Yes I agree Francisco Scarmanga.

Totally agree!

imgur plz,, would love to do the same

Where did you get the bezel insert?

@@mariog7213 I bought the bezel insert and the sapphire crystal from DLW.

If it had the things you mentioned PLUS a screw down cap, I would buy it.

​@@Carlos-nq7up❤

A ‘jumping’ hour hand is neat way to correct home time during dst shifts, but it saves you no actual steps. Otherwise, it’s a great fidget spinner for the gmt enthusiasts - who are, nearly inevitably, using them as dual-timers.

Agree, also add sapphire crystal and screw down crown.

tell him i would like one as well lol

Regarding the similar color of the GMT hand on the 005, that's exactly why I went with the 003 Blueberry.

Good point about the hour hand. Since it isn't a diver anymore, they don't need an arrow minute hand. Should have been a regular baton.

No need for a screw down crown. Its not a diver

Strapcode

@@RandomRobReviews TY!

I'm not a snob but brand equity matters. Seiko is Seiko.

They're from Clockwork Republic

@@SuperMariooo25 awesome thank you

BlACK

Why would they when it works? Seriously, this community has been obsessed with "specs". I have an original Seiko monster from 2004 that I wore daily for 8 straight years and nothing happened to it. I never scratched the crystal and the clasp never failed me. I still have that watch, and the clasp still hasn't failed me. Many people have decades old Seikos where are the clasp is perfectly fine. Hell, Rolex didn't move to a milled clasp until 2003 or something. I don't like them, personally. They're too bulky under the wrist and they pinch. I would rather take the slimmer profile of a stamped clasp any day. I've been in this hobby too long and handled too many watches to care too much about whether a watch is "specc'ed out". If something works, it works. You don't need to change it because people on the internet say you should.

I agree with what you are saying. I have some older watches and most have stamped clasps and they work fine. My point is that for $500 would it be too much to ask to evolve to an improved bracelet? The existing one works but an improvement would be appreciated.

@@elarson312 I would agree that sapphire is definitely needed at the $500 price point and Seiko drags their feet on that (most likely due to a lot of money invested in hardlex and a lot of hardlex sitting around needing to be used), but I just simply don't like milled clasps (my opinion). And I don't think they necessarily improve watches. I have handled so many watches that are decades old and the clasps are not milled and they still work perfectly fine. Watches from the '60s, '70s, '80s, etc. I don't think milled clasps are an "upgrade" that much, beyond the feeling of extra solidity. Unless you have something built inside them like an adjustment mechanism and you need a milled construction.

I’m almost sure you’re not gonna dive over 100m, buddy…

@@ulissesmosca666 100m isn't for good for any more than skin diving and water sports! You could never use this with compressed air at any depth!

This watch is not for diving but is good for swimming, snorkling, skin diving, jet skeeing, boat riding and surface water sports.

But can you see a micro mis alignment at half arms length 🤔. It will be so micro small it wont make any difference what so ever on the time 🤦‍♂️

@@longnetter to me and various other people it matters. And yes you can see the misalignments at arms length. And it actually affects the reading of the GMT hand. If a damn 50bucks Casio or Timex can be perfectly aligned why should we accept a 400bucks Seiko to not be? I don't and nowadays I just return them when it happens (with Seiko it happens with most of them). But to each their own. If you can live with and enjoy a misaligned watch, great.

@@tiagodvt i have 2 seiko's there's no problems with either of them 🤷‍♂️

@@longnetter i currently have 4 and they are all fine. But I had to return and rebuy several or even send them to a watchmaker to fix various issues. Seiko's QC is just garbage and that's a known issue. Just do a quick search. I love Seiko because it's the brand that made me fall in love with watches back in the days....but nowadays I'm leaning more to Citizen when I want a japanese watch. Seiko upped their prices without upping their quality. Citizen offers incredible value still...with their Tsuyosas, NY0040s, NB1050 etc

Why?

@@caomhan84 I don’t trust watches that have a 10 Bar specification I listen to Hamilton owners, after swimming in a pool, who bought 10 Bar rated watches complain about dampness on the crystal

I don’t trust 10 bar watches . Not even in a shower

@@greglewis20 Well I've never had a problem, and as I said in my comment above in the thread, my brother was just in Hawaii with his 10 bar watch, and he swam with sharks and was at the beach in the water constantly. I asked him, and he said it's fine. Nothing happened. You don't need 200 m of water resistance on everything. And if you're going to be swimming, or in the shower and need to wear your watch, just take one of your divers. I'm sure you have several. 100m isn't a reason not to buy this watch, or any watch.

I know, the Rolex GMT-Master II is such a garbage watch, only 10 bar water resistance.

They are

@@RandomRobReviews 👍

They should release quartz versions as well!