There is a difference between Russian propaganda and the West propaganda. Western propaganda is more like an advertising. Just like Abrams tank is the best, or HIMARS is accurate. Russian propaganda is a mixture of silence, self depreciating, truth or consequence, and what they have already accomplished. You have to read their lips and find out if it is a threat or a promise. They are full of riddles. Just saying.

@@TimVoktwo I think that is LSD talking

@@Cecil-yc6mc Russia has trillions of Yuan to buy anything from China. China is paying Russia in Yuan for oil and gas. Not dollars. So those articles from the MSM could be considered as hyperbolic hypothesis. Whatever Russia's industrial gap is, Russia could get them from China, India, Iran, and North Korea. The West cannot sanction trades between countries sanctioned by the US, EU or UK. That is the beauty of the multipolar world represented by BRICS+.

Too superficial analysis. Russian submarines have always had nuclear-tipped torpedoes. Now they have intercontinental range torpedoes.

These new torpedoes can track US nuclear submarines for years and at the hour of "H" eliminate all of the US nuclear potential that is installed on the missiles of American submarines.

Also, it is why the US hasn't tried to bring some freedom to Russia.

@@User-jr7vf I am sure that was Navalny's role , but with his 2 % popularity it's like running against a stone wall without helmet ! And the West called him Putin's main rival ?

Lol

Settle down Pajeet.

Putler bots detected, soviet propaganda 😂

so like Kursk, K-152 etc? its russian-made which means it is most likely going to end up at the bottom of the ocean.

Yup it can also be preemptively deployed and wait sort of like a high tech anti ship mine.

@@Rapid1453 Nuclear technology is complicated and only Russians and USA can do this. Well everyone has accidents not just Russians. Kursk was blown up by faulty torpedo...

​@@Rapid1453 copium lord here. we all remember how western media told that russian hypersonic weapons is a cartoons and lies when it was announced in 2018. Those brilliant analysis aged like milk but still some copium masters working in here.

⁠France, China, North Korea, India, Pakistan - countries besides USA and Russia possessing nuclear technology .

Russia is producing 2 times more shells every year than the entire NATO. NATO can fight insurgents with sandals only.

that was the best joke of the video

NATO is a joke just like UN

Russia possesses one of the largest nuclear arsenals in the world, with a diverse array of delivery systems, including intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and strategic bombers. Russian military personnel undergo extensive training, and while incidents of misconduct may occur, it would be inaccurate to characterize the majority of soldiers as "drugged and drunk." Like any military, Russia's armed forces consist of dedicated professionals who take their duties seriously.

They were right about the soldiers tho.

The Kinzhal is just a glorified Iskander launched from the air instead of the ground. Not really a hypersonic missile as the term is understood.

@@hwuilee That may be a fair point, but i'll do my own research.

@@hwuilee Wrong. It is a true hypersonic missile, recognized as such by the whole world. Moreover, it goes at hypersonic speed most of its flight and can maneuver at hypersonic speed, which is the definition of a true hypersonic missile.

like those dud Russian missiles that misfired and ended up in the White Sea

@@Cecil-yc6mc like those american made uk ICBM that don't work, russia has most diverse range of missiles, only nation to have fielded hypersonic ones, you're just coping

@@JayPatel-lz7wz bring it on. something special is brewing for this year. if Trump wins in November then Biden will launch a first-strike before Trump is sworn in.

@@Cecil-yc6mc Like that American submarine that got stuck in the ice

​@@JayPatel-lz7wzyou mean the hypersonic missiles that dont work, cant hit there targets have been shot down numerous times, barely class as hypersonics and have not once reached there acclaimed speeds or functioned correctly one time yet? Stop huffing paint and vodka you absolute dribbler...

and shovels. lame stream media is pathetic.

💯

Russia has nobody to blame for their problems but Putin. There is no "waking". The country lacks all resources to be competitive in any industry, especially their military.

the fact is that *the West* has been awoken

@@Katchi_ Why do you think so? Could you name a source of such info?

@@Katchi_ Lol, what? Put down the pipe.

@@martinmart481 special military operation, that’s the source and the proof. drunken corrupt paper tiger all thanks to the midget tsar

in soviet union was urban legend about submarine based nuke targeted under sea shelf, After explosion it brings 10 km Tsunami destroying more than 70% of USA, Legend says When Stalin spoken to the constructors he said that it was way too much)

it would be stupid to waste an expensive torpedo loading it with conventional explosives As a reference the Beirut harbour blast has been estimated at about 1kton Look at the overall limited damages images.ctfassets.net/pjshm78m9jt4/3iTQgazKN2IDcXhtqPW4kp/67831c53823f2aed3f2ca2885dfa44b4/BeforeAfter.jpg a torpedo with a nuclear warhead can easily reach 1 Mton That is something

@@romanfedotov1152 This torpedo cant make 10 km tsunamis... it can strike ports, military naval bases and aircraft carriers.

