They are just hypocrites, complaining about changes made from fire and blood and AWOIAF to the show. But like S1-4 of GOT deviated from the first 3 asoiaf books in pretty big ways and literally no one cared. So far it's been a really good show and moments like "A Targaryen must always be on the throne" adds so much to the book lore.

It's good that people are more critical than during most of GoT but at at some point the whining starts getting tiresome. Its a really good show with some flaws and quite a few people can't deal with the fact that not everything has to be perfect.

I would agree with this. The first season is usually to introduce *all* of the characters and even more so with a massive cast as GoT. Smaller shows (in cast size) like Friends, where there are 6 main and a lot of random support it's easier to get the pace going. Also drama vs comedy, though that's a minor detail. In GoT, characters that gets added along the way in later seasons are easier to introduce as they come in fewer numbers, and also dependent on their importance to the story. And if you think about it, season 1 of GoT picks up a little speed in the last 2 - 3 episodes, when a lot of things go down. Personally I feel that GoT was a great series from season 1 up to mid 6, and then it went south real fast, especially if you have read the fan-fiction script for season 8. It's not perfect, though lightyears ahead of whatever the duck those two morons conjured.

No, we're not actually watching what it really happened. There are several things that the show came up with, that aren't historical facts (whether the sources are accurate or not, some things in FB are true). Like Rhaenyra's age for example she was 8 when she was named heir not 14. Or Alicent's age she was 18 when she married Viserys not 14, and Viserys was 28 not in his early 40's/late 30's, like in the show. Or the fact that Viserys was healthy all throughout his reign, he only got sick during his last years. Or Rhaenys killing hundreds of innocents in the Dragon Pit during Aegon coronation, that never happened. Or the war for the stepstones that actually lasted nine years instead of three like the show portrayed. My point is that the show isn't more accurate either.

In season 2 war start so will be many battles

whoa it’s almost as if they’re building tension and stakes instead of starting out at breakneck speed and nonsensical spectacle

if you're looking for stupid action sequences and bad story telling just go watch an MCU film or a fast and furious film LMAO

Targaryens and Velaryons were closely related, so it didn't make any sense them to be black, unless Targaryens were black as well. Stupidity has no limits, as they say. From all the crap they have produced from Hollywood and elsewhere it was still pretty good in my opinion.

@@angleofshadow9818 100% agree, but the Panderverse is strong.

@@angleofshadow9818 you are crying over very irrelevant details, one was made black to make it easier to tell them apart because both have distinctive hair colour. Stop crying and grow up

@@yodasmomisondrugs7959You can simply chose not to watch since black people trigger you so much. Not everyone read the book, it's much easier to tell the the groups apart with the casting choices. Watching the show I got so confused with the valeryons and valayrians name, talk less the 2 groups looking the same

@@realdavidjones1623 I need to grow up, when you are the one whom can't act civilized and have proper manners in a conversation. Fair enough, point taken. Still it's pretty racist to change characters color just to please minorities. It would be lot better to create interesting characters like Yasuke(actual historic person), Blade, Black Panther, Jules Winnfield, Agent J and so forth.

Yeah, they tried that in Dorne, didn't really end up well