Cute to humans, useful for humans or both. It always works.

Chickens are wildly successful due to the adaption of tasting delicious

@@waldoman7 This is true. Cows, also. Nature only cares about numbers, and being tasty enough to humans to warrant domestication really gets those numbers up.

@@waldoman7 no that was genetic engineering. Chickens used to be lanky and scrawny 50 years ago.

@@jprec5174 did we have genetic engineering 50 years ago? Also, 50 years ago they still probably tasted good. Wild chicken, while low on meat, definitely tastes better than farm raised according to my dad, though those were probably descendants of domestic chickens

A majestic animal

Truly

of all the creatures in all the world this certainly was one of them

Pandas tend to do those things, they are highly intelligent. To whom much is given much is tested.

Obviously the bridge between Monkey and Man

Plot of Kung Fu Panda 5???

​@@drakeboutte1466there's a 4????

@@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.. 😂

@@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa..if your heartless there is a “fourth” movie

@@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa..nah it’s jest a myth

Lmao this made me laugh because it’s true

Or call us gay

We are not that much culture less...we can just hack into your internet and study human procreation...why is there so many of them??.. what with this werid rituals like "furry"and likes??.. what's wrong with your species?!

All the other animals are fine and can do it.

You could argue Pandas don't like being watch, but I think this video proves they are not smart enough to even be conscious about it.

hits way to close at home. I actually had this happen a day ago...

​@@commie_sylveon6563 damn I hate when I don't realize a female wants to mate with me

No one understands females...

what, you don't know that? when the female's skin-hood starts to expand and they begin to start screaming, that's when you know they're ready to mate. although it is very subtle, so you will want to pay attention.

Eeyup. I've resigned myself to the forever alone zone (FAZ) for short. It's a lonely existence, but there's a 99.999% chance of not having kids. So, I have that going for me.

female : drop the bamboo and eat me for now ;)

Sigmas have priorities

Not the males fault. Everyone is scared of rejection no matter what.

​@@Masterchief_Tito probably also some small part of his brain is going "the fucks going on here, I ain't even beat someone's ass yet."

She was just being friendly

💀nahhhhh

Nah that’s old law. We just fked their habitat up and us spending billions on them is just repayment.

Po is probably being fed meat in his diet growing up.

Wrong. I'm THE big, fat panda

Po was based tho, since he rejected bamboo & advanced to *literally everything else.*

I find this interaction.... Hilarious and convincing.

@@BobbinRobbin777 yes. He's the superior panda compared to the rest of his kind

Yup but cats and dogs do the strat way better

@@UNGOC_Engineer3231 Cats are the GOAT, perfectly adapted to survival both domestically and in the wild, able to convince humans to do what it wants with ease, great hunters, great hiders, can survive falls from terminal velocity, can climb almost anything, incredible acrobatics, minimal water requirements, perfect night vision, able fit through any space larger than its skull, and able to judge its ability to fit in a space perfectly using its whiskers, produces children in high numbers and has them achieve independence very rapidly. Able to teleport and walk through walls. The main thing holding them back is the weakness and fear of water. Plus the AIDS.

​@@Wertsir fr

And it works! 🤣

@@Wertsir I've NEVER...NEVERRR seen a better "essay" about cats being great🤣

That's just him using humor, geez

Species that are delicate and adapted to niche environments are doom to extinction. No one is worried about crows or coyotes for example. They only get stronger.

Humans came from nature, so every changes that they cause to the planet is also caused from the nature.

We did not destroy that ecosystem the Chinese Communist party did the same Chinese Communist party that owns every panda on Earth and rents them out for ridiculous prices to zoos the same one that invades Korea's Japan's the Philippines Waters and literally strip the ocean bear of everything

​@@hikki537exactly so many humans have this God complex and think where these Superior beings that are on another level I need to protect everything and if anything happens with the environment it's our fault not evolution it's not like the Sahara Desert was a jungle 11000 years ago I wonder what global warming turned it into a desert oh yeah the climate has been shifting back and forth for millions of years I forgot about that I think the Liberals did too we are just animals with high IQs a lot of us don't even have very high IQs anymore

75% is enough for me to also believe this.

Delete this comment. Do not let furries read this.

Finally a conspiracy theory I can get behind!

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Thats why they have Chinese names and Chinese government wants ALL their pandas returned eventually.

I mean you could say the same thing about certain underdeveloped nations with very low IQ people

You made a great example lol

Pandas are actually important to people local to their habitat. They rely on the forests for food . The pandas spread seeds in their shit which keeps these forests healthy.

