So true

Retroblasting made a perfect video on the OP's comment. An absolute recommendation to anyone interested: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fNeYdpiXst-5j30.html. Enjoy.

I'll eat your tablespoon of salt. This observation still tastes good.

Yeah I think that applies to all forms of entertainment, music, books etc. Reflection of the human cycle itself maybe ?

@@madmartigan8119 true. I got the feeling the last super creative and explorative era we've had both for art, cinema, music, and animation was the 80's, 4 whole centuries (edit : I mean decades, of course) after WW2, enough to recover from its wounds and start explore creativity (the beginning of creativity was probably even from the end of the 50's, actually). The 90's were a great echo of it, then came the 2000's and everything started to fall apart... (probably because peace lasted for so long people and trends started getting complacent)

Yeah, I was trying to express the same idea, but your professors did it better.

it feels like they're doing dominance pissing to replace every story and every character with their own identity. It isn't about creating

Yep.

without a doubt. and I concur with Chato that SJWs are terrible at movie making and incapable of self reflection. an example is the latest Sarah Silverman woke Xmas cartoon disaster with got a whopping 3% on Rotten Tomatoes. She claimed it was because she angered the "white supremacists" they will never own their failures, and all they have is failures.

The older liberals asked questions and created thought provoking stories. This is what’s missing in newer stuff.

@@WaywardPondering yeah because a lot of the great thought provoking ideas were accomplished and now there isn’t true oppression as there was in the 60’s in the first world at least.

@@FinanceMan are you sure there isn't true oppression going on in today's world? I would say there's an enormous amount of true oppression right now.

Movies used to use a lot more metaphors, or be subtle about politics. Along with being entertaining. They also used to not treat the viewer like an imbecile. Now it seems instead we get browbeaten with lectures, treating the audience as if they are to dumb to get any type of subtlety.

@@ryanpeck3377 It seems like they consider us morons until you examine Wokeism's messages and see that you have no choice but to "treat us like morons" to push it in a movie. You cant hide the dumb with ideological bafflegab when you use these "girl boss" characters who have exaggerated version of "toxic masculinity" traits and all that. Wokeism's silliness REQUIRES bafflegab and talking points to at least obscure how obviously just ideology and propaganda Wokeism is.

True, they always seem just dumb at first, then get a bit a venom on their tongue then it goes right back to them being stupid. They're so cowardly they cannot make their own stand on their own. It always a relience on other people's successes so when they do fail upwards they can blame the IP, fans, budget, etc. When it was their stupid vision where they refuse to commit 100%

I went to engineering school and I remember that our technical professors were so enraged by our lazy writing on the reports we made that they hire professional writers to encourage us to improve our style. What I'm trying to convey is that lame writing wasn't tolerated at an educational institute for a technical/professional career, I don't understand how "accomplished" and "professional writers" perform so poorly.

@@lordtanatos84kmkn59 Nepotism, wonder why when these people get stinkers they end up on a bigger project? Only to either quit or mess that up

At this point, that saying needs to be reversed. They are doing this on purpose, not by accident, and they say that pretty openly now. This is NOT the result of stupidity; it is genuine malice, in their own words.

There is a difference between writing for 35 million people of all ages and genders and 3 million mostly older females. The youth have left network TV and every year the average age of the network viewers are getting older. What do older viewers want? Procedurals. A procedural is a show where each episode is identical except some actors have changed. An example of this is a guy gets accused of a crime. The lawyer does some investigation and finds out his or her client is not guilty. The last part of the episode is the lawyer getting the real criminal to confess in a courtroom. The difference between the episodes are the crime and the actors for the side characters. Most shows in TV history, including sitcoms, have been procedurals. Creative shows have often either failed or turned into procedurals.

