Why was she avoiding the definition of a "woman?" Biology Online Definition of a woman "1. An adult female person; a grown-up female person, as distinguished from a man or a child; sometimes, any female person. Women are soft, mild pitiful, and flexible. (Shak) And the rib, which the lord god had taken from man, made he a woman. (gen. Ii. 22) I have observed among all nations that the women ornament themselves more than the men; that, wherever found, they are the same kind, civil, obliging, humane, tender beings, inclined to be gay and cheerful, timorous and modest. (J. Ledyard)" Transgender men/women should NOT be allowed to compete in women sports! 😤 This is unfair to real biological women! The transgenders should compete with other men. They share the same physical biological parts and strength. They should be placed under another category in the "Special Olympics!"

She’s a political activist

@@DR-nh2on Thank you for all you post! You speak for me.

@@jasperkensington2644 You're welcome!

Well said.

That’s right 👌

@@yasminogbu8929 It's not right. She clearly said, multiple times, that as a judge she had to look at all the sides of any case and that should affect their sentencing. She also clearly laid out how the internet has changed the way distribution works, so the scale they used when they made the guidelines is no longer balanced. The last time I watched this video I laughed at how much she was flailing and couldn't answer his questions but now I see that he's just being muleheaded and playing politics, while she's being very professional.

@@Drjackstraw Stop making excuses for pedophiles being given mer MONTHS in prison wtf is wrong with you people? It does not matter how the internet has changed basic human decency has not! It is sick and so are you for defending her.

@Uchiha the best This is exactly my point. You're not listening. I didn't make any excuses for anything. I only explained, as she did, how justice works. And you, like he did, ignored that in order to paint me as some sort of pedophile supporter.

@@Drjackstraw WTF?!

She is absolutely despicable!

She is not justifying her actions based on her thoughts but based on the case maternal. No wonder you just follow what others say. Her opinion on this case isn’t the biggest factor to determine the outcomes of the case but rather the policy that is used in those cases are given by the authority of congress and not her own interests. And she explained it but again you didn’t listen but jumped to your own conclusions.

Let's let all of the people she gave light sentences babysit her own children and see what happens Guaranteed she would be singing a different tune and actully throw the book at them

She blamed her crappy sentencing decisions on Congress! WTF??? She's the Judge!

Fadel Muthana in cases like this, it doesn’t matter what other factors justify the heinous actions of disgusting “humans” like these. They should all rot in prison. You’re gross.

Actually, she’s a trained propagandist. That’s how she’s able to provide these “not an answer” answers.

You are brainwashed..ofcourse

It really help when you make it up. They all run from the truth but alternative facts those they find

Kennedy and Lee i’d add to that list

NeonCat9 - you're to be acknowledged for being easily impressed, and pretty dim.

How far did you get into the Capitol Building on January 6, 2001???

@@acommenter5184 BINGO, you hit the repube nail directly on it's head.

EVRAZ Russia 🇷🇺 case law EVRAZ Chicago Illinois USA 🇺🇸 circumstance of wHo act$

I completely agree! She couldn't preside over a traffic court.

@@gregj831 bunch of hypocrites a black woman judge who is qualified and you’re Bitching about her ability to be judge she has a been a judge for 10 years but she is not qualified to serve in the supreme courts can you imagine her husband has to hear who the republicans are berating her t listen all bull shit of the republicans are behaving and keep repeating the same damn for 3 days and Ted Cruz asking her are babies going to racist as recall a baby doesn’t come talking I had a baby and they don’t come out asking there mommy if there be racist and good old hag Marsha Blackburn asking to define what woman I would not answer that lame ass question

@@irenebeltran6260 Irene, please go back to watching MSNBC and refrain from commenting, you sound ridiculous

I’m assuming you’re really against trumps second nominee then?