@spicesmuggler2452 dude I'm talking about urban legend))) My grandfather told me when I was a kid)

it's 100% fictional. It's propaganda prop that doesn't have a warhead. It's a hollow tube.

It’s a shovel with a washing machine computer!

go and talk to Putin and Netanyahoo

Then tell Biden to stay out of Slavic lands.

@@Cecil-yc6mc No, the dying empire that needs to have a serious reality check with themselves is US. They are the biggest warmongers the world has ever seen.

cool just use your army to end it

@@Cecil-yc6mc He needs to contact the White House in order to end the wars.

Yield and size of the bomb is typically limited to delivery method whether on a rocket or plane. Because this essentially a miniature unmanned nuclear sub, there is no limit to yield ( because there is little to no concern for interception or collateral).

The system itself doesnt exist nor function nor has passed the thesis stage or ever been tested its a nonsense waffle weapon system and a weak attempt to scare

We've already tested the effects of underwater nukes on ships. Putin's claims of a "Radioactive tsunami" is complete BS as well, Nukes can't create Tsunamis, the energy required to create a Tsunami makes even the most powerful nukes look pathetic.

Ядерные торпеды как раз и были созданы в СССР чтобы уничтожать авианосные соединения США

Absolutely I just left the same comment

2MT off the coast is wiping out coastal cities whether you can stomach it or not. It will also, more importantly to the adversary, take out ports, economic hubs and naval facilities.

No, it is just a delusion about some imaginary superiority. Don't know in what though

@@gdiwolverinemale4th in vodka drinking

Kinzal is also propaganda?!

@@yuriyl1618 I honestly thought that RU will crumble, that their army is weak, that their economy will go to the bin... Because I was reading European media but it took me too long (about a year) to realize that all of major EU media are owned and held by no other that the king of propaganda - USA. Thus, at this point in time, if anyone is a paper tiger, it's US and NATO.

@@yuriyl1618 Actually it is the bourbon drinking that makes people feel superior

Они заложенны на местах тектонических разломов земной коры. Посейдон обамнка, я дерные заряды давно на шельфе америки.

@@yyyy12344 из генерального штаба.......

Crispy crust for free!

Not sure if you even have 🧠

There's no reason for US to have 1.3 million active duty soldiers, because let's be real, no one is able to invade US and conquer it that way. But they have it anyway. How else would they remain the uncrowned king of the world (well at least more than half of it)

There is no reason to invade other countries to steal their oil and other resources, but the US did it. Many times! Why are you surprised that people want to burn down the USA?

@@vanjamenadzer They need it to maintain their military presence and geopolitical influence.

​@@achyuthansanal well, we have seen that presence in many places: Grenada, Cuba, Iraq, Lybia, Afghanistan, Syria, Haiti, Ukraine... neverending 'presence'.

True. They announced poseidon because of nuclear deterrance. It's just there to prevent USA from jumping over the wall.

not only for weeks but also for years,,,because it is nuclear powered,,,

Russian firepower 😂 Stop you’re hilarious

@@daibhi8030 *Russian nuclear power.

@@daibhi8030 Stop underestimating Russia. They have the fastest missile system(s) in the world.

@@ChiSa123 yet 1980s tech regularly intercept them

@@ChiSa123 empty threats from a position of weakness.

😂😂Everthing destructive that was made in history was used..Same will be to WMD,don't be naive

You can if let's say you want to take out a strike force

Keep telling yourself that. Politicians are getting dumber by the day, not smarter.

Every weapon built by man has brought us stronger weapons, those who didn't evolve stronger weapons were either wiped out or subjugated by those who did. It's in our evolutionary drive to invent more and more powerful weapons.

I wouldn't be so categorical. We live in completely unpredictable times

A nuclear torpedo don’t have to 70 ft long and 7 ft in diameter to take out a carrier group.

@@mehnameehjeff6325 it is nuclear powered ....so reactor is inside

@adrianzlatanovic1026 It does, but still wouldn’t have to be that big, just for 2mt. Which don’t get me wrong is a lot but is nothing compared to the Tsar bomb which was half the size of the torpedo, and developed over half a century ago.

@@mehnameehjeff6325 Bigger the warhead the further from the strike groups defenses it can detonate.

The message is: sleep well and have a good night.

