Andrew didn't you have bad allegations against you a few years ago whatever happened with that case

@@artjohnLagas-gk6mg OMG! You mean the stalking in Hatfield Township, Montgomery County? Or something else? 🤔Quite the vague comment.

​@@toshiyaar7885😊l

@LuvPureCom It would be, the response, a plant to continue the agenda of the psychopathic peoples who do this to everyone that tells the TRUTH about these trillionaires. So many throughout history. We need to be aware. The media who arrange this, are these psy...too

She probably got paid well from the higher ups.

Oh it will be. And it's on ch4 btw.

It was a C4 program not BBC

He worked for BBC lol

98% of all rapes go without any jail time, and those who do report it are scrutinised and accused of lying for attention. the british police don’t care about assault or abuse at all

it is

So why didn’t any of you say anything Back then?

@@littlemy1773because they’ve been paid now

Well you should go to police then ,

@@littlemy1773 it's a kabbal. They all belong to the funny handshake club.

@@angr3819 so by that logic they all still do, so what’s changed?

I too work in the legal system, lawyer, and I would think that said very reason is why most of us know exactly why people don’t come forward to police and, less so, follow through with judicial proceedings. Not talking about Brand nor the accusers, I’m talking most victims.

Would you please clarify the "why" in my comment that caused you to claim most victims don't come forward? You are speaking in very broad generalities regarding victims and not necessarily being specific about anything I stated. As an alleged attorney, one would expect your response to be more direct and clear to the point you are trying to make. Thanks!

(I see you deleted all 3 of your comments ranting and accusing me of blocking you, hmmm, I still leave my response over your unnecessarily aggressive accusations) @stellaallbright4750 it wasn’t me I promise. Haven’t blocked anyone, I honestly don’t think I know how, I just now got all three notifications. And there are plenty of comments throughout the comments section that show reply numbers but, I at least, can’t access them. Blame youtube, apparently you immediately assumed the worst from me, strange huh, I guess you would immediately go to police without any actual evidence, funny how that works. Jumping to conclusions without no a priori reason to. Huh. If you don’t believe my profession that’s fine, says more about you than me, I’m a Chilean lawyer, in Chile (though was born and raised in the US, American dad, Chilean mom), University of Chile (Emory university undergrad while in the US), class of 2010, moved here from the States in 2005; though I don’t need to prove my law school education to random people online. I haven’t worked in criminal proceedings since 2015, I now work mostly wrongful terminations and collective bargaining, but I did many years ago…and was involved with the grassroots organization that eventually aided in the passing of the 2019 bill that put and end to the SOL regarding crimes consisting of SA against children (“ley de imprescriptibilidad delitos sexuales contra menores de edad”; now being replicated all over South America and Europe). But come on, we know the stats, about 300 in 1000 are reported (1/3 women SAd, 1/4 girls, worldwide)…Then there’s the rape kit (if the victim is brave enough, old enough, cognitively-developed enough to immediately go to a hospital), initial police questioning, which will be brought up over and over and over during court (if there is a trial; likely there’s not enough evidence to charge, unless there’s forensic elements to be considered), where victims are re victimized facing the assailant whose defense team can cross-interrogate them with the assailant in the room (all for procedural “bilarerality”, but there are limits), where even children (and I mean children, babies in my eyes, not teenagers) must recount the story over and over and over again. Where a victim blaming defense, in many jurisdictions, is still legal, societal slut-shaming remains rampant. Where convictions rates gravely vary by jurisdiction, specially low on continental legal systems vs. common law ones. The stigma that will follow the victim around, for life, whether the accused be proven guilty or declared innocent, the stigma remains; etc…you honestly think a daughter/sister/girlfriend will press charges against their father/brother/boyfriend (all studies show victims usually know the perpetrator)? Some do, but familial and fraternal ties weigh heavy on victims’ shoulders, people’s reputations, the chaos it oftentimes brings to families. Have you had to work with victims in a habitual manner? Not being snide, honest question. I find that most people that dead with SA, rape and incest survivors have quite a different take than you. I myself am a rape survivor, was 16, had a rape kit done immediately, had actual eye and auditory witnesses, dna evidence and medical reports saying there was forceful penetration, dealt with two police officers and decided I couldn’t go through a trial, it would break me and, sadly, I don’t regret my decision. I could not have handled seeing him day in and day out in court. And said decision has, in my experience at least, been echoed by most victims I know, who remain silent in fear of repercussions. Yet, honestly, you’re barking up the wrong tree, if you want an academic treatise/thesis/compendium on why women don’t come forward you need a psychologist/psychiatrist/mental health professional to accommodate such request…not a lawyer. They’ve got amazing materials online, even legal ones, I assume you have access to WestLaw, I’m sure you can access information on this matter from a more strictly (though always cross-sectional) legal perspective ✌️✌️✌️

