we will always be the US little poodle.. and im sorry we dont have a nordsteam pipeline you can bomb..just to prove how much of a friend you are

@@briancarno8837 We? Who's we? Clearly your a confused Russian sympathiser. Let me guess. You live elsewhere, probably EU or UK where you are safe and free to go about your daily business. And won't be called up to fight this idiotic and entirely of Russia's own making war? How close am I?

@@TheBarnestah well its a UK newspaper so yes I am in UK.. the US has flooded Ukraine with weapons..built bio labs on the Russian border and overthrew a democcratic government in Ukraine so no I wouldnt say Russia started it.its hardly the first time the US has done this.

@@briancarno8837 ha ha ha right on spot.......

@@briancarno8837 you have a quee... oops had one we could have

It is the sun

The Sun channel is notorious for click bait.

This is 2 years old

@@Big-Government-Is-The-Problem Uhm no lol. That instance you refer to the US intentionally disabled their equipment

And I'd say navies nowadays probably have anti air defense systems on the ship lol so basically if it flies it dies no matter how close u are the russian pilot wouldn't be coming back just saying most modernized navies are uh like floating giant airforce killers lol along with other things

@@Big-Government-Is-The-Problem A drone swarm would be detected very far away for one. Hypersonic missiles are yet to be proven. How can you accurately hit a moving target when you have a ball of plasma in front of the missile that blocks all incoming and outgoing radiation for targeting? The US had hypersonics in the 60s and obviously saw no practical use. CWIS is the last line of defense. There is a layered system from the aircraft CAP, Long range missiles, short range missiles, then CWIS, then Chaff and other countermeasures.

@@Big-Government-Is-The-ProblemBahahaha......I'm sure the world is trembling at the superior Russian naval forces. Bahahahaha.......

@@Big-Government-Is-The-Problem lol no. A supercarrier has never been sunk in a realistic combat scenario, partly because NATO does not engage in useless combat practice where the overpowered blue team wins easily. The carriers have only been sunk when enormous restrictions were placed on them, (loss of active radar, tight movement corridor, close to shore, no search aircraft, etc.) The defenses for a carrier consist of: Aircraft to do the initial intercept, long range AA missiles like SM-2 and SM-6, then medium range like the Sea sparrow and RIM-116's, then phalanx. And you'd need several hits from 500+ lb. munitions to actually sink it.

Either that or the radar is a shambles. I smell clickbait drama.

Pretty sure the toleranse levels are a bit higher during peacetime,if this had happened after Russias invasion of Ukraine i bet those fighters would have been scrambled alot faster or allready been in the air

prepared for battle ahahaha, these morons dont know what theya re dealing with

Last time I look, E-2 Hawkeye or whatever British use as AEW aircraft around carrier group have over 550km ranges at targets detection capability.

Yeah dude, they got putin's brainwaves from his bunker 10 miles underground the very second he ordered it, or whatever way this works in you brain

acting as a deterrent to Russian aggression

Hehehehe

British in ww2.we will fight till the last french soldiers British 2023. We will fight till the last Ukrainian 🤣

Hello from Slovakia 🇸🇰♥️🇬🇧

@@fabianpillay860 You compare WW2 to Ukraine?

Because that's not live. That's a retake in the studio.

@@MetaView7 WOOOOOOOWWWW I have never heard something THIS DOWN BAD in my entire existence in this floating rock. You saying this is way worse than people thinking the Moon landings happened in a studio. The whole video footage was taken IN THE ACTUAL HMS QUEEN ELIZABETH AIRCRAFT CARRIER

One last sip of the earl grey and a slight 'tink' of the cup meeting the saucer and "Tally ho ol chap...for King and Country" lets show them what for.

Well I imagine everyone running around screaming “OMG OMG OMG WE NEED TO GET THE JETS UP! AHHH” Wouldn’t be the best way to go about it 😂

Britons actually are a mix between viking masters and breton slaves hahahah well at that time they call it genetic enhancement

@Carnaby Technically, William the Conqueror was a descendant of Vikings. Norman - Norsemen.....and the Britons were mainly in Wales and Cornwall as the Anglo-Saxons had flooded the eastern part of the island a few hundred years earlier.