Только красный октябрь было кино

What makes you think so? Typically, in a nuclear war you want to throw everything you have at once if your enemy also has nuclear weapons

@@itssardine5351 It will explode off shore. Giving time for retaliation. They would use their Supersonics 1st.

@@itssardine5351 Russians don't need to treat anybody, so they don't need to use it first, the only case Rusia will use nukes is an existencial risk to the state and country, even after the state disappear they will strike back for guaranteed punishment. The Russian treat is a western media tale to justify military complex spending. Except western countries, the rest of the world only wants to trade, prosperity and live in pace,no matter what your media tells you every day.

It could be used as a warning shot so scared American politicians would blame tsunami for damage

@@Rich-yj4ub yeah you’re right, I thought you meant they would save it for later 😂

that you're not from the USA sonny boy

Orcs watch too many Marvel movies.

The size of waves depends on the depth of the explosion. For test purposes, they do not need to go big with waves to calculate the potential capacity of this weapon

@@JZsBFF And westerners watch too much of LotR.

@andreycham4797 Not just depth but yield, water is heavier median to transfer energy (which if blowing out window 300 miles from ground zero like Tsar bomb did isn’t enough.)

Join NASA and Go to Space.

They flew around jumping out of planes trying to help and feed people

yeah what if we used our resources to colonized mars and go to nearest star system..but before we even dreamed of becoming a type 2 civilization we will eventually killing ourselves

bc essentially its global clan warfare with established regional clans and their allies against other clans ... just primate behavior ...and sadly you have to protect yourself against primate behavior of your neighbour anyways. ....

Right…

Yea Sub Brief reported on it

I heard it was 100-200 megaton 5-6 years ago now the media says 2 megaton. I think the media is ignorant (or covering it in a way that doesn’t project hysteria) and Russia is being humble about have this super weapon.

Poseidon is big enough to carry 3 or 4 Tsar Bomba though this would be a bizarre waste of bombs in one place.

Use google translate buddy.

@@countmorbid3187 His English is perfectly fine.

The scariest part of that is that even their own politicians believe their own propaganda. WW4 won't be fought with sticks and stones because humanity has destroyed it's productive capabilities. It will be fought that way because all the survivors of the third world war were brain-dead politicians.

The Brits have "The Funniest Joke In the World". There's probably no more terrible weapon.

what is WJ and are you saying the weapon is old?

@@letsplaywar Wallstreet Journal. Military Intelligence came to be aware of the Poseidon program back in 2015. But Poseidon program also has predecessors going as far back as 1970’s where remote submarine-like nuclear devices could have (and likely were) deployed to the West coasts. There is a weapon that actually stays dormant on the seabed until it receives a signal.

@@cranberryeater7459 i'm going to do a lot of research on what you said, but if you don't mind i am very curious about the There is a weapon that actually stays dormant on the seabed until it receives a signal and i'm guessing Russia is doing that i wonder if america can do the same thing as what you mentioned. and i'm going to look into Poseidon program also has predecessors going as far back as 1970’s Wallstreet Journal. Military Intelligence came to be aware of the Poseidon program back in 2015 .well i knew this came out in 2015 the weapon but i didn't know Military Intelligence knew about this in 2015 but i'm happy a video came out about this weapon and people are taking it seriously.

Under the Red Square 😂

Молись чтобы не показали у вас на побережье. Зная менталитет русских-они если сказали, значит уже есть или сделают. У них есть выражение"за свои слова отвечаю"

It will be a paper mache model because the actual thing doesnt exist

​@@Superius_Intelligentiait wouldnt get anywhere near our coast not ever have the russians been able to evade detection by our navy well in advanced in the last 30 years... to add we would glass them in an instance and as proven there s400 system cant shoot down f all, its a loose loose for the russian dribblers either way

Why? What would you even use a nuclear torpedo for?? Torpedos only real targets are subs/ships, and ya dont need a nuke to destroy that lol...

@@Scorch428 I think the logic is it would detonate under water causing a tsunami thus destroying the targeted city....I guess it doesn't matter how people are killed ...by nuclear explosion or by drowning

@@Scorch428 did you not watch the video?.....try to imagine the amount of water a underwater nuke at a couple of megatons would displace, it would make Fukashima tsunami disaster look like childs play, never mind if they target a nearby fault line with it

but nuking islands could lead to tsunamis by land mass sliding into the ocean or by creating seismic activity like an off shore earth quake.

Remember the Abrams almighty tank?... That's now scrap metal in ukraine.

Name me one foreign tank that was handed over to ukraine and still hasn't been hit? Abrams was hidden for a long time but when it was released.... three or four were hit and now it's a pile of scrap metal.

