Eps 347: 243 Win and Hydrostatic Shock

  Рет қаралды 61,840

Ron Spomer Outdoors - Podcast

Ron Spomer Outdoors - Podcast

5 ай бұрын

Welcome to the Ron Spomer Outdoors Podcast! In this episode, I answer listener questions about the 243 Winchester vs. the 6mm Remington, hydrostatic shock, and more!
Affiliate Links - help support the channel at no additional charge to you
Use Code RSO10 at check out for either Diamond Blade Knives or Knives of Alaska and get 10% off at checkout.
www.diamondbladeknives.com/
www.knivesofalaska.com/Home
Links:
Website: ronspomeroutdoors.com/
Facebook: / ronspomeroutdoors
Instagram: / ronspomer
Who is Ron Spomer
For 44 years I’ve had the good fortune to photograph and write about my passion - the outdoor life. Wild creatures and wild places have always stirred me - from the first flushing pheasant that frightened me out of my socks in grandpa’s cornfield to the last whitetail that dismissed me with a wag of its tail. In my attempts to connect with this natural wonder, to become an integral part of our ecosystem and capture a bit of its mystery, I’ve photographed, hiked, hunted, birded, and fished across much of this planet. I've seen the beauty that everyone should see, survived adventures that everyone should experience. I may not have climbed the highest mountains, canoed the wildest rivers, caught the largest fish or shot the biggest bucks, but I’ve tried. Perhaps you have, too. And that’s the essential thing. Being out there, an active participant in our outdoor world.
Produced by: Red 11 Media - www.red11media.com/
Disclaimer
All loading, handloading, gunsmithing, shooting and associated activities and demonstrations depicted in our videos are conducted by trained, certified, professional gun handlers, instructors, and shooters for instructional and entertainment purposes only with emphasis on safety and responsible gun handling. Always check at least 3 industry handloading manuals for handloading data, 2 or 3 online ballistic calculators for ballistic data. Do not modify any cartridge or firearm beyond what the manufacturer recommends. Do not attempt to duplicate, mimic, or replicate anything you see in our videos. Firearms, ammunition, and constituent parts can be extremely dangerous if not used safely.

Пікірлер: 291
@daithi1966
@daithi1966 5 ай бұрын
Ron Spomer is the absolute master of disagreeing without being a jerk.
@mike3f0
@mike3f0 5 ай бұрын
When I was just a kid, in the sixties, I had the choice between a deer gun in .243 or a deer gun in .308. I still have that .243.
@kenlansing1216
@kenlansing1216 4 ай бұрын
There must be some reason the .243 Win. has outlived so many similar rounds.
@gordonwells1626
@gordonwells1626 4 ай бұрын
Yeah it works very well, especially on animals under 100kgs, if you do your part.
@BigdaddyE71
@BigdaddyE71 5 ай бұрын
I shoot a 243 with either an 80 or 85 grain Barnes tsx or Hornady GMX. ALWAYS a 1 shot stop on whitetails here in Mississippi. Never had one make it past 50 yds.
@luketilley9137
@luketilley9137 5 ай бұрын
Yes Sir. 1977 Winchester model 70 243
@BHF40
@BHF40 5 ай бұрын
Same in Pa, .243 100 grain norma white tail. 1 hit stops em everytime and in short order. 100+ yards.
@georgecoons6872
@georgecoons6872 3 ай бұрын
dont matter what bullet you use. a T800 human combat chassis run and keep running like a deer in a forest fire.
@JimVaught-qm6gf
@JimVaught-qm6gf Ай бұрын
Same in TX with any bullet never had one make it past 30-40 yards unless rhey were running when hit. Most just dropped on the spot.
@freeslave8824
@freeslave8824 4 ай бұрын
A master course in how to disagree without being disagreeable! Keep up the great work Ron!
@texasyotehunter2964
@texasyotehunter2964 Күн бұрын
My parents gifted me my first rifle at age 15, a Remington 700 .243. I put a 3x9x40 on it that I bought from Gibson’s Discount Store (all back in the early 70’s). I still have that rifle and scope but it has been retired for sentimental reasons and to hand down to my kids. But, I bought another just like it as a replacement. Love the .243 and it’s definitely a great hunting caliber.
@jamesyarbrough4777
@jamesyarbrough4777 5 ай бұрын
Ive seen many a deer taken with 243 win in 70 grain nossler ballistic tip, 85 grain speer boat tail, 87 VMAX, 90 soft point, 95 grain SST and 100 grain soft point. On the shoulder and behind. I dont see why people dislike it.
@ThemantleofElijah
@ThemantleofElijah 4 ай бұрын
Hey I’m planning to hunt with 243 this year I’ve got several bullets to chose from I wonder how a 70gr Sierra hpbt will work
@jamesyarbrough4777
@jamesyarbrough4777 4 ай бұрын
@@ThemantleofElijah it will work behind the shoulder. a heavier soft point is less picky about shot placement. they all work
@ThemantleofElijah
@ThemantleofElijah 4 ай бұрын
@@jamesyarbrough4777 thank you I recently picked up a 243 brand new Remington 700 with 8 twist I did grab some extra bullets to handload got some 80gr cx Hornady along with interlocks 100gr and then some 108 gr eldm so I have lots to choose from
@jamesyarbrough4777
@jamesyarbrough4777 4 ай бұрын
@@ThemantleofElijah 80 grain cx would be my top pick. super fast and deep penetrating.
@ThemantleofElijah
@ThemantleofElijah 4 ай бұрын
@@jamesyarbrough4777 good deal I’m gonna load some up certain on that I was gonna try some Barnes lrx 95 gr but I grabbed these I think they will be some good deer medicine
@KathrynLiz1
@KathrynLiz1 5 ай бұрын
The amount of hydrostatic shock depends a lot on the right match between velocity and bullet construction...... Weatherby had trouble with the bullets of the time disintegrating due to excessive velocity at close ranges. This was partly cured by the like of Barnes "X" and Nosler partition bullets etc.... there are lots of them now. Placement is king... when the cheap milsurp 303 ran out here in NZ, the government deer cullers went to the little .222 which is superbly accurate and dropped deer in their tracks with head and neck shots within 200 yards. Quite a few hunters here, in the less open country, use the .223 to great effect, usually with 65gr bullets from a 20" barrel. A bit light in my old fashioned view, but they seem to work. Bullets these days are so much better than used to be case when many of these rounds were born and I was young and fit...the little .243 Win being a case in point. With the modern advanced bullets in the 100-110gr range they will drop anything that lives in NZ (up to Wapiti....Elk) with well placed shots. Get an expanding bullet over 60gr into the "boiler room" at over 2000fps and no deer will go far....