I've just come off of jury service. A case exactly the same allegations. In the eyes of the law the Def was not guilty because of evidence of lack of. RB should sue, hugely!

@@pumpkinqueen3776 individuals decide based of experience or expectation most of the time, so it is rational to rather agree to what you stated "people might not come forward immediately" (not exactly qouted) if they have a certain education and experience. Even then, allegedly few victims were about to take actions and went to a SA facility. History just proves, that victims words might not taken seriously by authorities. Also because of fake victims or narcissists

RB came out and denied it all yesterday preemptively before the article and news story came out...or are you taking about a further response?

You don't really understand do you

​@@stujujitwingfut5192Understand what?

He's already responded with denial.

I often disagree with Andrew and find his trash-merchant muckraker angle rather distasteful but I think he's handling this well

Why do you feel the need to use the word hate, you small minded below average IQ muppet. Disagreement is NOT hate. You brainwashed imbecile.

@@OrwellsHousecatEveryone is a critic.

Because he is supporting what is essentially a media driven witch-hunt.

@@OrwellsHousecat ok that's fine cause you are saying his content sucks sometimes but that is not saying he sucks.....I'm talking about the person who said he was fraud and I forget now but he read the statement and I couldn't understand why the person referenced him like that. Andrew deserves as much respect as he gives us..

Well done 🙏

@DanaX09 I understand. I was held at knifepoint in an attempted r@pe. I managed to escape and screamed so loudly that people came running from all sides. I was totally traumatised, but many people said "at least he didn't r@pe you". For many months, I lived in terror of him returning. The Police were great, but he wasn't found. That situation changed my life. I think people just don't understand how these things affect us. I had to have therapy to sort out my head.

I agree absolutely. One of the most liberating things I found was to hear RD Laing (I think) saying, in response to a patient unsure of her memory re levels or abuse, 'Why bother - why do you need to remember the details?' Fair point!

I have been saying this for years. How do I get passed all the abuse I experienced if I'm continually told I'm damaged. Society tell me this. I have been very damaged by what I went through both physically and ,emotionally, but I can still function in the world. Ironically, I recently was told I could not receive any form of compensation because I am able to mask what I feel and hold down a job. That i am not mentally affected enough . How dare they. How the hell do they know. Some of us have to continue, that's the way we cope. If I didn't have my job and something else to focus on and distract from ,I would probably go under ,but that has also gone against me ,though they accept the physical and sexual abuse took place, 100%. Unbelievable

Agreed. It IS possible to find healing from almost any trauma with the application of methods and treatments from people you trust. I know this from personal experience. I am not my childhood traumas. NOTHING is irreparable. Having a spiritual focused life is the most important aspect of healing.

He could still run for President. Because Trump 🤷‍♀️🤣

I didn’t know that. I missed that show.. But one thing that struck me in the news article I read was one of the women said that he got this glazed over look in his eyes. Kind of like something else took over. That’s a thing for people with sexual addiction. I’ve seen that look. My cousin who is r*pist looked at me with that face and his voice sounded almost like he was hypnotized. That’s a wild detail to include If this is a false story. And btw, like you, I hope it’s not true because I was a fan of his. But yeah, if he’s guilty, he should go to jail.

Thank God for you.

@@ronswansonsdog2833 yeah everything’s Trumps fault. SMH 🤦‍♀️

And you know what - any proof that exists and anything the guy has possibly done, I don't care. I will listen to him. He has got such a broad view on things and looks into things so deeply that I don't care what he might have done or even has done 10 years ago. Btw, I am a woman.

