Royal Marine Reacts To Deadly AC-130 Gunship in Action Firing All Its Cannons!

  Рет қаралды 502,994

OriginalHuman

OriginalHuman

3 жыл бұрын

HERE WE GO! Deadly AC-130 Gunship in Action Firing All Its Cannons! This thing is a beast!!!
Deadly AC-130 Gunship in Action Firing All Its Cannons: • Deadly AC-130 Gunship ...
[ OriginalAdventures VLOG! ]=======================
/ @originaladventures2728
/ original_adventures
==============================================
[ OriginalHuman Geek! ]===========================
• Welcome To Original Hu...
==============================================
►Twitch: / originalhumangaming
►Military Discord: / discord
►Geek Discord: / discord
►Instagram @OriginalHuman_
►Twitter: @OriginalHuman_
►Website: LukeJillings.com
►Merch! teespring.com/stores/original...
[Tactical Chin-Wag Podcast]=======================
itunes: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/6erZjNl...
==============================================
My New Chair!
GT Omega: bit.ly/3kr07Tr
Business inquires: originalhumanbusiness@gmail.com
I officially have a PO Box!
Luke Jillings
PO Box 3522,
Portland,
Maine. .
.
MY EQUIPMENT:
Camera: amzn.to/3W9dL37
Lights: amzn.to/3JtLflf
Key Board: amzn.to/3JpPWwx
Headphones: amzn.to/3JrF15x
Mouse: amzn.to/49P81ij
Monitors: amzn.to/4aLd1FP
Mic: amzn.to/3U7XWXY
Audio mixer: amzn.to/4b2FJSr
StreamDeck: amzn.to/4b4lHH1
Favorite Books:
Norse Mythology: Neil Gaiman
amzn.to/4b24Ftc
The Way of Kings: Brandon Sanderson
amzn.to/3JyHIlu
Breath: James Nestor
amzn.to/3Jur9Y7
We Are Nature: Ray Mears
amzn.to/3JurhXB
The Last Kingdom: Bernard Cornwell
amzn.to/3w4JjN0

Пікірлер: 2 800
@Steampoweredgeekery
@Steampoweredgeekery 3 жыл бұрын
As they said it has a turboprop but the other reason for the props and strait wings is the ability to 'loiter' over the battlefield. They move slow and can stay for some time to 1: allow for more accurate shooting and 2: allow for longer support missions
@alexhohl8530
@alexhohl8530 3 жыл бұрын
They’re also a lot cheaper to operate
@MrBubba1876
@MrBubba1876 3 жыл бұрын
Plus, they don't need the speed of the jets, except sometimes with short runways. Some aircraft use jet/rocket boosters to assist take off.
@hunteremmerson7149
@hunteremmerson7149 3 жыл бұрын
I put my reasons in the chat so Kirkley got everything he said right but there's more to the plane
@ryanweintraub9448
@ryanweintraub9448 3 жыл бұрын
Along the lines of short runways, they can take off from less unprepared runways and not worry about debris in a multi million dollar jet engine
@ROTTK9
@ROTTK9 3 жыл бұрын
@@hunteremmerson7149 correct, there is tons more to the AC-130 from the tight radius it can fly within to stay on target, to the amount of damage it can absorb. the list of of its capabilities is outstanding.
@reusablebelt1718
@reusablebelt1718 3 жыл бұрын
US military: Let's put a tank in the sky
@xen1313
@xen1313 3 жыл бұрын
Not really, more like let's put a tank convoy in the sky. One of the original design ideas from the Vietnam war was mounting 3x105mm Howitzers, 2x50cal mini's and 4x20mm gats, add to that night optics and rocket packs mounted on each side of the ramp to assist in take off due to it being fully loaded. Dad talked about when they fired all three 105's it'd shift the plane sideways 30ft instantly. They could put a round in every square inch of a football field.
@lonestoner8297
@lonestoner8297 3 жыл бұрын
@AIDAN GRAY that's more accurate lol
@user-um8vh2uc1y
@user-um8vh2uc1y 3 жыл бұрын
And just like a tank, it's an easy target, since it's big and it's slow. The AC-130 can easily be shot down by enemy jets and anti air units on the ground.
@macbookairgaming4121
@macbookairgaming4121 3 жыл бұрын
@@user-um8vh2uc1y they are fighting people with little to none air superiority
@maycontainhyjinks2347
@maycontainhyjinks2347 3 жыл бұрын
@AIDAN GRAY thats the A10 thunderbolt # BRRRRRRT
@michaeldunn3065
@michaeldunn3065 3 жыл бұрын
As a current ac-130j ghostrider crew, the weapon platform has been extensively modified over the years to its most current form with a 30mm auto cannon, the 105 howitzer, and now with the addition on guided bombs and missiles. The propeller drive allows for much more efficient operation in the slow pylon turns that allow the guns to stay trained on a target for hours.
@carrion-fairy
@carrion-fairy 2 жыл бұрын
Cool, I'm planning to enlist soon and I really want to try and get Special Missions Aviator, and be a gunner on am AC130, but I heard it's pretty rare to actually get the job
@michaeldunn3065
@michaeldunn3065 2 жыл бұрын
@@carrion-fairy it is but bing a loadmaster is a great second choice. Being a gunship we are limited on where we go for diplomatic and support issues so we don’t travel as much as the standard “slick” c-130. So if you really want to see the world it’s one of the best options in the Air Force, not to mention flight pay and per deim you make in overnight locations.
@carrion-fairy
@carrion-fairy 2 жыл бұрын
@@michaeldunn3065 yeah I just want to work with aircraft so I think I'm just going to list every air crew job at MEPS and hope for best lol
@joeslouie489
@joeslouie489 2 жыл бұрын
And now I'm hearing about a laser system being put on it.
@Yvaelle
@Yvaelle 2 жыл бұрын
@@joeslouie489 The laser system I believe is just an anti-missile system so it can't easily be shot down and doesn't rely on chaff (which doesn't work on all missile types). It's not a giant sci-fi death laser or anything, just an aim-bot anti-missile laser. Still with the new Ghostrider loadout, the 30m is upgraded to a full autocannon instead of the 4-round manual magazine (that the Spooky had), and it can carry like 20(?) smart missiles on it like Hellfires, with the ability for many missile simultaneous launch (so you could pick like 20 targets before you get in range and show up with like 20 missile hits before the guns even start firing). Plus I think there's something about making the 105 easier to load?
@citizenkane454
@citizenkane454 3 жыл бұрын
Gotta watch a video on the A-10. My favorite saying is "if you heard the Brrrtttt you weren't the target".
@1pcfred
@1pcfred 3 жыл бұрын
The motto of the planes here is, You can run but you'll just die tired.
@Gremlin14112
@Gremlin14112 3 жыл бұрын
Ironically, that applies to the AC-130 as well... The difference, you can find the AC-130 after it has attacked... The A-10, just disappears, and is also very deadly to arial adversaries that may try to stop it's attacks...
@thomasgarden3520
@thomasgarden3520 2 жыл бұрын
*if you heard the brrrtttt you weren't the perp
@allananderson2019
@allananderson2019 2 жыл бұрын
If you hear the Brrrrrt! You are alive!
@dannyeldridge3468
@dannyeldridge3468 2 жыл бұрын
It's the truth
@terrotron8742
@terrotron8742 3 жыл бұрын
"hey you guys see that compound?" "yes sir" "good, we don't want to." "understood sir." loads 105mm with malicious intent.