Psychological peace won’t expose the truth

Shame they weren't able to do so :(

@@xellis8434 the Russians won't ever see a functioning air craft carrier looks like. Nothing in their arsenal is functional. It all ends up being burnt down by a cigarette.

@@CaptainSkyMT burned down, definitely unlike USS Bonhomme Richard, right? By the way, how's HMS Prince of Wales doing? It's a much newer vessel, you know.

😂😂👏

Nah they wanted to test their new kinzal missile on this piece of crap.

Peace I don’t see that happening anytime soon

Being content with what you have has never existed for the human species!!!! Some might be content but there will always be someone or some group who wants more, has jealousy, is envious, is dissatisfied and/or corrupt!!!! This is reality. This is human nature!! Thinking any other way is living in a dream world!!!!!! The best way for peace is to carry a "big stick"

@@stevem2601 Funnily enough the only way to really achieve peace is having alliances like NATO that actually function. CSTO ain't too functional but poses enough of a threat for most people to not even bother. Alliances are the best defence and nukes compliment it perfectly. The scary part is what will be strong enough to replace that combination?

Your statement is utterly meaningless. Putin will only be content when he has most of Europe under his control.

@@xzlemin9569 I imagine the Family Guy skit where EVERYONE has a gun. So no one dies. I don't think that would work with say, nukes [I'm sure they would be used if some had them regardless], but I do think on a smaller scale it does work.

Im sure you dont realize but the new B-2 nuclear bomber is a joint program with russia thus giving russia full access of the stealth bomber since they supply tech and fuel for the b-2 nuclear bomber…. Russia has full access to our nuclear bomber.

@@rememberberries4277😂😂😂

@RememberBerries Doesn't matter what they have access to since Russia is to poor to develop och even built advanced fighter jets. They have the same problem as soviet, full of smart people but lacks the resources and industrial power to actually make use of their world class engineers.

@@rememberberries4277 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🤡🇷🇺🤡🇷🇺

@@devrerffs ……and ruSSia’s government and military hierarchy are extremely corrupt.

actually F35s are not that great for dogfighting

F 35 is worse in dogfights than russian jets

Is that what you just came up with? The Russians fly in their own airspace, and the British carrier group will not enter the territorial waters of the Russian Federation, this is a huge risk for such a large group to enter the waters of the Russian Federation, this is a serious act of aggression (there is a high risk of starting a war). The British are not that stupid!

@@sgru9558 it's not meant to dogfight, but it could probably hold its own. From what I remember it's maneuverability was close to an f16. Either way, missiles are what does the job.

@@vii7031 these Russian jets were SU-24's, the F-35s would easily win in a dogfight.

@@arunsathyaseelan433 you joined 3 weeks ago and spam misinformation🤡

As a retired American F-15 pilot, I was proud to serve alongside my British counterparts in the RAF!! 🇺🇸🇬🇧

British 😈

1💪🐻Vs 52 countries 🐑🤡🤡😈😈💩😈🤡😈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈

@@fabianpillay860 yes British and proud

5th generation fighters means you rule the waves

@@Anakin_Sandy_High_Ground just cos u have 5th gen fighters don't mean u rule the seas, u go into enemy territory and they can easily outnumber you, This carrier has about 36 5th gen fighters out of the 72 total, not enough to secure victory. moreover nowdays the radars and anti air can detect 5th gen as it advances.

@@sacchitkallaraviju1882 1 F35 fighter > 50 4th geen fighters

It’s an old song, back when we really did rule the waves. England has the 2nd best navy, first being the US.

Yes when USA & UK are around

@@philthompson8574 My thought exactly, I was gonna write it.

@@philthompson8574 all of NATO need to fall...

@@philthompson8574 Or that Wanna-Be Soviet Union China...

What bad guys, this event happened two years ago, and it's wasn't buzzed, apparently it was some sort of tech that killed all the electronics

Mate Russia is defending it's self from brits invaders! Didn't let them to do anything they want, maybe Russia should send it's nuclear submarine to scotland or Ireland? How would britian react? Or kick invaders ass like in ww2 or napoleon? Good job Russia no one called you for help britian.