@@sm0g-810 yucky

It is actually the opposite - Pandas were doing just fine, and adapting to be better and better at eating plants. There is an ice age cave bear called Arctodus which represents something similar to if Pandas went uninterrupted - It became huge and muscular as it was able to get proper nutrition from plants as its gut mechanics shifted. Pandas were in the middle of this transition, and in the wild they could find each other and breed just fine, and had more than enough bamboo to be able to be picky and still eat their fill, and were the biggest and most powerful animal around so nothing could touch them. Until humans came around, and started killing pandas and clearcutting their forests. Then it became very hard to find mates, very hard to find food, and the once beneficial adaptation of caring for only one young (which means that one survivor gets excellent care and attention, r/K selection theory) became a detriment. If humans never showed up, pandas would be thriving and on their way to becoming big and proper herbivores like Arctodus.

Is this true? Grass is notorious for growing vegetatively. Does this type of bamboo not do that? I'm sure there are details I'm missing here.

Disagree with you and those with thumb up, near extinction animals are well protected like other countries and organizations are doing now, pandas only rely on special bamboo food, if nobody aware the growing less bamboo vegetation, these pandas may suddenly extinct, some more you guys should know how aggressive and desperate these Chinese are, especially towards hunting valuable pandas for money.

that's so sad for the poor female pandas!

​@@seanrafferty6752There are boom and bust cycles when it comes to bamboo just as the OP mentions. Incidentally it is these boom and bust cycles that made chickens the way they are and why we eventually domesticated them. Because chickens have a shorter lifespan, they reproduce extra fast in the bust times (because when bamboo go bust they scatter huge amounts of seeds called bamboo rice) so that their population can all ride out the boom times (once the bamboo rice germinate there is way less food for the chickens). So humans see this and figure that if they just give the chickens extra food all the time the chickens will keep laying eggs.

So the female wants two males to fight over her and gets horny over the winner. I know some humans like that.

At least they have one. We're still not sure of koala have one or if it's just a small tumor in their skull.

Even sloths tstay in there trees

@@deinsilverdrac8695 Koala’s are just babies in suits.

don’t slander sloths like that

Sloths are smarter , pandas have the brain of a koala

China will *never* do that. It's too profitable for them and pandas are a bargaining chip. The CCP is smart about it.

we should eat them

I agree. At the end of the video, it shows how badly their natural habitat shrunk. If a specialist species have their habitats so fragmented and their lives threatened, they are gonna struggle more so.

THIS

Bro's absolutely right

They are just adapting into Brown bears, slowly, painfully, but they are gradually taking up similar traits and behaviors. They have a good chance of not going extinct as much as becoming a different species...They have already found several Brown/Polar Bear Hybrids in the wild...

The increase in some areas is probably because of the way currents work. One place will get hotter, which displaces all the cold water/air, which causes another place to get all the cold water/air. But if you do the math it's a net increase in temperature, the hotter area will almost always increase more than the other area decreases. If you look at a map you can usually tell which areas are connected by currents.

@juliandacosta6841 the ice build-up I am referring to has been long-term yearly buildup of ice. Your net positive temperature theory is not correct. There has been more ice gained over the last 10 years than lost. It is just somewhere else, and it is a pattern the earth sees except for its tropical maximum where it was tropical planet wide.

​@@deplorablecovfefe9489Or the most nightmare bear to ever grace this earth to punish our sins, the grolar bear. A grizzly/polar bear hybrid with the combined anger and hate of both of its parent species.

⁠@@zachbase1124 I don’t know where you got any of this

now that I look back at kung fu panda it really was

I'm genuinely psyched for Kung Fu Panda 4. Dreamworks is run by geniuses

​@@tvbnine793 Way better than Disney and pixar in the last decade.

​@@tvbnine793 Way better than Disney and pixar in the last decade.

@@DooDoo756-w5e Counterpoint: Boss Baby and Trolls

You taught me something cool today. Thanks

lmao "bursting billy" those aliens are wrong for that

@@unspecifiedx2096 All jokes aside, I’m happy to have brought that fact to your attention! I thought it was interesting when I found out, too.

THE BURSTING BILLY 😂😂😂😂😂 Got me creasing, you win the internet for the month 😂😂

*Bursting Billy* BROOOO

Yes. All of this. As a zoologist and rehabber, it frustrates me to no end.