Actually if there is a decent Republicans they should not vote for this woman

Kimmel argued that Sen. Hawley (R-MO), who served as hype man for the Jan. 6 insurrection, “has been working so hard to insinuate that Judge Jackson-a Harvard-educated, 51-year-old mother of two daughters-is somehow cool with child pornography. They’ve been beating this drum for three days now.” Cue Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who remarked to Judge Jackson: “You have done what 80 percent of the judges have done. You’re in the mainstream of sentencing when it comes to child-pornography cases. I also think it’s ironic that the senator from Missouri, who unleashed this discredited attack, refuses to acknowledge that his own choice for federal judge in the Eastern District of Missouri has done exactly what you did.” Amy comey Barrett couldn't even answer the proper five freedoms of the first amendment and you're worried about this judge? Barrett wasn't even knowledgeable to get the constitution right. www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/amy-coney-barrett-trump-supreme-court-protest-first-amendment-b1041461.html%3famp

@@cbes-lr5hs Just Rhinos!

Don't worry, he will LOL!!

Is it a judges job to define what a woman is?

You meant to say " Hawley makes Missourian traitors proud" I presume.

As only a sad individual would say....what a comment coming from such a username. SMH

@@christianovers3546 nope-I meant exactly what I said. You seem out of touch, ill informed, and like you get your talking points from CNN. But do tell what is your objection with Hawley holding justices who are soft on crime (a massive problem in this country currently), especially pedophiles being soft on crime? Such a shame a person would be against someone who wants criminals held accountable and the crime rate to decrease.

@@trulyblessed3303 please explain what you mean about my username

You guys got a REAL GOOD ONE in him.

Real Bad!

It’s not just her ultra light sentencing that’s disturbing but even the maximum sentences seem soft. Trading in child porn and 15-18 months is a maximum sentence? That turns into probably less than a year. I understand that they might not have taken the pictures and videos themselves but they sure as hell create and promote the market for it. I seriously thought these types of crimes had much harsher penalties.

Yet the same people arent worried about a 10 year old child being forced to carry a child by a rapist…irony

All these people that are out there killing, and child molesters, child pornography and including these damned judges. We do NOT need people like this in our society. And why waist taxpayers money keeping them locked up when you know they'll come out and do it again.😡😠

Your wrong!!!

@@joeyc4377 proof is in the puddin. She’s not a good judge. I get you like her. I also question you as a good person. No one, with any morals would support, nor defend this judges actions! Shame on you!!!

Every single judge they would have nominated would have the same kind of record

You do not get the whole video and just skipped to say what average uneducated Republican would say or ignorant should I say. If you seen the video and understand the due process you would see that the judges have restrictions on their ruling based not only on the what the government presented in the case but what also the policies for each case were which in the cases were on images and the set rulings on the amount of the images is outdated from the time of the mail. Having excessive jail time is prohibited by the constitution and understanding that we are in the age of technology the images that were used let’s say on the phone are in the hundreds would according to the outdated policy set by congress on the decades that passed mean jail for over 50 years which would not make sense.

cbwhatever - Why can't an apparent adult (despite your simpleton reaction) even spell "you're" correctly, like a below-average fourth grader?

@@acommenter5184ok…

Why is it that the guy who got 3 months is currently working in IT when he’s supposed to have monitored computer access now his job is teaching him how to hide it awesome just hearing the description in the case filing was heartbreaking also prosecutors should do better the guidelines say 10-20 years prosecutors only asked for 2years why so little asked

How is she an activist?

Hawley does not like a woman so much smarter than him!!!