@HobbitHomes263
@HobbitHomes263 5 ай бұрын
I know I've bragged on my grandma on your channel before but here I go again. On Christmas 1956 my grandpa gave her a shiny new Savage 99 in 243 to replace her ancient beat up M94 30-30. For the next 37 years ...EVERY YEAR my grandma filled her elk tag with that rifle with WIlliams peep sights. It is important to say that she was the sneakiest woman who ever trod a game trail. She had the skills and patience to work in close and the marksmanship to hit exactly where she intended. She never lost an elk in all those years. SOmetimes I think people expect too much of their technology. I used to be a gold instructor. Guys would constantly ask me if I thought they should buy the clubs that the current golf hero was swinging. I would ell them that when you have Tigers SWING then you buy his clubs. Same goes for hunting. If you have practiced and perfected your sneak, caliber is nearly irrelevant. Many of the elk she tyook with both 30-30 and 243 were shot in bow range. Much of that she attributed to making her own lye soap on the ranch. I had zero scent so she washed all of ther hunting clothes and her person with the scent free lye soap before she would hunt and at the end of the day she would put all her clothes in a bag full of dirt, prarie grass, sage and a some bark shavings off a live lodgepole. She also said that elk are used to the smell of smoke so she would stand around the fire for a bit in the evening before she bagged her gear. SHe also said that she was so short that elk probably couldn't see her so all she had to do was defeat their nose and ears. Whatever it was man, she had the gift. Lots of peoplpe practice shooting but I never met a client in camp who practiced HUNTING... end of rant... I now return you to your regularly scheduled program
@adamwilliams5417
@adamwilliams5417 5 ай бұрын
Excellent read
@HobbitHomes263
@HobbitHomes263 5 ай бұрын
@@adamwilliams5417 thank-you. she was an amazing human being but ranch women always are
@tazman8271
@tazman8271 2 ай бұрын
With soldid copper or copper alloy, you can drop the suggested bullet weight as long as the bullets are designed for big game.
@jefferywilliams7687
@jefferywilliams7687 5 ай бұрын
243 & 6mm Ron is spot on when it comes to bullet construction. I bet a 90 grain Swift Scirocco II will go thru the front shoulder and exit. In addition an 85 grain Nosler Partition around 3,300 fps a try if shots are not impacted by wind over 250 yards. Not much recoil. Guarantee it will go thru a Whitetail hit in the shoulder. If wind and distance come into play shoot the 100 Grain Partition.
@tacticalmattfoley
@tacticalmattfoley 5 ай бұрын
Construction of the Swift Scirocco is perfect for this application.
@e-legalcanadian
@e-legalcanadian 5 ай бұрын
Ron, you are correct. I did some more research and it turns out that what I have is a .458 Win Mag, but the ammo I have is made from .375 H&H brass. Thanks for the clarification.
@RonSpomerOutdoors
@RonSpomerOutdoors 5 ай бұрын
Aha. You figured it out. Yes, making different cartridges from brass like that can make things confusing. 270 from 30-06, 260 Rem from 308, etc.
@arthurshingler2025
@arthurshingler2025 5 ай бұрын
I agree with you, Ron and your view on the 308, 7mm-08, 260, etc....
@11x33mm
@11x33mm 5 ай бұрын
Thank you i've learned so much from your Shorts and your podcast! It reminds me of growing up in the 60s and 70s. We used to be able to shoot at school in the 60s. But today's gap is so far apart. It's hard to imaginebut I remember every time your pod or show comes on! and all the good things in life as a kid as it involves rifles and shooting. It was definitely a gun culture back then. Unlike today, it is still there but not the same. There's an saying "You can go home but you can't go home" right? Have a blessed day❤
@tacticalmattfoley
@tacticalmattfoley 5 ай бұрын
Same. Listening to someone else will give a person an expanded view if we keep an open mind.
@heinrichstoltz1356
@heinrichstoltz1356 5 ай бұрын
Thanks Ron for another great discussion. I’ve been hunting for a long time (including commercial culling), and spent many hours guiding other hunters in South Africa. Hydrostatic Shock exists in theory, however, animals are not a single vessel filled with a homogenous fluid. There are gasses present, and the chest cavity is not fluid filled. You can apply the hydrostatic theory to the heart, because depending upon the heart stroke it can be fully filled with fluids. However, you cannot apply a constant compression ratio to the impact in the skin, muscle, bones, tendons, chest cavity and then the vital organs.
@aronsingletary
@aronsingletary 5 ай бұрын
Right! Hydrostatic shock counts when you hit the heart. I haven't taken many deer but the two I shot with a 243 at 50 yards didn't have discernable hearts which implies something more happened than just a quarter inch hole being bored through the heart. It still all comes down to shot placement and I guess if you miss there is no replacement for displacement.
@RonSpomerOutdoors
@RonSpomerOutdoors 5 ай бұрын
Thanks Heinrich. That heartbeat theory seems closest to explaining hydroshock. Striek it during its compression stroke and you overwhelm blood vessels in the brain, causing stroke. Some post mortem evidence to support that, too. This likely explains why the vast majority of my heart-shot deer have not collapsed immediately.
@walterkleban2746
@walterkleban2746 5 ай бұрын
I have taken over 20 deer with 90 grain Sorroco .243 bullets with most dropping inplace with none running more than 50 yds. Two of those had holes in the hearts.
@donaldmartin4980
@donaldmartin4980 5 ай бұрын
I have shot everything smaller than elk with my .243 , never had to chase anything … been using that caliber since 1975…farthest deer was 370 yards , farthest pig about 250 ..
@dominicdevito
@dominicdevito 5 ай бұрын
Not a grain weight problem, but I've seen a 90 gr SST grenade on deer a shoulder. We found the deer the next day and followed it up with a neck shot. After dissecting the shoulder that bullet never entered the thoracic cavity. No hate to Hornady, or cup and core bullets in general, but after seeing that I would highly suggest close range shots with impact velocity over 3k to chose the projectile wisely. Love the channel, Ron!