I'd love to see all the resources that are currently allocated to pandas be switched to saving bees instead. Want to keep having food to eat and other plants to enjoy? Might wanna keep the bees from all dying.

It's unfortunate and messed-up because pretty privilege can get in the way of some people caring more for more "approachable" looking animals compared to others (along with probably instinctual fears we have from some endangered species). Like some people don't look into saving endangered spiders/arachnids, snakes, frogs, insects, or bugs or fish because some of them can look like nightmare fuel to most people, but they still need the attention when they help with the ecosystem. -_-

Jim Jeffries made me rethink about pandas too. I mean I'd fuck anything if I was locked in a room after awhile, he does have a point

​@lolhwaet isn't commercial use of chemical pesticide one of the major contributing factors toward the bee problem? It'd be inconvenient to all those malevolent companies to take appropriate action to save them.

Is it from gumball?

​@@Discussr might be

And it turns out that's not true, at least for Wild pandas.

@@Discussr Yes.

That's from gumball, the episode where Darwin have a crazy sneezing allergy.

Man south park could be right about pandas

Pandas are the mascot of pedophiles

south parks right about everything honestly

@@DeputyFish yeah true like the Scientology people

Dude have you not realized Matt and Trey are literal geniuses and every episode goes deep, have some secret meaning, or make a point.

Do the pandas even care about being in a cage?

@@Wishmaster787 They're too dumb to notice

​@@Wishmaster787 they do, it makes the mating problem even more of a problem Because they get depressed and can't learn all the things they do in the wild

@@Wishmaster787 The video you're commenting on states that one of the few times pandas mated in captivity was when the zoo shut down and were given privacy. So yea, they care a little bit.

@@zach6255 yup like us humans. f we dont even know what the hell is goin on. civlization is so complex that it makes important stuff like education suck big time.

The resorting to panda porn made me belly laugh. 🤣

Because people kept letting em survive on handouts

literally the only reason they haven't is because China is so heavily devoted to making sure they don't

@@AlyssaTaylor9 Yeah. The reason why is panda politics and its a good part of the somewhat salvageable moral image of China. Its also considered such an important cultural symbol because of its synonymity with Yin and Yang. But tbf those images are becoming more faded as China transitions to a more modern era :( which is sad because its such a great philosophy.

@@reijiorochi One could apply a similar argument to the homeless, or ''illegals''.

​@@reijiorochi handouts they never needed until humanity turned up and stole their homes and food.

Yes please, people need to understand this topic so much!

Great idea! I agree so much

yes i agree sm!! everyone only focuses on honeybees and bumble bees but there are so many more solitary bees and other cool pollinators that need our help!

Pffft you think bees are real?

@@QapNPoo Dumb people tend to think that they're smart

That's a fun idea tbh

Seahorses will definitely make the cut for that video!

One of my fav stories about dad animals was a Kestral male having to take care of the kids after their mate flew away due to owls. The male would bring in whole small animals and you could see the little gears going in their head on why they weren't eating. Well one baby managed to wolf down a small but large for them lizard. And thats when the dad realized he had to tear the food up into smaller bites. Since the mom usually does all this. Its on Robert E Fullers youtube channel. He only had to come in and help a little at first. Dad took care of the rest once he got the routine down.

Incel lmao

Giant Waterbug if you a creature for that. And an insect no less.

A looks a lot more like a sloth than B tho

Definitely B

Sloth bears are very dangerous.

🤔 it appears to me that this is one difficult question in I do say so for myself 🧐

they should name pandas "sloth bears" and sloth bears should be "killer bears" or "chainsaw bears" or even "Jason Voorhees bears". that'd be fitting

And gamer dudes.. JS...

