidmoser35353 жыл бұрын
Yeah DA, they used lasers and rifles, also
@JohnRoberts-wk6rf2 жыл бұрын
A pleasant surpise...
@yingyang10082 жыл бұрын
Shades of Thomas Beckett regarding Ambrose
@jbussa5 жыл бұрын
I've heard a couple different versions of that story. Was it moldy grain or dog meat the goths were forced to trade their children for?
@Aethelhald3 жыл бұрын
It was probably both, as well as other things the locals wouldn't eat. Kind of like how unscrupulous people would trade crappy food to Jews in the Ghetto for extortionate prices, like a moldy loaf of bread for a gold ring. When you're hungry and desperate that moldy old food is more useful to you than some gold around your finger.
@grdnzrnic Жыл бұрын
As good a study about human nature than history
@AntonioBrandao3 жыл бұрын
What happened with the quality of the statues at this point?
@LoneKharnivore3 жыл бұрын
More realistic, less idealised.
@AntonioBrandao3 жыл бұрын
@@LoneKharnivore they don’t look realistic at all, they look like caricatures or cartoon faces, using impossible shapes for eyes etc
@Martin-jk2ng Жыл бұрын
There weren't as many quality artisans probably. The amount of young men dying in all these wars probably had all kinds of untold consequences.
@TK-js7yz15 күн бұрын
City of God was written by Augustine, not Ambrose
@thehistorybard6333 Жыл бұрын
13:07 sounds like "in the far east of the Sasanid Kingdom, the cushions had revolted" lol (I know its actually Kushans)
@RussellGeorge67 Жыл бұрын
Probably a bit late for this, but the guy on the right is actually Valentinian II. Just saying.
@paulgundrum9059 Жыл бұрын
His comments concerning a fourth Indiana Jones movie is quite prophetic, though he believed in the integrity of Hollywood Icons to the peril of his statement, lol. (Comment about two hours into this)
@Brice23 Жыл бұрын
Never have I heard a reader produce a several second pause at the completion of each sentence rather than at the completion of paragraphs. It makes the rhythm of the narrative quite bizarre.
@uncommonsense8193 Жыл бұрын
The 'Indiana Jones" observation didn't age well. LOL
@CtG-Games7 ай бұрын
Hello 10-month-old comment. This episode according to his website was released in October 2011; 3 years after the 4th Indiana Jones. So it was a joke.
@seanstevens84163 жыл бұрын
*laughs maniacally at Indiana Jones part*
@MonikaEscobar19655 жыл бұрын
Not in Rome but in Britain!
@Strix20312 ай бұрын
12 years later and they made a new indiana jones movie and extremely crappy
@kanyekubrick53914 жыл бұрын
1:38:00
@TheDing17012 жыл бұрын
How dare you smear Pap!
@supermariosunshine643 жыл бұрын
Pap popped up
@noodlecoffee1933 жыл бұрын
Pap papped bad? Time to Scrap
@bluewizzard8843Ай бұрын
The whole mishandling of the gothic Situation was deastrous. These were practically new legionaries for valens. Just give them the head of an incompetebt fool of a local adminsestrator and recruit them into your army. It's not that hard.
@TK-js7yz16 күн бұрын
You will be surprised how often we speak about our king Pap in the modern Armenia. Just ask our Prime Minister 😢
@vernedavis58562 жыл бұрын
not compound bow, recurve. g5
@Moribus_Artibus3 жыл бұрын
Learn from these errors of these men and use whatever wisdom you gain on your own life or country.
@gunter63773 жыл бұрын
Don't let germs in the empire?
@Moribus_Artibus3 жыл бұрын
Günter More like get an education and don’t encourage the bad behavior of a politician. In this period in Roman history, Rome was ran by a mayor, nobody gave a shit anymore, people were too busy going to sports game and debating religion.
@stonedwalljack927610 ай бұрын
@@gunter6377 Mass immigration is bad.
