​@@henrikvalborgland4556One: It's Calvinism. Two: Explain

​@@EliB207Probably someone who have just heard about Calvinism with these pentecostals/ Non denominational youtubers who love to talk about it without knowing anything about Reformed Theology and make a 2 hour video just strawmaning Calvin. There are a lot of this guys out there since pentecostalism decided to consider Calvinism a heresy lol.

@@EliB207 1 i dont care. Calvanisme is 👹

PRAISE THE LORD!!!🗣️🗣️🗣️🔊🔊🔊🔥🔥🔥 For those who don’t know by the way, (anyone can read though), Jesus will fulfill you more than anything in this world, I speak from experience (from when i did Romans 10:9-13), he loves you and wants to be in a meaningful (not romantic) relationship with you. :) “that if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.” ‭‭Romans‬ ‭10‬:‭9‬-‭13‬ ‭KJV‬‬ “and saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.” ‭‭Mark‬ ‭1‬:‭15‬ ‭KJV‬‬ If you want proof that Jesus and the Bible are true look a documentary called “Ron Wyatt discoveries 2022” on KZfaq and a KZfaq channel called Expedition Bible. They both examine archeological sites and discoveries that prove the Bible, and even reference secular sources. (Just don’t convert to 7th day Adventism after watching the documentary) And lastly if you don’t know the gospel and want to be saved search up “abc’s of Salvation Teenmissions” on Google and it should be the first or second result. When you click on it read the whole thing, and do what it says and have faith in Jesus while you are doing it, do not doubt, and if it is hard for you to do what it says, ask Jesus to help you, have faith that he will, and *he will.* God Bless :)

So happy for you, God bless!

"Hello, based department?"

If you are serious about the study, there have been comparison done already that you can read up on. The differences are extremely minor, but the tone is vastly different. The Belgic Confession is written more "warmly" but not as clear and precise. The Westminster Confession is rigid but more precise. The reason is that the WC was written like 70 or 80 years after the BC and wanted to eliminate any misinterpretations.

And here I am literally doing my homework.

Here I am literally playing Minecraft.

if Reconquista is implemented, it will work

I’m Scottish, former Presbyterian, currently non-denominational/pentecostal but I don’t think I could even walk into a CoS church anymore it’s just so sad. I’d love to support the Reconquista here though

It got so bad that we (PCI, the Presbyterian Church in Ireland) had to cut all ties with them. The Free Church of Scotland is better imo.

@@Jupiter__001_PCI is BASED! I’ve visited two of their church’s, and they are killing it

@@keelanenns4548 Whereabout did you visit?

Вуистина воскресе! (sorry for being late tho)

Often times people say having communion more frequently would make it "less special"; These same people seem to want sermons and the offering every week 😅

There's a difference between saying that baptism saves (the Bible does explicitly say this in 1 Peter 3:21, and alludes to it in John 3) and that you can't be saved _without_ baptism.

😂 congratulations on being Christian. Watch more of his videos and look up what you don’t understand. I was you and still kind of am lol but seeking God more helped me understand :) (this sounds kind of dumb but his discord also helped too just as God intended.) This part of for unbelievers but really anyone can read it. Jesus will fulfill you more than anything in this world, I speak from experience (from when i did Romans 10:9-13), he loves you and wants to be in a meaningful (not romantic) relationship with you. :) “that if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.” ‭‭Romans‬ ‭10‬:‭9‬-‭13‬ ‭KJV‬‬ “and saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.” ‭‭Mark‬ ‭1‬:‭15‬ ‭KJV‬‬ If you want proof that Jesus and the Bible are true look a documentary called “Ron Wyatt discoveries 2022” on KZfaq and a KZfaq channel called Expedition Bible. They both examine archeological sites and discoveries that prove the Bible, and even reference secular sources. (Just don’t convert to 7th day Adventism after watching the documentary) And lastly if you don’t know the gospel and want to be saved search up “abc’s of Salvation Teenmissions” on Google and it should be the first or second result. When you click on it read the whole thing, and do what it says and have faith in Jesus while you are doing it, do not doubt, and if it is hard for you to do what it says, ask Jesus to help you, have faith that he will, and *he will.* God Bless :)

So do I, it is a fantastic book.

😂 MacArthites thinking macarthur is reformed

@@keelanenns4548 Accurate. That man really harmed the reputation of the reformed baptist subculture with his wild theology. Most people assume a "reformed baptist" is just a MacArthurite who thinks he has outstanding theology without looking into the rich particular baptist history and confessions

I didn't know you could take the Lord's Supper as a non-lutheran in an LCMS church!

@@RobertG3567you’re not, probably that specific Pastor doesn’t take his confessional role serious to allow that.