@jamiehurtt3530
@jamiehurtt3530 5 ай бұрын
Would've been different if you were using a 100 grain nosler partition guaranteed
@FISHUNTREE
@FISHUNTREE 5 ай бұрын
​@@jamiehurtt3530Facts. Or Fed Fusion.
@daye8132
@daye8132 5 ай бұрын
I've seen similar results, in my 2 cases the rifle had a 18 inch bbl length. On a 243 that overboor to begin with, I think it needs at least a 22 inch bbl to keep the velocity up JMPO, YMMV
@jamiehurtt3530
@jamiehurtt3530 5 ай бұрын
@@daye8132 Use the 100 graim nosler partition and you'll never lose another deer with the 243 And shoot straight
@WayStedYou
@WayStedYou 5 ай бұрын
SST doing exactly what its designed to do, increase hornadys bank account while selling you a interlock with a platic tip for more money
@derekrobinson5628
@derekrobinson5628 5 ай бұрын
Thanks Ron, long time fan, but this post resonates on so many levels. I can relate to every comment on this post. There's just too much to comment and agree upon. Just thankyou for your knowledge, cheers and regards from New Zealand/ Aotearoa.🙂👍
@richardfrieman
@richardfrieman 5 ай бұрын
My brother in law just shot a buck straight in the shoulder this past fall with a 243 within 100 yards. Can’t remark about the bullet weight, but the buck dropped in place, primarily due to the loss of use of that front leg and bled out within less than a minute afterwards. During processing, we discovered that the bullet sent shards of bone deep into the chest cavity which actually seemed to have aided hemorrhaging. Fragments of lead and jacket were found strewn throughout the chest cavity alongside the bone fragments. I was quite surprised about the damage considering that the bullet must have deformed instantly upon impact with the bone.
@williamdurdin1964
@williamdurdin1964 4 ай бұрын
Another fabulous informative video Thnx Ron
@joelpeterson8424
@joelpeterson8424 5 ай бұрын
Wow! That question of the week bell made me sit up straight! Gotta prepare for that. Thanks for your great program.
@giovannitallino6606
@giovannitallino6606 5 ай бұрын
It is so refreshing to watch Ron Spomer, especially after watching a couple of those macho gun gurus on KZfaq who in front of the camera speak two octaves below their normal speech and try to sound like John Wayne or Sam Elliot. Ron has a quality that is not found easily among so-called gun experts on the Internet: humility. He does not need to sound like an expert to impress his audience--he is an expert who bases his statements on solid evidence and on his own massive experience. Thanks, Ron!
@RonSpomerOutdoors
@RonSpomerOutdoors 5 ай бұрын
Humble thanks, Giovanni. Appreciate the support.
@carlwilliams6300
@carlwilliams6300 5 ай бұрын
Great video sir
@philipsteele5704
@philipsteele5704 5 ай бұрын
Ron, you are exactly right about the 308.
@pulldeauxduck2480
@pulldeauxduck2480 5 ай бұрын
Like Hicock45 a school teacher. It’s a gift !thanks Dad 🦆🦆
@tacticalmattfoley
@tacticalmattfoley 5 ай бұрын
We can argue over the strangest things....sometimes it seems like we're trying to determine the smallest projectile necessary to down whitetail. Even though 22LR has and will take down a deer, we all know it's not the most ethical hunting decision AND might put us at odds with state regulations. Something in 30cal with a lot of a$$ behind it will ALWAYS take down a deer, mule deer and elk.
@ravissary79
@ravissary79 5 ай бұрын
Pure poetry 👏 👏
@bryonslatten3147
@bryonslatten3147 2 ай бұрын
243/6mm cartridges are marketed for smaller shooters and those who are recoil-sensitive. Not everyone can shoot a 140+ grain hunting bullet accurately.
@tacticalmattfoley
@tacticalmattfoley 2 ай бұрын
@@bryonslatten3147 Not everyone needs to be hunting big game, either..
@bryonslatten3147
@bryonslatten3147 2 ай бұрын
@@tacticalmattfoley whitetail isn’t big game.
@tacticalmattfoley
@tacticalmattfoley 2 ай бұрын
@@bryonslatten3147 then, 6.5 will be just fine for you and your delicate, effeminate frame....
@StevenStyczinski-sy8cj
@StevenStyczinski-sy8cj 5 ай бұрын
Love your Channel Ron. Hydrostatic shock sounds like a knockout punch, and then they come to after a minute.
@ravissary79
@ravissary79 5 ай бұрын
Sounds great if you also can bleed them while they're down... or if you can close the distance and follow up. Interestingly, I listened to a medical symposium once on handgun wounding trends and ER technology and trauma/surgery success results. A big part of the talk was how they transitioned away from whole blood for transfusions into using separated ingredients to reconstitute a needed blood type from stored ingredients... resulting in ready-to-order large volume transfusions... but there was also talk about how they've seen a huge increase in handgun survivability rates (up to 60% at the time of the talk, perhaps a 10-15 years ago in a major city), and one hypothesis was that the increased stopping rate from expanding bullets also inadvertently increased survivability for any cases where the paramedics had a chance once on scene....and apparently this is a benefit of the shock causing them to "pass out" (why they fell down when shot, many people don't, primarily when very high or determined), but it's theorized that unlike older bullets that icepick through, the newer ones cause a sudden rapid loss of blood pressure, but the body responds with a defensive shock response which consolidates blood in the core vitals meanwhile lowering BP in the head, leading to loss of consciousness. Even the core vitals lose pressure as well, and the vessels change from this defensive response to prevent rapid bleeding out due to heightened cardiovascular activity when frightened or angry. The shock shuts tgat down, and this seems to sometimes buy the victim time... not to do anything, but to simply not die yet. Obviously this is a problem if no one gets you help, but if they do, their chance of survival in a good ER goes up unless the shock is too deep and brain damage results. It kind of blew my mind because it revealed that a stop=/=a kill. In the 20s-50s some police departments actually called their 38s with lead round nosed bullets widowmakers, because it was all too often that while they were plenty deadly, the enemy didn't always stop fighting before bleeding out, and thus could shoot back resulting a kind of mutually assured homicide unless you have cover or overwhelming force (shotguns, surprise, etc). Hollow points reduced this trend until drugs seemed to somewhat reduce the effectiveness of almost any stop, at least some of the time. Obviously this mechanically relates to hunting as we all want an ethical kill, but that starts with a fast stop unless that stop comes at the cost of a recovery. But if you can get both, problem solved. Unfortunately, most hand held options can't just Avada Kadavra a tough animal. So it's hard to be as merciful as we might want to be.
