Also was amazed by it's accuracy - got good groupings at 25 yards. I didn't believe it so went to the range the next day to confirm it. Most accurate gun I've ever shot and yes I done own several CZ's.

The vast majority of guns are range toys.

It's my favorite range toy and I have a safe full of guns!@@ironmonkey1512

The serious purpose is how alot of us justify our purchase lol

It needs the "2011" treatment. Yes.

It seems nuts that the carry version is also single stack.

@@mrfrosty3 a carry version of this makes no sense what so ever.

This 😂🤣😂🤣

Where's that ATM to make that impulse buy?

Damn me too.

Is Sig offering a carry model on this gun? That’d be the first time.

Mike Dee they had a pre production one at shot show. 4” barrel, aluminum frame, and g10 grips. It’s supposed to come out sometime this year.

Mike Dee tfb has a video on it

John Kleinfelter thanks, I’ll hunt it down. Is it really a P210 if it has an aluminum frame? What’s next, a striker fired P210? LOL.

Phillip Abreu thanks!

That sounds hot

Well played - I hate those super fat Nill grips.

I’m sure they made a few double stack, but no the vast majority were single stack

Not quite. SIG developed two versions of the gun. The single stack 44/8 and the double stack 44/16. The Swiss Armed Forces demanded a capacity of at least 8 rounds, preferably more. However, due to the lack of communication between the Army and SIG, the company couldn't rely on the 44/16 being selected as the next service weapon, so SIG started to look for other buyers. SIG proceeded to apply to the Swedish Military, and they preferred the single stack 44/8 over the double stack 44/16 and thus, SIG dropped the double stack version and proceeded to develop the single stack version into the 47/8-Model. However, Sweden didn't adopt the 47/8 in the end anyway. When the Swiss Army, still preferring the double stack version, finally came around a couple of years later (around '48), SIG no longer had any double stack versions to ready to submit and because the 47/8 still fulfilled the minimum requirement of 8 rounds, the Army cut their losses and adopted the 47/8 as the Pistole 49. And from there, any other P210 variant was derived. In short: The Swiss wanted a double stack, but were not decisive enough. Sweden wanted a single stack and that's what we got.

Sergej Izotov Well if you want to split hairs, you are not exactly correct... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/frqZY8iouNi1mY0.html

Yes, it seems like such an odd decision not to select the double stack. I think Ian on Forgotten Weapons said the trial was carried out by a gun club at the time and they preferred the slimmer grip. A carry model with double stack would be great but they are sticking to original capacity for that too.

@@failure2flinch876 I am actually correct. My information is based on the book by E. Armbruster and W. Kessler. "Begegnungen mit einer Legende" (page 34/35 to be exact), which is widely regarded as the best and most complete book about the P210 development and all it's variants. The video you referenced is a rare occasion of Ian being objectively wrong.

Again Nill grips suck - they are too fat.

Why not just get a cz75

g19 for regular carry p365xl for summer/lighter carry is the perfect rotation: change my mind

@@Wilfmott I agree if I'm wearing jeans but usually I'm wearing gym style pants or shorts. I also carry a 15 round backup mag for my p365xl so only 3 rounds less than my G19, unless I'm carrying my eight 33 round mags and two 50 round drums for my G19 lol

Couldn't agree more! The thumb safety on this is terrible. It's sharp, requires a lot of force to move and doesn't give enough purchase.

Disagree - thumb works great. I don't know what you mean by it being sharp - get out and do some yard work. @@tristaneuritt9556

While massively awesome, I don't see them doing that since it would probably cut into P226 sales. I'll be happy if I can get a 5" Stainless P226 with an optic cut without selling my P7 and a spare organ.

@@danielhenderson8316 Fair point, but i still think a double stack version of the 210 would rather cut into the 1911/2011 market. P226 legacy is too strong imo (and an awesome shooter as well)

He always says he likes to go fast.

Back in the early 1990s, I worked at a small gun shop. We got in a shipment of the police surplus specimens and put them up for sale for like $400.00. They were in nice shape. I always kick myself for not picking one up, which I could have gotten for a good bit less than the sticker price.

The ONLY difference on the frames between the target and standard is the wood grips. So if you love that idea buy the target and get some spare standard wood grips

I have a stable full of guns and this one hands down is my favorite . My trigger pull come in at less than 3lbs.

Help a poor like me out (not hi point poor, but... lol) and educate me on the target models Msrp please.

@@joshuagibson2520 Street price is typically in the $1500-1700 range if you can find it.

@@joshuagibson2520 Target model is adjustable sights and more of a target grip vs duty type, the target also has front serrations on the slide. I like the look of the standard slide better but I don't press check off the muzzle end, I prefer the old school smooth

In Bullseye, it's cheating alright. Lol. Target P210 is spectacular.

And about $2500 and maybe not enough production space to pull off due to all the police and military contracts for the guns they make right now.

hopefully

hard to say

H.O. always tells it straight, Like it is. Its ok to say the TSO has the 210 covered, 360°

@@tomd8313 Now that would be debatable. Both the P210 and the TSO share similar design concepts, that's for sure. The P210 has a long history of military service while the TSO has none. Over its time in production its probably won more pistol tournaments then the TSO. Though I do agree the evolution of the TSO from the CZ75 is outstanding.

They have a blued version........$2000