@@prophez23 sounds like your projecting bro.. js

This is a post i saw on a thread once its pretty fitting so i repost it here. Biologist here with a PhD in endocrinology and reproduction of endangered species. I've spent most of my career working on reproduction of wild vertebrates, including the panda and 3 other bear species and dozens of other mammals. I have read all scientific papers published on panda reproduction and have published on grizzly, black and sun bears. Panda Rant Mode engaged: THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE GIANT PANDA. Wall o' text of details: • ⁠In most animal species, the female is only receptive for a few days a year. This is the NORM, not the exception, and it is humans that are by far the weird ones. In most species, there is a defined breeding season, females usually cycle only once, maybe twice, before becoming pregnant, do not cycle year round, are only receptive when ovulating and typically become pregnant on the day of ovulation. For example: elephants are receptive a grand total of 4 days a year (4 ovulatory days x 4 cycles per year), the birds I did my PhD on for exactly 2 days (and there are millions of those birds and they breed perfectly well), grizzly bears usually 1-2 day, black bears and sun bears too. In the wild this is not a problem because the female can easily find, and attract, males on that 1 day: she typically knows where the nearest males are and simply goes and seeks then out, or, the male has been monitoring her urine, knows when she's entering estrus and comes trotting on over on that 1 day, easy peasy. It's only in captivity, with artificial social environments where males must be deliberately moved around by keepers, that it becomes a problem. • ⁠Pandas did not "evolve to die". They didn't evolve to breed in captivity in little concrete boxes, is all. All the "problems" people hear about with panda breeding are problems of the captive environment and true of thousands of other wild species as well; it's just that pandas get media attention when cubs die and other species don't. Sun bears won't breed in captivity, sloth bears won't breed in captivity, leafy sea dragons won't breed in captivity, Hawaiian honeycreepers won't breed in captivity, on and on. Lots and lots of wild animals won't breed in captivity. It's particularly an issue for tropical species since they do not have rigid breeding seasons and instead tend to evaluate local conditions carefully - presence of right diet, right social partner, right denning conditions, lack of human disturbance, etc - before initiating breeding. • ⁠Pandas breed just fine in the wild. Wild female pandas produce healthy, living cubs like clockwork every two years for their entire reproductive careers (typically over a decade). • ⁠Pandas also do just fine on their diet of bamboo, since that question always comes up too. They have evolved many specializations for bamboo eating, including changes in their taste receptors, development of symbiosis with lignin-digesting gut bacteria (this is a new discovery), and an ingenious anatomical adaptation (a "thumb" made from a wrist bone) that is such a good example of evolutionary novelty that Stephen Jay Gould titled an entire book about it, The Panda's Thumb. They represent a branch of the ursid family that is in the middle of evolving some incredible adaptations (similar to the maned wolf, a canid that's also gone mostly herbivorous, rather like the panda). Far from being an evolutionary dead end, they are an incredible example of evolutionary innovation. Who knows what they might have evolved into if we hadn't ruined their home and destroyed what for millions of years had been a very reliable and abundant food source. • ⁠Yes, they have poor digestive efficiency (this always comes up too) and that is just fine because they evolved as "bulk feeders", as it's known: animals whose dietary strategy involves ingestion of mass quantities of food rather than slowly digesting smaller quantities. Other bulk feeders include equids, rabbits, elephants, baleen whales and more, and it is just fine as a dietary strategy - provided humans haven't ruined your food source, of course. • ⁠Population wise, pandas did just fine on their own too (this question also always comes up) before humans started destroying their habitat. The historical range of pandas was massive and included a gigantic swath of Asia covering thousands of miles. Genetic analyses indicate the panda population was once very large, only collapsed very recently and collapsed in 2 waves whose timing exactly corresponds to habitat destruction: the first when agriculture became widespread in China and the second corresponding to the recent deforestation of the last mountain bamboo refuges. • ⁠The panda is in trouble entirely because of humans. Honestly I think people like to repeat the "evolutionary dead end" myth to make themselves feel better: "Oh, they're pretty much supposed to go extinct, so it's not our fault." They're not "supposed" to go extinct, they were never a "dead end," and it is ENTIRELY our fault. Habitat destruction is by far their primary problem. Just like many other species in the same predicament - Borneo elephants, Amur leopard, Malayan sun bears and literally hundreds of other species that I could name - just because a species doesn't breed well in zoos doesn't mean they "evolved to die"; rather, it simply means they didn't evolve to breed in tiny concrete boxes. Zoos are extremely stressful environments with tiny exhibit space, unnatural diets, unnatural social environments, poor denning conditions and a tremendous amount of human disturbance and noise. tl;dr - It's normal among mammals for females to only be receptive a few days per years; there is nothing wrong with the panda from an evolutionary or reproductive perspective, and it's entirely our fault that they're dying out. /rant. Edit: OP did not say anything wrong but other comments were already veering into the "they're trying to die" bullshit and it pissed me off. (Sorry for the swearing - it's just so incredibly frustrating to see a perfectly good species going down like this and people just brushing them off so unjustly) Also - I am at a biology conference (talking about endangered species reproduction) and have to jump on a plane now but can answer any questions tomorrow.