@sneakinguponit
@sneakinguponit 5 ай бұрын
⁠@@ravissary79the shock response makes sense with the animals I’ve shot in the chest cavity (heart/lung only) that drop instantly. They’re dead before they recover from shock with destroyed lungs and grazed or exploded heart muscle. I would only expect instant death from a brain shot. With a spine shot anywhere in the neck/back I would expect paralysis and possibly, but less likely, hemorrhaging. Of course a spine shot in the front half of an animal will eventually cause vital organ shutdown which would be instant but not immediately noticeable.
@jfess1911
@jfess1911 5 ай бұрын
There is an article from the Aug 1999 Firearms Tactical Institute publication that discusses the effect attributed to the hydrostatic shock comment. It is entitled "Blunt Trauma Concussion of Spinal Cord as Mechanism of Instantaneous Collapse". Basically, the force of the tissue being moved aside from the temporary cavity "can cause the spinal bones to collide forcefully against the spinal cord, disrupting nerve transmissions and causing instantaneous flaccid paralysis". In other words the spine gets rattled and the animal is briefly paralyzed. If enough tissue is damaged, the animal will die before it regains mobility. Otherwise, the animal can recover enough to run. The exact location of the temporary cavity and its size is important. The whole thing is pretty complicated since it involves the speed, mass, and effective frontal area of the bullet and exactly what tissues it goes through. From what I have read, this "Dropped Right There" or "like struck by lightning" effect became much more common with the introduction of the 270 Winchester. 270 loads seemed to have the right combination of bullet diameter and velocity to routinely stun deer, something seldom seen older cartridges like the 30-30.
@davidpruyne7340
@davidpruyne7340 2 ай бұрын
Luv it ,,,,, we all get to chose our choices ,,,, weather we endure them or enjoy them ,,,,, carry on Ron
@danthemanboone1102
@danthemanboone1102 5 ай бұрын
Hi Ron. I watch your videos every now and then and caught this one today and watched because of the reference to Hydrostatic shock. I started hunting red deer in 1969 here in New Zealand mostly for sale to the wild venison market that was booming at the time. I continued to hunt through to 2010 when I hung up my guns due to old age and physical deterioration. During that time about the mid1980s I had a brief affair with a mod 700 Remington in 22.250. One of the things I noticed with this rifle was the propensity for bruising between the muscle tissues that could extend all the way through the spine to the back knee area on animals shot mostly in the neck or shudder/ rib area. Of around 50 animals shot in a six month period all were total collapse and instant Death. I moved on from the Rem 700 because of its length and weight which made carrying animals with that rifle difficult in steep thickly vegetated areas. I replaced it with a Ruger mini 14 ranch rifle which I used until I gave up hunting altogether. I sometimes saw the same bloodshot issue with the .223. but never to the same extent. Small high velocity expanding projectiles generally stay inside the animal and expend all their available energy inside the animal. I am totally convinced that small high velocity bullets can introduce a shock wave effect that does not replicate with larger heavier bullets that bore a hole and pass out the animal, carrying off incalculable excess energy with them.
@ejsocci2630
@ejsocci2630 Ай бұрын
Another great video Ron, and we need to realize first and foremost to remember about shot placement first, keep doing your research for us and as older guys that have harvested more deer know a tad more after tracking and gutting deer and actually seeing what really happened after the shot,thanks Ron,
@mattsharpe3989
@mattsharpe3989 11 күн бұрын
Another thing to remember about long barrels is if you’re shooting iron sights a longer sighting plane is always better
@jfess1911
@jfess1911 5 ай бұрын
ADI in Australia makes the "Extreme" powders including Varget, H4350, and H4895.
@drichi07
@drichi07 5 ай бұрын
Haven't heard the ancient hydrostatic shock theory since the late 70s. Nice to see it back. Hope to see in more in reality with actual research showing significantly superior results. I recall the old theory held that a velocity of more than 3000 fps was the lower limit. I had always wondered if your velocity drops below that to about 2900 fps at some distance if the hydrostatic shock disappeared.
@dennisvandee2720
@dennisvandee2720 5 ай бұрын
I have seen the hydrostatic shock work with my old Thompson Center Firehawk muzzleloader in 50 cal drop pretty much every deer I ever shot with the old normal lead bullets, but when shooting a sabot bullet with the same charge and moving faster the deer run off so many yards before falling down dead
@thomasstrout1738
@thomasstrout1738 5 ай бұрын
I think you are correct about tissue elasticity. The hydrostatic energy wave at the wound would dissipate in the surrounding blood vessels as they expand in diameter and stretch in length. I think it would vary a lot based on velocity at impact, bullet weight, diameter, etc. There would be a big difference between a .22 short and a .460 Weatherby mag. I think a skull shot would be different as mechanically the skull cavity would act more like a rigid pressure vessel to some extent.
@SuperMarshall2009
@SuperMarshall2009 5 ай бұрын
Lots of cool thoughts here - Love the discussion in the comments. Hydrostatic shock is a good model, but a model isn't always the reality for example where a body is made of various densities like bone that if struck early could disrupt hydrostatic shock. Velocity is great at imparting energy into an object, but mass and surface area helps carry and transfer energy - So many variables, so much empirical data that isn't super organized -in official capacities, but lots of good experiences to share - love the talk around the subject, Its where we learn from each other on this.
@johnferguson185
@johnferguson185 Ай бұрын
I harvested a deer the year before last went in behind the left shoulder and came out the right shoulder . Ruger American 243 , Winchester deer season XP 95gr
@chadillac95
@chadillac95 5 ай бұрын
3:33 using a faster twist rate in the same caliber will also add slightly more pressure
@CB-68-westcreations
@CB-68-westcreations 5 ай бұрын
For hydrostatic shock to actually be as effective as described, you would need the entire chest cavity filled with fluid. It is not filled with fluid for head shots, large muscle groups or direct muscle impact. It does make a difference. Not so much through voids, such as lungs and semi hollow chest cavities, there’s a lot of airspace in lungs. And there’s something to say about the pericardial sack as well.
@hrdrockfarm8948
@hrdrockfarm8948 5 ай бұрын
Can air not be displaced now?
