"Experts" is media dog whistle for "Don't ask questions, just obey."

@@legiran9564 Always has been, and always will be. I had the pleasure of having a senior lecturer as my main teacher in primary school second half, he said "when someone brings out an expert to underline a point, be very wary". (edit) Best teacher i ever had, by far.

"paid the most to spread PROPAGANDA" fixed it for you! 😁

​@@TiaraStarbrighter like that elizabeth bikxn00d guy. how surprising, eh! 🙄

Indeed! Manga Kyubey’s word has far more to worth than the “science 📰s”.

Just check out The Pensuke Files instead.

More: “question everything apart from my BS”

Is spelled soience.

Ironically, that is anti science.

@@Cyber-Rain It is. But tell that to the commies who completely infiltrated and hijacked our academic institutions.

I had a similar experience working on my M.A. thesis in political science. Unexpectedly one professor was actually honest with the thesis students and black-pilled me on the whole state of the academia. I think she was very bitter because she was literally the only professor specializing in and qualified to teach advanced qualitative research methods in a system where only quantitative methods are now acceptable and "relevant", so she told the truth about how only quantitative research in political science has any chance for publication, how researchers "adjust" their data to get the needed results, how almost all published papers are fraudulent due to the hypothesis being artificially retrofitted to fit the research results (because no "serious" publication would publish a negative result paper. Why? Because academics are too petty and proud to admit they could ever make a faulty assumption), and more. She also told us how the oh-so-great scientific community is full of pompous douchebags and people impossible to deal with due to how academia is a perfect environment for people with autism and social anxiety. I was already extremely concerned (because I was a qualitative researcher and had no interest in the pretending-to-solve-political-ideological-and-philosophical-issues-with-nonsensical-halfassed-mathematics-and-statistics which the quantitative research has become), but the last straw was that after I brought a genuinely interesting thesis proposal based on a completely new not written before hypothesis to my thesis advisor (the only specialist in the topic I chose at our faculty) he bluntly told me that he finds the idea rather boring and he won't accept it. He also said very clearly that it is way too early for me (a goddamn M.A. thesis student) to think for myself and come up with my own ideas, and I need to engage more with previous research before I am to think for myself. I quit the thesis track, quickly finished my M.A. with no thesis, and abandoned any plans for a PhD. Fuck the academia.

From what i remember the Kamph paper was one of 27 aubmittes by guys trolling, and of the 27, seven got accepted for further review, and three were publiahed ,and one given an award. Kamph was onw of the awven but could not go fuether, but for wrong reasons. "We like the passion but it is a bit too strong for what we are willing to publish" was their response for the White gene o side version of the book. The paper with an award? "How dog parks promote rape culture"

Pressing against the throat bump will cause swallowing problems. The bump goes up and down, hurting the males.

Hey pal , he is above any criticism. He is a diverse individual , so therefore, you are a bigot , regardless of how often he is proven wrong

Indeed, I've noticed science has become rather sensationalist over the years, and Neil DeGrasse Tyson is one of the people at the head of it.

​@@AdonanS Sensationalist and dogmatic.

Tyson is just like Sagan & Nye. Grifters with degrees.

@@walterroche8192 I don't think they're grifters, but they spend too much time theory-crafting all the things we MIGHT be able to do in the future, and not enough time figuring out how to do those things.

It depends heavily on the childs\persons ability to think independently. And their ability to dig into what is spat back out vs. what they think they knew, blind belief is dangerous in all aspects.

@@todf5230 That was always the case.

And also a chargeback on whatever grants they recieved.

They can go homeless for all I care.

Don't need a chargeback as it's a Federal crime in the US to steal from the gov.

Indeed. Science is based on scrutiny, second guessing, experimentation, repeat experiment to see if results check, alter slightly the experiment to see if results still check or how the changes affect results etc. Its all about Inquiry. Trust nobody and nothing, not even yourself, nothing is ever settled.

In the science field nothing is supposed to be a sacred cow. Sadly, that is not the case.

Not necessarily. Unfortunately, a lot of people don't really have a hint of skepticism in them, which means that they are susceptible to appeals to authority; And are themselves willing to push authority in the same way they had it pushed on them; Basically, not liars themselves, just people who have been fed a lie and are regurgitating it without thinking.

So the Lyle's suffering begins. 😀

As someone learning to code, I cannot laugh. This hurts me.

😂

And don't forget about taking bribes in form of grants and also writing papers with a huge conflict of interest.

@@Dregomz02 Nepotism & greed in general as well? (also twisted corrupt version of "pride" tied in lies.)

Oy vey!

But they are forced to lie or Hitler wins or something...

You mean the nosy chews?

I just call them NPCs

Same, I grew up on popular science and me along with my uncle loved science fiction, these monsters have poisoned the well beyond repair

Same with me & with history as well...(Wish there ways to do "reverse Nostradamus" with actual ways to prove THIS HOW IT ACTUALLY WENT DOWN...) *sigh*

It is because you where into it, you spot the mistakes. Turns out most scientists, just do what they are told, and never learn anything. Just like modern day librarians would burn down the library of Alexandria, if they are not allowed to add or remove one book.

The worst thing of all is that this could set humanity back because people will not trust it anymore. It angers me to no end.

"Has become" Medical science has always had a fraud level of over 50%.

It is most of education. And it has probably been this way since education began, because it is a human problem. Turns out, most people do not think, they just repeat what others told them, without checking for them self. You have doctors giving opinions based on what they where told, not because they where paid, but because they never bother learn for themself. We used to have "4 out of 5 doctors recommend smocking for your health" and now they advice on medication.

@@haraldbredsdorff2699 The 4/5 smoking was definitely due to tobacco industry money though

@@wrongthinker843 It became that later. But they said it before too. Just like you have doctors claiming drinking red wine is good for the blood, at the same time as doctors say all wine should be avoided no matter what.

Not only funny, but the papers they published were an effective trap.

He literally tried to prove how fraudulent the whole process was and that money and ideology ruled over the facts.

Oh. They exist, but have extrapolated what happens if people notice them. *grin*

"JACKAROO" -Outback Al

It always ends this way. The "intellectuals" are always shown be to abject idiots eventually. Oh sure they read a lot of books, talked a lot, bounced around a bunch of ideas but at the end of the day they were a detriment to society. That's why they get wiped out every time. The people who get upset about the culling of the intellectual class don't seem to grasp that it was the intellectuals themselves that pushed these insane communist movements in the first place! They lose control of the movement and end up targeted first. Oops!

Fantastic :) I wonder how FONV runs now

Spot on.

what do you expect of " counterfeit consciousnesses"? :V