Ofcom-regulated media. Ofcom-regulated agenda.

BRAND = Controlled Opposition. You don't get that Big, without being "Part of the Club". If he was genuine, he would have had his channel taken down years ago. This @media disclosure@ - could well be planned or even a "Humiliation Ritual" - to get to the next level. Could also be a huge media distraction. Take care.

100% it’s definitely a personal attack on Russel and an attempt to tarnish his reputation. I don’t doubt these accounts from the women happened, the media wasn’t the place to air their stories. The American who claimed she was raped didn’t want to go to the police in fear of the repercussions yet is quite happy to broadcast her story to the nation

They seem to have blocked the replies to your comment (at least I can't see them, but I can see there are 3 replies), but this is absolutely spot on.

Great point!! The absence of the law is something strange.

Shouldn't one of the factors considered is if these things were done while using or in recovery? Doesn't make the actions ok either way. And what has RB done 'to make amends?' What do these women want to have happen?

Andrew isn't responsible for any of that. He didn't harass any women, he didn't take a definite stand about the behavior of Russell Brand (though he clearly doesn't like what is alleged). I'm encouraging him to show people how to 'withhold ascent' (that is, not immediately take a position or a side simply because of social pressure). That will not affect the investigations or criminal prosecutions, which are totally external to him. He's just trying his best to be an objective journalist.@@2Question-Everything

Considered separately, I'd say you're asking good questions. Not sure why they are responses to me, rather than just comments directed at Andrew himself.@@2Question-Everything

There is a reason most countries have Historical "R" laws. This is such a difficult thing to report to anyone.

Who fucking cares? Not illegal even if he did do it.

creepy yes illegal no

​@@alterego2421It's called a pattern of behaviour.

Can't repeat because if you heard them you'd realise they're not shocking. Always be cautious when people are literally telling you how you should feel ('shocked')

​@@OrwellsHousecatJesus Christ you Brand cult members are such pathetic apologists 😂😂

Between being able to talk his way out of situations and having the money to hire the best solicitors and barristers, we can see how people like Brand get away with their disgusting, despicable behaviours. It’s time for Brand to pay the piper, and it’s much too late for many of the victims. Stories have circulated about Brand for many, many years. It may be an old cliché, however there is no smoke without fire.

Yes, exactly. And he has fame, wealth and influence. A dangerous combination if someone wants to exploit others.

@@powderandpaint14 Wealth, fame and influence ..... a bit like epstein, saville, prince andrew, weinstein and the rest.

Russkie Brand lost that right the moment he went to work for Moscow as a paid foreign asset. You should encourage individuals to out paid foreign assets paid to do propaganda operations on your neighbors.

But Brand does this all the time to other people on his channel.......

Trial by public opinion is what Brand does day in day out to other people through his daft conspiracy theories.

While I agree generally; it seems to me most fans of Russell Brand would absolutely take part in trial by public opinion of figures he criticizes. Allegations that various politicians, prominent people, etc are doing really bad things. But then when Brand is accused everyone suddenly says "Wait for the evidence!"

That’s great and I don’t disagree but you don’t get that afforded to you if it’s DOCUMENTED in your interviews and tv shows. We have every right to judge his behavior that is right in front of us. The rest is not favtual and every person needs to keep that in mind. But he’s behaved in abbhirabt ways that have been proven. Just like Ashton K factually lied about not being the one to find his murdered girlfriends body because that would have been bad for his career. There’s no allowance when stuff is factually documented.

Exactly, especially during the height of the 'me too' movement. That would have made more sense

Money & motive

Victim shaming also shames you. It is not for you or I to judge a victim for not acting in thr way we think they should.

​@dribblywildman7744 yeah, but we don't know if they're a victim or not. So because they aren't a confirmed victim, they are up for scrutiny.