Rule Britannia 🇬🇧💪

Ooh well we'd better back down to china then right.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 stupidest quote of the year , so far

Theyve been there in international waters. China didnt do anything

Go back two your room

@@blademanx Setting up man made bases in international waters? Yeah, sure they clearly didn't do anything.

If you can't take Ukraine, I wouldn't be picking fights😏

Getting ready to be sunk letting the stinking Russians that close to the ship without interception.

@@justmenotyou3151 why are they stinking my mother is english my father is russian why are you using inflammatory words lime that ?what is your problem mate ?

@@justmenotyou3151 hey mate the British navy is more ready from any threat on their ship than their drunk Russian counterpart

@@justmenotyou3151 You can thinks that again. That's warships been all over the world and detected everything in decades on theirs systems. All data been collected my friends! 🤷‍♂😂

Don't kid yourself. In the modern 21st century, a huge aircraft carrier like the British one shown in this video, is nothing but a big sitting duck on the water. All it takes is an intelligent and maneuverable hypersonic missile fired from several hundreds of kilometers away and travelling at more than 5 times the speed of sound to sink this huge chunk of iron into the depths of the sea. And Russia and China have these missiles.

We don’t have the aircraft to put on it or the sailors to crew another one, let alone two more 😂.

Old news. Any other top tips like not eating yellow snow?

That's the norm around these parts lol

Good one Tan, I can see by your other comments you are anti Nato. Strongest combined army in the world 👍

@@bid84 the F35 is flying behind it with missiles locked on !

soon zelinky will beg for more BILLIOns to usa and europe , like a romanina beggar, he loose all wepons, russinas destroy everything.And he will not pay it back

It’s not supposed to be a threat. It’s simply conveying information in a calm and precise manner, just as he is trained to do.

весь гей экипаж вашего корыта нассал в памперсы и уволился в первом порту

@@einzelganger2939 I never said it was a "threat", that's your words. My point is that it was a very British response to an air threat that was six miles from the battle group.

@@Frame-313 zzzzzzzzzzz... Original....Just because Chinese shout down the radio or USA make noise doesnt stop Iranians buzzing their ships with gun boats

it will if the Russians want it to

Does it really matter when all it takes a few hypersonic missiles to send her down to the ship graveyard?

Not to mention it's actually on fire at its mooring lol.

Dreaming again.. wake up!

@ramblingrob4693 Have you read any History Books?? I think you'll find it's you who needs to wake up

They are our ally, So yeah they can.

Just a little bit off with those numbers, she's a bit lighter, but overall her deck area is about 90% of the size of USS Ford.

Carriers are obsolete. Trade deals are crap by making a country reliant on others could become your Adversaries. Cases in point; Russia and China.

cool story bro. More total rubbish

@@Magezzz He doesn't realise that even hypersonic missiles will show a massive heat signature, and slow down to normal missile speeds as they descend through denser air below 10'000 feet..... both US and Royal Navy ships are armed with the means to deal with such threats.

There's no hypersonic under 10,000 feet , work it out ,its not rocket science

@@Magezzz you probably never heard of the French Exocet missiles, much older technology that wreaked havoc on the British ships during the Falklands war , one missile took out modern battle ships.

The guy and girl they show in the water. Yep..

No it was just posturing. Militaries do it all the time.

​@PIGMEN UKRAINE Makes absolutely zero sense in any way. Get a life.

Quality tho ?

@PIGMEN UKRAINE Uk never made slaves - read up- on your history - in fact uk wanted to abolish slavery so get your facts straight sir

@PIGMEN UKRAINE Russia and India have the most amount of modern day slaves out of any country in the world .

@PIGMEN UKRAINE lol yeah ours have iPhones and wear Gucci

That is funny

It’s a traditional British navy song …. Should all military forces abandon the traditions they are proud of?