Being a second-generation Trekkie, I am in a precarious position when it comes to both the Kelvin Timeline and -nutrek- ... In 2001, I was nineteen years old, but I was fully saturated in Trekdom when _Star Trek Enterprise_ debuted, and I rejected the show before the first season even ended. There were too many problems for me to bother putting up with, and I walked away. A family-friend used that magical, mystical newfangled device at the time called a "DVR" to record the show, and he sent me Season Four on home-made DVDs _after_ the show had ended. For many years, I claimed that _ENT_ was garbage _except for_ its fourth season. Jump ahead to fall 2019, and I accidentally binged the entirety of _ENT_ on Netflix, and was- in my late-30s- fully converted to a fan of the show, to the point of _deep regret_ of my foolish arrogance across 17 years [at that point]. Of all the shows and movies that have come out since _ENT_ was unceremoniously cancelled in 2005, the only one that I have wholeheartedly embraced is _Star Trek Beyond,_ despite knowing its box office was affected more by the previous dumpster fire than poor word-of-mouth at the time, and that was a risky prospect I took back in 2016- that I wouldn't get burned a _third_ time in a row. As I continue to silently boycott Secret Hideout's mad flailings-about on Paramount+ (my sole _financial_ exception: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z5yPqraexK67Y2g.html ) and laugh at Bad Robot as they scramble to stay relevant despite failure after failure to their name and the slow eroding of JarJar Abrams' reputation (too many Kelvin Timeline Eaglemoss unboxings to list here, check out my channel #ShamelessPlug ), I cannot help but remind myself of my significant mistake in regards to _Star Trek Enterprise._ Will I- at some point years down the line- ultimately come to _regret_ boycotting the supposed genius of nutrek which I despite and loathe so heavily right now??? And by boycotting, that means I have not seen it with my own eyes (save for only the pilot of -std- in 2017 and peer-pressured into "MST3K-ing" five episodes of -lower recks- ) any significant part of -nutrek,- so I can't even verify _by my own personal standards_ whether these shows are actually enjoyable or not! - If I'm right and they _are_ garbage, then I will have given Kurtzman and the w0ke mob the justification of a view count and corrupted my "pure" view of _Star Trek,_ and in the same instant betrayed the principles upon which Roddenberry & Co. founded it in 1966. - If I'm wrong and #TheFandomMenace was making mountains out of molehills since 2017, then I will have- once again- _arrogantly and blindly condemned_ a quality product worthy of the name "Star Trek", and killed it out of my foolishness.

If I want *good* Star Trek, there's hundreds of hours of older shows I can watch. If I want *NEW* Star Trek, I have only CBS shows to watch, whether it's good or not. And CBS knows this. They're making money off the new garbage, at least enough that they keep making new seasons of it. Someone is watching it and making them money, doesn't matter (to CBS) if the fans of older shows are part of that audience or not. Sadly.

A certain amount of loss is able to be written off as an expenditure. If I was at the IRS I'd be looking closely at the amount they are claiming. These sjws are burning through money.

@@EVAUnit4A I shudder to think what awful writing singularity that could redeem STD in the future.

I've been watching star trek since reruns in the early 80s. I liked all the shows till STD and I just couldn't understand how this pos got made.

You forget that the comic book industry exists only to maintain the IP, lest there EVER be another Captain Marvel fiasco (Captain Marvel was almost as big as Superman, then paid to stop publishing. Another company created a “Captain Marvel” character as soon as they could, then DC bought the creating company of the old “Captain Marvel” only to discover some other little comic book company now had the rights to the name, and decided that the litigation wouldn’t be worth it, and so tried to recreate the Billy Batson Saga as “Shazam”). The point of that epic digresso is that it is cheaper to make comic books that don’t sell using “authors” that can be paid chicken feed, than to create new characters for every few movies (where the real money is).

Sadly I've spent decades in Hollywood. The biggest problem in both Hollywood and comics (almost synonymous since DC moved West) is a culture that actively hates and disrespects the past... just as greater culture sadly finds little use or respect for senior citizens. Without that respect for what came before, art becomes untethered from reality, history, and reflection... base, vacant, and childish. They're angry children with matches looking to burn down their homes. Problem is they don't understand how to build new homes once they've burned the old.