@CB-68-westcreations
@CB-68-westcreations 4 ай бұрын
@@hrdrockfarm8948 sure it can. But they haven’t done testing to see what that displacement is. Everything is based on fluid and gel. Which behaves entirely different.
@GregoryMcBride-qf7hx
@GregoryMcBride-qf7hx 5 ай бұрын
If you look at the gel of an 8.6 expanding bullet you can see it make a single turn in the gel every 3in . The extra spin of the 8.6 blackout really enhances penetration aswell
@user-du8wc6lq5y
@user-du8wc6lq5y 5 ай бұрын
I agree with you completely Ron regarding hydrostatic shock and the role it plays with killing animals. Even wtih the fastest cartridges and best bullets, it sometimes seems to play a role in killing, then the very next animal you shoot with that combination runs 70 yards before dropping. You simply cannot say come up some combination of bullet and velocity that guarantees instant kills 100% of the time. Most hunters come to this conclusion eventually as they gain experience.
@billhatcher2984
@billhatcher2984 5 ай бұрын
Ray needs to think about the old muzzle loaders that took a 45 cal. Ball 44 inches of twist to stabilize it and a 32 cal. Round ball would stabilize with 1 in 32 rotation and the 56 cal was done in one in fifty six was supposed to be the best long. Rangerifle
@ArcticNemo
@ArcticNemo 2 ай бұрын
.243 is the favorite youth rifle in my family and often 'borrowed' by the grown-ups for anything smaller than elk. (Though I believe it fine for those with good bullets) I find it light and long-reaching with little enough barrel wear for three lifetimes. A king among midweights; not magical, but adequate.
@sha6mm
@sha6mm 5 ай бұрын
Great Show Ron and Yes I like the 6mm Rem and with a quality bullet I would hunt anything smaller than Elk for Me this is where it shines with low recoil. Barrel length in a rifle to Me in a bolt action 24 inch in standard weight barrel in non magnum calibers is perfect and Magnum cartridges 26 inch seems great. The weight of a couple inches more barrel is very little in a Sporter. 🎉If I can carry a Shotgun bird hunting with a 26-30 inch barrel in a pump or auto makes rifles seem short and no Big Game animal is as fast as a Quail in the thickets. But Rifles are tools and one will not due for every thing and thats where a 2 or 3 rifle battery makes sense. It also has merits when I was getting ready for a Montana Mule Deer hunt I had a scope fail a week before I was to leave. I went to the gun safe pulled out another rifle checked it’s zero and went hunting. If I would not of had another rifle I would have been scrambling to get another scope and mount it and get it zeroed in.
@scottstruif3939
@scottstruif3939 5 ай бұрын
Hydrostatic shock is simply disruption of CNS signals in a bundle of nerves. Ron’s example of shooting a deer in the chest, causing it to fall instantly is an example. If the bullet also succeeds in grenading in the chest, causing physical damage to the nerve ganglia, it will stay down. That’s why frangible bullets are better than those that “mushroom,” such as copper bullets.
@crawlinwithkeagan5678
@crawlinwithkeagan5678 4 ай бұрын
I shot 243 when I was younger and had a 90 grain lead core bullet go through and break both front legs and put almost a fist size hole through the chest cavity on a decent size doe in sc
@crawlinwithkeagan5678
@crawlinwithkeagan5678 4 ай бұрын
Wont let me post the photo
@crawlinwithkeagan5678
@crawlinwithkeagan5678 4 ай бұрын
If anyone’s wanting the photo lmk I can’t send
@gregjones2217
@gregjones2217 26 күн бұрын
Great coyote gun. Not bad for head shots.
@paulholznagel6101
@paulholznagel6101 5 ай бұрын
Hi Ron. My mate and I used to use a 303/25 as teenagers hunting Roos and feral animals. Was an awesome gun.
@paulholznagel6101
@paulholznagel6101 5 ай бұрын
Love your videos by the way
@RonSpomerOutdoors
@RonSpomerOutdoors 5 ай бұрын
I'll bet it was. Were you pushing 85-grain bullets about 3,300 fps?
@billkniseley4052
@billkniseley4052 5 ай бұрын
On barrel length. Prior to telescopic sights for rifles, long barrel equals long sight radius. Better accuracy
@kvonzwild8979
@kvonzwild8979 27 күн бұрын
Plenty of experience seeing a 6mm work and personally using it. I used nosler partitions. 1 shot kills all. Wrecked vitals, exited with a large hole, lots of blood trail but never needed much trailing since they never went far. That said I've seen some that did well inside the animal but never exited and the inbound hole was small and near no blood to use in trailing and some needed a little bit of trailing. The lesson? Get the right bullet and your in business.
@marktemplin1159
@marktemplin1159 5 ай бұрын
I use a 100 grain , Hornady btsp, they drop deer where they stand,,,, 34.5 grains ,of 4320
@thedirtygot9570
@thedirtygot9570 5 ай бұрын
I wonder how long a barrel needs to be, to get to hornady box velocity😂?
@johnnorman7708
@johnnorman7708 5 ай бұрын
Hydrostatic shock can in theory happen with high velocity and rapid bullet expansion. You cannot predict it, measure it, or even photograph it inside a game animal. It is an elusive thing.
@JPtogether-fg5nm
@JPtogether-fg5nm 3 ай бұрын
from cartridge to cartridge the velocity will vary with the same powder charge as much as 150fps.
@chuckcompton9349
@chuckcompton9349 4 ай бұрын
Lewis and Clark expedition requested larger 45 caliber, shorter barrel rifles because of the large animals they had heard they were going to be encountering on their expedition. The only other rifle I have read about being used other than their requested rifles was their air rifle that they tried.