He’s a 4th gen Lutheran: as a Pastor he has to subscribe to their LCMS confessions; however he made an exception for my wife and I on regarding soteriology differences, but agree that we must be born again and “saved by faith, not by works,”etc. !✝️

Predestination is not an infringement on free will, at least not how we understand it. We do not believe, as the Gnostics believed, that election is on the basis of containing some divine shard in our hearts, and that those without it cannot be saved. Predestination is a statement of final destination. Every day of our lives is already written in His Book of Life. This is possible because truly free choices are not made randomly, but instead based on environment and circumstance (as well as the condition of our hearts, e.g. Pharaoh having his heart hardened by God so he wouldn't let the Israelites go before God was finished showing who's boss). God foreknew that Adam and Eve would eat the forbidden fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, but yet He still chose to put the tree there with them in the Garden. By your logic, a loving God would never have given them the choice to do evil in that way at all, but clearly God disagrees! God would like for all of us to be redeemed in Him, as He loves us all, but He has not chosen to predestine everyone to be among the redeemed elect. It should be noted that election and non-election are not the same as redemption/condemnation. (We are condemned for our own actions due to our sin.) In Calvinistic language, we say that He decreed that all should sin and fall away by willfully disobeying his commandments, and then He decreed that some should repent and be restored to participate in His Glory. Those chosen for this honour are called "the elect". If you're still struggling, I'll explain it another way: we do not believe in multiple possible future timelines like in science fiction, but instead in one singular future history. This necessarily implies predestination (furthermore, as God already knew us when He wove us together in the womb, and as He already knows every day of our lives, this is backed up by Scripture). I hope this helps.

​@Jupiter__001_ As a Calvinist myself, I have struggled with this as well. Why does God only decree SOME people to be saved, when He could save all? I know He has no requirement to save everyone, but in His loving mercy, he still decides to save some, but why not all? Since he does not save everyone, does this mean that He is not ALL-loving?

​@@esserman1603 all is determined in the sight of our omniscient God. I think God wants all to be saved, but in his omniscient, he foreknow who will be saved. We are free to choose, but God sovereignty knows the end, and nothing escapes his control and limits.

@@Jupiter__001_ That was an excellent explanation! Well done, brother!

I would appreciate if you could explain further and how that fits with your beliefs as a baptist

I don't personally affirm any efficacy of water to save (nor does Zoomer). In my mind, baptism is the water. That said, I need to do some study on baptism because I know there's more. To me it seems most likely that there's several baptisms, possibly related but not sacramentally tied. But if baptism by water is sacramentally tied to a baptism that equals regeneration, it's got to be time travelling, and Zoomer has already explained why.

​@@fresholiveoil6490Scripture says there is only one baptism. This is the trouble with the Reformed view: it wants to maintain that baptism is a single sacrament that is genuinely efficacious for salvation, but its seperation between baptism's institution and effect inevitably leads to the Evangelical mistake of confessing two baptisms ("water baptism" and "spirit baptism").

@benjaminAnderson21 I hadn't thought of that verse. Regardless of whether it's correct to separate or conflate different baptisms, it's clear that Paul's point in saying there is "one baptism" is to emphasize the unity of the church. In the previous verse (Ephesians 4:4) he says there is one spirit (πνεύμα); yet we know there are a multitude of spirits based on other scriptures. One Spirit binds us as a church, as does one baptism. But the gospel accounts do imply very strongly that there is more than one baptism: in Luke 3:16 and Matthew 3:11, John tells his disciples that he baptises with water, but He who comes after (that is to say, Jesus) will baptize with the Holy Ghost and with fire. If those are all the same baptism, why does John bother mentioning it? There could be alternate explanations, but the simplest and most straightforward understanding I have is that there is a distinction to be made between baptism with water and with the Holy Ghost.

@@fresholiveoil6490 A good point

I think we read it.

@@esserman1603 it debunks Calvinism. It indicates that those for whom Christ died can still perish either limited atonement or perseverance of the saints is false or both.

No such thing as a Calvinist

against. both the Scots and Westminster confessions are against it

shut up

“I teach people how to make money online with KZfaq.” You have less than 3k subs with 24+ month old channel 💀

@@trevorhartman9411 This is not my main channel lol, I run a youtube automation network. (This literally has nothing to do with the video)

Bro imagine having school. LLLL

@@DruckerYTA lol

the "return dislike extension" is not accurate

@@redeemedzoomer6053 oh ok. Thanks

big if true

I doubt that vivziepop is a confessing Presbyterian. Vaguely influenced by Christian mythology (Heaven, Hell, Satan, even values like redemption), but not an actual Christian.

12 pm in TX