You think those Russian toy planes could stop an f35? And it only takes a small Ukrainian missile to sink Russias flag ships 😄

Well I know one thing, russia can't even rule a port, let alone the entire sea. FYI, russia is the only army to loose naval ships to a country with no navy, that says it all 🤣. Edit, I have so many things to add... Lol the russian flag ship has been stuck in port for YEARS and keeps catching fire, and it's VERY common for tugs to accompany their ships as they are so unreliable, probably something to do with russia still unable to make bearings and such, what a super power lol, they truly are a joke on ALL fronts, really we all just laugh at you lot these days, russia thinks it is mighty as much as pootin think he's a tall person 😂

Or better still, the Budgie album ... Britannia waives the rules

Its on fire again

It's not. It's in a dry dock and there have been 2 fires on board it.

@@SIBUK Its a POS lets just leave it there.

It travels with tug boats to tow it back to port when it breaks down ...

Both are nuclear powers, Russia is unlikely to attempt anything against the UK because of that. Even if Russia hit first and completely destroyed the UK, there's always a nuclear armed submarine waiting to retaliate.

there are more british navy at the bottom of the sea than all the other navies combined

@@MetaView7 source: I made it the f**k up May I remind you that the Royal Navy was the largest and most powerful navy in the world from the mid 1700s to 1944 and is still in the top 4 most powerful navies.

@@Anakin_Sandy_High_Ground 《《《May I remind you that the Royal Navy was the largest and most powerful navy in the world from the mid 1700s to 1944 and is still in the top 4 most powerful navies.》》》 I know, I have been to the British Museum. I have seen the shameless loot.

@@MetaView7 🇬🇧💪 Not looted, finessed

educate yourself.

Dont be bitter you didn’t go far in life mate

@Conky2000 but he's right though

Russian* 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪

@@freedomwhenneeded Ruzzin military is not strong they are second best army in Ukraine...

@@Albert-Mag... third actually, right after DPR and LPR militias. Number five is Poland, by the way.

It is our way to provide weapons, training and intelligence to ukraine to wipe the floor with bad 3rd world russia. Which is exactly what they're doing

Good luck stopping a machine gun with an iron sight ,cool story though

scrapping NATO would bring peace to the world

@@briancarno8837 or scrapping communists totalitarian nations would definitely bring peace to the world notice how like 99% of the time the ones always threatening and launching off missles claiming the next one is hitting so and so are typically the totalitarian rulers putin Xi Kim..nato don't walk around on the workd stage threatening everyone lol not once heard or seen it

@@briancarno8837 Yeah what wars has NATO started?

@@TankZappa It depends if you consider NATO and tyhe US as seperate entities the US has started plenty

Nope

zzzzzz

Lisps can be cured.

He that insisteth on pushing his religion on people who hath not bade for it, findeth scorn and sometimes a splith lithp.

Who say's so?

@@spacelemur7955 Great!

Ah is that from Pulp Fiction?

Yes let the Russian youtubers/military believe this

CIWS cannons go brrrrrrrt

bro really thinks they didn't know the Russian jets were there 100s of miles before they scrambled jets

You think they were surprised by the jets? How naïve.

It was in a strike group. A type 45 would of had them all locked on and ready to go.

@@ryand900 Yep, a type 45 can prioritise and deal with around 30 aerial threats simultaneously......and can if necessary, track objects in inner space....such as ballistic missiles. The carrier would have seen the jets approaching from 150+ miles away on radar.... if a lock-on from the jets had been detected, it would have triggered a reaction.

@snowball6175 • You mean to handover horrible commedian Zalensky

@@lagosian123 🤣🤣🤣

most of the slaves were sold by their own people do some research and you will find out it was britain that ended slavery.

Still considered the premier of world navies, hence why it is referred to as just ‘Royal Navy’, without qualification. It’s also one of only three blue water navies (the others being the US and France). It may not be the largest by number anymore, but it is still considered the most experienced, the most revered and the most famous. You can be sure that a Royal Navy warship would be far more competent in combat than any other. It is the godfather of all navies. The only navy that does not include it’s nation when addressed internationally. Royal Navy, nothing more, nothing less.