@CyberWolfGaming2020
@CyberWolfGaming2020 3 жыл бұрын
Very accurate, Ac-130 Gunner "You won't be seeing that building in a minute." Loads 105 MM shell
@owenpyott8739
@owenpyott8739 3 жыл бұрын
Tanks: Loads 105mm rounds Also Tanks: No aircraft can match a gun this size AC-130: YOU DARE CHALLENGE ME!!!
@CriticalClub10
@CriticalClub10 3 жыл бұрын
AC-130: what compound
@jsbcody
@jsbcody 3 жыл бұрын
To be fair, anytime a 105mm is loaded, it is with malicious intent. 😁
@msgtpauldfreed
@msgtpauldfreed 3 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@BKG0730
@BKG0730 3 жыл бұрын
Sometimes the phrase “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” applies. It’s been effective for a long time.
@phazegate7578
@phazegate7578 3 жыл бұрын
sorry in advance effective*
@jotarokujo4830
@jotarokujo4830 3 жыл бұрын
I hate that the air force tried to get rid of the A-10 damn
@GRiiZZ
@GRiiZZ 3 жыл бұрын
@@jotarokujo4830 at least they are not getting rid of B52s, C5 Galaxy, and the U-2 just yet.
@jotarokujo4830
@jotarokujo4830 3 жыл бұрын
@@GRiiZZ yeah thats a gud thing
@eliwixson8863
@eliwixson8863 3 жыл бұрын
With the military it's more "If it ain't broke we don't want to replace a bunch of planes at hundreds of millions of dollars a piece."
@psych0CS2
@psych0CS2 3 жыл бұрын
2:57 "Newer isn't always Better" Mikhail Kalashnikov Approves this message
@Svensk7119
@Svensk7119 2 жыл бұрын
And John Moses Browning!
@timengineman2nd714
@timengineman2nd714 3 жыл бұрын
They are so deadly that a lot of enemy starts to retreat when they hear Turboprop aircraft approach!! (Same with the A-10 which sounds differently from other jets!)
@mikemuppet3807
@mikemuppet3807 2 жыл бұрын
very true. i watched a released video from the taliban not long ago made me laugh and here is why. The person recording it was also shooting and watching his buddies shoot at U.S Forced then you hear it, that turbo prop, camera pans to the sky and you see the plane come into view and LITERALLY he drops his weapon and i think it was about 8 or so others around him they all drop their weapons, they wanted nothing to do with it at all. In the comments after that believe 37 enemy force elements surrendered to only a squad who had no idea how many enemy were in the vicinity. They were absolutely terrified of the terror of the sky.
@angrydingus5256
@angrydingus5256 2 жыл бұрын
@@mikemuppet3807 Pretty common for those in the mid east to drop their weapons mid battle and try to walk off pretending to be civilian. Fighting out there has really re-defined combat in a lot of ways because of their tactics. And with the US rules of engagement, even though this man was just shooting at you... the second he put his weapon down you technically have to stop engaging. It's not uncommon for NATO soldiers to be out walking a town, even sitting down and having tea with their enemies at times. The modern battlefield is a strange place.
@PureCountryof91
@PureCountryof91 2 жыл бұрын
And, when the cannon lights off, heads go down. And so does every vehicle in the strike zone.
@douglaswayman536
@douglaswayman536 3 жыл бұрын
I am a ex army infantry and I can vouch for the power of this plane. It feels like the Wrath of God raining down on you it is quite awe inspiring
@Stepperg1
@Stepperg1 3 жыл бұрын
My husband was infantry also. Cleared the area instantly.
@carsonkouts
@carsonkouts 3 жыл бұрын
during the raid on mohmand valley we had a gunship matching our tracers and almost completely destroyed an entire mountainside. Shit was crazy.
@Stepperg1
@Stepperg1 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your service. My husband had two instances where that old girl saved a lot of lives, while ending others. He was 25th infantry, mech. After his time was up he stayed to be a door gunner through Tet. I should have been jealous of his love affair with Spooky watching after the boys, and then his Huey and the "fitty" ( 50 cal ) he wore out. God love you guys. Again, thank you.
@robertgutheridge9672
@robertgutheridge9672 3 жыл бұрын
From one to another thank you for your service to our country. I was 15tango crew chief on a uh60 black hawk and the C130 is definitely the shit and second only to the A10 in terms of kicking ass.
@mr.unknown6956
@mr.unknown6956 3 жыл бұрын
Mw2 12 kills.. AC130 ABOVE!!!!
@jmakminhas
@jmakminhas 3 жыл бұрын
The 105 is basically an artillery cannon , in the sky
@lonestoner8297
@lonestoner8297 3 жыл бұрын
Except instead of launching rounds into the air this one is throwing rounds right at your face.
@empire-classfirenationbatt2691
@empire-classfirenationbatt2691 3 жыл бұрын
That's exactly what it is lol
@Fish220
@Fish220 3 жыл бұрын
With tanks and artillery and RPG and auto 50 cal and laser rounds (US army says will happen by 2027 I think)
@g__wizz
@g__wizz 3 жыл бұрын
direct fire is still artillery.
@BIOSHOCKFOXX
@BIOSHOCKFOXX 3 жыл бұрын
Quite small for an artillery cannon, more like a Cold War tank cannon.
@MrTonyg2010
@MrTonyg2010 2 жыл бұрын
I worked on the guns on the gunship for the last 10 years. If you want to know anything more than what you asked in the video let me know. 25mm was originally a navy gun, same with the 40mm cannon, previous models of the gunship had 2x 40mm cannons side by side like they would be on the navy ships. But in this model there is only one and it is the left 40mm cannon. The 105mm is an army one and by far my favorite to work on, because it was the easiest. This model of the gunship has just recently been retired and now have a new model that has a little more fire capability than this one.
@DJP-ph7yj
@DJP-ph7yj 10 ай бұрын
Could you put a 155mm howitzer on it??? There's a next level of hurt right off the bat...
@miltmarhoffer7829
@miltmarhoffer7829 3 жыл бұрын
The air force has had the c-130 online since, I believe 1955. It's basically a tractor-trailer for the sky. The main change has been from a 4 blade propeller to a 6 blade for more power with fairly good fuel effiency
@dvhater8848
@dvhater8848 3 жыл бұрын
ENEMY AC-130 ABOVE
@DarthVaderTheSithLord
@DarthVaderTheSithLord 3 жыл бұрын
I heard this in the Spetsnaz announcer's voice.
@McLuvin4O8
@McLuvin4O8 3 жыл бұрын
ENEMY UAV ABOVE
@Namelesssly
@Namelesssly 3 жыл бұрын
TACTICAL NUKE INCOMING
@kyriekiller2779
@kyriekiller2779 3 жыл бұрын
@@DarthVaderTheSithLord yo,still hating sand
@projectdelta50
@projectdelta50 3 жыл бұрын
@@DarthVaderTheSithLord Is there any other way?
@shade3285
@shade3285 3 жыл бұрын
The slower the AC-130 - The more precise it is, that's the story.
@DaToastyGoose
@DaToastyGoose 3 жыл бұрын
Yes that's true but it also dated back before most aircraft without propellers were made
@shade3285
@shade3285 3 жыл бұрын
@@DaToastyGoose completely true, although I'm more interested in the new info that the pentagon is gonna drop in july cause that's gonna be a game changer
@nyph933
@nyph933 3 жыл бұрын
@@DaToastyGoose Don't forget that the C-130 and its variants are turbo-prop powered.