So, we're still doing the "why didn't they go to the police" thing? Why? I'll tell you why: Because victims traditionally get treated like pesky nuisances, at best - and as if they're the actual criminals, at worst, by law enforcement (and other people). Maybe listen to what victims who did report what was done to them to the police, have to say about that experience. For some, the trauma of being treated like that was just as bad as the crime. Also, a lot of traumatised people basically freeze up emotionally and intellectually. They just can't process what happened to them. Some will even try to convince themselves it never happened because they simply can't continue to stay alive otherwise. Sometimes to the point that a victim even destroys evidence of the crime in an attempt to pretend it never happened - just to be able to keep on existing as a human being. Studies say that eight to nine out of ten sexual assaults don't get reported to law enforcement. Tragically, victims not going to the police is actually the norm, not the exception. I'm not a person who socialises a lot or has more than a small handful of friends (acquaintances are not friends to me) - and even I know of at least three people in my rather small circle of family members and friends, who were sexually assaulted and didn't/couldn't go to the police. Four including myself.

Ahhhh not only scrutinised BUT EXPOSED for who it REALLY US I'm afraid. The guy has always creeped me out.

Hired amateur actors no doubt!

If you’re on “the far left” then you’re too bias to decide on what’s “reasonable”. I also wouldn’t put much stake on what some swastika tattooed neo Natzi has to say about being reasonable. Stay in your lane.

Why did no one report these criminal allegations and file a lawsuit.... Instead of releasing a smear campaign by MSM on a Saturday night, just before the 2024 elections?? 🤔

Sadly not too many people will take such a responsibile approach. I used to love Russell before his recent right wing conspiracy turn. If you read his books he is beyond blatantly open about his behaviour good, bad, & beyond embarrassing.. so I highly doubt this is true. It literally defies all common sense to be honest... thing is sadly I doubt his actual guilt or innocence will matter in this day & age :o(

@@JustMeELC Just because someone openly admits to being promiscuous does NOT mean they didn't grape people. It's like when a kid admits to a small infraction to try and make it appear they didn't do the far worse thing.

Wow well done you. Sadly many women’s charities unquestionably support (in fact they go further and act as the woman’s second voice spewing lies) women. As you say most woman tell the truth re SA. Women will lie for gain and often these types of people are emotionally unstable.

Fair points but it's a completely different scenario when celebrities are involved. Certain bad actors or those not acting in good faith use their fame to dazzle, hoodwink, promise, all that. A young lady maybe told they'll be introduced here and there it works both ways sometimes. There are the Meghan markles who will flirt and charm and then ghost. Then there's the male tarts who will Dean Gaffney their way through women. Then there's the big bad Harvey Weinstein types that actually have the power to make and break careers. It's a different world so civilians don't really know how amoral the whole industry is.

Nuance. You used an important word there.

Very suspicious

How can you believe the victims stories w/o any evidence? Did you follow the Amber Heard trials??

@@stellaallbright4750 I did nor state whether I believed them or not. I am not surprised, given the past and recent propensity for leveling these types of charges.

​@@stellaallbright4750two rich cunts who spent six weeks bitching about each other on national TV. The trial was ridiculous, stop quoting it in every comment.

I agree, if someone has changed and has a new life why punish them and ruin his family

I am 66 and totally agree with you. I love Russel Brand . I hope it’s not true . But you are right things were very different back then. Dating was different. Things ( not rape or incest ) but people were different than and it was acceptable , common place . How far back do we go ?

what happened to the DW coverage...just disappeared

Cronkite, Rather, old Commies.

Andrew is Gold

You believe everything that he's accused of, but the accurate reporting is still an "obvious" smear campaign? 🤷

Completely agree

​@hakancarlsson2881 two things can exist and be true at the same time

@@lisamcphee8923 How is accurate reporting a smear campaign though?

Agreed.

The tiny bit i've seen when he was live You can see the wheels turning against him and he would say things more against him ... he wasn't as objective as he normally is, He talked about it but I learned he is the type to believe a well made documentary , I'm guilty of that , I can FEEL my heart change as I watch these but I have to keep a level head. I am NOT just blatantly ignoring it but The way smear campaigns go now a days...its always more suspicious, the problem with being super self aware like he is and i am, is we over compensate by pushing away that bias to the extreme BUT he did a better job than others, Even what he says here, he talks about russels actions but he was a literal ADDICT and as a kid who grew up around addicts, THAT IS not the person, getting clean reveals THE TRUE PERSON, it doesn't excuse the stuff but it definitely does not represent the character, He also said he was shocked by russels oh this isn't me.. when that is not what russel said, he denied the non Consensual allegation's but said HE WAS OPEN ABOUT THE STUFF THAT IS TRUE and already known

@@jsbaldo5556 And as an addict, and alcoholic he had less impulse control....