I just noticed that Shifu is a red panda

Agree. I'm ok with them putting their pretty privilege to work for other species

I genuinely thought that all the info about how bad pandas are at panda-ing was legit... I feel like a stupid jerk for dissing pandas :( I'm sorry little oreo blobs

​@@RadiantSharaShaymin Same here. Until very recently, I used to think that. It was only after I started reading more about this animal that I realised how wrong I was

Ppl need to stop donating to the giant organizations as they’re mostly all corrupt scams. PETA being the most blatant one. Thankfully with things like Instagram we can easily find smaller, locally operated organizations with proof that your donations actually save lives and make a big difference in conservation. My favs are the r.e.s.c.u.e Reteti Elephant Sanctuary, and The Wild Animal Sanctuary in CO that played a big role in saving a lot of the tortured big cats from that scumbag Joe Exotic.

@@krishbohra5536 It's much nicer to believe that Pandas are too stupid for survial despite being an ancient species that to think that once again it's the fault of industrialization.

You are aware that there were humans in China 5000 years ago... right? I need to know that you know that.

​@@mysticwizard1943 "...without human interference" as in when we didn't keep them in conservation sites nor destroyed their habitats on a large scale.

@@mysticwizard1943 yeah but now practically no where is left untouched they probably mean pandas living in areas unaffected by humans as we were everywhere and not polluting hunting tree cutting like we are now so basically pandas in the wild

I think you'd have to go back a few more centuries lol. People have been around quite awhile.

​@@whodafox and they probably still interfered, there is a reason their ranges shrank drastrically

😂

He just wanted the drip to impress the females

@@wilkinlow If they could actually think that hard/about females, they wouldn't be going extinct.

I'm still on the pandas side

Long term borrow the drip 😶‍🌫️

They need to start putting those 1 way glasses into enclosures, that might help

@@caralho5237 It is also the noise. Have you been to a zoo lately? There are tons of preschoolers running around screeching all of the time. Also, little kids like to pound on the glass of such enclosures to get the animal's attention. If anyone tries to stop them, they scream even more!

I like to do it when peole are wachin because I retck that ho

Find the pandas with a kink

So you think pandas are one of the few animals that experience shame?

Very true if we take the amount of individuals of an animal as a measurement for success then cows, pigs and chicken are absolutely winning. We humans had to get through a lot of trouble to reach those high numbers and Chickens even outnumber us 4 to 1.

And then everyone clapped 🙄

@@therainman7777 bro shut up💀 idk if this is fake but there’s no reason for it not to be

Everyone clapped, except the guy who was wondering what they taste like 🤪

@@justdavedoindavestuff3479 according to cannibals that have been taught English, we taste kind of like pork

Bro his video is not going to make an exclovascular change in the panda ecosystem they still going extinct, no ammount of posts and comments can equivilate to nature’s reproduction.

My exact thought

No not true actually pandas are biological carnivores that eat a herbivorous diet so they struggle as a result even with all the land in the world pandas would be a struggling species they are slow depleted of nutrients and don’t reproduce well

Become more dumb when humans took them XD

Colonialism against an animal

Free subscription, I'd take it

Yeah, this guy's writing is gold

bimbo for bamboo 😭

Came here to say this. I feel so inadequate as a writer. I'm going to be tuning in more often for the AV version of reading like a writer.

While humans continue to birth defective children with deficiencies and disabilities...

"this try hard vegans.." lol

literally i thought i was the only one 😭! he got me tearing up

bear only in looks

@@yokai1235 no, bear as in bear

@@hackerman2552 which one the the brawn one or the urso

@@yokai1235 my brain is slightly confused right neow

@@yokai1235 Like the video said Panda's are actually super dangerous, especially wild ones.

looks matter, the blackpill strikes again

Never understood how bugs was a sociopath. Chaos was always around him but he was pretty chill and reactionary. Not to mention he cared alot for helpless things. Ironically enough, the literal embodiment of chaos is more calm than his peers lol

Dogs literally evolved muscles in their face (like the eyebrows) that wolves don't have just so they could make cute faces to us and emotionally manipulate us for treats and attention.

I’m pretty sure we’re the only species who gives a F- about “cuteness”, which is subjective anyway

@@wolfdragox5563 don't elephants or/and dolphins think that humans are cute? Which I'm alright for the elephant but not for dolphins, don't think people want to be cute for them...

You shouldn't,this is just nature.