@carlwilliams6300
@carlwilliams6300 5 ай бұрын
Speed kills 👍
@ricktaylor5744
@ricktaylor5744 2 ай бұрын
Thanks Ron
@allenrosesr.8480
@allenrosesr.8480 5 ай бұрын
My 243 ruger md 77 as a bull barrel shoots lights out
@jjgriffin3275
@jjgriffin3275 5 ай бұрын
Great 357 Mag ammo is the LeverEvolution from Hornady
@dinoquintana4319
@dinoquintana4319 3 ай бұрын
Excellent video.as to the 243 vs the 6mm rem that 10 grains from 90 grains you say is not significant. It certainly is.for a 100 gr bullet that is 10 %.=higher sectional density in the heavier bullet.better penetration It's my opinion (bigdeal right) that I will gladly trade some velocity for some more bullet wt.my most common shots outwear in NM have been well within 200 yds.my longest shot ona elk was 285 paces. A measly 8mm Mauser with a 200 gr Speer cup and core at approximately 2500 fps Slight quartering shot through and through penetration. Very minimal meat damage and a very short sprint then dead immediately. Good video and I truly respect your knowledge and experience. I've gone from the big 7 to the 06 and now to a 303savage in a 100 yr old savage 99 The old timers really knew their stuff
@donbenson5292
@donbenson5292 4 ай бұрын
243, 75gr Hornady HP. Perfect shot between ribs blew heart and lungs apart, mush, landed on opposite rib cage. DRTI would call that "hydrostatic shock". Shot a groundhog once with a 125gr bullet in s 308. Never hit his head. DRT. Blood running out of ears and nose. Shoot a groundhog with 50gr TNT at 3400fps in a 223. Many times the bullet never exits, pick it up and shake it. Mush... I think this "shock" has more to do with velocity. I have a custom 6mm BCC which is necked down to 243 and maxed out in capacity. It will blow a groundhogs head off at 3975fps with a 70gr btip or 70gr TNT. I like the "ballistic shock wave" explaination. Great video Ron..
@winstonskafte5505
@winstonskafte5505 5 ай бұрын
Hydrostatic shock what causes blood clotting all through your meat .
@GodsCountryShootingOutdoors
@GodsCountryShootingOutdoors 5 ай бұрын
Hey Ron, While many of us enjoy the ballistics and such in testing bullets. I grew up hearing the hydrostatic shock theory but I have often wandered as I learn more about bullets if it is more the bullet types wound channel near enough to say the spine that causes the near instant death rather than hydrostatic shock. I'd be interested in your thoughts on that point. Keep up the great work.
@RonSpomerOutdoors
@RonSpomerOutdoors 5 ай бұрын
Gods, I've made and seen plenty of spinal column hits and near hits and they've always paralyzed the animal's hind quarters if struck behind the withers/shoulders. Struck in front they either stun temporarily or killed outright if spinal cord is severed. I've had several neck-shot deer go down and out, but then jump up and run off from a near spine hit.
@allthingsconsidered3211
@allthingsconsidered3211 5 ай бұрын
In terms of energy the 1-3t doesnt add anything significant, but it does increase the cutting surface area.
@user-ic3pj6og3y
@user-ic3pj6og3y 2 ай бұрын
243 works on everything from prairie dogs to whitetail not a problem and I don't care if you hit it in the shoulder. I think old boys just missing. LoL great video Ron
@joracer1
@joracer1 4 ай бұрын
While talking about long barrels on rifles, you missed the opportunity to talk about the slight advantages of a longer sight radius for rifles with open sights. You're right about the 25-06 but i go for the neck though. But i guess ive been lucky...
@EricChmelarsky-vh7eq
@EricChmelarsky-vh7eq 5 ай бұрын
Every deer hunter ive ever known in the state of PA, that used a 243 or 6mm Rem for Whitetail, swore by a 85 grain pill. Hydrostatic shock is real, excellent example is the 257 Weatherby Magnum. 264 Winchester Magnum with a 125 Partition properly loaded. Stuns deer like a phaser on Star Trek. You can tell how old I am.
@dennisshemory4859
@dennisshemory4859 5 ай бұрын
Ron this is off the subject, on your last 22creed video I would like to know what was the brand off the coat that you had on. I like the look of it.. thanks
@kikbuttowski
@kikbuttowski 4 ай бұрын
Ron, ADI is the manufacturer of many Hodgdon powders. If that Australian man happens to use one of those powders, he could cross reference the full power, Hodgdon data.
@nomadicmicmac
@nomadicmicmac 5 ай бұрын
Hi. Love your show. Ive learnt a bunch. I do have a question. I have a 30-06 and use 220 grain on moose every fall. Is that overkill? Would i have the same effect with less drop with a lighter bullet? Sincerely Billy Phillips
@RonSpomerOutdoors
@RonSpomerOutdoors 5 ай бұрын
Billy, that is a classic use of the 220 RN .308 bullet. Typically gives deeper penetration. But I've found a good 180-gr. will do the job. Ditto 150-gr. Barnes X from a 280 AI and once even an all copper J-36 from a 6.5-06. Oh, a 130-gr. 270 WSM gave a one-shot kill on a bull moose for me. Yeah, all bullet designed to penetrate well and retain weight seem to do the job. Benefit of the high B.C. versions is extended range and more retained energy at all ranges. But 220 is certainly not overkill.
@Wootangtw
@Wootangtw 5 ай бұрын
Thanks buddy…
@richardfrieman
@richardfrieman 5 ай бұрын
Also: the lever action being referred to by Blair is probably not chambered in 35 Remington, but the 357 Magnum. Those pistol caliber lever actions (like the 1894) are much more common than a 35 Remington.
@RonSpomerOutdoors
@RonSpomerOutdoors 5 ай бұрын
Good point!
@RegularGunGuy
@RegularGunGuy 5 ай бұрын
Dropped many Monster Mule Deer with 243win 95 grain sst in Idaho all dropped dead in tracks.
@hrdrockfarm8948
@hrdrockfarm8948 5 ай бұрын
There's a golden rule in life. It's like gravity or time. It's true in every instance. Size does matter. If you think it doesn't, you might want to take a good look at what you're shooting. Is it little? So you're basically saying, " It's not the size. It's how you use it?" Size matters.
@edwardabrams4972
@edwardabrams4972 5 ай бұрын
Size and SPEED!
@andypanda4927
@andypanda4927 5 ай бұрын
Don't know about 6MM any type. Do know that in late 70s thru mid 90s, I hunted with a .30-06 using 180gr Remington cor-lokt. Hit a tad high in the shoulder blade. That buck didn't take a second step and the shoulder meat ruined with bone shards on the exit. Since where I hunted, sightlines rarely greater than 100 or so yards, stuck to neck shots after that messy shoulder hit. Never had to try tracking down a wounded deer since I was sure of my rifle & me with that loading. Beyond that, not so certain.
