Yes. It does not have to be taken to court.

@@sycamorebacker1 True but sadly we have to even though those criminal traitors do not obey any laws including the ( unlawful ) ones they impose on WE the people.!

He's a liar. That's how.

He said it himself that the Judiciary should help Biden force gun control as much as he can get away with.

He should not be able to be in position of any job of justice office 🤬☠️ He’s not telling the truth about his opinion on 2 Amendment and if he is then he Doesn’t qualify for the position ‼️‼️‼️🤬🤥

and I am no scholar asking this

Deliberately

I actually thinkk this ah was put into it with the backing of whats his name.......

Exactly right brother!

@@dannyboy5272 you know with all of his stuttering, you can tell he is another puppet

yeah, and they are indeed both scorpians add to Hillary rice gourmet

@Justin Edwards get a funny bone.

@@bronson6585 a tank HAS a gun...It ISNT a gun itself. It is a VEHICLE of war, much like an 18 wheeler is a Vehicle of Commerce. Even an 18 wheeler needs a special license and training. No regular Joe would get a vehicle of war that is fully operational nor do regular Joe's seek to get such a vehicle. Not only that but such a thing would be severely cost prohibitive thus locking out over 95% of regular people struggling to survive regular life let alone trying to afford a weapon of war.

I pray the people such as Mr. Lee takes them all zee way wray alll of them offf and down

the whole lot

The Second Amendment is already one of the most "regulated" of Amendments. Every read the 1934 NFA? Let me guess you just "feel" that more limitations would help. Answer a question for me. What does "gun show loophole" mean? Ever read the 1968 Gun Control Act? The Heller decision? How many more limitations do you want for a Constitutional Right? Do you have any dangerous books in your home that should be banned? Maybe "Catcher in the Rye"? The Bible or Book of Mormon? For those of us who actually swore an oath to the U.S. Constitution, we understand the sacrifice that upholds our nations principles. For you it's about how you feel. Lemmings march right off the cliff just like you. And remember, just like Mario Cuomo...."What will I do when they come for me?" Think about that. "Bad behavior" created this country you enjoy instead of getting on our knees for the Redcoats. Are you on your knees Danny? I bet you are many times.

Shall NOT be infringed mean EXACTLY what it says! That it shall NOT be hampered in ANY WAY!

@@nomadjeff1922 I think you woefully misunderstood what I was saying. Mike Lee was agreeing that some limitations are prudent , while I was trying to hammer home that shall not be infringed means don’t fuck with it in anyway. I guarantee that the only time you will see me on my knees is on the final judgment day. I will stand and fight to the bloody end for my freedom and the future of my children. I hate this tyranny so much and stand ready to be counted among the resistance. Do you? Will you lay down YOUR life for the liberty of our children??? It’s easy to opine here, what happens when you’re face to face with these goons? I hope and believe that you will stand with me.

Actually it does

Against tyranny especially! That’s what the second amendment specifically was written to guard against!

They never answer questions anymore they just dance around the questions ! It's always a dog and pony show . I just finished watching Sen Lee asking the FBI director if they are using information from phone companies to locate who was in DC on Jan 6 and same thing just another dance routine !

@@Toddscomp2 exactly. And what pisses me off is the Senate and congressman who are asking the questions never push for an answer. They just let it go.

If it slithers like a snake and hisses like a snake it must be a _ _ _ _ _? Fill in the blank

@@joseinfante7540 not anymore Jose ! You forgot if the snake want to identify as a eagle than the snake is an eagle ! Get with the program buddy ! 😁

@@Toddscomp2 lol ..good one , its funny to me when they say exept me for who I am when they cant even to the same ... the good Lord doesnt make mistakes but hey what do I know , "there's nothing new Under the Sun " ( history repeats itself ) Saddam and Gomorra . A man isn't free untill his conscience is - San Lee .

good point if it's a responsibility it wouldn't be included in the bill of rights thou. And a right to bear arms gives you the option to bear arms if you want. What I am wondering is why is that the only place in the constitution that uses the word "Infringed" and when you use the word shall makes a rule rather than a permission. NEC specifies this. Shall expresses an instruction or command.