My point exactly which doesn't equal things he wanted to do, a person also ate a man on the street while on spice and without that drug.. he wouldn't have done it@@elephantintheroom5678

Do we really need to get the bobbies involved in this?

He's a complete fraud, a douchebag

You really think they are don't this because he's got an audience of 6 million? I was a subscriber to Russell's talks and blog but stopped because he started sounding too crazy. I didn't enjoy watching him after a while. Once I stopped, I didn't hear anything of him. Russell Brand isn't a name that is just out here floating around. You have to look for him. I just don't see the BBC feeling threatened by a guy in the ALT space that was coming across as nuts as he was. They may have a vendetta though. They might just think he's an asshole and will enjoy bringing him down.

Now he has changed?..Danny Masterson said the same, he was now a loving and caring husband. Omg, some of you people, defending rapists. You are so blindly in love with him for whatever reason you don't even want to see the monster he is. Shame on you. And what he is now is irrelevant, what happened back then matters. This kind of mentality is like the worst thing i can think off. Simply erase his bad history and only judge him by present (and i doubt even his present is all good).

100% agree. He has always been a douche bag. Listening to his stand up routine I was appalled at misogyny and contempt for women- I was gobsmacked to see the audience howl with laughter at his sick behaviour. He is a complete fraud and nowhere near as smart as he likes to think he is. I cannot believe people are still excusing his behaviour even after they have been presented with the vile acts outlined in the documentary. Maybe each relationship started consensually but it is obvious he was manipulative and devious and at some point crossed the line into sexual assault. Anyone who still thinks he's innocent is either stupid, deluded or share the same sexual predilections that brand has. @@BluesyVlogs

@@th2k864 If you knew how many lesser names have been erased from these platforms over the last few years you wouldn’t think this way. The censorship started long ado and is getting worse and worse. YT has now banned any ‘health advice’ omits platform which does not align with the official narrative and not a word from the rest of the media. There is a chokehold on information and alternative voices and thought. Stand by and let me know if what I have said finally hits you in a year or two. Tall poppies get their heads cut off.

Grow up. Republicans are as corrupt as they come.

No offense, but the government in California is great. You're welcome to move to Idaho.

@@themoviedealersNo offense taken. I'm welcome to do whatever I want because this is America, which includes thinking California government is full of s*** thanks to people who vote like you I'm sure.

My sentiments exactly.

I wouldn't put much Faith in the Court System (Crown) - Spacey got off (3 of his accusers just so happened to die before reaching Court.) Charles = best mates with Saville. Andrew best mates with Epstein. All those celebrity Pedos - that just so happened to be knighted. Makes you wonder ..........

Great comment!

and STOP apologizing--it's a turn off

no shit xD

Utter nonsense.

The counter argument is they are guilty by notoriety regardless of evidence. "I always knew he was a wrong un" hindsight on steroids.

Yes I agree. You present it well. 💎

this is nothing to do with the public. This is another case of the MSM and police covering for another pea dough aka their mate. Sadowitz warned you all about this decades ago

That seems a rather stereotypical view. It’s a bit like saying don’t park your car in Brixton because it will be stolen.

Ross is another turd.

They were both disgusting, and that stunt was not at all funny. The pain they inflicted on Andrew Sach was deep and emotionally damaging. It also ruined his relationship with his granddaughter, as he cut her out of his will. So being involved with Russell cost her dearly.

I still can’t believe that actually happened looking back . I was a lot younger then so it kind of went over my head at the time , but now I’m older and have kids of my own ( one of which is a daughter ) I can honestly say I would have handled those voice messages with a LOT less grace had someone said those things about my daughter!! ( I can’t get my head around the idea of being a grandma quite yet 😆)

It’s unimaginable how WA is still walking around a free man. Perfect example. Thank you!

You just said you think he's abusive. Stop being such a pathetic apologist.

