do warzone

​@@matthewcruz1443 will do!

@@lebking95 I'll wait!

@@matthewcruz1443 posted!

why the thumbnail is in 144p and the video is Full HD?

Durirou it’s the ressource pack lol! My fav

Hell!

@@gauravsussy4853 😨😨😨

thank you!

Genan Omer a lot more , expect like 300-400+ FPS, maybe even close to a thousand if you set everything to the lowest setting

definitely, in my opinion at least, which is where you should start, ask yourself if its worth it for you. if you have a strict budget (limited, not necessarily low) this is one of the best rig you can get. it runs everything. as for big heavy tittles, to reach that 144fps you just tweak some settings, and you should be golden. if you have more money to spare, go for a stronger gpu than the 1660 super, otherwise, very solid gpu. best bang for buck. the ryzen 5 3600, needless to say is a powerhouse. my favourite part of my build!

@@lebking95 if like you said had money to spare which gpu should i buy

shame around 60 on like medium ish I could go a bit higher the lower the settings but it’s good to stay at a medium if you’re gonna hit 60 FPS, still remaining pleasing to look at!

(in the description) Full PC Specs: Ryzen 5 3600 Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO 16GB (2x8GB) G.skill 3200Mhz 16CL 500GB Crucial ssd EVGA GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB SC ULTRA GAMING EVGA 550w 80+ Gold Case is a phanteks p300a mesh

FoxyEddy no you will need an RTX card to run the new minecraft raytracing feature! Or any other games raytracing feature for that matter. So any RTX 20 series card like the 2060/2070/2080 should do the trick. I’m using a custom shader pack in this video!

@@lebking95 Ouh! Btw, thank you for that information!

@@lebking95 certain gtx cards do support ray tracing. I believe the 1060 and up. I can verify a 1070 and 1080 will.

@@davidfranklinv2860 oh wow i actually didn't know that. good to know

JBuLLen yeah I will!

maybe purely for gaming, (single core tasks) so it depends what you do with it. but overall the 3600 is better. but I dont have the 3300x so i couldnt tell you for sure! sorry

Biagio Sarracino I didn’t overclock anything!

Penguiz the shaders make it super hard to run, it takes a lot of power, so the FPS will naturally be lower. You can get 60fps with the shaders which is nice! Just put the shaders settings on medium ish look in the video and pay attention to when the shaders are on medium you’ll see a bit over 60 FPS

@@lebking95 ok thank you for the help its just that i wanted to get a pc with these cpecs (Ryzen 3600 - gtx 1660 super 6G - 16Go ram - ssd 120Go - HDD 1 to) and i wanted to know how much fps i could get on it

road burn Seus shader pack!

road burn oh also I have ovos rustic craft resource pack! It’s my favourite one, you can have shaders and have a resource pack both at once. They both do different things. One adds the shadows and lights etc and the other adds the textures.

And no, I do not have ANY mods installed, nothing added to the game. Just built it yesterday, downloaded NVIDIA drivers are up date. So idk why and it’s stressing me out, I can’t return my GPU because it’s too late.

The build I have is very good in specs so for it to underperform has something seriously wrong with it. I think it’s the GPU only but maybe someone can assist me on this issue.

@@micspamgod2324 hey man, don't stress. something is clearly wrong with your PC. the specs you have are good and it's under performing because something is either not set up right, or something is faulty, or you dont have the right drivers somewhere. did you set up XMP on your ram? did you install the correct GPU drivers from the nvidia website? check your temperatures, make sure your not throttling. make sure you also have your motherboard updated to the latest drivers as well. go on its manufacturers website and you should typically find them there. make sure you have the latest version of windows installed and then check your system for updates, go into the start menu and type in "check for updates" and just click on that and then press check for updates. let that run, and restart. try all that and lmk what happens.

Youssef Abbas Yes, I have done everything accordingly. Newest and correct NVIDIA drivers, all windows updates, A-XMP Profile for my RAM(3600Mhz running) my temperatures are fine, I’ve used MSI Afterburner to check GPU temps, I’ve used Speccy, I have use AMD Ryzen Master to check CPU temps. I have done a benchmark using Userbenchmark and the results were my GPU is below average. This happened when I put my GPU in my old system that could definitely run the GPU as well, it done the same thing. One thing also with the GPU is that it has coil whine so in games or even just randomly it makes this buzzing noise and it’s so fucking annoying. I cannot return the card because I bought it through newegg and it’s been over 30 days. I tried returning it the day I got it and spent $20 doing so to only cancel the return label 3 days later since I figured maybe it’s underperforming because of my motherboard or power supply. Nope, does same noise and underperforms on a whole new and much better specced PC as well. So it’s the GPU itself. Fucking sucks man I’ll have to wait until December just to get another GPU, what a waste of $260 fml.