@jonathanfeltman4362
@jonathanfeltman4362 5 ай бұрын
I took a buck this season that was quartering hard to me with a Nintendo grain burger at 70yds hit the heaviest bone low in shoulder got into the heart the dear made about 20yds
@dpbierman2586
@dpbierman2586 2 ай бұрын
Thank you Ron Great channel you have! You have heard and seen it all over the years but you won't keep everybody happy.. people will disagree for the sake of disagreeing and they will argue out of their corner of inexperience. The bottom line for me is that many hunters do not know the anatomy (bone structure, placement of vital organs)of the animals they hunt well enough, therefore fail to put the bullet in the right place (at different angles sometimes) and then blame bullets/weights/calibers ect for their failures... and many hunters can improve in driving their rifles as well. That counts for all of us.
@yc9419
@yc9419 5 ай бұрын
Every Elk I've seen shot with 257 wby has been lights out dead on the spot, even out to 500 yds. All high shoulder shots.
@panthermartin7784
@panthermartin7784 5 ай бұрын
Iv gutted 20 of my own elk and probably 10 for other hunters, many shot with .30 cal rounds. Those kills you can basically eat up to the hole, killing done by brute force blood loss. For the absolute pile of elk Iv shot with a .243 or others shot by 25/06 or .257 Weatby, Mag by other hunters there is 1000% a very visual difference in damage when field dressing . The shockwave can actually be seen in the lung and tissue damage. The internals are vapourized 8" away from the actual bullet hole. The .257 WM will actually take both lungs and u can pour them into a dixie cup. These kills were instantaneous and the elk dropped on the spot or within feet, while a bull soaking up a 300 Win or 30-06 for the most part made it somewhere under 100 yards before flopping over. One round kills through brute force the other through hydro dynamics .If you field dress enough game you know just by the damage what round did the deed. Read up on the FBI case files concerning hydrostatic shock damage and immediate incapacitated threats in war zones or the streets. A very interesting topic indeed.
@panthermartin7784
@panthermartin7784 4 ай бұрын
@firstchoicemechanical1403 Wouldn't expect you to understand .. go back to your Big Gulp refill.
@GodsCountryShootingOutdoors
@GodsCountryShootingOutdoors 5 ай бұрын
Hey Ron, love the channels! As a man with an old Remington rifles nostalgia I have been revisiting the new Rem Arms now taking up the challenge of rebuilding the Remington firearms. I purchased the 783 in 350 legend to test and was quite pleased with this budget rifle. I was able to get sub-moa 3 out of 4 ammunition type tested. I am now purchasing the 700 ADL in 270 winchester to test as well. Having ran around the bush for a minute I come to my QUESTION? IS THE 6.8 WESTERN A DEAD STICK? Now that it has been out for awhile, what is your thoughts on it now? Thanks again and keep up the great work.
@chuckcompton9349
@chuckcompton9349 4 ай бұрын
I've been reloading for a Rem 700 ADL 270 for 45 years. The only change to the factory production was to free float the barrel. Tried many different factory 130 gr cartridges and only Hornady shoot moa. Tried 100gr, 130gr, and 140gr with different powders and couldn't get consistent moa. Was using for big game hunting so I tried Sierra 150gr bullets and soon found a consistent moa load. Have used only this load for the last 30 yrs. Your barrel will probably have an appetite for a different load.
@vb4567
@vb4567 5 ай бұрын
I worked on feral goats shot in the rear upper leg with the military 5.56 mm. I observed a wide area of muscle tissue and blood vessel destruction, almost the entire upper leg muscle, not a small hole, and I think that hydrostatic shock is what the high speed low weight bullets were designed to create, to cause injury that would immobilize an enemy soldier no matter where they were hit. Of course, these bullets also tumbled sideways upon entry into the muscle tissue which contributed to the injury and shock.
@singaporeacademyusa9739
@singaporeacademyusa9739 5 ай бұрын
If a ball's center of mass is at its center (unlike an elongated bullet), then why does rifling make ball-shaped ammo fly better/improve accuracy?
@geezerdude4873
@geezerdude4873 5 ай бұрын
Back in the day I was into accurate shooting in a big way. Don't remember the naame right now, but a guy inherited a bunch of money and went to shooting back around 1890 to WWI era. By placing a bunch of targets and tracking bullet flight accurately, he found out that bullets travel in a spiral through the air. I remember back in the day when the Remington 7mm came out, people noted 3 inch accuracy at 100 yards, and 3 inch accuracy at 300 yards. The air spiral condenses over flight time, so that you get greater accuracy relatively speaking over time. Bullets are much better built today, and there has been a lot of effort put into accuracy, performance on game or target, etc.
@talisikid1618
@talisikid1618 5 ай бұрын
Well, the guy is right. The 308 is better than you say
@HobbitHomes263
@HobbitHomes263 5 ай бұрын
I do know that using chisel cut broadheads on my longbow does significantly more damage than regular knife edge broade heads.
@Halcyon1861
@Halcyon1861 5 ай бұрын
I don't know about the .243 but the .308 is the most interesting cartridge there is...Hold on I do know about the .243 it's a necked down...308
@johnschneider6183
@johnschneider6183 5 ай бұрын
Hydrostatic Shock. After hunting and killing animals for 60+ years (took my first deer @6yo) hydrostatic shock is a myth. It works on jugs filled with h20 but not on animals. Animals are not filled with water. They do have some but more air in their lungs than blood. Muscle and bone are not h20. Hydrostatic Shock is also known as h20 hammer. If you have ever witnessed that then you know exactly what I am talking about. Loss of blood in the pipes and vessels is the most common cause of death when shot unless the central nervous system is compromised. DRT is nice but doesn't always happen. I have seen too heavy of a bullet that's too heavily constructed cause the loss of more game than to light of a bullet. In a 243 or 6mm I like 70-85 grain bullets. I also like Barnes, Hornaday, and Hammer Bullets. If you think it takes a 100-grain bullet to kill a White-tail then how does a 22LR kill them. Why is there so much success with a 22-250. I routinely take wild hogs and axis deer from my front porch with a CZ 22 Hornet at ranges up to 100 yards with a 45-grain varmint bullet! It's like Ron ALWAYS says, It's putting the right bullet in the RIGHT place that counts.
@theunofficialresults231
@theunofficialresults231 5 ай бұрын
It may not be called "hydrostatic shock" , but testing by the FBI has proven that when the velocity of a projectile is above 2100 fps when it contacts the body, the organs are stretched past the point of recovery. That shock is what causes death.
