My thought too. Ukraine seems to be hitting a lot of SAM and Radar sites lately.

not likely....russia has way more s300 than ukraine will receive f16 or atacms

@@peetky8645 F-16 have HARMS...S-300s wont last long

Ukraine won't be flying F-16s in combat for quite some time. Their pilots & maintenance personnel still have years of training ahead.

@@jtf2danUkraine has had harms forever, Russia has hundreds of SAM systems. The F16 will always be in danger anywhere near the border. It’s going to play a rear anti air and anti missile role, stand-off munitions platform. It won’t be over the frontlines except in rare situations. This is why every single military expert has said they will help but they aren’t changing the course of this war. RU has hundreds of advanced jets and even they can’t fly near Ukraine

I wonder what gifts Ukraine will be sending Russia for their May 9th celebrations.

​@@SwarmerBeesPutler is taking a big risk by still having that parade. Moscow is hit weekly now.

​@@SwarmerBeesthere will be military vehicles there so sending drones is perfectly legal according to the laws of war.

​@@misterwirez7731I suggest two drones ro do a fly-by, the top one spraying blue smoke, the other one yellow smoke

Brilliant ❤​@@sjonnieplayfull5859

Yes

simply shortlived like storm shadow cause its days of successes have gone quite fast. Russians are not stupid, they are learning and reacting quite fast compare to the western world which was laughing about the russian cages and ideas how to defend tanks and armored carrier against drones We send unprotected tanks into the battle like the abrams which had been killed by drones as seen in moscow. Let me know who was more stupid to ship these expensive tanks to the ukraine without adding anything to defend against drones while we could watch every single day russian drone footage hitting the ukrainians. Big defeat for us in the west to laugh about the russians and not being able to protect our far , far more valueable (we have no pile of 10.000 Leopard 2) against drone attacks. You'd rather survive an attack unter the turtle cage than dy inside an abrams, right ?

​@@typxxilps Dígalo sin llorar pro-Ruso bot. 😂😂😂😂😂

@@typxxilps T-72: turret goes wheeeeee Abrams: turret does not go whee comprendo, russki?

​@@typxxilps It's a war and nothing is safe on either side. They were expecting losses so chill out. They captured a tank or two there's no big deal in an asymmetrical war. NATO doctrine is based on an air superiority not on a meat grinding.

@@typxxilps The cope cages have proved to be less than useless , the drones just fly under them 😂

I don't understand why everyone thinks they can learn F-16s faster than you can get a driver's license.

​@@donwyoming1936Thank you for contributing to our kind host's algorithm. No potato for you today.

@@donwyoming1936 Those Ukrainian pilots are already trained on fast jets so learning the F-16 is like a civilian pilot learning to fly a jumbo jet rather than a A320

Comparing Boing and Airbus planes makes little sense as those had similar technology and had English language manuals and training. That said, only 6 or 8 Ukrainian pilots knew English language or were bilingual when the project started, and its totally different to learn modern western technology planes from Soviet era planes, the rest of the pilots will have to master English first before starting to train. That aside, the maintenance crew needs two or more training time than the pilots.

💙💛🇺🇸

Marge has been the biggest advert for MUGA caps, the moron 😂

🇳🇱❤🇺🇦

Marjorie Trailer Trash! 👎 💛🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇺🇦🇬🇧💙

Ugly outside, ugly inside🥱

yeah, Russia seems to struggle with ATACMs, same as Storm Shadow

​@@suchomimus9921russia seems to struggle with russia and smoking soldiers.

@@suchomimus9921 Russian air defence struggles with anything that travels faster than 20mph.

😂👍as first discovered, when Ukrainian farmers were towing away Russian tanks, in their tractors! 😅 ​@@chrissmith2114

@@chrissmith2114they also seem to struggle with drones and drone boats under 20 mph as well

If someone has the cajones to tell him.

@@eriks.9730He knows.

You might even say it has been that way for a while now.

allergies, maybe a bit of both

And a dash of Polonium.

hot toddy

350km range is something

Yea, Turkey is finally realizing how bad those S-400’s are and they’re probably kicking themselves for choosing a couple of those over the F-35’s they could have had a helped in making some parts for it. Live and learn!

She knows, and we do too. It's just not the side she likes to pretend that she's on.

Marjorie Taylor Yockey

Marjorie Traitor Greene

👏👏👏

😂🎉 hey Danny 👋

@@7screamingdizzbusters 💙💙💙

Huh?

they will likely be the same as the high quality images we sometimes get, which allow the vehicles to be ID'd. These are just free sentinel imagery

HP or Worchestershire.

barbecue

Peppercorn sauce, with mushrooms on a fat juicy steak

@@dumptrump2294 mmmmmm

Chili sauce.

Vast soviet stocks. They are buying back weapon they sold to other countries many years ago. Plus what little they can produce. Not much to understand about it really.

The soviet and muscovite imperialists squandered most of their money on manufacturing wmds. They had 70 years of junk to use. Most of that is now scrap in Ukraine.

Putin has no choice. He has to double down and keep on doubling down. The slightest acknowledgement of defeat on his part and he's "retired". He's boxed himself in. Hell take ruzzia down with him. Poor bastads will be paying Ukraine compensation for a hundred years.

How do you know? Are you trying to say that you know more than the people in the war zone?

Of course it is as it won't be used against Ukrainian forces

That system had coverage of the Kherson to Zaporizhia front lines. Russia also uses the S-300 and S-400 in a ballistic ground attack role. Russia has to replace that system now, which means difficult decisions about where that's going to come from. And it makes it easier to strike the airfield with other systems. That's pretty good value for a couple of ATACM's.

@@ptonpc well I look at the satellite image and I don't see anything hit. Supply of ATACMs is not unlimited.

Over 3,500 ATACMS were built. Ukraine can probably afford to use a few in a way that you and the US Army might not approve of.

He doesnt claik his video has footage anyways, it is satellite footage.

@@neferpoyaz4037 i know that's satellite image. No need to explain everything.

@@warmachine676 I mean you also said ''your footage doesn't show that S-300/S-400 is destroyed'' look, he says ''possibly destroyed'' you pointed something obvious by yourself.

@@neferpoyaz4037 he used that as clickbait & i just said that there is no possible signs of "destroyed" sam system. That's it.