He should have stopped her from babbling on the way she did by interjecting, "You are not going to answer that question"

Totally inaccurate and abuse of power by giving misleading information and forming questions based off nothing that holds legal value to her ACTUAL capabilities as a judge nor did he act in a manner that the confirmation process is supposed to be handled, by actually allowing her to answer the question or at least complete a sentence. Her role in the government’s 3 branches is at the bottom of the totem pole while his role is at the top. So he wanted her to apply maximum sentencing based off the societal norms of how vial and disgusting sexual acts against children are deemed and for the sole basis of deterrent of others considering crimes in the same capacity. Which is legally against the legislative code of conduct of how Judges are to conduct themselves when deciding sentences of the convicted. While he conveniently neglected to factually articulate that while she served as Vice Chairman of the Sentencing Commission a report was made criticizing the federal guidelines as outdated which basically means they are placing the burden of responsibilities of better sentencing guidelines to current times on the legislative branch to give Judges a better outline to fairly and diligently sentence punishment to fit the crime committed. So due to there being no legal grounds to deem her as an activist or held accountable for ANYTHING to discredit her qualifications as becoming SCOTUS, any ramblings and brought up issues that either are based off emotions, feelings, opinions, etc… without FACTS in comparison to her legal duties as a judge or qualifications is ,and will forever be, deemed as “it’s because she’s a black woman” in my book as a definition to such activity displayed!!

joe jack Klan - demoklan projection suits ya

You can't handle her answer!!!

Agree. No decent, self-respecting human being should confirm her, but I don't know if there are any of those left on the Left. We have very few like Josh Hawley left on the Right.

@@cookingsherry8784 - but these GOP folks are just playing...they need to start HAMMERING these deviant liberals.

Don't the woke leftists say we're not allowed to say the word "mother" anymore? It's supposed to be "birthing people" so degrading to real biological women

Exactly!!!

The Judge is only following the Law our congress passed.

@@perryp2261 Not exactly. the Judge had a range, the Judge chose a low value

Dumb as the day is long, is no way to go through life

Ok let’s put it this way. Pretend I am a judge and handing out sentences where the suggested range was 70-100 months. If I were constantly giving black folks 75 months but then giving white folks 30 months…. What would you say about me?

She did answer him but as usual you didn’t listen. The Senator even stated at the end that he understood where she is coming from but doesn’t agree with her judgement which doesn’t matter because he was not there to see other factors as well which judges are Pulled into.

Yes, I certainly agree. When they of other colour, they carry such a chip on their shoulders.

Lol you must be white supremacist

@@francesbell6412 what a racist pos comment

@@francesbell6412 I’m sure you know about chips on shoulders, you look like the size of a car.

She scares the crap out of me. There's a sneering contemptuous nature about her that is truly evil.

What's more scary is if you were truly a judge

What’s scary to the maximum percent is how y’all clearly lack the knowledge of how our very own government operates and it drastically shows by these comments!!!🤭🤦🏾‍♀️ She stated REPEATEDLY throughout this highly disrespectful confirmation process that she based her sentence rulings from the provided argued facts, case law, and guidelines that is ALREADY set forth by the “legislative Branch” of our Government (who ironically Hawley is a member of) in relation to severity of the crime, in comparison to the numerical chart based off numbers of and/or the action done (possession, distribution, etc…) in order to fairly, impartially, and diligently impose the appropriate sentencing as punishment to the crime convicted! That’s ALL she can legally do in this process. So the naysaying members of the congress and you all as well are basically discrediting her capabilities to up hold the constitution while serving as SCOTUS because she didn’t decide rulings while using her emotions, personal beliefs, and disgust in crimes of that nature and give the maximum sentence to use as a deterrent of a trend of this crime to others. When ultimately (as she stated many times over) she expressed that the current guidelines she is forced to operate with in is outdated considered that “mail” was the basis mode of distribution type used to make the numerical chart while considering length of time done. now 3 times the amount of child pornography is easily accessible in a matter of secs due to advances in technology which is causing complications for other judges as well when trying to apply the length of time engaged and number of (in possession and/or distributed) In order to know when maximum punishment should be applied. Example for the layman, it’s hard to surrender a maximum sentence to an 18 year old who possessed 100s of child porn images in 30 secs one time when it doesn’t coincide with the length of the time that is outlined in the guidelines within the legislative to fairly or legally give an appropriate max sentence. So basically old Blame gamer here needs to fix the guidelines within his own legislative branch to be up to date with the current technology and then he can actually get the results he is expecting on harsher punishments being rendered!!