Actually Marvel Comics died at the moment that Stan Lee set foot on the airplane to move to the West Coast. Until then, people like Jim Shooter were kept under control. Once Stan was out of the way for good, the lesser talents were turned loose and the long (not very slow) decay took hold.

@@Thorn76 There's a lot of things wrong with the U.S. comics industry, but I think a lot of people forget the ACTUAL reason comics died - manga. That's right, Japanese manga - the best of them, at least - shit all over most of the U.S. comics in nearly every possible way. Better art, better stories, and they appeal to a broader range of readers. Is it any wonder? U.S. comics just about gave up on trying to make new characters, and there are only so many stories you can write about the same characters repeatedly! On top of that, manga are a HIGHLY competitive business, just to get your stories printed, whereas the system in U.S. comics has zero competition, or close to it, as to what stories are going to be published. I keep waiting for Marvel and DC to start doing something like Shonen Jump and the other big companies in Japan do, but all we keep getting is crap. What was the last time Marvel or DC got a spurt of new, interesting characters? The Rob Liefield era in the late 80s?

@@Thorn76 I'd argue Jim Shooter was a competent manager trying to keep some erratic egos in check. Shooter may not have been charismatic or even an attractive artist but he did ensure the output was tolerable and that the people got paid. Those who came after him didn't seem to have his ability to navigate between the egos and and practicalities.

Because I think there are people within this new generation that don't just want to ignore the past, they hate it with every fibre of their being. You must also understand that actors are egos wrapped in skin. And this isn't a criticism. It has to be this way to survive as an actor. I might just pitch the DWTS and bees.

@@CallMeChato I could see an entire suite of shows that would benefit from the addition of caged bees! Heck, change the "CW" to "CWB" (Caged with Bees) Network!

@@CallMeChato I have no desire to watch more Fear Factor. Nor do I desire to watch DWTS. However, Fear Factor crossed with DWTS would definitely get me to tune into episode one. As long as one of the stars didn't extol the virtues of underage sex.

@@CallMeChato Hosted by Nicolas Cage?

I am of the opinion that social media and Twitter are the worst things that happened to creatives in the entertainment industry. Before social media there was a mystique about Hollywood and a kind of 'wall of mystery' that separated audiences from the artists. Prior to social media, audiences rarely knew the inner thoughts or political views of the actors they watched on screen or the thoughts of the creative talent behind the scenes. Social media showed audiences 'the man behind the curtain' like in the Wizard of Oz and audiences don't like it. Many of the people in entertainment are not nice people I would want me or my family spending time around in real life. Before social media, the public images of movie stars were carefully crafted 'brands' that were sold to the public. That brand control was destroyed by social media. I'm of the opinion that one of the things studios are going to have to do to 'right the ship' is contractually muzzle their artistic talent on social media. Forcing their actors and creative talent off of social media will have to become a requirement to restore 'brand control' and improve public relations. All official social media accounts for actors and other employees in entertainment must be managed by professional PR departments. The current norm of actors and creatives tweeting out their latest rant on social media will have to come to an end.

Yes, I have experienced and thought about this a lot. I tried to rewatch the Disney Star Wars movies and I stopped. Same with the Avengers and I recall enjoying them the first time. I’ve watched Wag the Dog at least a dozen times, The Rutles, Singing in the Rain, The Big Clock, Jacques Tati films, Matrix 1 but not much from the recent crop. Thanks for your comment.

Or if you happen to check off the diversity victimization boxes....

Pretty true, famous for doing nothing with little to no talent. Our TIk Tok world and everyone has an opinion on everything.

I'm doing a video on why do the SJWs hate Shatner's Captain Kirk. It encapsulates what you've posted.

@@CallMeChato looking forwards to it. shatners kirk was awesome

Speaking of contradictions, is the model you talk about "marxist", "post modern", wanting to "deconstruct"? Because it can't be all of those at once.

