lol

Why is this so accurate

As a 1600 I’m of the mind… “That’s a strange move, do they see something I don’t? Let me look around and calculate a few moves… still don’t see it. Ok I have to take it, if I’m wrong, I learn a new tactic.” When training, if you can’t calculate the threat of a strange move do NOT defend it. If you can’t calculate the poisoned-piece/gambit/trap DO play into it. Getting punished and reviewing the line is the best way to learn new tactics :)

I'm around 2100 and most games I blitz out the knight block and then instantly realize it was hanging. I don't think any 1400 is consciously declining a piece gambit and there are almost no piece gambits that are sound

1600: takes a few seconds to think before taking the free piece 1800: haha this bozo blundered a free piece 2000: imma punish this guy for trying to be a troll, you don’t who I am?? I’m a certified 2000 rated player, elite player who’s part of the 1% of the player base, disrespectful c*nt you will regret the day you tried to mess up with me

That was like a jontron moment or something

Very polite lol

I genuinely think his opponent thought it was a mouse slip and was being nice. Wild how many good folk he’s run into

lmfaooooo should be a meme on its own

This is a spoiler for me ;()

GingerGM has his own speedrun

US chess school?

Andras toth also really good

who complains?

@@darian5428 GingerGM is incredibly weak when taken out of his memorized lines & opponents don't surrender by default when they see an H pawn push... Check out his games against FM/IM and weaker players in events where he plays openings he is not familiar with - he blunders full pieces in 7-8 moves 😂😂😂

Lmao 😂

Motivating comment

😭😭 I laughed out loud

What it really illustrates that Naroditsky is one of the best players in the world who can do things mere mortals cant. Especially when playing against much worse players.

The engine response to f4 for black '...Rc4' leads to a pretty easy cleanup of the pawns, but it's incredibly hard for people at 1350-1400 level to find. A stronger player probably finds it, but then Danya probably wouldn't have sacrificed a bishop against a player who was strong enough to find that move so your point is still valid.

@@Matt-sl1wg One response is simply to take the free pawn and go Nf7 next... if the pawn is pushed you fork it. It's not even a "engine line" and not a very hard move to find, something he could have "lucked into" easily as he moved the knight anyway. It's definitely not a "game winning move". He (opponent) was really close to winning after that move. Even GMs can blunder.... a few moves later evaluation is -6, in game.

2:32

Genuine laugh out loud moment. 😂

"Just take me now, Lord"

I watch it and moan but in a different way 👀

a short long video

Two pieces*

Yeah you'd assume he started using an engine after he blundered. 'Blunders a piece then miraculously plays 95+ accuracy at 1400 rating? Definitely cheating' - turns out it was all part of the prophet's cunning scheme.

I would probably think of him as cheater😂😂

👍

What rating are you?

probably 1300-1800 if an IM dominates him but he can keep a winning position against an NM following a blunder, any lower and the NM probably could've clawed his way back. I only say this because I beat a CM after he made fluke blunder against me and I surprisingly was actually able to win and i was 1350 at the time.

WHAT AN AWESOME GAME!!👏🏻👏🏻

There are puzzles where it's just about those pawn/king moves. They are just a little higher rated. Keep doing the puzzles and you get to them as well

@@stvia Thanks for the advice :)

This is true but not the ideal long term solution. The real solution is to not blunder the piece in the first place. That's the main avenue for getting better, not playing better down a piece.

@@TRXSTA38 I am 800 ELO, it will be a while before I stop blundering pieces lol. I take your point, and obviously my main focus is on that, but given that it's just a reality of my chess experience for the foreseeable future that I will blunder in a nontrivial amount of my matches it's good to have some recovery skills as well.

@@LucasStoten1 haha I hear you dude. I'm officially ~1400 ELO and it will still be a while before I stop blundering pieces. :)

Not at all. Hell, even titled players mess up (women's world champion failing to convert a knight+ bishop win and aronian hanging mate in 1), but it also depends a whole lot on the type of opening/position. Down a piece in a symmetrical petroff? Sure. Down a piece in the king's gambit/ vienna? You still have a lot of chances. I've noticed that when you lose a piece the most important thing to do is to change your mindset- you're going to lose anyway so any result other than that is a plus. Danya did not play the most _accurate_ moves, what he did do was play the moves that may be a bit suboptimal in the eyes of a GM/stockfish, but would require precision to dismantle.