The animated movie made by Sergey Krivoplyasov and Antropogenez.ru Why don’t apes evolve into humans? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mcyhfNOjxN67nHk.html Subscribe to our channel: clck.ru/Jnmvo Become a patron: www.patreon.com/join/antropogenez_world

Thanks to cameraman live from million years ago for the documentary

human long ago: survival mode human now: creative mode

I feel people honestly don't appreciate or understand the vast amounts of time this all took place over. It's really mind-boggling. Generation after generation reproducing over endless time with little changes here and there eventually adding up to whole new species. It's crazy to think about, but totally makes sense.

*"We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology."* - Carl Sagan

6:34 me running from my responsibilities

why is no one talking about how beautiful the animation is.

FUN FACT: All chordates possess a tail and pharyngeal slits at some point in their lives, and humans are no exception. Early on in human development, the embryo has both a tail and pharyngeal slits, both of which are lost during the course of development. Pharyngeal slits are openings in the pharynx of a vertebrate embryo that develop into gill arches in the bony fishes and into the jaws and inner ear in the terrestrial vertebrates. Pharyngeal slits and tails are found in the embryos of all vertebrates because they share as common ancestors the fish in which these structures first evolved. Every human embryo starts to develop a tail for a brief period during our embryonic development. At between 4 and 5 weeks of age, the normal human embryo has 10-12 developing tail vertebrae. It is most pronounced at around day 31 to 35 of gestation and then regresses into the four or five fused vertebrae becoming our coccyx.

I m thankful for becoming part of this evolution 🧬🧬

Humans million years ago: Hunts various animals with ease Humans now: Scared of flying cockroach Edit: There’s a dumb conflict going on in my reply section

This is the proof, cameramen are immortal

Parent were really worried when their 4 year old son, Bobby never spoke a word. Then on one day at breakfast, all of a sudden Bobby began to shout "This food is a piece of sh**t" The parents hogged Bobby and gave thanks to god for the miracle. After everyone calmed down, the father turned to Bobby and asked: "Son how come that you never spoke before?" Bobby replies "Well up till now, breakfast was OK".

Denial is not refutation. There is a reason creationists keep attacking a man who has been dead for 130 years; it's a soft target, so much easier to attack a dead man than evolution itself which comes from the combined work of the millions of scientists in multiple fields of study.

Monke no wanted leave tree. Monke leave tree. Sad monke. Now human.

What blows my mind is that out of all the generations of hominids born before me stretching back millions of years; I was lucky enough to be born now, in the only time it's been possible to know about our hominid ancestors! *hits bong again*

The most powerful and epic story of all - is truth. Far more fascinating than any creation myth.

You can deny the value of the Theory of Evolution to Biology all you want, but it will gain you as much respect as denying the Spherical Earth.

" Man was now armed " sounds more of a threat than a evolutionary level-up

Back in my day's.....

*ALL LIFE ON EARTH IS DEPENDENT ON THE DNA MOLECULE THAT REGULATES BODILY FUNCTIONS AND TRANSMITS HEREDITARY INFORMATION TO PROGENY.* That is very strong evidence for common ancestry in that there are about 1 million other molecules that could conceivably perform the same function. *THE FACT THAT THE DNA MOLECULE IS BOTH HERITABLE AND MUTABLE MAKES EVOLUTION INEVITABLE.*

*SOME PEOPLE STILL ASK, "WHY ARE THERE STILL APES (OR MONKEYS)?"* It should be obvious that such people lack an understanding of what evolution is and how it works. Apparently someone told such people that humans evolved from apes, and from that, due to their lack of education, they assumed that all apes were supposed to evolve into humans. That is not how evolution works, but creationists have no interest in learning anything other than creation mythology. They might just as well have asked "If dogs are descended from wolves, why are there still wolves?" Or even "If Americans came from Europe, why are there still Europeans?" Just as dogs descended from a population of wolves, so too did humans evolve from one particular population of apes. What we know is that the first apes evolved in Africa about 25 million years ago from a population of Old World Monkeys. Whereas monkeys run on all four feet across the TOPS of branches, apes evolved the ability to swing, arm over arm, from branch to branch. Evolution works to make each species best suited to their environment. For apes, that environment was the forest and they are well suited for it. At one time there were about 30 different species of apes in those forests. Had environmental conditions remained the same, we would still see forests covering the whole African continent. However, conditions did not stay the same; the climate became drier. As a result, forested areas shrank in size and were replaced by grasslands, the African savanna, with just a few scattered trees. The shrinking forests put different ape species in competition with each other and many went extinct. Then, about 6 or 7 million years ago, one population of apes split, with some of them opting for life on that open savanna. All apes are capable of walking upright, they are just not comfortable doing so for long periods of time. Recent experiments with trained chimps on a treadmill have shown that for them, walking upright was more efficient in terms of energy expended than quadrupedal walking. Chimps and other apes though must shift their weight from side to side while walking bipedaly. That savanna environment favored skeletal changes that placed the knees directly under the center of gravity. by about 4 mya, our ancestral australopithecines had almost the same pelvis, femur, knees and feet as modern humans. That gave them a smooth stride that was efficient for long distance travel. They did however, retain long arms and curved fingers enabling them to climb a tree when danger threatened. The apes that remained in a forest environment were under little pressure to change. They became the ancestors of today's chimps and bonobos. Those living in the open were presented challenges not experienced by woodland apes, and that required greater intelligence and cooperation to overcome them. It set their descendants on a different evolutionary trajectory that culminated in us.