You feel bad ? It made me horny, this, this IS true level of Bad. 🌡️🐧

😂

Sad but true. Humans really are the scourge of the earth

.. do.. do you realize we are also animals? To rule this planet we first had to conquer all the rest. Or you feel like a perspective of having a 1/10 chances of being eaten by some forest predator daily could be a norm nowadays? (if you come from densely populated country I feel your answer may be biased lol(you all humanity haters should at east once enjoy the absolutely spacious freedom less dense countries provide, just don't stay here, - Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Sweden, Norway etc.))

Ask the common housecat about that. They've got a massive population, a free ride, and yet are still able to thrive (a bit too well even) if they go feral. We've damaged a lot of things, but not everything.

​@@1stCallipostle Don't forget dogs. They literally wouldn't exist without us. The majority of them would be fucked if humans were suddenly wiped off the face of the planet, however.

Humans are the dominant animals on this planet. It’s just the way evolution worked at some point.

exactly! humans took them out of their habitat, they suffered and died, then everyone just laughed at the corpse and profiled it as always ugly. justice for the blobfish!

yes!!! in their natural environment they are quite beautiful :)

justice for my blob bois they didnt deserve this

yeah they just chill at the bottom like blub blub glug blub

every single animal species looks like a blobfish if put under the same ammount of depressurization

They are a proof God exists

They have no natural predators and their habitat didnt change much. Hence thrs no forced evolution. U can see it in koala bears too

​@@bander-Coolb and children dying from cancer, getting abused and killed is proof there is no god

​@@bander-Coolb there is no definite proof of that lol smh

@@bander-Coolbif that’s true then god is awful at designing animals.

Did he drop his bamboo branch and fall out of the tree?🐼

@@nhmooytis7058 🤣 Almost dropped a coffee cup, so close enough.

🤣🤣🤣

It took me out! 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Like pandas the koala was doing perfectly fine until humans came along.

Also for tree sloth that looks so helplessly pathetic yet they can survive til this time, unlike seemingly much stronger ground sloth

If I could push a button and kill all the pandas and koalas, I would push it twice

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hZaTdNtiz7LGep8.htmlsi=2clkL5CD2cKubi0R

Actually, china is the main provider for these bears. We call it the panda policy

We do the same thing with women 😂

@@darksu6947 wtf

i mean just look at dogs

​@@darksu6947 who the hell is we bro

Outside of that (possibly sexiest) comment that dark soul said, all wild animals in nature have a function right?

Unfortunately many people hold this belief that humans causing ecological disasters the world over is just the way things are and not a problem.

Tbf I bet there's a lot of parents who won't even realise that blobfish are real animals.

​​​@@error-try-again-later or that they don't look like a half-melted pink caricature of a fish when they're still alive and pressurized. Sadly the build-a-bear blobfish has also died of rapid decompression. A bit macabre to make a toy that looks like a bloated animal carcass, but it's not like the kids will know.

I came here to see if anyone commented this. “Nobody’s buying their child a plushie that looks like a deflated sunfish fetus.” “Eh, actually….”

well I mean there’s “trash panda” Edit: take a joke you mentally degraded redditors

​@@some_random_merc that's what they were referring to

ok

​@@hats4pigeons132 would still be a superior form of Panda.

We do call em trash panda for a reason

Humans have helped the "good enough" along immensely! Being cute and or tasty is enough to propel your species to the millions.

Evolution also teaches us that "good enough" never lasts.

​@@Freshjuices15is the name for a constant rule

@@OutsiderLabs rats and cockroaches are laughing

They do fine when their forests arent erased

With the Wuxi Finger Hold

Just like us

@@powersurge_beast take that shit elsewhere Just like the pandas have to when the forests get eliminated

@@kirb9744 Bruh I thought Shifu retired

My zoo is next unfortunately

Yeah. Considering we only started paying attention to species population numbers *after* large areas of natural habitat were destroyed, I find a lot of "we are totally to blame for this" claims hard to take seriously. Earth is a complex set of systems and there's usually *several* factors at play when a species goes extinct.

Historically it's pretty clear loss of habitat was the main factor in the pandas decline. As the video noted they lice and breed pretty well in intact habitats. Theirs was not a "bad at living" sort of decline.

@@brigidtheirish Most times I heard Earth is comlex as defense. I go back to the simplest example. Engines are incredibly complex too. If you are fucking with it, its going to stop working. So no, nature being complex just means that interactions with it are more prone to affect it. Not less.

@@Luis519RS Earth also has a lot of redundancies built into the systems. When we can tell what lead to a species going extinct, there's usually multiple factors involved.