While I was watching, I thought the same thing.

Thanks for watching!

Thank you!

Thank you!

I used night mode too it didn't make any difference. Get your disrespectful ass out of here Ikleel I been testing Huawei before you even knew what they were

Hi @paolo, I did take ultra-wide with night mode but it made no diff the shot looked the same so I cut it out from video to save time.

@@bensgadgetreviews I mean no disrespect. Sorry if you feel offended in anyway. I like ur videos. Keep up the good work.🙏🏽

Thank you

Yes He Does

You can get rid of noise two ways, lower the ISO or use a smoothing/reduction algorithm. Both come at the expense of details, I also prefer to have a little noise.

Agree. On top of that they try to compensate the lack of real detail with pumping that local contrast slider all the way up.

Oof, I remember (not long ago) when Huawei's pictures were a bit more yellow than the competition, and I found that to actually be preferable as it looked more happy(?) than the competition. I guess people complained and they "fixed" it by going the opposite direction. That's unfortunate...

Apologies if you don't like what I'm doing here, commenting on the video bit by bit while I watch it, but I wanted to mention that while Huawei's ultrawide pulls in the least light, I find it also does the best at making night shots look like they're taken at night. There's an allure to the lighting of the shots that reminds us just how unappealing it can be to have too much light taken in with these night shots, if they are "too" good. I feel like there should be a secondary mode in all of these super good sensors that takes night-mode pictures that are intentionally darker and emphasize the yellow or orangish glow of the street lights while also taking in a bit less light (or reconstructing the clarity and reduced noise of the brighter night-shots) and create photos that look darker and more appealing as "at night" photos. Perhaps just a personal preference, but I actually don't like when night-shots are too bright, too well light, making them almost look like they were taken in a MUCH brighter environment than they actually were.

I've noticed a theme here that, while you often criticize or count out the Oppo shots in comparison with the others, I actually feel the opposite about the pictures, feeling like the Oppo ones look less digital and more like organic film taken shots. I think Oppo's camera is taking some really fantastic night-shots.

Just finished the video, thanks for staying up late to make it. :D I still think Oppo's camera does the best job of taking pictures that look like they were taken with film. Samsung often has the "best" shots if we're just being analytical, but that doesn't always translate to what I consider the most pleasing shots to look at. A technical win, but not so much a "man, this is a GREAT photo!" win. Anyway, thanks again, Ben!

Thank you

DON'T BELIEVE THIS GUY ABOVE ME HE IS A SCAMMER. Check the name closely for comments.

Thank you!

Snapdragon

Thank you!

There's a Find X5 Pro Mediatek Dimensity 9000 Edition with no MariSilicon X inside.

Snap

Yes

I think US sanctions have prevented Huawei from using newer/better sensors

@@bensgadgetreviews Unfortunately I think you're right, Ben. Thank you for a brilliant comparison nonetheless.

I felt like Huawei seemed to overpromise yet their final product was never the best

Hi! Thanks for watching

Fair critique. I do do more in depth testing for my written articles at XDA developers. For KZfaq I would be more in depth but I do KZfaq entirely on the side so I sometimes simply don't have as much time. But I will try!

@@bensgadgetreviews Thank you. Appreciate the fast reply! Either way good job and nice comparisons.