The terrifying part is that judges gleefully accept qualified immunity for themselves and others even when the ones under immunity are committing this same offenses and you all just run cover for each other, that’s what is terrifying!

No, they need people who lie to be held accountable. Lying, obfuscation, time wasting etc

At least u guys have a system to hold judges accountable , in india there is no such mechanism, judges are highly corrupt and give jidgements whatever they feel like without any accountability .

I think it’s great to listen to them try and explain their logic. That is much more effective than limiting them to a yes or no answer

So there should be at least a time for yes or no questions

Did you stop beating your wife? Yes or No. The Democrats would abuse yes or no only responses- josh exposed her without hostility.

An honest person can ask a question that is not crafted to make someone look bad while realising that answering that question is not part of that persons job.

Just like Thomas huh?

Time is the greatest truth teller of all nothing hidden that won't be revealed so we will see in Time just like the inflation high taxes and gas prices for some strange reason I and many many others saw these things coming at the poles in 2020.

@Monsieur Tarzan I see.

Must be when maximum minimum sentencing are applied. She is more fair and balanced but I guess even if we took a small moments of your life with little to no explanation of the full story of what when how and where and applied that kind of questioning you would look like a saint??? Right

Absolutely

Lol, you clearly have little idea as to how many cases come before a judge. How are they to be expected to remember each of these cases and the details and the arguments, even when they happened over 8 years ago?

Because the more people you sentence, the more justice there is! ...is that actually your argument? It's like saying the more bread you bake, the less hungry the world will be as a whole, while a huge pile of bread accumulates in your backyard which no one who needs it can actually get to.

The answer should be obvious...

Wrong. The GOP was planning to set the judge up. They know that they can't attack her qualifications. They just zeroed in on her cases. How crooked of the Republicans.

You are so right! Demon in Lambs clothing! The more she talks! Its obvious, She’s been made clear, on moral issues! Something we don’t need! Like someone said earlier, NEXT!

Kimmel argued that Sen. Hawley (R-MO), who served as hype man for the Jan. 6 insurrection, “has been working so hard to insinuate that Judge Jackson-a Harvard-educated, 51-year-old mother of two daughters-is somehow cool with child pornography. They’ve been beating this drum for three days now.” Cue Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, who remarked to Judge Jackson: “You have done what 80 percent of the judges have done. You’re in the mainstream of sentencing when it comes to child-pornography cases. I also think it’s ironic that the senator from Missouri, who unleashed this discredited attack, refuses to acknowledge that his own choice for federal judge in the Eastern District of Missouri has done exactly what you did.” Hawley literally did the samething as jackson. Yet you won't acknowledge it

That’s basically what she’s saying. Trying to be victimized like all her kind always does 🤦‍♂️

Yes, a man of honor who speaks well and supports America, unlike the lame 🥔 in the WH.

I 1000% agree with you, well said

You are right. It seems they are after our children in every facet.

The devil uses willing men to hurt innocent children made in the image of God. He rewards their destruction with power, wealth, fame & especially protection. Crowley says, Do as thou wilt: evil begins in child sacrifice.

@@jasperkensington2644 sounds like this devil has more power than this God you talk about.

We wonder 'WHY' and then we listen to so called Judges like her pass the buck of blame on everyone else. Now I know. She is pathetic!

She is a lefty yuck 🤢

This woman is ridiculous! In no way does she deserve a seat on the highest court in the land!!

What's your opinion based on

Interesting that Drumpf appointed judges have made exactly the same judgments and handed out the same convictions. If Hawley, in fact, if all the Republicans, are so uptight about the sentences, then change the law!!! Isn't that what lawmakers are supposed to do. Oh no. Sorry, it's to gain as many political points as possible before the midterms. Wow, American politics, a laugh a minute.