@@dWFnZWVr that's just the convention from the past, in WW1 the French navy was called 'La Royale'. The German navy at the same time was called 'Kaiserliche Marine', many other navies have not included the name of the country in the official title. Even today the Chinese navy is called the 'People's Liberation Army - Navy', with no reference to the name of the country that it serves. And the Chinese PLA Navy is now the second strongest and second largest navy in the world. Far bigger than any European navy and equipped with very advanced and capable vessels.

@@simonyip5978 My point is that the Royal Navy is still internationally referred to as ‘Royal Navy’; it does not have qualification by nation unlike the others you mention in your comment. It’s naive to judge the strength of a navy by its size, you could have 300 paddle boats against 2 state of the art warships. Technologically, the Royal Navy are at the forefront of world navies. The PLA Navy vessels are not battle proven, nor does the nation have the same level of experience in maritime warfare. Frankly, an island seafaring nation, such as the UK, will always harness a more potent maritime force than a non-island nation. The UK’s primary strength is its naval capabilities. Let’s not forget during the carrier strike group the Royal Navy sniffed out Chinese submarines 2 weeks before they were due to cross paths. Likewise, China nor Russia, nor India can sail far beyond their coastal waters. They do not have the capacity to undertake blue water operations. Only Britain, France and the US possess navies of such ability. The UK can send a strike group to China’s back door, whereas they cannot do the same to the UK.

@@simonyip5978 except chinas navy isn't a blue water navy and the royal navy is. China also doesn't have very advanced vessels at all good lie.

@@dWFnZWVr a quick look at the type of vessels operated by the PLA Navy will show how well designed and well built their navy actually is. The latest Type 055 and 052C/D/DL DDG and the Type 054A/B FFG frigates each cost around $800 million per destroyer and $400+ million per frigate. The submarines, aircraft carriers, amphibious vessels and support ships are of a similar standard, it is a fallacy that Chinese weapon systems and hardware is cheap and shoddy. They have the technology, the industrial capabilities and the money to design, develop and build very capable equipment in very large numbers. This is not my opinion, it's the opinion of the US naval intelligence, the Pentagon and those organisations and agencies that have access to information that we don't. When you say that the Royal Navy could send a task force to the South China Sea, it might be logistically possible, if the whole of the 2 carriers, 6 destroyers and 12 frigates and all of the support ships were available, but only in peacetime. The chances of any foreign naval task force being able to survive within 500 miles of the coast of China is increasing unlikely. The whole Chinese naval strategy is based on preventing the prevent US carrier groups getting within 1000km of China. The thousands of air launched/ship and submarine launched/land launched cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, plus the 70+ submarines/150 DDG, FFG and FSG surface vessels/etc are specifically tasked with defending the seaward approaches to China. So yes even though the Royal Navy might be able to reach the South China Sea, its doubtful how much of the fleet would ever get back home. I'm not sure if you are aware of how much China has advanced and how much they have devoted in the last few decades, but you might have been correct 20+ years ago, but I doubt that you are correct now.

Dam, someone doesnt understand how modern ships operate

Does your u-boat moskva shoot them? 🙂

Or a few homing torpedoes.

Almost as easy as taking out 600+ poorly equipped and trained troops with a HIMARS.....🍿

Dont forget the powerful anti surface cigarette missile that sunk the moskva

Not every country has a financial system built on laundering billions and trillions of dollars into their war machines. I'm not even saying they're wrong to do so.

They don't, you can see footage of this carrier moving with other ships too

@@gammafox5431 sorry, my bad... what I mean is sometimes they are traveling alone without an escort....

@Jhojo Casiple in Port or close to base. Escorts are never far away.

the USA still remembers Pearle Harbour the UK cant remember a bloody thing.

Maciej you can start out and empty your bank account. You can just wire it straight over to Zelenskis off-shore accounts in Panama.

You got it we ain’t no slave

right , like they have to pay a tax to watch tv.

@@BROCKUPPERCUT lol is a choice too pay for tv if you smart enough you never have too pay for it

@@Nick186 Not slave, but puppets , western one

@@BROCKUPPERCUT From which vanquished nation do you hail?