@@roulette3657 It can, when the proponents are wildly unstable and cognitively dissonant.

I've been saying for a long time that this SJW cult is an Ouroboros. It will eat itself eventually.

JJ is a competent project manager. Probably why he hasn't directed anything but a couple of big projects in over a decade. His writing is lower than lazy, but why not get paid twice if you are the one in charge? The best thing I can say about JJ is that he was always meant to be a producer.

But JJ did a wonderful job at further wrecking Star Trek

That's it exactly. The executives care about 1 thing: Butts in seats on opening weekend. JJ knows how to create a spectacle that the sheeple will show up for. That's pretty much all he knows, and why he is meant to be a Producer and not a dear-god-stop-kicking-it-its-already-dead-stop-jj-stop Director or Writer.

You mean JarJar Abrams ? The guy who wrecked both Star Trek and Star Wars?

I'd say JJ has talent, but his talent comes from the perspective of a producer, who knows how to do money shots well. There also lies his failure, as a movie can't just be a string of money shots cobbled together. That's just an overly long trailer.

I'm too self-aware for my own good.

@@CallMeChato Disagree. Your self-awareness is good. It got you out while you could still retain recognizable parts of yourself.

Nah. Today we have a dozen super hero and law and order types shows, but in the 1950s, it was full of westerns and law and order type shows.

“Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.” G.Orwell. The woke undestand it and wish to destroy what they could not build out of envy and spite.

I think it's not really the case of actual hate. They see these franchises as conduits to spread their message to this demographic they really don't understand. It doesn't matter that much if the franchise is a bit soiled after use as long as other ones still remain. It's a bit like a spacebug walking around in an Edgar-suit.

@@TimoRutanen I think it does come from a place of hate. They hate that they themselves cannot create, or at least cannot create anything worthy of real love and affection, and they hate that others have not only created, but created things that people love and adore. So, they set out to trample those beloved creations into dust, so that they are only remembered as being garbage.

Agreed, very blue pill take by Chato here. It was pretty hilarious to see him arguing that the key to controlling entertainment is controlling so-called prime time TV, which has become a backwater. the guy really wants to relive the old days as a network guy.

teach it yourself. The industry is not imploding so much as it is delocalizing from high cost coastal production centers to lower cost cities and states that offer incentives and other benefits. Those are the places they need good acting training, beyond community theaters which have their own corrupt groupthink because they are all nonprofits and care more about "social change" than entertaining an audience.

@@ktoth29 Relax a little; It’s not my fault they aren’t paying your quotes (even if you do have the credits that deserve them) Maybe the delocalization and rebates from states aren’t going into the actors pockets? Who knows? If you don’t think Chato has excellent advice for actors, who does he have good advice for? The suits? If he was one of them he never would be making these videos. Chato is a good teacher and I stand by what I say. I wish you continued success.

And then they wonder why stuff like DC Comics or the CW network is basically on life support dispite having a bucket load of diversity and inclusion.... Yeah because NO ONE ACTUALLY BOUGHT THEIR STUFF. The way I see it, companies should really just ignore Twitter all together if they actually want to end up making some level of profit, which they are having a hard time doing when you have all this new generation directors/network executives who are more or less creatively bankrupt.... And thus you will get more low quality stuff like Star Trek Discovery.

True. My disgust with Hollywood led me to become a fan of Korean cinema and Indonesian action flicks.

you can not get a indie produced lord of the rings. if you enjoy dramas set in the modern world there are still good movies out there. if you are into fantasy and science fiction you are FUCKED.