She is a real pc of work!! Gave a child molesters more rights than the victims 🙏 😔 he is 100 percent correct these victims will never ever be the same.

I am also interested in knowing if there is a system whete the court will also rule psychological treatment plus jail time for that 18 years old kid. Is there such a thing? Or is it just jail and that's it?

or president

They won’t deny her. She checks every box for the times except the ability to discern what evil is. She’s in for sure.

I agree! She's clearly hiding a LOT! There was sneering contemptuous nature about her that I found very unnerving.

They are of their father the devil

You watch alot of Fox.

@@Zxx459 never mainstream media. Just an opinion from life experience. 30 years of knowing a bull shitter when I see one.

Our congress past the Laws handed down to the Courts.

Wrong. This Senator is attacking her record so that he can use this for his political ambitions. Judge Jackson is well qualified for the Supreme Court a d she will be confirmed whether you like it or not. Why don't your Josh Hawley dig up on Amy Barrett and Brett Kavanagh records?? I bet he won't.

Yeah maybe read a book once a year

I hope the do during our elections My concerm is the children that are being abused by pedophiles but evendenly the democrats and a couple Republicans do not care God save America and our children

You want another criminal like trump, I bet

Incorrect. It is not her job to create policy, that's congress job. If they want to mandate a sentence minimum they can do that. Be annoyed with Hawley who, for the first time seems extra concerned about her record of child porn offenders, when it suits his agenda.

I agree!🙏🙏🙏

Barrett couldn't name the liberties protected by the first amendment.

Do you really think so??? The GOP wouldn't dare to check her qualifications. They just zeroed on her cased to exploit her. That's a doggone shame of the Hawley, Cruz and the rest of the Republicans.

Praying hands, what a load of crap hypocrites

Amen .May The Almighty Yahweh protect and strengthen you MIGHTILY ... praying for you...

Thank you. I agree with you. You said it the best. I feel as you do. She would legalize sex with children if she could. I love your comment. She showed very little compassion for the children and very much compassionate for those who looked on their pain and degradation with pleasure.

That's a long statement for basically saying"idk what the fuck this is about and am no legal expert "

​@@PianoBangBang LOL. Disagreement is fine, but incompetent disagreement is NOT. Your statement is also is a cautionary lesson in spouting off in cyberspace at people YOU DON'T KNOW. FYI, I am a civil rights attorney who has been practicing decades longer than Judge Jackson has been on the bench although she finished law school a few years before me. In addition to having a multijurisdictional practice spanning several state and federal courts, I have served as a legal analyst on television a few times and I have also been a member of the United States Supreme Court Bar for decades sworn in by a few of the current Supreme Court Justices. An easy click on my channel, website and accompanying media appearances would have spared you the embarrassment of not knowing what you are talking about. Instead of attempting to delegitimize, browbeat others and trading barbs in cyberspace with people you don't know, how about forming a coherent argument as to why you disagree? I won't join you in the space of barb-trading, personal attacks and personal delegitimization, but I am all for COMPETENT DISAGREEMENT. Reasonable minds can disagree. As far as my "long statement," that remark demonstrates how little you know about law as the practice of law is all about "long statements" in the forms of court filings, legislation, executive orders, judicial canons, legal treatises, agency regulations and judicial opinions, for which Judge Jackson has cogently written thousands of pages over her career to which lawyers practicing before her and the Senate Judiciary Committee and its staff had to spend countless hours READING. Competent lawyers and judges spend far more time reading than in court. Thus, for you to complain about my "long statement" here says more about you than me. If you don't like to read, stay away from my posts and all things involving law as the law does not speak in soundbites like social media and it is not a profession for PEOPLE WHO DON'T LIKE TO READ- even those things they vehemently disagree with, despise, find laughable or otherwise find deplorable. Perhaps you were standing in the mirror when you responded to me here for it is you and not me who is the person who should be "basically saying idk what the fuck this is about and I am no legal expert." Cheers. Tam veri studio volumus atque.