Russia can actually claim they have an operational new generation tank that’s in service. One that won’t be used in a high intensity war like the war in Ukraine that requires vast quantities. Not to mention that they’re literally presented with the opportunity to further enhance and optimize that tank with all the lessons they’ve learned fighting a modern war in the age of FPV drones. The west doesn’t have an operational new generation tank. That’s just a fact.

Russian Technology - mostly lies and fakes. But gullible people swallow the propaganda.

@@echetamadavidson9454 Indeed I remember. 4 Abrams. It is always big news. It just shows that everybody matters in the west. Nobody carers about Russian tanks or their crews. Not even Russia-fans and the paid bots. That's the reason why we watch this american video and not some from a Russian channel. Nobody cares about them.

No, it is neither. It isn't the video, and it isn't 'war in general'. It is your fixation, the phallus. Like extreme feminists, you will see it everywhere you look.

Parts would need lubrication, so no it can’t travel that far in any case 3 oil drums welded together and a bit of orange paint slapped on it means nothing.😂😂😂😂

To the moon! Woosh. I have to buy Russian stonks - smartest 5D chess play game leader Putin.

@@delhog6161 parts don't need lubrication if they're not making contact with one another when moving around.

'never really been tected'... 'just a concept' ... Don't make it up. You know nothing about it. Think first, the 'know it all'.

@@olegkhokhlov-ct3ey I don't speak flowerfood, sorry red.

@@olegkhokhlov-ct3ey ты будешь растительной пищей, маленький мальчик

Perhaps it was not tested because u know, we made a deal to end nuclear testings. But they can always leave the deal, and pretty sure they already know how nukes work.....

@@Warrior-lt1kc yep. the Russians stole the nuclear fire from the West.

so unbelievably stupid comment mercator maps are used bc of special mathematical properties and not bc of ideology.

Could not have said it better.

So long as we cannot be 100% certain, we have to plan as best we can for the possibility.

​@@zuperdeewho is "we" ?

@@wheressteve I’m referring primarily to the United States here.

Good. Let’s put it to a test, shall we? I mean, what could possibly go wrong? 🤡

It’s all they have.

​@@Kodakcompactdisc and flying shovels and washing machines. 😂

​@@iam_joshua_bcxviiWhich are stolen.

Don’t be so glib! These are the facts: Russia is one of only 9 countries in the world that currently possess nuclear weapons. Of these, only FOUR possess a full nuclear triad, Russia being one of them. Russia also still has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world, although it has been aging. There are only 4 countries in the world that have voluntarily given up their nuclear weapons: South Africa, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine. The latter three did so reluctantly, under pressure from the Western powers, who were concerned about the possibility of their nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands. The issue is NOT the sanity of the their use, but the sanity of the people who ultimately decide about these things in Russia. It’s always possible for a leader to make an irrational decision.

@@zuperdee Not only is the Russian nuclear arsenal is aging, so does the United States whom even still uses the big floppy disk drives from the 60s or 70s in its silos. It was already documented in 60 minutes i think a decade ago.

yeah, i dont know what you would even target with a nuclear torpedo that a regular torpedo couldnt destroy lol. Its like making a nuclear flyswatter. No need!

@@Scorch428A city, or an entire coastline. Do you have any idea what 200 million tonnes of TNT exploding at once looks like??

​@@user-pg2kj7ps7o as has been proven by other underwater massive explosion tests it would do sweet f all, it would also be pointless to use because as soon as its launched we would know and before it even reaches us we would have already glassed russia with our actual working arsenal unlike russias make believe theory weapons that never have been tested nor exist

​@@user-pg2kj7ps7oNot enough to create a 100m tsunami, or whatever laughable bs that Russia has claimed. At best, it would cause damage to a city. Zero real point though, considering you could strap a smaller warhead to a regular ballistic missile and do the same or better damage.

​@@Scorch428Ports, to cripple the enemies offensive capability.

Says the typical overconfident American

NATO is so Corrupt it cannot even produce a Hypersonic Cruise missile. Over 10.7 Trillion dollars missing from the Pentagon since 1996. The most corrupt Institution in human history.

The fact is russia won ww2 captured berlin and no us uk capture enemies capital

If you ever see tsar bomba explosion 50 megatonne russia posibblity make 100 megatonne you have to trust it before you too late

still waiting for those T-14s. Russia is famous for saying they are about to come up with some fantastic weapons and nothing happens.

Fvcking crazy my guy

The waves of that size is in domain of imagination. Regardless, even if 10m waves would wash through, let's say half of NY, the city would remain inhospitable for life for many, many years.

