Big D. Urouge when does he say that?

@@potatotower7288 1:36:34

"Write on it, wipe with it, paper; a million uses." Sponsored by Dan, the marketing board of the world.

Mike Schilder and his voice is awesome as fuck. Reminded me of Cornfed from Duckman.

TB has been terrible every time he's fascist, and he managed to throw Snake under the bus with him in that last game

He's got nothing on Jesse.

@@TweekDash I can sorta see the play TB wants to make as a fascist but his execution is poor so he never gets to make them. then he ends up backed up in a corner quickly. i feel like i'd be like him if i had chance to play, i have the ideas of what to say and what to do in my head but i have a hella guilty tone of voice lmao

Kubilay Kan I don’t actually think he has won a single fascist game

@@numbersinnames5039 he did on the live co-optional lounge during coxcon some year if i remember correctly when he and jirard where on the same team.

Yep. I could tell instantly when TB was fascist, by listening to his tone of voice. When he's Fascist, his voice taps into a faster, slightly higher pitched quality. Very easy to detect. TB was a terrible liar.

In a perfect scenario, where there is no player bias transferred from previous games, you HAVE to base your choices on probability and what clues the game provides you. Otherwise, it's almost like playing poker just by reading player behavior: yes, you could, but it would not be optimal.

He was right Tb was hitler Snake was a fascist Cry was a fascist

Yep he was indeed right, but still that was no fun to watch.

He was boring but he was still among the best players, he was right on almost everything.

@@gigicestone4902 Yeah of course he would be if he's taking notes or counting the cards. The spirit of the game is supposed to be chaotic - that's why in the actual board game version you don't have bullets, confirmed not hitler cards or previous chancellor/president cards. Getting the liberals to forget what has happened is supposed to be one of the fascists advantages.

@@AndySomething That would make the game not only wildly OP when playing against a group of morons but also more frustrating not being able to confirm facts. This is a very long detective game and what is a good detective without evidence. I totally defend Dan's playstyle for not only being smart but being logical which is an incredibly powerful tactic AND by that same logic because TB often points out Gamblers Fallacy and likelyhoods of cards being drawn is the 2nd worst player to you. He is my favorite though. Playing smartly using intelligent arguments is how you get me.