Asa Hispanic woman hopeful for minority representation,I wholeheartedly agree with you. It's painful to watch our people and by our people I include all minorites black hispanic Asian and those not mentioned but existing. However I will say that we must put aside our personal bias that marries is to race and do what is right and that is too protect our vulnerable demographic. Children and the elderly I may add. Well said, sir.

She doesn't make judgments she does protocol that's judgment going by the book. Now once they're in the chair what exactly do they do? Travel site see or check records?

Her intellectual mind is like Joey's! This is why Biden nominated her. She says well if ya can't beat em Lie!

If that's true than neither are the last 4 or most of those who are questioning her. She is of strong moral character. And to someone who has no idea what a judge does and the many legal rule they have to follow. You don't just make your own judgments like we all get to do

@@paulcernava7091 Only a Pedophile would defend this person

I guess you're talking about Little Lord Bonespurs? That has nothing to do with the topic at hand. And I guess you're too dim to figure out that the videos to which you refer are illegal? You have my sympathy for having to go through life so poorly armed with such limited understanding and comprehension.

@@acommenter5184 I don't have to "guess". I actually realize, You are to Dim to see the hypocrisy! As it was stated, Some videos were available for public access. You are apparently pro-pervert!!

He drop kicked her A$$ all over the place. Geez!

Yeah, you can really hear her God complex when she refers to the complex process of assessing criminal cases while taking the recommendations and rulings of multiple institutions into account...the ego on her

She didn't refuse to answer.

@@PerniciousPecker you’re right. She answering by not answering his questions.

Kiki - it seems you (think you) know a lot about her record - do tell. For example: please tell us how many repeat sex offenders she sentenced, and how many of them repeated their crimes. Tick... Tick... Tick...

She was getting pissed because Hawley was drop kicking her incompetent irresponsible A$$ all over the place and she knew it.

She is not worthy to be sitting on the Supreme Court she answered this question so you won't get it answered the way it should be. She cannot even tell you that she is a woman.. Stupid Bim

To bad they rammed her down all of our throats and she was nominated even with her bs beliefs.

Girl you don’t know what you are talking about. Judging her based on what this senator have presenting doesn’t bring all the facts. Just saying the worst ideas in your mind doesn’t make it right nor does it make it right to say that she didn’t do her diligence when she explained that she herself has two daughters of her own. 🤦🏻‍♂️ you guys talk about rational but don’t apply it to your own statements.

It still has to hurt. As a parent I would have lost my shut by now but I'm not near as composed. But if for any reason I was up infront of a judge I would want them to be as fair and measured as her

@@fadelmuthana What constitution have you studied ??? Pedophiles are ok ? Get the hell out of here

@@fadelmuthana I study the law

@@jax408 I never said that they should not be punished which you and your friends have a good consistency of doing but rather I stated that there are chains in the system which make it harder to declare your own judgement in a case as you take other cases or policies within the jurisdiction of Congress and the other parties involved, so you need to better understand my words before you become all defensive and talk about you are studying the law. And even if you are studying the law doesn’t make you understand the situation of the cases that were discussed or the factors that were tied to the case. We have chains in our systems for a reason, that’s why they say that our legal system is a fragmented system of individuals and ideas but since you study law you should already understand what the Judge here was stating.

She was caught red handed but then tried to blame her horrifically irresponsible sentences on Congress! Isn't she the Judge?

AMEN BROTHER!!!!

kzfaq.infoSgrAHbfJPeg?feature=share

This response is blatantly ignorant, and backed by no evidence. She explained why she imposed sentences, in her explanation she noted, that congress requires her to do so! HAWLEY is on congress, be upset with him for not being stricter on child porn.