@theunofficialresults231
@theunofficialresults231 5 ай бұрын
"hydrostatic shock", testing by the FBI concluded that when projectiles hit a body at speeds above 2200 fps stretch the organs past their point of elasticity which is what causes almost immediate death. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ipybiNmanJjXYI0.htmlsi=jZ9eNKxBJnAj_xdC
@FISHUNTREE
@FISHUNTREE 5 ай бұрын
If the valves in the heart are open upon this impact, then the blood vessels on the brain have a chance of rupturing, but much less likely if the valves are closed.
@andyc.947
@andyc.947 5 ай бұрын
This is incorrect. Have you ever shot a deers in the lungs with a rifle? The lungs are basically turning to jell. They dont just have a 30 caliber hole in them or even the diameter of a bullet that has opened up. It's not a myth, just depends on what you are shooting on how effective the hydrostatic shock is.
@talisikid1618
@talisikid1618 5 ай бұрын
Depends. It also works on animals. But there many variables. Bullet design being a big one. Velocity is another. I haven’t hunting that much, but I have taken a few whitetails with jellied heart/lungs. They usually drop straight down. But I’ve seen other people just have a wound channel and a tracking job. And the calibers varied.
@robertmahon2820
@robertmahon2820 5 ай бұрын
Gee Spomer you got that right about black powder
@vervi1jw1
@vervi1jw1 Ай бұрын
The 95gr hornady sst is a very good 6mm bullet. Load it at 3k fps and it is devastating on whitetail. And a deers shoulder is not going to stand up against it.
@josephr2766
@josephr2766 5 ай бұрын
Imagine yourself sitting around a fire eating buffalo you just killed with a sharp rock tied to a stick shot from a longer stick and a gut string. While you chew on a hunk of roasted meat you listen to a group of modern hunters arguing about all these modern hunting bullets.
@russbowman6801
@russbowman6801 5 ай бұрын
Any time a bullet goes faster than the speed of sound there is at least a little compressed air in front of it. If it is larger and faster, more compressed air is in front of it. When it hits flesh, how much damage comes from exploding, compressed air?
@martinfernandez5005
@martinfernandez5005 5 ай бұрын
dang.ol.winner "Pellets vs Slugs" energy transfer Part 3 might shed light on how pellets slice threw game animals but hollowpoints as they expand, create a shock wave energy transfer as it punches threw the target. Some Pellets (Bullets) will slice like solid older monolithic Bullets with minimal expansion but controlled rapid expanding Bullets will crater the target upon impact temporarily or permanently dropping game by the concussion.
@kennethcampbell6934
@kennethcampbell6934 5 ай бұрын
Hydrostatic shock. Supposedly anything over 2,600 ft per second ruptures the cell walls in the shock cavity. They dropped where they're standing like turning off a light switch.
@daye8132
@daye8132 5 ай бұрын
15:40, legal canadian,..Canadian,... 375 tapered/rimmed. It was designed for a double rifle. The 375 belted, was designed for a bolt rifle.
@claymclaren5788
@claymclaren5788 5 ай бұрын
Not really on topic here, but I'm curious as to why many monolithic Copper bullets seem to have lower BC's than lead core bullets.
@bentwheeldryerrepair
@bentwheeldryerrepair 5 ай бұрын
35 grains of 3031 behind a 100 grain flat base spitzer in my .243 is a devastating tack driver.
@Jandyg
@Jandyg 5 ай бұрын
Dr. Kevin Robertson, author of “The Perfect Shot”. Claims that round and flat nose bullets deliver more hydrostatic shock, than spire point bullets. Just a thought to add to this great discussion.
@RonSpomerOutdoors
@RonSpomerOutdoors 5 ай бұрын
Certainly worth considering. He's a veterinarian as well as PH, so has been around the block. But I'd sure like to see some evidence/proof. The difference in diameter between a spire point and flat nose is so tiny and they get so expanded/mangled so quickly...
@Jandyg
@Jandyg 5 ай бұрын
@@RonSpomerOutdoors The podcast was on the Big Game Hunting Blog, from about 6 months ago. I’m not promoting it, I’m just passing along his information. My experiences with PH’s is they don’t care much about technical details as much as results. It’s worth listening to. Thank you for all the Great Videos. Stay Safe and Well.
@pierregauthier3077
@pierregauthier3077 5 ай бұрын
Would increasing twist rate cause higher chamber pressure? The bullet is spinning at the same rotation as the barrel twist. When passing through the target. I would think twist rate would follow through.
@portersorensen8814
@portersorensen8814 5 ай бұрын
In the same way as velocity impacts, yes but not a crazy amount
Eps  348: Defending My Stance
51:32
Ron Spomer Outdoors - Podcast
Рет қаралды 27 М.
343: BEST Poor Man's Rifle?
48:44
Ron Spomer Outdoors - Podcast
Рет қаралды 48 М.
LOVE LETTER - POPPY PLAYTIME CHAPTER 3 | GH'S ANIMATION
00:15
Became invisible for one day!  #funny #wednesday #memes
00:25
Watch Me
Рет қаралды 59 МЛН
One moment can change your life ✨🔄
00:32
A4
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН
Playing hide and seek with my dog 🐶
00:25
Zach King
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
321: Can 1 Grain Really Affect Accuracy?
41:02
Ron Spomer Outdoors - Podcast
Рет қаралды 36 М.
243 Win. 20" vs 22". Velocity Difference. Sierra 80gn. and 100gn. Tested.
15:01
Dave Strohmeyer - Saddle Up Shootin'
Рет қаралды 19 М.
Eps. 354: Bear Advice With A Master Alaskan Guide
50:34
Ron Spomer Outdoors - Podcast
Рет қаралды 450 М.
5 Best Cartridges & Calibers for New Hunters
12:26
Backfire
Рет қаралды 217 М.
270 Winchester - Relevant or Relic
31:34
Ron Spomer Outdoors
Рет қаралды 128 М.
345: Round Nose vs Spire Point - Which Hits Harder?
49:52
Ron Spomer Outdoors - Podcast
Рет қаралды 21 М.
243 vs 308 vs 7mm-08: Which Should You Use?
22:02
Big Game Hunting Blog
Рет қаралды 150 М.
Eps  361: 30-06 Going Obsolete
30:09
Ron Spomer Outdoors - Podcast
Рет қаралды 125 М.
The TRUTH About Hunting in Africa
27:37
Ron Spomer Outdoors
Рет қаралды 42 М.
LOVE LETTER - POPPY PLAYTIME CHAPTER 3 | GH'S ANIMATION
00:15