Inzy was greatest, Sachine is not league, he is above all. The starts league

Sachin hardly won matches. Hardly saved matches. That is the key.

It right Sachin didn't win matches. India won matches because of players like SACHIN, Sahwag, Ganguly, Dravid

Yes the impact was the run outs

@@sagarw4197 haha..what a joke you are.

Only if he is good enough. Or he can get out first ball ! Sachin is a Middle order batsman (4) in Tests. Sachin came as No.4 in ODIs as well for some time. Truth of the matter is that Sachin has played more matches, kept fitness for longer time, was selected to play for India for longer time, scored more runs, more centuries, more half centuries, hit more boundaries and more sixes as well. Sachin has a better average in Tests, and better strike rate as well.

Poi

LOL he was just an runs machine not an match winner and its fact

No he is a good batsman but not a match winner

Unmai​@@pratheeshanpilenthiran6345

​@@ivanandrew8070bhai, Jo dimak me ata hay bol de. 😂

Yes bro

Yes, especially 1990s team...

😂😂

Of course, there is no reason to compare Tendulkar with Inzamam. Inzamam was beyond any comparison with Tendulkar. Tendulkar the so called god, couldn't prove himself on the ground. He made useless 15000 runs but couldn't play only 15 innings when he proved himself a "Man of Crisis or Man of Occasion." Whenever he made century his team lost the match. Even it took one and half year (1.5) to make him his 100th century against Bangladesh. Impact and Winning Ratio of Tendulkar was almost NIL or ZERO. He never had impact of his innings throughout his career and this what he also mentioned in his last innings [Farewell] speech. Whether Inzamam played almost half of the innings as compared to Tendulkar but proved a great asset and Man of Crisis and Man of Occasion. This was also mentioned in Indian mainstream media "Hindustan Times, India Today and many more: Inzamam made 25 centuries and 22 times when he made century his country won the match. His innings had great impact on his country's victory. Tendulkar is just an outrated batsman not the god. Virat, Rohit, Dravid, Ganguly, Dhoni were much better, who really had impact the victory of Indian cricket. Dhoni proved 51 times out of 64 innings when he proved himself the Best Match Finisher ever. Same applies to Kohli, Dravid and many more. Sorry, Tendulkar is not in this list and cannot be!

True sachin had one of weakest odi team which changed after Sehwag,Yuvaraj entry

@user-es7wb7ec4s Again, same typical Indian thinking. Love to play with bogus and wasted stats but not the Quality and impact. Indian always love to play with Quantity but not with the Quality. For example: India make more than thousands of movies in a calendar year but during last 75-80 only one movie could not win OSCAR because all or 99% of movies are always copied from Hollywood or West or Other countries, songs, dialogues, even I have seen the Movie Poster were copied and paste from Hollywood movies. Same applies to Tendulkar too. Who made 15000 runs but couldn't play only 15 innings when he proved himself A Man of Crisis or A Man of Occasion. You repeated the same of your point again. For example: You more focused on century against South Africa and other centuries in other matched but you didn't focus what was the result of the Match? What is the use of the wasted even triple century, when one player make and his team lost the match. Look at the stats, quality of innings and impact of Kohli, Dhoni, Gangualy, Dravid and many more who didn't make 100 centuries but win for India as many times as we can think of. For example, Dhoni played around 60 innings at the last moment and out of 60 he played 49 of innings and proved him the Best Match Finisher. But Tendulkar couldn't do it even for one (1) time. I don't remember one of his inning when he stood till last or when he proved himself in the time of crisis or difficulties and played the winning shot. Another argument is: Shahid Afridi who even don't know How to handle a bat and take stance and it would really be insulting to compare a batsman like Afridi who is Big ZERO in technique but Tendulkar is really have strong technique, reflexes, better attitude but Afridi won Worldcup 2009, Asia Cup and many more tournaments and left his impact till date. This is called the Impact --- that lasts forever. And only hallow records with silent TEXT have no impacts. For example: Tendulkar made 100 wasted centuries but Kohli made also 100 centuries but his innings created such a long lasting impact and won many unforgettable innings which will be remembered in the name of Kohli. To cut it simple: Its always Quality that does matter, and Quantity does not matter at all.