F for that one ancestor who killed by the bear

"Reject humanity" "Return to Monke"

Clueless creatard cliche number 56: Micro evolution is proven but macro evolution isn’t. Reality: First of all, this is cherry-picking. It’s like saying that “2+2=4 but 2 million + 2 million doesn’t = 4 million.” Secondly, macro evolution is speciation, which has been observable in American Goatsbeard flowers since the 1950s.

*FACT: No one is born with a language or religion.* A developing child is capable of learning any language, just as it is capable of learning any religion. The ability of a child to learn another language diminishes with age, as also happens with patterns of thought. As Albert Einstein noted "What passes for common sense is the collection of prejudices we acquire by age 18". He also said; "Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." In essence a child is imprinted by the family and society into which it is born. It takes concentrated effort to alter those learned behaviors and few are capable of doing so. Being confronted by new information that conflicts with those learned behaviors will likely result in the discomfort known as 'cognitive dissonance'. Ideas and attitudes absorbed by a child's mind were not reasoned there, and in most cases, cannot be reasoned out of them. There is no evidence for ANY creation event. NONE, ZIP. NADA. It does not exist because there was no 'creator'. What anyone chooses to believe exists in their mind and cannot be distinguished from delusion. There are more than 3000 creation stories; they all originated in the imaginations of primitive peoples. They exist today as culturally sanctioned superstitions.

Imagine million of years later they making video how humans todays looked like

The cameraman needs to get paid more ngl.

*EVOLUTION is a BIOLOGICAL PROCESS, NOT AN EVENT.* Evolution proceeds by incremental modification of existing structures. That is what we see, for instance, in the evolution of the heart, from simple muscular contraction of a blood vessel, to the two chambered heart of fish that is basically a thickening of a section of the circulatory system. Higher order vertebrates, like amphibians and reptiles, evolved a 3 chamber heart with two atria(inflow) and one ventricle (out flow). Warm blooded animals, birds and mammals, required the greater oxygenation provided by a 4 chamber heart. Our brain evolved in a similar manner; it did not just "pop into existence".

Questions creatards can never answer: Why do endogenous retroviruses and syncityn exist? Why do antibiotics need to kept up do date with micro organisms if they don’t evolve? How do you explain ring species? Where can I find a single example of a non-transitional fossil? Why does DNA show that some species are more distantly related than others? Why have there been three new variations of American Goatsbeard flowers if macro evolution doesn’t happen? Why do you pretend that you’re qualified to separate micro evolution from macro evolution when you can’t even tell the difference between evolution, abiogenesis and atheism? Why do we have vomeronasal organs despite not using pheromones? Where did we get chromosome 2 and cytochrome B from? Why do we have pseudogenes, appendixes, wisdom teeth, Plica semilunaris and Nictitating membranes? Why are there stars farther than millions of lightyears away if the earth is only 6,000 years old? Why do tree rings say the earth is older than 6,000 years old? Why were stone tools older than 790,000 years found in Gesher Benot Ya'akov? Why were stone tools older than 400,000 years found at the Revadim Quarry in Israel? When has a creatard used electron spin resonance and thermoluminescence to prove the earth is only 6,000 years old? What is the flat earth method for predicting an eclipse? Where can I find a map of your space frisbee that makes geometrically accurate flight patterns? What is the flerfer explanation for the phases of the moon? Why is there continental distribution when Noah’s Arc says different? What proof do you have that a bunch of dust can turn into a man? What proof do you have that a bone can turn into a woman? Why should I believe in your god instead of Zeus, Thor, Krishna or the Flying Spaghetti Monster?

Knowing they roamed an empty earth where there’s now cities and houses musta been surreal

It's amazing that the skulls remain in the soil for millions of years for us to do such detailed scientific researches on. Without them, we never knew what they looked like or how they evolved. Fossils really are precious legacy of our ancestors.