@@fall190 : No. You forgot to add fantasy and science fiction... 'with existing IP's'. There is still some good new stuff being produced and written. Some by self-published authors. Crap, there's an entire alternative publishing industry at this point because the traditional gatekeepers have made it near impossible for white males or conservatives to have a platform to write fiction. The Martian by Weir is an example of something that started out as being self published on one's own blog, gained popularity, and eventually even broke into the regular bookworld and had a Hollywood movie made about it. While the 'wokesters' wouldn't make a movie about most stuff the alternative publishers write (not PC) there are tons of them making tons of money on Amazon, on Castellia House, to a limited extent on Baen (the one trad publisher that is only mostly, not totally 'converged'), on webtoons and of course on all sorts of crowdfunding platforms. Movies and etc are much more expensive, but some Non Traditional companies have seen opportunities and now "The Daily Wire" will be making films, just like KZfaq and Apple and Netflix did before they also surrendered to the SJW's. TDW doesn't seem to have the same risk. Hollywood's control of the distribution system would have totally slipped away by now if they hadn't focused on buying up so much internet competition and if the SJW's hadn't focused on getting so much of the streaming and internet based competition to self-censor.

@@remo27I can't even understand what you're saying man. I'm talking about movies . you can not make an indie epic fantasy movie. the lord of the rings trilogy was 300m $ in early 2000 money. It cant be done. theres no way that the daily wire is going to be making movies with a budget in the hundreds of millions.

/

Wish I could help you.

I'm sure there are better experts on the topic, but the super simplified answer is that Netflix (or replace with whichever service applies) needs to purchase streaming rights to stuff per region. If a series/film is available in another but not yours, then the branch of Netflix in your region has not opted to purchase the series/film. Factors that come with that: cost of licensing/distribution rights, estimates of viewership in the region, possible social/religious/political concerns (rare but its there, this actually ties in with viewership size), is the series even available (another local network or media group may have already acquired exclusive distribution rights), and some other things I dont know about.

The rights to content - film or TV - are usually sold territory by territory. No one would purchase the rights to distribute a film in, say, the USA if everyone in the USA had already seen it via the streaming service who had bought only the UK rights.

Plot twist; the studios are the ones making the VPN software! A little side cash deal.

Plan B is John Waters.

Interesting observation on shows like A Different World. I had a conversation not too far back with some Gen Z types at work and the way they speak it's as if the 80's and 90's were the fifties and sixties. I told them that the arguments they make regarding things like race are not new and date back to my teens and 20's, I said that if you don't believe me go check out some early nineties sitcoms. You are correct in that things were put out then in order for people to make logical conclusions based on both sides of an argument, I certainly see very little of that now.

@@gator7082 yeah. It's pretty interesting. Even in the 70's they were doing this. Sanford and Son for example. Fred said some really offensive things that would make a lot of people sweat, but then you had Lemot, his son who would call him out for being a bigot and Fred would learn his lesson about judging people for being different. He wouldn't change overnight. He was still a grumpy old fool, but he'd come around eventually, getting along with Lemot's Asian friend and their neighbor Julio. But yeah...we never see this stuff today. At least not in the mainstream. I'm sure there's some stuff out there that's trying, but it doesn't get put in the "spotlight"

@@gator7082 in my personal experience, in the 90s, people were a lot less divided on race than today. not just in the USA but every western country. 30 years of mass media brainwashing people into thinking they belong to different groups depending on how much pigment they have in their skin was quite effective.

A key skill to being a good writer is understanding people with very different views from yours on their own terms. I suspect a lot of young writers these days live so much online and in media/Social echo chambers that they can't get outside the frankly religious woke way of viewing the world to write a not woke complex character.

They want to brainwash, not entertain. Once you view things through that lens everything makes sense.

I just can't get past how clear this grand project in media is so evident, and so evidently tied to various ideological goals , deconstructionism and critical theory for example, it's like these are the new product and conventional notions of product for the consumer is of secondary or incidental concern. These ideals are not really about creating anything they are about destroying it and creating it anew without the problems perceived in the conventional , not that any new product can really meet these goals because they in turn must then be evaluated ,their problems exercised , and this churn and grind cycles. At the point the product is commercially destroyed and unsalvageable they move on like locusts to another. The commercial failures lead to the deconstruction of the industry, its eventual failure, another win for these ideologies. Reminds me of the apologue of the boiling frog.