@user-es7wb7ec4s Again only TEXT and TEXT and TEXT that has no meaning to anyone. What it can have impact to others? India still remember the last ball six of Javed Miandad in Sharjah.... It is called the True and Real Impact, will last for next century or even more --- who cared Miandad made century or not. Same many of Innings from many of Batsmen from rest of the world for example: Viv Richard, Ponting, Haynes, Richie Richardson, Mathey Haden, Gilcrist and many more....... Unfortunately, Tendulkar is not there. Please go through my comment and see what I wrote about Afridi? I myself said, "IT is insult to have a comparison of Afridi with Tendulkar in Technique but in proving Man of Crisis and Man of Situation. Tendulkar is big ZERO and even a Joke Infront of ZERO Afridi when we make a comparison on the basis of Quality of Innings [not Technique] and leaving Impact of the matches. And now, again even Tendulkar might have got 1000s of Man of Matches.... They go only to trash bins. Period! What is use of useless Metal cups and left no impact on people minds. Better to leave an impact with only one six(6) as Miandad did, Dhoni did, and many more from rest of the world players did it. But Tendulkar couldn't. This is the reason why Tendulkar was never been added as Greatest of all Times in Wisden. Because He couldn't play impactful innings. He always focused on his centuries but not the results of the Matches. Which made Tendulkar's a Big ZERO in creating impact on people's mind.

@user-es7wb7ec4s And you missed the Logic... Teams always consists of Individuals. And Individual's performances made Team performance. And its always only who stands out and rise for the occasion not everybody in the Team. Tell me only three (3) innings out of 100 when he played and his team won the Final or Semi Final or any Crucial match. It shouldn't be any side or league or normal match. Please count!!!

Thanks ❤

Lagta h ki tumhara gk thoda kamjor h isliye ye bakwas kar rahe ho aur rahi world cup ki bat to Sachin se behtar record kisi bhi player ka nhi h ab akela Sachin to match nhi jita sakta h na jab bhi Sachin ne accha khela kabhi bhi dusre player ka sath nhi mila yakeen nhi to bahut sare matches h record utha k dekh lo aur ak jamana tha ki sirf Sachin k upar Puri team india depend rahti thi wo to jabse sehwag yuvraj dhoni gambhir Raina aye tabse thoda bhar kam hua tha Sachin k upar se.

Just like anything else, you need hard work to gain some knowledge in Cricket as well. Those who can not memorize the numbers, matches, keep talking about selfishness, waistline etc. Sachin played better than Not just Inzamam, most of his contemporaries. That is why he got 100 international centuries. Let us for a moment accept that Sachin is selfish and got to 100 centuries by playing for himself. Why is that no one ever got to that land mark in Tests and ODIs ? Every body who played cricket (other than Sachin) is self less ?

Sachin played more innings

Of course, there is no reason to compare Tendulkar with Inzamam. Inzamam was beyond any comparison with Tendulkar. Tendulkar the so called god, couldn't prove himself on the ground. He made useless 15000 runs but couldn't play only 15 innings when he proved himself a "Man of Crisis or Man of Occasion." Whenever he made century his team lost the match. Even it took one and half year (1.5) to make him his 100th century against Bangladesh. Impact and Winning Ratio of Tendulkar was almost NIL or ZERO. He never had impact of his innings throughout his career and this what he also mentioned in his last innings [Farewell] speech. Whether Inzamam played almost half of the innings as compared to Tendulkar but proved a great asset and Man of Crisis and Man of Occasion. This was also mentioned in Indian mainstream media "Hindustan Times, India Today and many more: Inzamam made 25 centuries and 22 times when he made century his country won the match. His innings had great impact on his country's victory. Tendulkar is just an outrated batsman not the god. Virat, Rohit, Dravid, Ganguly, Dhoni were much better, who really had impact the victory of Indian cricket. Dhoni proved 51 times out of 64 innings when he proved himself the Best Match Finisher ever. Same applies to Kohli, Dravid and many more. Sorry, Tendulkar is not in this list and cannot be!