@user-ps6un5jk4x6 ай бұрын
Your Indiana Jones comment didnt age well 😂
@crustywhiteboy5 жыл бұрын
Mike can you be my dad
@john.james.1106 жыл бұрын
I'm with the Goths on this one.
@gunter63773 жыл бұрын
*GERRRRRRRRRMS* 😡
@perrycomeau262711 ай бұрын
Edward II was a good king
@Focusyn7 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure what Mike was talking about. There are, indeed, four Indiana Jones movies, not three.
@nodinitiative6 жыл бұрын
Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus I think he was being sarcastic.
@Wallyworld306 жыл бұрын
This podcast was made in 2007 one year before Indiana Jones Crystal Skull was released.
@zanlooney3436 жыл бұрын
Podcast was between 2007 and 2011 - Crystal Skull was released before he got to this point.
@washizukanorico5 жыл бұрын
I really think you do not understand the phrase « Indiana Jones movie » if you think there are 4 of them
@CtG-Games7 ай бұрын
Hello, 6-year-old comment. I'm not sure what you are talking about. There are *five* Indiana Jones movies, not four. Also, this episode (based on his website) was released in October 2011, which is 3 years after the 4th Indiana Jones.
@adminholly9 ай бұрын
That Indian jones bit didn’t age well
@Shminkydinky666 Жыл бұрын
I love fueling my autistic interest of Rome 😂
@nebojsag.587110 ай бұрын
It is kinda sad how the late Romans were less evil than the old ones, but were costantly harried by their neighbors. They tried to be less bad and to just live in peace, but nope...
@JoseFernandez-qt8hm2 жыл бұрын
illegal immigration..... Battle of Adrianople...
@lukaszspychaj92103 жыл бұрын
I dislike ambrose
@MonikaEscobar19655 жыл бұрын
Maximus did no crimes. What are you telling here?
@paulrosa61733 жыл бұрын
Why does Ambrose make for required reading of Augustine's City of God? An when it comes to what Ambrose did to the Nike in the Senate house - it really is a battle of superstitions and purported magical powers. Although Mr. Duncan wants to avoid getting sucked into theological black holes, it has been a puzzle to me how any philosophy like theology could be argued at all. It sounds only like one builds one's intellectual or theological bricks and proceeds to walk on them. They are building very public, even obligatory bricks, and that's what seems to make them so damn bossy. But what those bricks are made of and why one brick is better than another is still a mystery? A strong intellect can probably crush them all, but then you have a head full of dust, I suppose? But maybe it's also a plasma if you really get hot over it? . Ambrose is essentially the same sort of political being, or operative, as Julius Caesar when he was appointed to be Flamen Dialis. The Vestal Virgins are nuns with a limited term of contract with the higher powers). It sounds very like a change of theological clothing for the same body of psychological human needs. Even polytheists seem to, or can be reduced, to being a kind of monotheism in as much as Zeus-Jupiter is the creator of all the rest. And even the first book of the Bible seems ambivalent when it has God say - "they have become like us" after the first parents discovered the ability to know good and evil. I am used to thinking about one God because I can't even keep an extended family tree straight most of the time and was born into a nuclear family with a total of four persons.. But if I had a more tribal or richer sort of family background - I mean lots of people and relatives who occupied a neighborhood and I knew more about their lives, I might not have been such a one eyed monster of small social range. That little candy box RC church my Grandmothers family attended their whole lives had a funny kind of similarity to a pagan temple in as much as God was also surrounded by many "sub luminaries" in the form of saints and images. Their god always had an extended family. You had to know the proper way of thinking about their relationship, however. They are all mostly gone now but weddings could be a matter of calling together over a hundred immediate family members down to first, maybe a few second cousins. I really recommend Carl Jung's "Answer to Job" for some really juicy and far more intelligent analysis of these early Catholic ideas. I've tried to read everything I can get my hands on by him but am still only an amateur and am not at all sure I'm a catholic with the big C anymore. He was a "good Lutheran" a Quaker I once met told me.