Some really powerful forces in our society have a lot of reason to hate Russell right now. He's been building a massive audience while factually attacking Big Pharma, the military industrial complex, and the police state, and doing it in a way that appeals to both people on the left and the right. He's been especially good at exposing pharma's lies around COVID. Furthermore, he's been aggressively anti-tribalism, bringing people with varying political views to the table, which the deep state hates. He's a very unifying figure in the independent media world; the bad guys hate that. I watch his show daily. He's still a lefty, by the way, he mentions that often. He's just anti-tribalism, I'm exactly the same. Russell had some dirt in his past, and they're dragging it out in an attempt to damage his current trajectory. "They" probably being the CIA.

​@@Mursh26 Yes it was a hit piece. You and your type were a very dangerous bunch back in Salem all those years ago. I wonder when Channel 4 will come out with that Epstein client list documentary, oh right....NEVER.

@@Mursh26 Look into the Lab for Character Assassination and Reputation Politics (CARP) ... utilising these kinds of methods is well practiced and manipulating damaged women into playing into a narrative is an art for these people.

@@Mursh26like another publisher journo a smear campaign was used on

Idiot

She attended a Rape Crisis Centre, a rape kit is taking samples to look for sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy.

Talking about it? Ok well what was said?

source: I made it up

Medical records aka evidence.

So Does Clinton, Bush, OBAMA, Biden 👿👿👿

If these crimes were committed, they belong in a court of law, NOT MSM.

Spot on, see my comment.

@@stellaallbright4750 Exactly and the question is why aren’t they being handled that way?

@@soulfireonfire6423 3 guesses ...

Here, here.

By this assessment Jimmy Saville hasn’t much to answer for. Dig deeper and you will see it isn’t quite as simplistic as you suggest

​@@ParkuptonExplain what you mean.

Because they thought they were the only ones, which is why most people don’t come forward, particularly when the allegations are about a person IN POWER.

Umm, we don't have a statute of limitations in the UK. Only for civil lawsuits. These are criminal allegations.

Your comment is excellent. I appreciate it.

Finally a sensible comment

He has admitted that he was like that. Anyone can see he's a changed man, notwithstanding the fact that HE HAS said so himself. He's not proud of that time in his life.

@@kateorwell7203 No one knows if he's truly a changed man...he's a manipulative narcissist and begging forgiveness after he does something shitty is his MO. We saw it in the text messages Andrew read us in his previous vid, after he forced himself on a girl in some way. He was begging forgiveness after the girl told him how scared he made her, and he basically just blew it off. If he's raped or sexually assaulted multiple women, whatever he says about himself is completely irrelevant. I'm not insinuating that he's guilty yet...I'll reserve that judgement until I see evidence proving the crimes, but I don't believe a damn word he says either. Predators LIE.

A self-serving apology for what he's already been busted for in the past does not excuse him from facing consequences if he's raped or sexually assaulted multiple women. Lets find out the true facts before we grant him our forgiveness merely because he happens to be a wealthy celebrity.

@@veronicawood8295that’s right. Because IF he is guilty of raping that girl, an apology doesn’t cut it. Lol that’s a CRIME. Bizarre that you even need to make that comment.

That's the thing about releasing a docudrama slandering someone on MSM and not addressing the criminal allegations in a court of law! Too many will turn on Brand just for the allegations alone. Just as they did with Johnny Depp.

Absolutely! Thinking admitting to unruly behaviour has let him off the hook? What goes around comes around. It's a pleasure to wave another goodbye! 👋

Channel 4 , Dispatches

@@sharonknevett9699 I’m not familiar with that.

@@carolbrett2167 are you in the uk ?

Yeah they should have shown all the least relevant bits cos that would have made total sense

He has talked about having huge memory gaps because of drugs. He could have done something, but think he didn't, because he simply doesn't remember. He should let the women speak, because he simply can not claim that nothing happened. Because he knows there are gaps in his memory.

Agreed.

Mental

Really ?!? Ha !!!

He's just as bad now, just abuses people in a different way

​@@marktlogwhy do you think so?

@@marktloglike who. Please elaborate.

Brand was and is today one of those arrogant pricks who intimidated others via the legal system, because he has the money to hire the best. His behaviour is despicable. Two things; Witnesses and consequences. I don’t believe for a second that there are not many, many more victims and perhaps now many many of the witnesses to his behaviour will now feel empowered to speak up against evil.