@NavyVet4955
@NavyVet4955 3 жыл бұрын
@@DaToastyGoose we were pretty modernized with jets when the ac-130 entered service (1966). The choice to use the c-130 was due to it being readily available and the original craft (ac-130) being a test platform. Most jets of that time were either fighter or bomber, both not up to the task. Adding to the stable slow speed of the platform piston engines required less maintenance and were less susceptible to small arms fire from loitering around a target area. As it worked as well as it did there was not much reason to switch to a jet powered aircraft. They did however try the same setup in the c-119 a ww2 era design that was still around but it was not as effective.
@orlock20
@orlock20 3 жыл бұрын
Props have a lot longer loiter time. For some aircraft the loiter time is hours compared to 15 minutes for jets.
@johnnyo3fan
@johnnyo3fan 3 жыл бұрын
When you're doing ground cover, you need low and slow. Jets can't hang around. Check out the A-10 if you haven't already done so.
@dmarti11235
@dmarti11235 3 жыл бұрын
To answer your question about why a prop instead of a jet, there's a couple reasons for this. One is that they can operate at lower speeds, which make them better suited for air support. Another reason is prop engines consume less fuel, allowing the plane to remain on station longer. Source: Assigned 3 years to US Navy squadron
@PromptCriticalJello
@PromptCriticalJello 3 жыл бұрын
Snipers "Don't run. You'll only die tired" AC-130 crew "Just pray. God is your only hope"
@billrobertson5895
@billrobertson5895 3 жыл бұрын
And you will be meeting him soon
@m.vondrake5534
@m.vondrake5534 3 жыл бұрын
"...And don't run. You'll only die tired, scared and dirty". (It is from the memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant. It is what he often told his unit commanders before a battle to keep them "fighting forward. Not backwards.")
@nyetzdyec3391
@nyetzdyec3391 3 жыл бұрын
"Ha! Verdammt Yankee, welcome to my beach... I haff you in my sights!" - German sniper, Omaha Beach, 6/6/1944 "Ha! Sniper, I have a fourteen-inch present for you! Guns! Bearing... mark! Range... mark! Fire!" - Captain, USS Texas... Omaha Beach, 6/6/1944 "Where am I? How did I get here?" - Sniper, looking confused, to Saint Peter. "Just a minute... we don't have that answer yet..." pauses... "Oh, the USS Texas shot you... with a 14-inch naval rifle." - St. Peter at the Gates. "What is a fourteen 'inch'...?" "Call it 355mm... or a little over four times the size of one of your 88mm's." "That... is as big as I am!" "Yes... that's about the size of it." St. Peter pauses. "Of course, that was *before*..."
@lily_2479
@lily_2479 3 жыл бұрын
@@m.vondrake5534 wow I didn’t know people now and days are into like history and stuff
@Fergus_0703
@Fergus_0703 3 жыл бұрын
A-10 pilot: “Don’t even dare to listen. You will not hear your death anyways.”
@chevalierjd
@chevalierjd 3 жыл бұрын
When you hear The Spectres' engines above, be very afraid. When you see The Spectres tilt to their left and circle, make your peace with God.
@BiologistRyan
@BiologistRyan 3 жыл бұрын
or your deity of choice as it were.
@jamessveinsson6006
@jamessveinsson6006 3 жыл бұрын
Or in their case alla
@shaynesimmonstattoo
@shaynesimmonstattoo 3 жыл бұрын
@@jamessveinsson6006 Allah is just the Arabic word for God. Same god shared by all of the Abrahamic religions (Islam, Judaism, and Christianity).
@The_Ghost_Of_Holliday
@The_Ghost_Of_Holliday 3 жыл бұрын
By that time it’s to late
@marcrud1250
@marcrud1250 3 жыл бұрын
AMEN!!!
@richardhickman3596
@richardhickman3596 3 жыл бұрын
The slower speed allows for more effective targeting and a longer sustained attack.
@kyleburns8590
@kyleburns8590 2 жыл бұрын
That's why it has propellers
@arthurpendragon6563
@arthurpendragon6563 3 жыл бұрын
"Oh you got an ak-47 and such?" "The government has sky guns!"
@Fayrwel
@Fayrwel 3 жыл бұрын
They use props because they can operate at low speed which is good for CAS
@mikehunt69981
@mikehunt69981 3 жыл бұрын
He might not know props means propellers he said he didn't know anything about planes lol
@Rebelrocker69
@Rebelrocker69 3 жыл бұрын
Also better fuel economy. Means that it can stay over target for a longer amount of time. Same thought process as with the A-10, just a bigger gun.
@mikehunt69981
@mikehunt69981 3 жыл бұрын
I was also curious tho thank you for answering
@mercanus71
@mercanus71 3 жыл бұрын
There's another very good reason for the props. They're built on the regular C-130 airframe (obviously) and the props have an easier time landing on rough, dirty landing strips. Turbines really don't like dirt particles and landing on a dirt strip at a forward base would be hell on turbines, but not for props.
@williamlong8859
@williamlong8859 3 жыл бұрын
found it funny he called jet engines traditional.
@Viper_Gaming555
@Viper_Gaming555 3 жыл бұрын
Military: let’s put a tank in the sky People: no Military: what about a battle ship People: no Military: what about we combine them People: Y E S
@budwilliams6590
@budwilliams6590 3 жыл бұрын
That is the A-10.
@X-JAKA7
@X-JAKA7 3 жыл бұрын
@@budwilliams6590 and the AC-130
@bryandanish9514
@bryandanish9514 3 жыл бұрын
Leave it to the USA to find a way to put both a tank and artillery equipment in a plain and it actually work. Reminds me of the iron man 2 movie when stark says it is decades away from having the tech he has. So I’ll sum it up in one word, “Merica”!
@angeryzach5450
@angeryzach5450 2 жыл бұрын
@@bryandanish9514 give the engineers a concept and they sure will deliver!
@Svensk7119
@Svensk7119 2 жыл бұрын
@@angeryzach5450 And that doesn't even begin to be the limit. Look up the term Skunkworks.
@oldtimerf7602
@oldtimerf7602 3 жыл бұрын
And in case we want to really get our point across to an enemy, we have more than 1 of them. A lot more.
@kellywright540
@kellywright540 3 жыл бұрын
I was at a military display at our local Air National Guard base a few years back and got to see inside an AC130 - freaking awesome to-say the least! The crew was there answering questions and when the crowd thinned out a little, one of the guys tells a story about getting the pilot mad... Apparently they came across a weapons transfer and they had several targets to smoke. They worked on the first couple, cleaned their clocks and then went after the truck that was involved with this transfer. For grins and giggles, they were purposely lining up the 105 so it would shoot just to the back of this truck or off to the side of it, the whole time the driver was driving like a mad man to get away from this evil sky monster. After a few minutes of this and a half a dozen rounds or so, the pilot gets on the intercom and tells the gunners to quit playing with that truck, smoke it and then we can get out of here! Imagine the accuracy of that big 105 and the computer controlled targeting system that you can "play" let's scare the shit out of the target before we take it out?!?!? Gotta love the USA baby!