*WHAT DARWIN KNEW* In 1830, at age 21, Charles Darwin graduated Cambridge University with a degree in theology. Had it not been for one of his theology professors, Reverend Professor John Stevens Henslow who was also a biologist, Darwin would surely have faded into obscurity as an ordinary Anglican (Church of England) minister. At that time, theology professors were also expected to teach other subjects and young Charles Darwin eagerly sought out such teachers, one of which was Henslow. In his eagerness to learn about the natural world, Darwin would often question his tutor between classes. This was noted so often that Darwin became known as "The man who walks with Henslow". Even after graduation, Henslow encouraged his young protege to study geology with Reverend Professor Adam Sedgwick. It was Henslow to whom the position of ship's naturalist was first offered by Captain Robert FitzRoy of the HMS Beagle. At the time, FitzRoy and the Beagle were preparing for an extended voyage of discovery, charting the waters of South America. Henslow declined that offer due to his wife's opposition, but recommended his young student in his stead. Darwin's social status also made him a suitable traveling companion for a ship's captain who is, for reasons of discipline, denied familiarity with his crew. Despite young Darwin's fascination with the natural world he was not yet a scientist. During the voyage however, Darwin was shipping fossils and plant and animal specimens back to Henslow and others who eagerly awaited them. He learned much in the process due to his powers of observation. He published his account of the expedition as 'The Voyage of the Beagle'. Two years later he was nominated and elected a member (Fellow) of the British "Royal Society", which conferred upon him the right to use the letters FRS (Fellow of the Royal Society) as part of his name.* At that point, Charles Darwin was a recognized scientist. Darwin's knowledge of geology had served him well during the voyage, during which he furthered that knowledge by reading Charles Lyell's 'Principles of Geology'. Lyell is famous for the principle of "Uniformitarianism"; that the earth has been altered by physical, chemical, and biological processes that are uniform through time. Darwin himself later authored books on geology, resulting in his being elected a Fellow (member) of the Royal geographical Society (FRGS), permitting his use of those letters in his name. Those books: The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs (1842. Geological Observations on the Volcanic Islands (1844), Geological observations on the volcanic islands and parts of South America visited during the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle (1877) Darwin's curiosity and search for knowledge lead him to do research and write books on such diverse subjects as barnacles, orchids, earthworms, carnivorous plants, et al, In total 19 books, and thousands of letters to family and colleagues, all available on-line. His seminal work of course was his "On the Origin of species by Means of Natural Selection" published in 1859 when he was 50. It was the culmination of almost 30 years of work. That was followed 12 years later by "The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex" which reignited a firestorm of protests from fundamentalist creationists. By any measure, the life of Charles Robert Darwin FRS FRGS FLS FZS was one of great accomplishment.He was honored in life by those fellowships, not only the Royal Society and Royal geographical Society, but also the Linnaean Society and Zoological Society. Today there are those who fear his revelations weaken religious belief, and so will attempt to vilify him with slander and lies at any opportunity. Of what value is such a religion? *The Royal Society of the U.K, is, like the U.S. National Academy of Sciences that was patterned after it, an organization of the top scientific minds of the nation. Fellowship is by invitation only; new members are nominated and voted upon by current members. Those so chosen are entitled to use the letters FRS. (Fellow of the Royal Society) as part of their name. Charles Darwin was one of those so honored. To be continued.

Atheism is a non prophet world view that rejects magic as an explanation.

Animals : *kills human* Ancestors of early human : makes sharp stick Animals : "so thats when my time was up and i was told to leave"

My little brother walked in during the half human half monkey part and asked if I was watching monkey porn Good times

