Thank you for your feedback and love. 😀

I am glad you liked it

Thanks

Felicidades. Lo amarás. Disfrutar.

Que tal es telescopio? lo acabo de comprar también desde Colombia.

Sure! My next video.

Sorry to hear that. You can do it, by aligning the finderscope and main scope by pointing at the same object at a distance and experimenting at night.

Mira mis otros videos.

Yes, pipp, as, regitax, gimp, and photoshop. I used svbony camera for this one. Watch my other videos for more in camera.

@@YASAJTV Thank you! I will check them out! :)

You can do astrophotography with any telescope. But the main purpose of this particular one is visual. You can take the awesome moon and Andromeda galaxy photos.

A quality Barlow lens can get you closer and give more magnification.

@@YASAJTV Thank you for responding!

A dslr is the wrong camera for that, especially on such a small scope

@@k.h.1587 oh ok... Ill see about trying a planetary camera.

I used SVBONY SV106 Guide Scope 60mm as the guide scope. It is cheap and brilliant.

I have used 90maks as guidescopes, with a pixcell 255 as the guider and the main scope was 8"lx200R ota at native f10 with an st1001e on losmandy gm8. It was a pretty good match but needed 2 computers since both cameras were parallel. I later downgraded to a DSI as a guider with an old box that connected via serial and converted the lx200 commands from PHD into autoguider standard output. Only needed one computer to run it all. And yeah this was a long time ago, and that converter box was even older

You will needs these softwares - PiPP, Regitax 6, Gimp and Photoshop. Also, look at some tutorials on YT for PiPP and Regitax.

Yes, pipp, as, regitax, gimp, and photoshop.

Yes, why not. You can do many nebulas and also the Andromeda Galaxy.

​@YASAJTV thank you! I haven't found any reviews covering nebulae, just the planets and moons. I ordered during prime day. Do you recommend any upgrades for it? Filters, a new Barlow, etc?

@@kaitlinexl Do not spend too much money on this scope. This scope comes with all things needed to start. Use it as is, learn few things and enjoy. Once you are ready, you'll know when you are ready. Upgrade to better scope altogether.

Yes it is available in India. www.amazon.in/s?k=sarblue+mak70&crid=TXM0DNR2FEHB&sprefix=SARBLUE+Mak70%2Caps%2C349&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_1_13

Yes. Bortle 8

Light pollution does not affect finding and viewing planets

@@k.h.1587 Yes and No, visual Astro has less noticeable affects than astrophotography. But, It does affect with everything. Try from DT and than from Bortle 3-4, you will be amazed by the difference even for visual Astro.

@YASAJTV I have many times, been doing this for 20 years and have been exposed to it through college astronomy classes 30 years ago. Yes it took me 10 years to finally start getting gear other than the spotting scopes and binos I owned. The only benefit dark skies have on planetary observing is being able to see fainter moons. In fact, when in really dark skies, the presence of jupiter or venus in the sky can be quite annoying, casting shadows or even interfering with dark adaptation. We go to dark skies for deep sky not planets :) But I can see how light pollution can effect the background sky in a planetary image, but I was never much of a planet imager, I mainly focused on deep sky during my heavy imaging period, though I did get a semi decent planet image with a friend's LPI on my then owned 6"f8 dob tube up on my EQ mount. The LPI pales on comparison to modern planetary cameras though, and the whole community as a whole was not as advanced in processing, and the really sensitive Uber small pixel cameras with Uber fast frame rates weren't a thing and computers were much slower with much less storage capacity at the time. I could see myself doing planetary imaging in the future though, since all my gear including my good mounts, scopes (my.c11 would have been a killer planetary imager, but i mainly used it visually), and most importantly my ccd cameras, ao7 adaptive optics and my filter wheel, were stolen out of storage and insurance wouldn't pay. With the gear I had to settle for on a shoestring, vintage SCTs on forks/wedges, planetary imaging is the only thing I probably could do and the cameras can be had pretty cheaply. But I wouldn't bother with going to dark skies for planetary imaging, but If I am ever out in dark skies and happened to have a planet cam, I might do a quick run and compare it to back home. But note that comparing planetary results has more to do with seeing conditions at the time, and hence it is really impossible to do a comparison from 2 different sites at 2 different times, as seeing would affect the resolution of faint moons more than light pollution. Some of the best planetary imagers do it from very light polluted areas. One of the reasons to focus on that segment of the hobby. Making lemonade with lemons

@YASAJTV and I was referring to strictly planetary imaging, of course deep sky imaging is better from dark skies unless strictly dealing in narrowband imaging

Да. С 2 линзами Барлоу.

🤣