@djwilliams2554
@djwilliams2554 3 жыл бұрын
as a former AC-130 Spectre Engineer 3 in a HALO overloard, our honor to support you
@Lofiivibezz
@Lofiivibezz 3 жыл бұрын
I salute you sir
@andymiller7390
@andymiller7390 3 жыл бұрын
*lord
@jeffjones6221
@jeffjones6221 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your service sir!
@tiffanybuerer5565
@tiffanybuerer5565 3 жыл бұрын
Eff yeah! Kudos, brother!
@baileyerickson6544
@baileyerickson6544 3 жыл бұрын
God bless you. Thank you
@CriticalClub10
@CriticalClub10 3 жыл бұрын
Enemy sees AC-130: "get inside" AC-130 loads 105: "you can't hide from death"
@aprilluke228
@aprilluke228 3 жыл бұрын
Hides in a stash of nuclear bombs: "nor can you"
@KT4VT
@KT4VT 3 жыл бұрын
You cannot hide from my 105
@CriticalClub10
@CriticalClub10 3 жыл бұрын
@@KT4VT nice
@tobinrowe9558
@tobinrowe9558 2 жыл бұрын
The latest model is the AC-130J Ghostrider. They kept the 105mm, but replaced the 20mm Gatling and 40mm bofors with a 30mm autocannon. However, it now has the ability to drop bombs and fire missiles. Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I think it even has the ability to conduct limited electronic warfare as well.
@frankallen3634
@frankallen3634 3 жыл бұрын
Props let you maneuver quickly and keeps you tight into the target and flying using less fuel. The new one flies 3000 miles using 30% less fuel and has 6 props instead of 4
@k5vg
@k5vg 2 жыл бұрын
That's close. The new ones still have only four propellers. But each prop has six blades instead of four.
@catfishgaming1136
@catfishgaming1136 3 жыл бұрын
I got to guard this aircraft in the Air Force and I loved every minute of it
@bobmartin7070
@bobmartin7070 3 жыл бұрын
Where were you guarding them at? Their home base or when they were TDY?
@catfishgaming1136
@catfishgaming1136 3 жыл бұрын
@@bobmartin7070 It was TDY
@blakewestwood8096
@blakewestwood8096 3 жыл бұрын
Defensor Fortis my brother. I guarded these a Duke field!
@catfishgaming1136
@catfishgaming1136 3 жыл бұрын
@@blakewestwood8096 Defensor Fortis I guarded them in Okinawa
@bobmartin7070
@bobmartin7070 3 жыл бұрын
I was a crew chief on one in the late 70's, early 80's at Hurlburt.
@miceltusav88
@miceltusav88 3 жыл бұрын
There is a reason it's called "Spooky" . It's spookily effective. Gatling is for soft targets, 40 is for normal vehicles and lightly armored vehicles, the 105 is basically when the thing we aim at we don't want to see anymore
@jeffreyhutchins6527
@jeffreyhutchins6527 2 жыл бұрын
By the time this video was put on youtube this model AC-130U had already flown its final mission. The new AC-130J has already flown sorties in Afghanistan by 2019. It no longer carries the 40mm. Too old to maintain and they were already using reman brass from ww2. It's called 'Ghost Rider' it replaced the AC-130U Spooky, which replaced the AC-130H Spectre. The new J model does not carry the gatling gun nor the 40mm. Instead it carries a 30mm auto cannon to replace the gatling and now carries standoff weapons like the Hellfire, and Griffin missiles and GBU 44b and GVU 69
@zayhansdah
@zayhansdah 2 жыл бұрын
"We don't want to see it anymore, it is disturbingly arousing" *fires 105*
@mbts-_-gacha9535
@mbts-_-gacha9535 2 жыл бұрын
“Hey Bob there’s an armored truck moving towards the tanks, we got anything for that?” Bob: *loads life eraser*
@bobharris5213
@bobharris5213 3 жыл бұрын
The C 130 has 4 turbo prop engines. It was designed to use shorter airfields and hauled a lot cargo and troups during Vietnam (back in my day). The original gun ship was the AC 47. Next was the AC 130, bigger and better. I was in the USAF from 1966 until 1986. Thanks for the video.
@Bitchslapper316
@Bitchslapper316 3 жыл бұрын
I remember this plane mostly from the first transformers movie. The weapons the ground troops were using to attack the metal decepticon did not do anything so they called in a AC-130 to put it down. It's silly fiction but it was still a cool movie scene with a real plane.
@Duckie-ep4sx
@Duckie-ep4sx 3 жыл бұрын
"Rivalry", we are like brothers and sisters. It's OK for us to fight each other. Do not mess with our siblings, we will mess up up.
@MrSheckstr
@MrSheckstr 3 жыл бұрын
Inter-service rivalry exists but when you get down to the individual level, we all know that there is a scenario where we’re could be lying wounded and depend on being patched up, protected and extracted by a member of any other branch, and speciality within that branch.
@mattiOTX
@mattiOTX 2 жыл бұрын
Must be a marine with that typo lol
@RETOKSQUID
@RETOKSQUID 2 жыл бұрын
@@mattiOTX Well, every family has that one "special" kid.😁
@carsonkouts
@carsonkouts 3 жыл бұрын
God bless the crews of that beast. Saved our asses in mohmand valley several times over
@scbrewallamerican1807
@scbrewallamerican1807 3 жыл бұрын
AC130 uses props instead of jet engines to stay on station at slower speed to be effective for ground support missions. AC130 is a converted C130 cargo transport plane
@chauncy1582
@chauncy1582 3 жыл бұрын
“Why do they not have jet engines?” I’d be impressed if you could hit the same spot on the ground more than twice when you’re travelling at mach 1.1
@musicheadt
@musicheadt 3 жыл бұрын
Don't need to hit it twice, when once will do it!
@lonewolfwar6817
@lonewolfwar6817 2 жыл бұрын
it more so for the fact that they arnt going in, firing quick, and getting out. the ac 130 will sit there circling the target area while its needed so props work alot better for this job than jet engines would as props perform better at slow speeds than jets do
@DeathDealer1808
@DeathDealer1808 2 жыл бұрын
@@musicheadt Why only hit once when you can hit the same spot 10 times in a minute and put the fear of god into the enemy. Its psychological warfare at its finest.
@Svensk7119
@Svensk7119 2 жыл бұрын
@@musicheadt Ah, but overkill is under-rated.
@ryanspalding875
@ryanspalding875 3 жыл бұрын
Aircraft engineer: "How much firepower do you ne-" US Military: "YES!" Also please check out the story of the B-17 bomber "Old 666".
@JonathanH1253
@JonathanH1253 3 жыл бұрын
They have jet engines, they're just a different kind of jet engine. They're called turboprops, instead of using a piston engine to spin the propellers, they use a turbine engine. And yes the C130 aircraft is pretty old, its been in service since the late 1950s and is primarily used as a cargo plane that can take off and land on short, unprepared runways, and it can be in and out very fast, a capability unmatched by any modern aircraft, which is why its still in service. The AC130A Specter entered service in 1968 and since then it has gone through several different models, the current model in service is the AC130J Ghostrider.
@jasonchiu272
@jasonchiu272 3 жыл бұрын
I'll just simply say that if you don't have much threat, then there is no difference between both propellers because as long as your plane flies, you will be wrecking the enemies.
@JonathanH1253
@JonathanH1253 3 жыл бұрын
@Josh Kirk it first flew in 1966, but it didn't enter service until 1968. In 1968 it replaced the AC47 Spooky.