*HOW EVOLUTION WORKS* It is helpful to understand that evolution is a molecular process. The random mutations that naturally occur during cell division and replication (mitosis and meiosis) are the raw material for the genetic variation we see in every population of organisms. Mutations are ongoing and continuous for every living species. Mutations are essential to evolution; they are the raw material of genetic variation. Without mutation, evolution could not occur. WITH mutations, evolution is inevitable. [NOTE: My original essay had links to applicable illustrations and scientific studies, but KZfaq keeps deleting it. My apologies for their absence here.] Those genetic variants are subjected to a selection process that is performed by whatever environment the organisms find themselves. In this respect, evolution is an ongoing, continuous set of natural experiments. Those that work get perpetuated, those that don't, perish. It is as if the environment acted as an umpire who says "There are good mutations and there are bad mutations and there are neutral mutations, but they ain't nuthin' until I (the environment) calls 'em." That is Natural Selection. Neutral mutations just go along for the ride producing neither immediate benefit nor harm (Genetic Drift). The result of those selection processes is organisms best suited for their current environment. Should that environment change, it would put the population under stress. If the population gene pool has sufficient genetic variation it increases the likelihood that at least some offspring should be able to survive and perpetuate the species (albeit one of slightly different genetic makeup). What everyone should understand is that genetic changes do not occur because of some 'need'. The mutations are RANDOM and get selected if they are USEFUL. That is a process called Natural Selection and it is anything BUT random. Let's take the example of the Panda. Bears in general are omnivores, eating plant matter, but with a marked preference for meat when available. The preferred food of the Panda however, is bamboo leaves, which have such low nutritional value that they must eat almost continuously. The Panda would certainly be able to extract more nutrition with a four chambered stomach (as in ungulates and whales) or something akin to a cecal valve that would slow the passage of food, but it has neither in its genetic toolbox. In feeding themselves, pandas are continuously stripping bamboo leaves from their stalks, a process that could be facilitated if they had a grasping thumb. Bears however do not have thumbs, nor do they have genes for them in their genetic toolbox. Nor do new features simply spring into existence. However, if a slightly altered body component provides some benefit, natural selection will perpetuate it. Evolution is descent with modification and results in incremental alterations to what is already there. As an analogy, imagine a robot gardener dragging a hose around various obstacles it encounters in a garden until it can go no further. Now an intelligent gardener could simply retrace his steps and take a different path, avoiding those obstacles. The robot gardener (evolution) is not an intelligent force and cannot do that. With a limited tool kit, it can only (figuratively) add more hose to get the job done. While a thumb would be quite useful to a panda for stripping leaves, evolution cannot rewind to produce one. Instead, it has taken "a piece of hose' (a wrist bone) and enlarged it to act as a stand in for a thumb. That is not an elegant solution and not a perfect one, but it gets the job done. Evolution is does not produce perfect solutions, but tweaks here and there to get the job done". THAT is how evolution operates. The panda’s "thumb", developed over thousands of generations of holding things, is clearly an enlarged bone (the “radial sesamoid”) in the the paw of a bear. Based in part on the fact that no tetrapods, (terrestrial vertebrates) exist in the fossil record prior to about 370 million years ago, the Theory of Evolution would predict that tetrapods evolved from fish. If that were the case, there should have existed at one time a fish with characteristics of both fish and tetrapods. In other words a Transitional Species. Until about 2005, there was only scattered evidence for such a creature. There were however, a class of fish called Sarcopterygians or Lobe Finned Fishes, that dominated Devonian seas. What characterized those lobe finned fishes was that those fins were supported by external bones and muscles. Those bones, a single bone, connected to two bones connected to smaller bones, are homologous to the limb bones of all tetrapods, including humans. Most Sarcopterygian Fishes have long been extinct, but they are survived today by two species of coelacanth and six species of lungfish. Still, what was missing was a fossil showing characteristics of fish AND tetrapods. When Neil Shubin and his team decided to search for a fossil that filled the gap between the Lobe Finned Fishes that dominated Devonian Seas and the earliest tetrapod fossils represented by Ichthyostega and Acanthostega dated about 370 mya. Since those fossils were found in geologic deposits indicating a freshwater environment and if the Theory of Evolution is correct in its hypothesis that tetrapods evolved from fish, then transitional fossils should be found in similar deposits somewhat older in age. The problem was that geologic deposits of that age are exposed at few places on the earth's surface. Fortunately, a great deal of geologic exploration has been done throughout the world, financed often times by oil and mining interests. They selected an area in the Canadian Arctic, Ellesmere Island, as having the greatest likelihood of success. It took them 4 expeditions over 4 years, searching during the short summers of that hostile environment but finally succeeded in 2004, returning with 9 specimens of the fish they named Tiktaalik (an Inuit word meaning large freshwater fish). It was exactly what one would expect a transitional fish-tetrapod to look like and was found in deposits dated 375 mya. If this was not the direct ancestor of tetrapods, it was something very much like it.This is a great example of using evolutionary theory as a predictive tool. Btw, biointeractive(dot)org is a great source of information for all of science. If anyone has an interest in expanding their knowledge of science they should use it. The genetic variation within a population is referred to as a gene pool. Organisms can move freely within that population breeding with each other, perpetuating any new mutations that work and eliminating those that are less than optimal. Each offspring will most resemble its parents, yet will vary slightly genetically because of unique mutations acquired during meiosis. Thus the genetic makeup of a population will change ever so slightly with each successive generation. Populations are not stable, they expand and contract with changing conditions. So long as there is sufficient genetic variation within a population there will be some members capable of surviving those conditions and perpetuating the species. The alternative is extinction. When populations expand and migrate to new territories, some portions of it will become genetically isolated from each other and no longer share a common gene pool. In such cases, each such sub population will carry a subset of the parent population genome, but subsequent mutations will be unique to each new population (the genotype) that will come to differentiate that population from others (Genetic Drift). To the extent that such populations encounter differing environmental conditions, that environment will exert different evolutionary pressures on that population. New mutations will have a much greater chance of coming to dominance within a smaller population than they would in the larger parent population where they would be one among the many. Over thousands of generations genetic differences accumulate in the different gene pools making interbreeding ever more difficult until at some point speciation can be said to have occurred. Because speciation is a process, rather than an event, it would be no more possible to pinpoint where speciation occurred than to identify where on the color spectrum orange becomes red.

It's really not that long ago in geological terms that we became us and historical humans are less than the blink of an eye and yet the development has been incredible.