Youssef Abbas Hey, I actually found out my GPU isn’t underperforming as bad as I thought it was, it does have coil whine but it’s not like blaring loud or nothing, just a mild buzzing noise but luckily I have the NZXT H510 case so it doesn’t let the loudness of the coil whine out as much. Everything in my PC was was performing like it’s supposed to but the GPU was in fact the lowest factor. It did say it was performing good however, it said performing as expected and above expected performance. It’s just that Minecraft wasn’t showing the best results itself, I get it. It’s not as easy to run anymore depending what version you’re on. I did CS:GO and on pretty much any map I get 200-400FPS. I mainly average 250FPS which is amazing because I’m staying up 144 which my monitors are, so I’m never dipping to 144 to never have a unsmooth experience! :) My graphics settings for CS:GO are all set to High, 2x MSAA with FXAA enabled, I was getting good and expected performance in it so before I tested anything but Minecraft I was very stressed. The GPU issue does remain but it’s not nearly as bad as I thought, it’s still performing well. I over reacted. Going to be trying more GPU and CPU intensive games and see how they work out, should be good as CS:GO ran well! I tried Mudrunner too(since it’s like 1.5GB only) and it ran much better than my older build so I was happy about that as well.

just save money! you can have one too

i dont think you watched the whole video :)

i only put it there to show what it does, i reduced it near the end of the video to show that it gives better performance when lowering the render distance!

No im using a cooler master 212 evo!

your monitor refresh rate has no effect on your performance, this set up should get you to 75 fps to match your 75hz refresh rate, so long as you lower some settings!

@@lebking95 ok thx

@@lebking95 what hz is your monitor

Like 80-90 ish with the shaders

SEUS (sonic ether's unbelievable shaders)

@@lebking95 no, i was referring to the resoursepack used

It really depends on your settings. i turned shaders off and had everything maxed out with render distance at 24, i was getting somewhere around 100-150 fps. then still on max settings, render distance 16 now, fps went up to around 130-200. same with render distance 18. which is where i would leave it at. Also, running the game at fullscreen insteadof windowed is better for your game to run smoothly! I laos ran the game with ovos craft resource pack (with no shaders) and the fps was the same but the game looked even better! if you wanna hit over 300 fps (which you have no reason for) you can tone down the settings a bit and you will easily hit that.:)

PXLION yes!

Im using the SEUS (Sonic Ether's Unbelievable Shaders) shaderpack for Minecraft. theres no way youre getting that high FPS with that shader. maybe if you put everything on low but i seriously doubt it.

just for demonstration

@@lebking95 14 chunk More fps

Fyn Pedersen A few more! Not much of a difference. This build is great!maybe add like 5 fps or even less.

he has 32 chunk which isn’t needed but that’s also lowering his fps alot

@@mkaypot yeah i normally have it way lower, this is just to showcase the possibilities of this build

Kermit the frog thank you :)

@@lebking95 getting a new system E5 3600 Gtx 1660 super 6g by gigabyte B450m pro4 Nzxt h510 Be quite psu 600 w Crucial p1 m.2 Ripjaws 2 8gbs clocked at 3600 Was your system a prebuilt or built by you

@@Kermitthefrog-ju9vr hey sorry for late reply, i built it myself with some help from my girlfriend. your build looks good as far as i know! :) personally, i wouldnt spend too much on an NVME ssd, i would get a regular 2.5" ssd (basically youll get more for your money, the speed difference isnt that worth imo) unless you can get a great deal, then go for more storage for less $! trust me, storage runs out quick!!

Yes! I have an ssd! Haha also the rest of the components help do that!

@@lebking95 I have an ssd too x(, only 120gb but an ssd as well ^^

ofcourse I have the same specs and I can tell you you are getting a very nice pc for the price

yes, very worth it! it wont break your bank and youll get a pretty mid/high end pc!