@JonathanH1253
@JonathanH1253 3 жыл бұрын
@Josh Kirk its easy to get first flight confused with when an aircraft enters service. First flight means just that, an aircrafts first fligh during its development, basically a test flight.
@JonathanH1253
@JonathanH1253 3 жыл бұрын
@@jasonchiu272 turboprop engines are more efficient and much more reliable than piston engines, one of the huge advantages the C130 has the 54H60 variable pitch propeller system as well, meaning it has the the ability to taxi backwards, which is why its able to operate from short unprepared runways.
@JonathanH1253
@JonathanH1253 3 жыл бұрын
@Josh Kirk the C130 aircraft itself first flew in 1954 and entered service in 1956.
@kerrijohnson2303
@kerrijohnson2303 3 жыл бұрын
I live in North Louisiana right beside Barksdale Air Force Base which is home to the remaining B-52’s left in service. They are all that’s left of B-52’s (76 planes out of thousands originally) all built before 1955. My son in law works inside the bomb bays on these planes and says they will be in service another 50 years. Something about these old planes made them so mighty that they just refit them with new technology while keeping the body and frame unchanged. It’s quite an amazing site to watch them do maneuvers every afternoon. The old planes are serious sky beasts!
@jobefoxworth2325
@jobefoxworth2325 2 жыл бұрын
The purpose of the props is so the craft can move slowly enough to target ground forces for a long period of time
@Stepperg1
@Stepperg1 3 жыл бұрын
My husband loved "Spooky" when he was in Vietnam. It was a terror for the enemy and a lifesaver for our boys.
@darthvader6533
@darthvader6533 3 жыл бұрын
Thank him for his service for us o7
@Stepperg1
@Stepperg1 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you. He's been gone 5 years but I believe he hears those words. Thank you for your service and support.
@o5u
@o5u 3 жыл бұрын
Your husband is a true hero and legend. I thank you and him!
@Stepperg1
@Stepperg1 3 жыл бұрын
Stoner, we were blessed to have him. Thank you, thank you so very much.
@darthvader6533
@darthvader6533 3 жыл бұрын
@@Stepperg1 ahh, I’m very sorry for your loss
@stevehansen9150
@stevehansen9150 3 жыл бұрын
the AC-130 is the thing you hear when shit hits the fan. It is the bringer of death from above. The lethality of it is fucking insane
@bullpup33
@bullpup33 3 жыл бұрын
A long time ago there was a show that swapped an Army Ranger and an F15 pilot. On the end they both walked away with massive respect for each other.
@billthecat7536
@billthecat7536 3 жыл бұрын
Cross training should be required duty. It can be invaluable.
@tyl8770
@tyl8770 3 жыл бұрын
Seeing it in use was amazing. It looked like lasers shooting onto the target, there are so many rounds put down range, so quickly.
@aapfades9781
@aapfades9781 3 жыл бұрын
Fr how lucky , more impressive than a jet flying by??
@oli3645
@oli3645 3 жыл бұрын
When I showed a video of this plate to my dad he thought that the plane was in trouble because of the fire from the 20mm Vulcan and I answered : everything is in trouble except of plane.
@I_DE1FY_I
@I_DE1FY_I 3 жыл бұрын
25mm Gau-12 Equalizer. The vulcan was on older models and has since been replaced.
@oli3645
@oli3645 3 жыл бұрын
@@I_DE1FY_I ok cool i just went to the wiki and wrote the first multi barrel gun that I saw
@phazegate7578
@phazegate7578 3 жыл бұрын
you. i like you.
@Mrtweet81
@Mrtweet81 3 жыл бұрын
That would be so cool if it was true…
@UAFF0069
@UAFF0069 3 жыл бұрын
Us old boys used to call Puff the Magic Dragon
@michaelbateman8469
@michaelbateman8469 3 жыл бұрын
Puff was this plane's father.
@UAFF0069
@UAFF0069 3 жыл бұрын
Affirmative that's what I was referencing
@aspetuck11
@aspetuck11 3 жыл бұрын
Yes, yes. Puff the magic dragon in the sky over south Vietnam. A welcome site to the boots on the ground. God Bless Vietnam Vets, RIP
@blakewestwood8096
@blakewestwood8096 3 жыл бұрын
That was actually the AC47, the AC130's predecessor.
@jordanulery524
@jordanulery524 3 жыл бұрын
@@blakewestwood8096 Puff came 1st; then Spooky on the C47. There was also an attempt to use a Chinook, but it didn’t work as well.
@B-SybrZaku-ThendHaloAirsofting
@B-SybrZaku-ThendHaloAirsofting 2 жыл бұрын
The A-10 and AC-130 angel of death are the scariest sounding jet and plane on earth.
@Legodude665
@Legodude665 11 күн бұрын
Fun fact, there's two different procedures to move a plane out of a parking spot. The push-back procedure and the power-back procedure. The push-back procedure is what is most commonly seen at airports with passenger planes and requires the use of a tug to push the plane backwards (as the name implies). The power-back procedure is most commonly used in military aviation with planes that have turboprop engines. This procedure uses the reverse thrust of the plane to push itself back under its own power. While turbofan engines can also do power-back, they are more likely to suck debris into the engines which would damage them. This is another reason the C-130 and AC-130 use turboprop engines.
@Walker_Bulldog
@Walker_Bulldog 3 жыл бұрын
Prop driven aircraft can loiter and remain on station longer. The AC-130 is based on the C-130 Hercules which has been in service sine 1955 or so.
@joelpieters6788
@joelpieters6788 2 жыл бұрын
And also less affected by things like sand. Which can degrade the turbine blades.
@k5vg
@k5vg 2 жыл бұрын
@@joelpieters6788 Except that the C-130 (and all its variants, including the AC) have jet engines. The props do not protect the turbine blades from FOD.
@jbarrieorosco6985
@jbarrieorosco6985 3 жыл бұрын
I'm getting some Death From Above vibes by seeing the AC-130 😂
@zgSH4DOW
@zgSH4DOW 3 жыл бұрын
You'd be suprised to know this is a real aircraft, Cod fan
@thomasduren1679
@thomasduren1679 3 жыл бұрын
@@zgSH4DOW just cause he mentioned cod doesn't mean he thinks it's not real
@phantomkitsune010
@phantomkitsune010 3 жыл бұрын
Wrong mission but same game the mission is death from above
@jbarrieorosco6985
@jbarrieorosco6985 3 жыл бұрын
@@phantomkitsune010 thanks for that 😂
@jbarrieorosco6985
@jbarrieorosco6985 3 жыл бұрын
@Domino 7258 thanks 😂
@disabledusnvet.8771
@disabledusnvet.8771 2 жыл бұрын
It has "turboprops" which are very fuel-efficient and very powerful and when combined with broad fat straight wings so they can fly real slow so they are more deadly and accurate killing machines, any slower they would need to be extremely large helicopters to be able to carry the weight of all of the weaponry and armament that it carries to the battlefield scene.
@shaneboltpara-vet7390
@shaneboltpara-vet7390 3 жыл бұрын
The 105mm howitzer are still used by units. We used the 105mm in Alaska. They're light enough that a Humvee could tow them and they use smaller crews. Prop planes are still in service because sometimes you need something that goes a tad slower without the risk of falling out of the sky, you can be more precise with these planes
@chscott9525
@chscott9525 3 жыл бұрын
First flight for the AC130 is 1966. If it's still this powerful today, imagine how powerful it was back then.