Humans billions of years ago: killing elephants with ease Humans now: *scared of barking dog*

go back I want to be monke

*The American Association for the Advancement of Science statement on evolution:* *"Evolution is one of the most robust and widely accepted principles of modern science. It is the foundation for research in a wide array of scientific fields and, accordingly, a core element in science education. The AAAS Board of Directors is deeply concerned, therefore, about legislation and policies recently introduced in a number of states and localities that would undermine the teaching of evolution and deprive students of the education they need to be informed and productive citizens in an increasingly technological, global community. Although their language and strategy differ, all of these proposals, if passed, would weaken science education. The AAAS Board of Directors strongly opposes these attacks on the integrity of science and science education. They threaten not just the teaching of evolution, but students’ understanding of the biological, physical, and geological sciences."* Creationists, who are often scientifically illiterate, often make the claim that evolution is not really science. The AAAS, in essence, is saying they lie.

THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS ARE WHAT REAL SCIENTISTS SAY. The creationist answer: "Nuh-uh", "Nuh-uh", "Nuh-uh", ad nauseum They think it is a really powerful argument.

wish i had a time machine so i could know wtf happened back then

“they gathered and ate everything” ah i see so thats where i got it

*SOME PEOPLE STILL ASK, "WHY ARE THERE STILL APES (OR MONKEYS)?"* It should be obvious that such people, usually creationists, lack an understanding of what evolution is and how it works. Apparently someone told such people that humans evolved from apes, and from that, due to their lack of education, they assumed that all apes were supposed to evolve into humans. That is not how evolution works, but creationists have no interest in learning anything other than creation mythology. They might just as well have asked "If dogs are descended from wolves, why are there still wolves?" Or even "If Americans came from Europe, why are there still Europeans?" Just as dogs descended from a population of wolves, so too did humans evolve from one particular population of apes. What we know is that the first apes evolved in Africa during the Miocene, about 25 million years ago from a population of Cercopiths. Whereas monkeys run on all four feet across the TOPS of branches, apes evolved skeletal changes giving the ability to ability to swing, arm over arm, from branch to branch. Evolution works to make each species best suited to their environment. For apes, that environment was the forest and they are well suited for it. At one time there were about 30 different species of apes in those forests. Had environmental conditions remained the same, we would still see forests covering the whole African continent. However, conditions did not stay the same; the climate became drier. As a result, forested areas shrank in size and were replaced by grasslands, the African savanna, with just a few scattered trees. The shrinking forests put different ape species in competition with each other and many went extinct. Then, about 6 or 7 million years ago, one population of apes split, with some of them opting for life on that open savanna. Other apes are capable of walking upright, they are just not comfortable doing so for long periods of time. Recent experiments with trained chimps on a treadmill have shown that for them, walking upright was more efficient in terms of energy expended than quadrupedal walking. Chimps and other apes though must shift their weight from side to side while walking bipedaly. That savanna environment favored skeletal changes that placed the knees directly under the center of gravity. By about 4 mya, our ancestral australopithecines had almost the same skeletal features as modern humans. Changes to pelvis, femur, knees and feet gave them a smooth stride that was efficient for long distance travel. They did however, retain long arms and curved fingers enabling them to climb a tree when danger threatened. Their brains, as measured by cranial capacity, were only slightly larger than that of today's chimpanzees. The apes that remained in a forest environment were under little pressure to change as they were well adapted to it. They became the ancestors of today's chimps and bonobos. Those living on the open savanna were presented challenges not experienced by woodland apes, and that required greater intelligence and cooperation to overcome them. It set their descendants on a different evolutionary trajectory that culminated in us.

Non-smoking is an addiction.

Damn the ardipithicus swinging in the tree part is cursed lol so uncanny

That was a key stage, when they started to bury the dead, showed care and respect for other individuals plus the thinking process to prevent the body from being consumed by other preditory animals.

Unemployment is a job

The cameraman is a legend

Humans then: finally i can make tools Humans now: go back i want to be monke

The fact that we’re on the same planet where all this happened so many millions of years ago is incredible

The difference between faith and insanity is that insanity is the ability to hold firmly to a conclusion that is incompatible with the evidence, whereas faith is the ability to hold firmly to a conclusion that is incompatible with the evidence.

One thing I learned.... we evolved into scared humans from fearless animals

Humans 10000 B.C.E: " The future is going to be amazing. Endless opportunities for the human kind" Humans 2021 C.E: "I'm depressed. I don't want to be human anymore, all I want to be is monke"

2:09 got me actin up for some reason 😂

GOD WAS A TREMENDOUS INVENTION AND A GREAT BENEFIT TO MANKIND. Before man created God, they felt really stupid. Confronted with any question, all they could say was "Gee, I don't know" and no matter how hard they thought, they couldn't think of a better answer. Then someone came up with the brilliant idea of God. It was wonderful, it obviated the need to think about anything. The answer could always be "Gee, I don't know, it must be God." Problem solved. The "God concept" alleviated the need to think about mundane things and they could concentrate on serious questions, like "How many bibles can we sell?" There was no incentive for human intellect to advance beyond that of ancient goat herders. Religions need to perpetuate ignorance in order to preserve their influence. It is quite likely that the "god concept" originated with Homo erectus as an explanation for thunder.