There's more facts in this one clip than has come out of Russia in the last decade.

@@nick4819 So you think Russia isn't Factional?

@@letsplaywar 😂

@@nick4819 k

they obviously get paid and dont care about the authenticity

I don’t believe humans can destroy ALL life on earth, unless it was literally the goal. So many extinction events in the past, life carries on.

😂😂😂😂😂 Russian can continuously attack west but west can't 😂

You are wrong. Russia has over 5,000 nuclear weapons that can be delivered by air, land, and see. Stop misinforming.

how west cant ? 2 submarines have enough to strike in every russian base in russian territory@@informativefacts7356

@@DavidGitongawriter Nyet

​@@DavidGitongawriterнадо им наглядно продемонстрировать это и мир заживёт спокойно против гегемона.

😆😆😆😆😆

@@AJ-qi4fp 🤣🤣🤣 Well put. They have ran out of weapons before they've even began. Ha ha.

Nato is good on paper and destroying poor smal countrys. Not saying its usless but i higly doubt they could fight a big scale war for years.

Nato has never fought conventionally against russia yet, nato isnt currently fighting russia and russia wouldnt dare fight with nato because they would be wiped out before they could finish saying blyat...

@@bio7377 which is why first it was russia will loose and now th west says russia must not be allowed to win and russia is a threat to nato .atleast when you lie make sure its acc. to facts not just something said off hand

It's there lurking already.

What if it's powered by water.

It's nuclear powered.

Nowbody is as strong as Russias big best friend North Korea. Soon Russia and the collective West will be North Korea.

You're right. Russia got into the situation in which it is currently mired in Ukraine because it underestimated the Ukrainians. Of course, because of that, we learned an important lesson: that we had been overestimating Putin for the past decade. Copentent generals throughout the ages - going at least as far back and probably much further than Sun Tzu - knew that you don't want to underestimate *or* overestimate your opponents. Over a century and a half ago, McClellan failed largely because he overestimated his adversary. It's important to weigh all the evidence and be mindful of the fog of war. As was said, maybe 100 years ago seems to still be true today: "Russia is never as strong or as weak as it appears."

@@jeffbenton6183could any country bar the us and China sustain this war like Russia has ? Ukraine has received over 210 BILLION in military aid ALONE that’s almost triple the entire Russian budget … countries like Germany France uk etc would have been annihilated long ago … Russia is fighting valiantly and slowly taking more and more land .. you westerners hide behind the American military and the American military hides behind its 37 trillion dollar debt ..

We all know that without the support of all the west and US Ukraine wouldn’t be where it is today, let us put hate aside and stick to reality, I know that most people from the west won’t agree that Ukraine is still where they are today because the west have been supporting them. 1. Ukraine have received different kinds of weapons from the west which Russia have never face in wars before and that’s very challenging. 2. Ukraine have access to the world market where they can buy all the components that they need to build new weapons as they learn lessons from battlefield to counter Russia. 3. The west is helping Ukraine with intelligence with their advanced satellites and spy networks. 4. The west is helping Ukraine to build new weapons to counter Russia. Let’s assume that Russia have access to the world market what do you think would happen to Ukraine by now? Ukraine can get most advanced chips to build anything they want but Russia can’t because of sanctions. In reality, Russia is fighting not just Ukraine but all The west and USA.

Your knowledge of maths is a bit below par, if the torpedo were to turn through 360 degrees it would carry on in the previous direction, which would presumably be the US.

​@@GreenIsland38🤣🤣🤣🤣

if you know then I guess everyone knows

Bahahaha maybe in the land of make believe 🤣😂 in the real world we track all of russias naval assets without issue unlike them who havent ever been able to keep tabs on our sub fleets, stop dribbling on your keyboard and typing nonsense 👍

@@bio7377 According to a 1969 trial, a Soviet submarine was able to detect a U.S. nuclear submarine departing Guam, and then track it based on its wake until it surfaced close to that base. However, theoretical tracking can face challenges, such as distinguishing between the signal from gradient markers and the noise of currents and eddies. In calm conditions, a passive Russian sonar system might detect an American submarine within 1-5 kilometers. The US Navy has made its submarines more visible in recent years, including visits to North Atlantic ports. The UK's Royal Navy has also tracked the movements of Russian submarines into the North Sea. and Why do you have to insult them in their comments?

​@@bio7377Americans can not track their land borders, I do need to continue

Without "support" of the west Ukraine would be neutral federation including all of the south east parts except for Crimea. And with 20 mil people more living there.