@dooder456
@dooder456 3 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Firepower is the same but now we have operating systems that can aim the guns onto a quarter.
@eTraxx
@eTraxx 3 жыл бұрын
C-130 Introduced December 1956
@chscott9525
@chscott9525 3 жыл бұрын
@@eTraxx the C130 cargo/troop carrier airplane, yes, but the AC130 gunship first saw service in 1966.
@eTraxx
@eTraxx 3 жыл бұрын
@@chscott9525 He was asking about the airplane .. that it looked "old". Since the AC-130 was based on the C-130 I thought it appropriate. On a side note .. saw the AC-47 in action in Vietnam. :)
@greywuuf
@greywuuf 3 жыл бұрын
The airframe has been in the inventory since the 50's ( not as a gunship but still the 130 first one was commissioned in either '54 or '57 ....if I am recalling correctly)
@generalkayoss7347
@generalkayoss7347 3 жыл бұрын
This bad boy right here can pin down an entire company of soldiers with ease.
@dooder456
@dooder456 3 жыл бұрын
Imagine 20 of them circling any major city in the world.
@martinilp2513
@martinilp2513 3 жыл бұрын
Props are also more efficient at hauling cargo as well as being safer to use at slower speeds because it can accelerate faster due to its higher static thrust
@Liam-cm5vb
@Liam-cm5vb 2 жыл бұрын
When you started speaking about the physical and mental affects on the crew that reminded me of something I heard once, it basically went like this: "The AC-130 loaders get poisoned from so much they fire"
@AshMeta
@AshMeta 3 жыл бұрын
"if it ain't broke, don't fix/replace it." - US Military
@azurehorizon6097
@azurehorizon6097 3 жыл бұрын
A-10: Am I a joke to you?
@f4ephantom
@f4ephantom 3 жыл бұрын
Except when politics are involved, ie the Berreta 9mm for the Colt 1911.
@robertgutheridge9672
@robertgutheridge9672 3 жыл бұрын
Actually the us military is more. We have something that works great and we have lots of so we need to replace it with something that doesn't work as well and that cost 10 times more.
@Mrtweet81
@Mrtweet81 3 жыл бұрын
That’s the Russian military you thinking about…
@BiologistRyan
@BiologistRyan 3 жыл бұрын
Politicians... "hold my beer".. see also the Warthog.
@jacobrivera8136
@jacobrivera8136 3 жыл бұрын
"An AC-130 huh? Haven't worked with one of those in a while." -Gaz
@The_Ghost_Of_Holliday
@The_Ghost_Of_Holliday 3 жыл бұрын
Our so called leaders prostitutted us to the west
@redhausser7492
@redhausser7492 3 жыл бұрын
@@The_Ghost_Of_Holliday destroyed our cultures, our economies... our honor
@largebrneyes
@largebrneyes 3 жыл бұрын
The 130 has been around since the '60's if I recall. While we used to call the 130 "four fans and a trash can", the AF used this airframe first because they are robust enough to handle the weapon systems, but the aircraft has excellent loiter and maneuverability characteristics. The jets sucked much more fuel, so they couldnt loiter as long. We rode the 130 everywhere. Knowing this is is in orbit around your position when things went hot always gave us a warm and fuzzy feeling
@joeslouie489
@joeslouie489 2 жыл бұрын
My grandfather on my dad's side was on a C-130 in Vietnam. I was thinking he was a jump master on it.
@Svensk7119
@Svensk7119 2 жыл бұрын
The C-130 is an old Viernam era design (I think) made when VTOL (vertical take off/landing) was a pipedream restricted to helicopters. It has a rough surface capability, and the turbo-prop can use jet fuel which is cheap compared to precision gasoline (racing fuel, basically). It is designed to deploy Airborne Infantry (the transport brother of the gunship) so jets are more problematic. The B-52, for instance, needed over a mile of runway to take off, at least in the past. The C-130 can use a much shorter and more primitive runway. As for its firepower, one of these can linger over a battlefield for hours. There is a reason the Vietnam vets called these (and their predecessors) Puff-The-Magic-Dragon.
@billhiggins1882
@billhiggins1882 2 жыл бұрын
Puff
@ottovonbearsmark8876
@ottovonbearsmark8876 3 жыл бұрын
And now you’re know why the Spetznas guy sounds so terrified we he yells “ENEMY AC130 ABOVE”
@dbatchison
@dbatchison 3 жыл бұрын
The reason they have props is because they can land at dirt strip forward operating bases if needed
@dreamscape8045
@dreamscape8045 3 жыл бұрын
They can also linger in the area much longer.
@mybad8805
@mybad8805 3 жыл бұрын
@@dreamscape8045 Let us not forget the famous frog in a blender video, we have to remember our roots.
@dadthoughts3362
@dadthoughts3362 3 жыл бұрын
They can also land on an aircraft carrier!
@kuhljager2429
@kuhljager2429 3 жыл бұрын
@@dadthoughts3362 unfortunately no. They need too long of a runway, and the airframe can't take the strain of a catapult or arrestor wire
@jamessveinsson6006
@jamessveinsson6006 3 жыл бұрын
They can also loiter on point longer
@thomasgarrison3949
@thomasgarrison3949 2 жыл бұрын
The reason for props instead of jets are, they can slowly loiter over combat zones for hours, instead of a fast fly by, causing much less friendly fire & more enemy casualties. Introduction AC-130A (1968), the AC-130U Spooky (1995) and AC-130W Stinger II (2012). In the 2020's we use the turbofan powered, A-10 Warthog for close support of troops. The AC-130 was designed from the Lockheed, turboprop military transport aircraft, C-130 Hercules 1954-present.
@anthonybean931
@anthonybean931 3 жыл бұрын
If you are traveling the US and make your way to the state of Florida, the AC-130 gunships are located at Hurlburt Field Air Force Base in Fort Walton Beach, Florida. There is a public road outside the base between the runway and the beach where you can watch them take off and land. The C-130 of which the AC-130 is built on has been around since the late 50's. The RAF actually has a considerable number of C-130 cargo planes. Even though the aircraft has propellers, the engines are actually turbine engines with a gear reduction to turn the propellers.
@bradbutcher3984
@bradbutcher3984 3 жыл бұрын
The original concept was a smaller plane during Vietnam. The service members called it "puff the magic dragon" because it made everything disappear in a puff of smoke.
@PikaChu-fy5pt
@PikaChu-fy5pt 3 жыл бұрын
I believe it was 3 20mm gatling cannons on a dc3/ c-47 platform then. Also used the c119 mounted with cannons before settling on c130 still in use today.
@bobmartin7070
@bobmartin7070 3 жыл бұрын
The VC started calling these "Dragon Ships" because of tracer rounds making it look like it was spewing fire. Thus Puff the Magic Dragon.
@sgtted8225
@sgtted8225 3 жыл бұрын
The original was a AC-47 with the gatling gun "Spooky". Slow and steady.
@MrBillkaz
@MrBillkaz 3 жыл бұрын
Weapons are older, but the targeting systems are state of the art ...
@shawn6860
@shawn6860 3 жыл бұрын
Same with the ammo. Top quality boom.
@trafficsignal101
@trafficsignal101 3 жыл бұрын
To answer your opening question, the AC-130 gunship is designed for close air support. That is why it doesn't use jet engines. It flies relatively slower and a lot lower than a jet so the crew can protect the friendly's but detect and kill the enemy. The turboprop A-10 was built with the same ideas, although it was primarily built to be a tank killer. A job it did very well!