0:31 "wait, its all mango?" "always has been"

Human in the future: A N I M E E Y E S

No creationist can show real evidence for their creationism or that refutes the Science of Evolution.

There's over 1.5 million animal species in this world, but only 1 animal(Apes) related to human?? That's sound very very logical & now I'm waiting for a dog name Randall that keep following me after month(his hungry need to be feed)

Damn, my ancestors were ripped af. And I am here watching this video while eating fries all day.

2:10 such a gross sight im sorry

I now believe that my dad did in fact crossed jungles and saharas just to go to school. I'm honestly suprised to see him here

*ALL LIFE ON EARTH IS DEPENDENT ON THE DNA MOLECULE THAT REGULATES BODILY FUNCTIONS AND TRANSMITS HEREDITARY INFORMATION TO PROGENY.* That is very strong evidence for common ancestry in that there are about 1 million other molecules that could conceivably perform the same function.

6:36 Oh no, run great x25000 grandpa

*"Man was now armed."* That sounded amazing and highly ominous at the same time

*Does every scientific organization in the world endorse evolution as a fact? YES.* *Do all science organizations in the world regard evolution as a branch of science? YES.* *DO Biology departments of every secular university in the world back evolution? YES.* *Does the Biology department of Baptist Baylor University teach evolution? YES it does.* *DO the Geology departments of every secular university in the world endorse evolution? YES.* *Does the Geology department of Baptist Baylor University endorse evolution? YES it does.* *Does the Episcopalian church endorse evolution? YES it does.* *Does the Catholic Church endorse evolution? YES it does.* *Does the United Methodist Church? YES it does.* *Does the Presbyterian Church? YES it does.* Do creationists accept the evidence for evolution? NO, because their belief system requires them to reject any evidence that does not support their biblical interpretation. They grew up with that belief. It was not reasoned into them, and most likely cannot be reasoned out of them. One cannot reason with those who reject its use. That would be like giving medicine to a dead man.

This is how documentaries and video should be made on science

2:08 The first Belle Delphine

This was so nostalgic I remember me and my monkey friends where climbing trees eating fruit

Q: Why did the creatard jump off the building? A: He thought gravity was "just a theory" Q: Why do creatards pretend that evolution means we came from rocks? A: Because they themselves made it no further than brainless rocks. Q: Why do creatards so badly want to believe they’re intelligently designed? A: When else do they get the chance to say “intelligent” while describing themselves?

The Christian "Old Testament" is actually the Hebrew Tanakh written by Hebrew priests and scribes during the Babylonian Exile (597 to 538 BCE). That 'Exile' was a factual event that began with Nebuchadnezzar's siege of Jerusalem in 597 BCE. That began the first of several deportations in which much of the population of the Kingdom of Judah (the Jews) were forced from Jerusalem and the arid Judean hills to Babylon on the banks of the Euphrates River. That was in Mesopotamia where floods were a regular occurrence. During their roughly 60 year stay in Babylon, they would have experienced several floods which they had never seen in their arid homeland. They would have heard the Sumerian story of a great flood and its hero Ut-napishtim. It was a great story, so they changed his name to Noah and put it in the bible. They would have also heard the legend of how Sargon II (Sargon the Great) as a baby was saved by his mother floating him down the Euphrates River in a reed boat sealed with pitch. That was another great story and, with a couple of name changes, it too went into the bible. Of course everyone in Babylon knew of King Hammurabi, the great law giver, whose laws are the basis of modern day legal systems. The bible needed a hero like that. And so it was that over those 60 years a story emerged that served to give the Judean peoples a foundation mythology. Six hundred years later, a new religion, Christianity, adopted it as their "Old Testament".

6:35 bro why didn’t the cameraman do anything

Thanks to the animation team who worked hard for this

I subscribed just because I like "scientists against myths" quote

darwin: 🙉 I am fooling people today with my theory

5:57 : "Last step was to colonize the planet" britishers in 18th century : let's do the last step again

4:07 rare video of man without wifi

What anyone _believes_ exists in the human mind. Religions are _OPINIONS,_ *TRUTH* is determined by *EVIDENCE.* The rules of evidence are this: *IF YOU DON'T HAVE ANY...YOU LOSE!*

The Geological Society of America Position Statement: Adopted October 2005; revised May 2009, November 2012, May 2017, and October 2021. Evolution and the directly related concept of deep (geologic) time are essential parts of science curricula at all levels of education. The evolution of life on Earth stands as one of the central concepts of modern science that is accepted by the scientific community. Two centuries of research in geology, paleontology, and biology have produced an increasingly detailed, consistent, and robust picture of how life on Earth evolved. Creationism, whether presented as creation “science” or intelligent design, attempts to explain complicated phenomena of the natural world by invoking a supernatural creator or designer. Creationism cannot be tested using the scientific method and therefore has no place in a science curriculum.