True, but Manga is huge. I'm surprised the comic book industry hasn't ripped off that idea yet.

@@CallMeChato Yeah, Manga is doing great and has an excellent digital presence. If they were smart, they would hire the people who make those sites and shamelessly copy it. Marvel has Marvel Unlimited, but the whole thing is clunky and hard to use.

@@CallMeChato they don't really have any IP or other advantage in that space. like saying Kodak should have just embraced digital photography, when they had no advantage over their competitors in that space.

It's the insults that make no sense. Instead of trying to increase their audience share, they go out of their way to drive the fans, who would otherwise be an almost guaranteed audience/profit source, away with insults. Once you offend people, you have pretty much lost them forever. They will never pay a penny to buy anything you do ever again.

I see your point and it's not something I'm unaware of but I think you might be shocked at how many people do not get their entertainment over the Internet. And by that I don't mean HBO over IP on a ROKU. There is still an argument that the power of traditional media is very strong. Broad notoriety comes when traditional media takes notice. Take Lilly Singh as an example. I think she has escaped back to her KZfaq channel after her talk show crashed and burned. She has a huge YT following but I will bet you anything she would trade it all to keep that shitty late night show going. Network TV still has a powerful draw. More people consider Colbert a celeb than Rogan even though Rogan's audience dwarfs Colbert's. Don't just discount trad media yet. Thanks for your thoughtful comment. A video about Internet fame vs traditional media fame would be interesting. I already did a video on the economy of nothing.

@@CallMeChatoThanks for replying! I think you're correct for current demo. But I have two teens. They have NEVER watched network TV and barely consume anything but free streaming. The kids at their schools seem to follow the same trend. Their idea of celebrity seems a lot different than what you and I would consider. The current millennial generation may be the last to have ever watched media (T.V.) the old way. It's fascinating watching the dramatic change in how media is consumed, especially in the last 5-10 years or so. Content creation will continue to match the fragmentation, it's just a bit behind. It's a dramatic shift and from my viewpoint (obviously not as knowledgeable in the field as yourself) one that's accelerating. That's why this woke junk looks just like cost-cutting / cost-shifting measures to me. Much like a failing restaurant starts to cut corners. These legacy content creators know there's no recovery from the cash-flow trap they are in. Hence the plethora of "+" subscription channels now (almost all of which are failing..even Disney's). Consolidation phase is quickly coming up. THAT is going to be interesting to watch. As content fragments it's shelf-life degrades and so does value. Prediction: As bandwidth availability and speed increases this trend will accelerate. I've been in I.T. since the mid-80's and can see this pattern everywhere in my profession. In any case...keep up with the insider perspectives. They're fascinating and entertaining to listen to. .

Thank you. I don't think I'll top this, sorry.

I think we're in the middle of spending money spree to crush the competition. The services will consolidate. I have Netflix. That's it. I refuse to buy anything else.

@@CallMeChato I'll make more comments later on, but curious about your refusal to get more than NetFlix. Aside from keeping your digital finger on the pulse of "The Biz," Amazon Prime has some great content like "Bosch," "Reacher," "The Expanse"and others, as well as being a portal to several other services like the BBC library. Also, being a Biz guy, how on earth can you not have the Criterion Channel with its mind-bogglng selection of classic foreign and American films, as well as some Off-the-Wall collections such as Doris Wishman's Sixties nudies, Herschel Gordon Lewis' seminal gore films, and their fondness for Godzilla.

Oh I see Amazon. I borrow my son's account. :-) I was just being truthful that ME only have Netflix.

@@CallMeChato Ahhh, I get it - OPM. (Other People's Media...) You should still get the Criterion Channel. If nothing else, watching "Chimes at Midnight" or "The Children of Paradise" will remind you of just how soul-humbling great films can be.

just get a vpn. yo ho ho and a bottle of rum

And they were so proud of their accomplishments.