@k5vg
@k5vg 2 жыл бұрын
LOL. The A10 does _not_ have turboprops. They have turbojets--no props on the Warthog! The C-130 most definitely has jet engines. When you hang props on a jet engine (like the C-130) it is called a turboprop.
@motherofdogs27
@motherofdogs27 3 жыл бұрын
It’s not that old...but the best philosophy is “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”.
@crownregis
@crownregis 3 жыл бұрын
Laughs in M2 Browning
@barrysheldon3881
@barrysheldon3881 3 жыл бұрын
It's been upgraded with newer electronics, like any other plane in the service, but it's still an old airframe(think back to when tailfins on cars were the rage).
@k5vg
@k5vg 2 жыл бұрын
The engines have 1940s design elements. But Lockheed designed it extremely well, it still serves its original purposes, and the operational costs are far cheaper than starting a new, unnecessary development program. It gets upgrades from time to time when they are appropriate (avionics, instrumentation, propellers, etc.)
@jesusstout7450
@jesusstout7450 3 жыл бұрын
Grandpa always said, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
@scottjohnson943
@scottjohnson943 3 жыл бұрын
Propellers can land or takeoff on unimproved surfaces, versus a jet would suck up the dirt and debris and shell out the engines. The C130 was designed as a small/versatile cargo plane to haul or drop small supply shipments into the combat area. It was repurposed as a gunship by the manufacturer and sold in a weapons platform configuration. In Africa during the Rwandan civil war for example, we were using C5s and C141s (during the 90s) to ferry cargo from the US. A C5 for example can carry about 6 large deuce trucks and the 141s were smaller but would pack palletized cargo well. Landing in Ethiopia, we would offload the 10 or so C5-sized shipments of about 300,000 lbs each, and the C130s would take them in much smaller bites of about 5-6x trips per C5 and unload in Kigali. The locals were shooting at the planes delivering in Kigali - hence the props instead of jets. For the AC130, the props can loiter longer and slower above the target while being considerably more quiet than a jet rumbling overhead, and a lucky 50 cal from the ground isn’t a threat to the propellers.
@SeanP7195
@SeanP7195 3 жыл бұрын
The original C-130 came along in the early 50s and I believe was an Airborne troop transport. The C-130 is now used all over the world for a variety of civilian operations. You see it used in Hurricane research, forest firefighting, search and rescue, etc. It's just one of those machines that worked well. Someone got it in their head to use it as a flying artillery unit. It makes sense since those weapons are land based, but are very deadly if they can be used in the air. I think the original Bofors was a British or Swedish invention, I can't remember. US Navy stacked them 4 at a time on their ships and had them all over. During the middle of WWII students at MIT came up with the proxima fuse. This fuse would detonate the shell once it came into the proximity of metal. Between the Bofors, the fuse, and seasoned gunners Japanese airplanes soon found that attacking US Naval ships was almost certain suicide and few planes ever got in close enough to do damage starting in late 1943. AC-130s are extremely expensive and are filled with a lot of spy technology, jamming equipment etc, and the crews are trained to destroy everything onboard if the plane is ever compromised and has to crash or be captured. I remember during one mission an AC-130 called us (infantry soldiers) to tell us a woman near our compound was hiding an AK under her shirt. The infrared was so sensitive it could detect it thru her clothing.
@procommunistdestruction2318
@procommunistdestruction2318 3 жыл бұрын
Hey buddy so my childhood friend ran the gun on one of these for the last 7 years. He told me the engines use less fuel cost less to maintain and so they can stay up on overwatch for hours and hours to help. If they used jet engine they would not be able to stay on site for 12 hours and still make it home.
@TSLAYER34
@TSLAYER34 3 жыл бұрын
C 130 it’s been around for like 1950s and also for a simple question the reason why to use propeller because it is easier to hover the air and jet engines burn a lot of fuel. So that’s why these propellers because they will need to stay longer.
@mikegray-ehnert3238
@mikegray-ehnert3238 2 жыл бұрын
C-130's are around 60 years old. The fleet has been upgraded and newer models have been bought but they are workhorses! Capable of being used in many different locates. A classmate from HSchool graduated from the Air Force Acadamey and flew C-130's. In civilian life he retired recently, by federal regulations from flying commercial passenger flights from the US to Hong Kong and Tokyo and from the east coast of the states to Oslo and other NoEuropean cities.
@keithp8015
@keithp8015 3 жыл бұрын
These gunships can put fear in any confrontational force just by appearing without fire a single round. Awesome platform.
@Juicejunkie409
@Juicejunkie409 3 жыл бұрын
Man I love these videos and I can't wait for the original adventures to start when you guys are on the road and travel in America
@lizacombs7568
@lizacombs7568 3 жыл бұрын
I love your accent and the way you explain it is very soothing . God bless ALL soldiers and their families too!
@charleslankford6922
@charleslankford6922 3 жыл бұрын
The C-130 HERCULES has been in use since the mid 50s. The primary purpose of the aircraft was cargo delivery. There were a few converted to flying gunships.
@cliveklg7739
@cliveklg7739 2 жыл бұрын
Propeller over jets question: Fuel efficiency to weight and range. If it was a jet fuel would eat up all its cargo weight for ammunition and cut its range. The props are more fuel efficient so it doesn't HAVE to carry as much fuel so more ammo can be loaded and also gives it a longer range with that fuel efficiency as well. The updated AC-130J has a range of 3,000 miles. The J has an updated airframe, propellers, engines, tech suit, weapons. That old cannon from WWII has been replaced (they were struggling for parts to keep them repaired). Newer 30mm is replaced it. They also can carry a number of smart weapons in addition to the cannons. In 2022 they'll be testing laser weapons on the J. And are looking to add anti-jamming technology to fight electronic warfare being used against it as well. The AC-130s first use was in Vietnam.
@jefflanduyt6750
@jefflanduyt6750 3 жыл бұрын
The C-130, which has been around since the Vietnam era, was designed with props. The loiter time on these gunships is insane because of the props.
@darthvader6533
@darthvader6533 3 жыл бұрын
I love the respect and comradery for the US troops from this British soldier, does me ol colonial heart good :,)
@texaschief8389
@texaschief8389 2 жыл бұрын
Goes both ways Sir. I'll say that one of my favorite days in Iraq was when: Iraq Police "We're keeping your people" British: "Where are they?" "The Police station Sir." "Good. Drive a tank through it and bring them home." "YES SIR!" - That was a good day. Made this old Navy Chief smile from ear to ear.
@texaschief8389
@texaschief8389 2 жыл бұрын
**Conversation a tad longer, I paraphrased the quotes. Didn't want you to have to read pages. :)
@darthvader6533
@darthvader6533 2 жыл бұрын
@@texaschief8389 thats awesome haha. Thank you for your service sir
@glorifiedboxkicker
@glorifiedboxkicker 2 жыл бұрын
My best friend is a spooky gunner, and he says it's the best job he's ever had.