Absolutely right! INZAMAM is the greatest batsman ever . Sachin was nothing but a selfish player, who played for his records only!

Yes

Sachin is god gifted player he is not god

If Sachin was your god, then note u say god retires? Or when sachin got out for 0, do u mean your god can’t score a single run with another human bowler!?. Please say Sachin is God gifted player. Please don’t ever demean the power of God!!

Of course, there is no reason to compare Tendulkar with Inzamam. Inzamam was beyond any comparison with Tendulkar. Tendulkar the so called god, couldn't prove himself on the ground. He made useless 15000 runs but couldn't play only 15 innings when he proved himself a "Man of Crisis or Man of Occasion." Whenever he made century his team lost the match. Even it took one and half year (1.5) to make him his 100th century against Bangladesh. Impact and Winning Ratio of Tendulkar was almost NIL or ZERO. He never had impact of his innings throughout his career and this what he also mentioned in his last innings [Farewell] speech. Whether Inzamam played almost half of the innings as compared to Tendulkar but proved a great asset and Man of Crisis and Man of Occasion. This was also mentioned in Indian mainstream media "Hindustan Times, India Today and many more: Inzamam made 25 centuries and 22 times when he made century his country won the match. His innings had great impact on his country's victory. Tendulkar is just an outrated batsman not the god. Virat, Rohit, Dravid, Ganguly, Dhoni were much better, who really had impact the victory of Indian cricket. Dhoni proved 51 times out of 64 innings when he proved himself the Best Match Finisher ever. Same applies to Kohli, Dravid and many more. Sorry, Tendulkar is not in this list and cannot be!

To inzi bhai ko bhi khelna tha kisne roka tha khelne se ha lekin dono player great h isme koi doubt walo bat nhi h

To inzi bhai ko bhi khelna tha kisne roka tha khelne se ha lekin dono player great h isme koi doubt walo bat nhi h

Sachin is basically a good lora for your mother

Of course, there is no reason to compare Tendulkar with Inzamam. Inzamam was beyond any comparison with Tendulkar. Tendulkar the so called god, couldn't prove himself on the ground. He made useless 15000 runs but couldn't play only 15 innings when he proved himself a "Man of Crisis or Man of Occasion." Whenever he made century his team lost the match. Even it took one and half year (1.5) to make him his 100th century against Bangladesh. Impact and Winning Ratio of Tendulkar was almost NIL or ZERO. He never had impact of his innings throughout his career and this what he also mentioned in his last innings [Farewell] speech. Whether Inzamam played almost half of the innings as compared to Tendulkar but proved a great asset and Man of Crisis and Man of Occasion. This was also mentioned in Indian mainstream media "Hindustan Times, India Today and many more: Inzamam made 25 centuries and 22 times when he made century his country won the match. His innings had great impact on his country's victory. Tendulkar is just an outrated batsman not the god. Virat, Rohit, Dravid, Ganguly, Dhoni were much better, who really had impact the victory of Indian cricket. Dhoni proved 51 times out of 64 innings when he proved himself the Best Match Finisher ever. Same applies to Kohli, Dravid and many more. Sorry, Tendulkar is not in this list and cannot be!

Why some Indian are so cheap and don't know the meaning of Respect? Is there something wrong with your DNA? Well, there are as many good as many bad people in any country and you are amongst the later.

Thanks your information 💚

Sachin starting mein 6 number pe ata tha ..... fr 4 number.... baad mein opener...... test mein bhai woh 4 number hi ata tha ...... aur opening krni jyada mushkil hoti haa😊

Is se koi farq nahi padta k koi opener tha ya two down. Question yeh hai ke kaun Impactful and Result Oriented player prove hua..... No. or Stats koi meaning nahi rakhte........ Meaning yeah hai k kaun Team ko match win karata hai....!!!

aata tha magar potato runout hojathatha..po tata bye bye 😂