This would be hard to comment on. I realized the Wachowski's were frauds after the two Matrix sequels.

@@CallMeChato Oh yes good point! Nevermind then keep up the great videos!

@@CallMeChato I wonder how many hundreds of millions of dollars they've wasted over the last twenty years. And they keep getting work?!

@@ShadeDraws I'd imagine it's because they had a HIT once, and the execs keep hoping that they will again. Also, they have name recognition and some slight lingering kudos from the original Matrix.

@@CallMeChato to their defense, I believe the first Matrix was just a perfect self-contained one shot they crafted for years before releasing it, and Joel Silver and Warner Bros, seeing the massive success of it, just couldn't sit still and forced them to make a trilogy of it, which they were ruefully unprepared for. Their previous work were not bad at all, and the quality curve leading up to the Matrix was logical. Doing such a massive smash hit is at once both a blessing and a curse, coz everything you'll do down the line will always get compared to this on hit you did before, and the pressure is ON for the rest of your life ! Ask Georges Lucas about it, who never directed a single decent movie after the original Star Wars trilogy (heck, even after A new Hope, actually, the 2 other episodes being directed by other, better directors than him). Should the Wachowskis brothers (I'm only now realizing their acronym is also the WB, now wonder Warner Bros likes them so much ^^) had a bit more freedom and time to craft stories that were relevant to them, maybe their career would have been very different (although they did make some movies that they themselves wanted to work on, and never got the shining of the Matrix, like V for Vendetta, and Speedracers, although we could laud them for being pretty ballsy in believing in their outworldish vision. It's what got them their first smash hit in Matrix, after all).

I’m blushing.

Picking the race/gender/etc.. for a charcter and not haveing the character make sense does seem to be common. There are times that changing an extant charcter works.. Example Nick Fury. and then there are the times it does not work. Exampe Anne Boleyn (the latter is I think far more common)

@@treyriver5676 Making Anne Boleyn black was truly bizarre. Anne Boleyn was the most privileged woman in England until Henry decided to get rid of her. If she could have given him that son & heir, she would have had it made.

@@treyriver5676 Well you can find examples that work or not, but my point is that they are doing so based on a fallacy that people "want" diversity and this kind of thing, when it is based on very skewed data from a very leftist subset of people

Rerun stripping. Have to have a minimum made to make it work. Long game.

The owners of CW is trying to sell CW while still makes more SJW series that no one sees. Their reruns aren’t selling well enough.

It was natural for Hollywood to embrace the Wokester. Hollywood just didn't expect them to be this uninterested in its history.

The Woke are NOT victims. They just play them on tv & movies. In real life, they're actually victimizers. They look in the mirror and virtue signal while adding fuel to the fire that causes the suffering of others. You're the world's biggest hypocrites.

@@robinlillian9471 I didn't write that the woke are victims. I think you misunderstood what I wrote.

Thanks! Will do!

So would I. Now, if only you could convince my wife.

How nice of you to read your comments. That made my day. I'd love your opinion on a few things. Perhaps some future video ideas. 1. The Daily Wire's efforts to create content. I signed up after Disney fired Gina. 2. With the success of Reacher, The Mandalorian, and now Top Gun Maverick, why is Hollywood not quickly pivoting to copy these successes' formulas? 3. Growing up, Iconic Movies and characters like Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Alien, Blade Runner, Predator, Princes Bride, Christmas Vacation, Sixteen Candles, etc were the norm. Now I wait all year for maybe one good movie and it's likely a reboot of one of those early greats. What happened? Were you in industry, and observed the change? I just discovered your channel and am binging your videos. Apologies if you have addressed these questions. Again, really great content. I'll spread the word about your channel!

Thanks and welcome

Glad you enjoyed it!

I might acronym it in the future. Thank you.

Awesome, thank you!