@sgtmjr_avery_johnson7949
@sgtmjr_avery_johnson7949 3 жыл бұрын
Thank for doing this video lad, I waited to see this too (Lol, I had to retype words cause I misspelled it)
@DryTEKGI
@DryTEKGI 3 жыл бұрын
There is this video called "guy in vr talks about their worst day as a soldier" and its about a guy that operated AC130. It's quite powerful story and you could check it out
@CharlieDoesntSurf
@CharlieDoesntSurf 3 жыл бұрын
i just watched that a few days ago that whole series is cool
@InevitableMayo
@InevitableMayo 3 жыл бұрын
I saw that. Learned a lot about the plane and my god the story is heart breaking
@jaimerosas4874
@jaimerosas4874 3 жыл бұрын
This plane has been first introduced and used during the Vietnam War
@frankiefrostie1
@frankiefrostie1 3 жыл бұрын
They do actually have jet engines. They use turbo props, which means the prop is driven by a turbine engine. I don’t know why beyond that.
@garyechols9458
@garyechols9458 3 жыл бұрын
C-130 first flight 1954, still in production. It does it's job very well.
@k.jcampbell6633
@k.jcampbell6633 3 жыл бұрын
I first remember this from Vietnam war,and remember seeing Puff the magic dragon in a movie called The Green Berets with John Wayne.
@zgSH4DOW
@zgSH4DOW 3 жыл бұрын
@ the WW2 gun The 50 cal M2HB Browning was invented in WW1 and it's still the default weapon for US ground vehicles
@pyronuke4768
@pyronuke4768 3 жыл бұрын
You're half-right. The M2's mechanism is based on the Browning M1917/M1919. The .50 cal M2 was designed in 1918, but the cartrage wasn't ready until 1921. And although the HB variant was around from the beginning it wasn't adopted by the army until 1933.
@_wanted_outlaw3007
@_wanted_outlaw3007 3 жыл бұрын
@@pyronuke4768 just an updated design
@pyronuke4768
@pyronuke4768 3 жыл бұрын
@@_wanted_outlaw3007 yup, pretty much
@ChanceReed
@ChanceReed 3 жыл бұрын
I remember when I was in tech school for the airforce, my dorm neighbor was a c130 crewchief and when he got his marching orders, he found out he was going to train on an ac130, I was instantly jealous
@cseale61
@cseale61 11 ай бұрын
They call it the Angel of Death for several reasons. It uses turbo props for it's stability. They usually fly so high that they can't be perceived from the ground. It's invisible death from above.
@roberthodson8645
@roberthodson8645 3 жыл бұрын
I've heard it was intended to operated from forward air strips and a prop is less susceptible to debris getting sucked into the engine.
@philsymes2247
@philsymes2247 2 жыл бұрын
You sir are correct. I was a jet engine mech usaf. Not in this aircraft but a10 and b52 kc135. This plane can take off from any ground and not worry about fod damage.
@Nervegas
@Nervegas 2 жыл бұрын
Yup. Its a modified C-130 which has been around since the 50's. Its ability to do steep angle of attack descents and the short distance needed to land and takeoff again is unmatched. In vietnam they would just daisycut a section of forest, use the dozers to move the stumps and bam, instant hercules landing strip. Its a hell of a plane.
@k5vg
@k5vg 2 жыл бұрын
No. You are thinking about reciprocating engines. THOSE are less susceptible. But the C-130 has four T-56 Allison engines. These are jet engines, which is why it is called a turboprop. They are quite susceptible to foreign object damage (FOD). But Lockheed mounted them way the hell up off the ground. That is why they are good for forward (i.e. unpaved) strips.
@RedEyedModok
@RedEyedModok 3 жыл бұрын
"Why do they have props instead of turbines." I believe it's so they can go as slow as they can.
@glennmartin8664
@glennmartin8664 3 жыл бұрын
Yep -- both for accuracy and time on station -- I hope he sees this comment!
@benbonneville9802
@benbonneville9802 2 жыл бұрын
Good for you bro. I’m an American Combat Air Force Veteran. Also, AC130 gunship isn’t current anymore, It’s the AC130J, now. She has amazing guns.
@johanrunfeldt7174
@johanrunfeldt7174 3 жыл бұрын
It all started with the AC-47 in the Vietnam era, this was a C-47/DC-3/Dakota transport with a 7.62mm Gatling in the cargo door. This was followed by the first version of the AC-130 and later by the AC-119. After the Vietnam War was over, USAF decided to standardise on the C-130 as the platform for future fixed wing gunships and made new versions while phasing out the piston engined gunships (AC-47, AC-119). There is really no reason to use jet or turbofan powered planes in this role, because they need friendly air superiority and they need to be able to fly slow, in order to make as tight circles as possible. As a bonus fact, all AC-130s in the USAF are operated by the USAF Special Operations Command, along with MC-130/HC-130 rescue planes and most KC-130 tankers.
@williamrose8726
@williamrose8726 3 жыл бұрын
Ac130s use turboprops instead of jet engines because they offer a more reliable stable speed and they also need to be able to hold a speed consistently so they're targeting systems work
@swwwsss7870
@swwwsss7870 3 жыл бұрын
Good reaction but you should react to “THE ATTACK OF THE DEAD MEN!”
@ghostrecce4463
@ghostrecce4463 3 жыл бұрын
The song from Sabaton?
@martinosborne4703
@martinosborne4703 3 жыл бұрын
@@ghostrecce4463 the story behind the Song, the siege of Osoweic fortress. But... TURMOIL AT THE FRONT!
@ghostrecce4463
@ghostrecce4463 3 жыл бұрын
@@martinosborne4703 oh now I understand
@Rebirth419
@Rebirth419 3 жыл бұрын
@@martinosborne4703 Wilheml's forces on the hunt
@thorno8246
@thorno8246 3 жыл бұрын
@@Rebirth419 There's a thunder in the east
@alanw9677
@alanw9677 3 жыл бұрын
Vietnam- Air Force search and rescue- specter sometimes made it possible for us to rescue downed pilots deep in enemy territory when we were taking too much ground fire to go in for a recovery. Little or no fire after that. They were Awesome!!! Props to the sandy pilots too. You saved our butts many times and lost yours doing too! “that others may live”
@bruh7644
@bruh7644 Жыл бұрын
"Sir, we designed highly destructive weapons that can obliverate tanks and armed personnel." "Nice, now make them fly."
Lockheed AC-130: The Angel of Death
16:37
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Royal Marine Reacts To Why No One Wants to Fight the A-10 Warthog
14:08
Дибала против вратаря Легенды
00:33
Mr. Oleynik
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
Did you believe it was real? #tiktok
00:25
Анастасия Тарасова
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
N Scale Albuquerque Carnuel & Tijeras RR 4 Layout Update 110
16:25
Royal Marine Reacts To German KSK Hell Week
25:06
OriginalHuman
Рет қаралды 260 М.
We Test Different Execution Methods with Ballistic Dummies
15:29
Garand Thumb
Рет қаралды 4,3 МЛН
World War 2 | D-day | Omaha beach |  Claymation | Stop motion
3:48
PLASTILINA JACK'S
Рет қаралды 79 М.
Brits Reacts to How strong is the United States military?
17:10
The Beesleys
Рет қаралды 111 М.
AC-130 Gunship In Action Convoy Destroyed In Fallujah - ARMA 3 - MilSim
9:32
Royal Marine Reacts To USA VS WAGNER!
14:10
OriginalHuman
Рет қаралды 404 М.
NASA Finally Unveiled 'Quiet' X-59 Supersonic Aircraft
10:59
Military Affairs
Рет қаралды 203 М.
Harrowing Audio from A-10 Warthog Close Air Support in Afghanistan
6:31
FUNKER530 - Veteran Community & Combat Footage
Рет қаралды 821 М.