0:53 searching for your phone charger in the dark

Throwing the spear away was probably the dumbest thing the man could have done when the bear attacked.

Creationism and poor education go hand in hand.

source 'trust me bro'

3:06 props to the camera man almost getting attacked by the ape woman...

4:25 me trying to find who made all the bad decisions in my life

I'm relieved to see that my moobs are just a vestigial remnant of evolution, and not just the result of Cheetos.

2:15 i feel uncomfortable

" for millions of years our planet has been floating in space " Yes. That's what a planet does

great video, showed it to my kid and he also liked it.

*EVOLUTION OF THE HUMAN BRAIN* - While the human brain is the largest in relation to body size of any animal, it came about in response to a series of environmental pressures. When we look at endocasts of early mammal skulls, we see rapid brain expansion, particularly in the area of the Olfactory Lobe. A highly developed sense of smell was obviously a tremendous survival advantage to early mammals as it enabled the avoidance of predatory dinosaurs as well as finding food and mates. When we look at modern mammalian genomes, we find a large number of different odor receptor genes, (as many as 1,000) approximately 3% of the total number of genes in the genome. Each olfactory gene codes for a protein that is sensitive to a specific range of chemical signatures (odorants). Each olfactory receptor (OR) triggers a nerve response sending a message to the brain. Olfactory genes are found in clusters in mammalian genomes and are remarkably similar to each other, often differing by just one or two amino acids. What this suggests is a series of events wherein segments of DNA were duplicated multiple times. The duplicated coding sequences (genes) over time would be subject to random mutations (insertions, deletions or substitutions) that slightly alter the protein produced and the chemical signature to which it responded. Natural selection would favor those that provided some advantage. As olfactory receptors proliferated, a larger brain was required to process them. When ancestral primates took to the trees, hand-eye coordination became of paramount importance, again necessitating a larger brain to process that information. Fossil primate skulls show expansion in the visual cortex. Any individual deficient in that area, or lacking depth perception stood a greater likelihood of falling to its death, thus eliminating its genes from the gene pool. Primate brains are, on an average, about double the size of other , similar sized mammals. Monkeys have larger cranial capacity than prosimians (lemurs and lorises), and apes larger still. It has long been known that human brains go through a rapid expansion in connectivity during childhood. What was not known was whether humans were unique in that respect, or if it was also found in other apes. In Japan, researchers did MRI brain scans of three baby chimps over their first 6 years. That data was compared with previously existing brain scans for six macaque monkeys and 28 Japanese children. They found that brain development in early life for both chimpanzees and humans greatly exceeded that of macaques. "The increase in total cerebral volume during early infancy and the juvenile stage in chimpanzees and humans was approximately three times greater than that in macaques," the researchers wrote in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B article. It showed however that, during early childhood, human brain expansion was twice that of Chimpanzees, due to rapid growth of connections between brain cells (white matter). The human brain keeps expanding throughout a very long childhood, whereas those of apes max out at an early age. This may be due to duplications in the human lineage of the SRGAP2 gene. This gene Is also present in the other apes, but has never been duplicated in those lineages. It has however been duplicated three times in the human genome in the past 3.4 million years: one duplication 3.4 million years ago (mya) called SRGAP2B, a second duplication 2.4 mya (called SRGAP2C), and one final duplication ~1 mya (SRGAP2D). (see my essay *Genetic Differences Between Humans and Apes* ) Why do other animals not evolve larger brains? Because in terms of calorie consumption the brain is a very expensive organ. The adult human brain weighs about 3 pounds and constitutes about 2% of average human body mass, yet it uses 20% of total caloric intake. In human infants undergoing rapid brain expansion the figure is even more dramatic; 60% of caloric intake go to neural development. For most animals, life is a daily struggle to secure sufficient calories for survival. Having to nourish a larger brain would not enhance their survival. Humans, with hands capable of manipulating objects, and perhaps a more cooperative nature, could have put extra brain power to use and improve their odds of survival, IF they were able to provide the necessary calories. The diet of today's chimpanzees is largely leaves, which their forest environment supplies in great quantity, supplemented by fruit in season and the meat of small animals when the opportunity presented itself. Leaves are low in nutrient value and chimps must consume them in large quantities. It has been observed that chimps spend about a third of their waking hours just chewing. Ape physiology is well adapted to that diet; large teeth, powerful jaw muscles that wrap around the skull and a long gut to enable maximum nutrient extraction from a nutrient poor diet. Unlike the human appendix which is minuscule, the ape appendix is quite large and serves as a repository for bacteria that aid the digestion of their leafy diet. The ape rib cage flares outward to accommodate the large gut, unlike the tucked-in rib cage of modern humans. Since the discovery of the fossil hominid nicknamed "Lucy" in 1974, there have been many other discoveries of both her species, Australopithecus afarensis, and perhaps a dozen other species of australopithecenes, including several with rather complete skeletons. From them, it has been determined that they were fully bipedal, but retained rather long arms for climbing. The skull was ape-like in that it projected forward (prognathic) and cranial capacity was marginally greater than that of chimps. Chimpanzee skulls have a 400ml capacirty, whereas A. afarensis skulls measured 400 to 550ml. One major difference between apes and australopithecines was that the teeth were much smaller and the huge fighting canines found on chimpanzees were much reduced in size. That suggests that Australopithecus had adopted a more cooperative life style. While much of the sub cranial skeleton was more human-like than ape-like, the rib cage flared outward, indicating they had much the same low quality diet as did chimps. Analysis of phytoliths and isotopes extracted from tartar on fossil teeth indicates they too had a plant based diet, but the chemical signatures were those of grasses and sedges, perhaps roots and bulbs. Savanna baboons subsist on such a diet today. Those savanna dwelling hominids were surrounded by high quality protein in the huge herds of ungulates; unfortunately they had not the means to harvest it. At some point, however, they must have found a way. We know they began to use flake tools, the primitive Oldowan technology, to cut meat from bone. It is unlikely they had become killers at that point, but they could have become adept at scavenging lion kills. Lions will make a kill, gorging themselves on the flesh, then find a shady area to sleep it off during the heat of the day. Cagey hominids could have exploited that opportunity to make off with some leftovers. Lions don't have the same bone crushing capability as hyenas so, even if they had pretty much stripped the carcass, leg bones rich in marrow and the brains inside skulls would have been a calorie and protein bonanza for intrepid, cooperative hominids. That scenario is speculative, but we do know they were using flake tools to butcher meat and whatever mutations favored larger brains would have been useless without the calories to fuel it. Homo erectus had a skeleton with all the hallmarks of a diet that provided that fuel. Double the cranial capacity of his predecessors, lean, tall, long legged and capable of running. It is speculative to suggest they engaged in persistence hunting, but it is used by Kalahari Bushmen even today. We know that H. erectus used fire, and eventually learned how to make it. Cooking food would have made it easier to chew and digest allowing greater extraction of nutrients. Physical evidence for early man's use of fire is patchy and there is no doubt they witnessed lightning strike fires and learned how to retrieve glowing coals from them and nurture a more or less continuous flame. There was a movie made on this theme; “Quest for Fire”; perhaps 45 years ago, but should be available from multiple sources; perhaps even KZfaq as copyright has expired. What that movie illustrates is that early man's use of fire depended on maintaining glowing coals over long periods of time and that was very tenuous. The ability to make fire occurred much later.