@@rickdavis7141 Agree with your comments. Thank you!

I think there is a good reason why they stated Right instead of responsibility. The reason why I say that is because, Responsibility is something that can be taken away especially if you are negligent in upholding that said responsibility. Another reason they used the word Right, because it follows the concept of inalienable rights that we hold since birth given to use by our creator. Just like the right of thought and reason and to speak the right to self defense, they weren't simply just given to us and they are not something you can truly take away from us they are inherent in all of nature and followed by all animals. It's also why the Second Amendment has the secondary clause in unlike any other Amendment "Shall not be Infringed". Because the founders knew the essential power of self defense and power of Armaments. And the nature of governments tendency to desire in controlling that particular Right. We can see through history and what the founders have seen. In which authorities in power have always desired to control who had access to weapons and those who did not. Why were nobles allowed to carry swords and peasants could not? In human nature would the government allow those who they persecute or those considered less desirable to have access to a means of defense from their oppressors? of course not if they did they would fight back against that oppression. That's also why when a regime wants to get more authoritarian or totalitarian they must gain control the means to resist that authority and control. Just like when Hitler came in power in Germany he was a big proponent of gun control and he made sure that those who he considered less desirable and wanted to oppress had no means to resist it. Shoot just look how our own country got our own independence what were the first two battles in the war for American independence? The battles of Lexington and Concord aka the shot heard around the world. What was the British Empire trying to do in that action. They were marching to Lexington and Concord to Confiscate the American powder stores, arms and ammunition located at Lexington and Concord. So our country got its first start for the fight for independence by the British attempt to Confiscate the American colonists stores of Arms and Ammunition.

Very Good point Rick and appreciated.

@@charlenealston1966 him i

There are lots of things that I don’t care for with Garland but the 1st listed definition of entitlement literally means a right to something by law or contract. So by using entitlement he has said it is a right by law. Do I trust he means what he says? Not necessarily but entitlement in this context is a correct term.

*Loanword* then I guess the 2nd Amendment doesn't really matter then. Just use the 9th Amendment.

@@jetcitysinatra7300 Yes, the 9th also applies, as does the 10th.

@@LoanwordEggcorn But no one uses these to protect their right to own a gun. If people think their 2nd amendment is under siege then use the 9th amendment. It is supposed to protect all of our rights that are not written down . . .

@@jetcitysinatra7300 Agree 100%, but 9th and 10th amendment lawsuits are far more general. Since we have a 2nd amendment, and it's more specific, it applies first. Please note: I agree with you.

@@LoanwordEggcorn We, up until the 1970's no one had the right to privacy but the 9th amendment was used and the court granted Privacy an actual Right. The more it gets used the more it will be accepted as a way to protect our rights. . . Just sayin. If the courts start to apply the 2nd amendment as it was meant to be taken then we will still have the 9th amendment. . .

Senator Mike Lee War blow

Garland is answering these questions as if it’s a Supreme Court nominee hearing instead of a person about to run the largest law enforcement agency that has prosecutorial powers. Considering his answers it appears he will look at all existing court cases and craft policies around loopholes he discovered. President Silver Alert said he wasn’t going to politicize the DOJ yet Garland keeps stating he’s going to pursue the Biden agenda. That hardly sounds apolitical.

@@deeinfl5600 Agree 100%, but in a perverse sense Garland is being honest in admitting that he will be political.

Senator Mike Lee Brun in hell is comeing

The govt doesnt know the difference between a pole or a hole, let alone the duity of posterity the constitution demands of them. Goldfish memory glub glub

Be grateful that Garland isn’t on the Supreme Court for a lifetime appointment. As AG he may last 4 years.

Biden. Biden is a principal author of Senate gun bans for many decades.

I believe it was....none other than......O'SAMA O'BAMA.....⌛......next......

david grg117 He needs to be answering based on the rule of law not what Biden or anyone else wants. Totally unacceptable.

Senator Mike Lee Blow u p