Neanderthals and homo sapiens where two diferent human species that coexisted, neanderthals were not ancestors of homo sapiens

Old day humans:not scared of a mammoth Humans now:*scared of spiders*

Is there a continuation of the video somewhere? It's amazing.

You know what I'm worried about? This is that Muslims are increasing every year, and given that Islam is the fastest growing religion, this is the main problem for the whole world. Here is an example: a huge number of Muslims are growing in Europe, especially in France and Germany. I don't want my family to disappear because of Islam, I want the whole world to be secular

KZfaq: *sees naked ape* that's all good KZfaq: *sees naked human* TAKE IT DOWN TAKE IT DOWN

Me when I was 9 turning off the lights in the livingroom: 6:28

enyone watching at 2024?

*DOES THE FOSSIL RECORD SUPPORT THE IDEA OF BIOLOGICAL CHANGE OVER TIME (BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION)?* The answer from conservative Baptist run Baylor University Geosciences Department: *Yes. The fossil record clearly indicates a progression in complexity of organisms from very simple fossil forms in the oldest rocks (>3.5 billion years old) to a broad spectrum from simple to complex forms in younger rocks, that some organisms that were once common are now extinct, and that the living organisms inhabiting our world today are similar (but generally not the same) as organisms represented as fossils in young sedimentary deposits, which in turn have evolutionary ancestors represented as fossils in yet older rocks.* *Mammals, for example, are prevalent today and can be traced back in the fossil record for approximately 200 million years, but are not present as mammals in the fossil record before that; however, fossil forms that have reasonably been interpreted to be associated with the evolutionary precursors to mammals are found in older rocks.* *Whether biological evolution occurs has not been a matter of scientific debate for more than a century. It is considered a proven fact. The specific mechanisms of biological change over time continue to be a topic of active research, and include mechanisms proposed by Charles Darwin as well as more recently developed ideas based on our growing knowledge of genetics and molecular biology. Using the methods of modern science, our knowledge of the fundamental mechanisms of life has grown enormously since the initial characterization of the role of DNA in reproduction, inheritance and evolution in the mid-1950s.* The American Geological Institute and The Paleontological Society, partnering with the most respected geoscience societies in America including the Geological Society of America, the American Geophysical Union, and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (among others), have produced a booklet on evolution and the fossil record that can be downloaded as a PDF file. This booklet was written for the general public by people who have worked with the fossil record throughout their careers, and was thoroughly reviewed by other professional geologists and paleontologists.

3:13 “Are ya winning, son?”