Hows the autofocus vs the 24-105? I'm about to make the trade. I shoot running children and marching bands.

@@michaelholzhausen5741 Haven't tried the 24-105 so I'm not sure. It's been pretty good for stills and just ok for video. Most focus issues are probably the S1 and not the lens though.

How is the af c in video?

This is the combo I'm considering.

LOLOLOLOL. Love your channel.

It's pronounced "Tuna".

Looool man

same as bukake but different spelling

😅😂

Whats the difference between art and a non art.. sorry I'm new idk the terminology

lcador9 I'm in a pickle to sell my Nikon F mount to go Sony. I want to like the Z system, but I'm an enthusiast and spending $2K+ on a lens is not worth it. Now with Sony being able to get a 2.8 from $900-$1200. That's a game changer. And Nikon doesn't seem willing to open their mount eng,... Hello Sony?!

The only reason why I'm stuck and consider going Nikon Z is their built in stacking, for Macro, and ergonomics, however battery life is trash and that's a huge thing for me.

@@coltoncyr2283 I agree. My Nikon Z7 is stuck in warranty repair in New York for very poor battery life, less than 150 shots under minimal demand. Problem is the 500mm PF, for birds, is a fabulous light weight wonder and the S-lenses are super sharp end to end for landscape. I print for galleries at 20-40 inches and the quality difference shows. I more then make my money back by paying the premium lens prices. Best of luck with you photography.

Yeah but Tamron swaps places with the zoom ring and focus ring, LOL :)

Simple.. Tamron wins always with 2.8 Lenses

@@prabhubhoopathy7478 I guess you've never use any Sigma lenses.

@@PeterPing I have used it from 2012 to 2015, but I didn't like the softness in the corners & distortion. Tamron lenses are little better in sharpness and giving little more color richness in my photos.

Prabhu Bhoopathy sharpness and color is something that can be fixed in post, colors don’t really matter to me in my opinion when buying a lens when 99% of photographers are just gonna edit their photos and play with the tones and colors in their images regardless...

Yeah they did it matters something with the serial numbers if you have a certain serial number its fixed and the older has a different one

Why do they talk about the focus clutch? You can manual focus with the L mount lens right?

@@bornfromthefires2515 claro que es posible.

@@davidsanchez1 Jajaja gracias! Estoy a punto de comprarme la S5 con ese lente. Ya decía yo que no tenía sentido.

@@bornfromthefires2515 para mi es el mejor objetivo calidad precio para las lumix s, yo lo uso en el 90% de mis trabajos y estoy muy contento. Ya me contarás...

Techart adapter sony/nikon and take tamron

I'm sure it's as well sealed as the other art lenses. I never worry to much about some dust inside our lenses because sooner or later it's just gonna happen. Minimal effect on image quality so i don't sweat it.

One year later, Johannes Malm, look at the new lens from Sigma and Tamron. Talking about upping their game, now their old lens are just old. Tamron has new lens that are right up there with Sony's G line. Sigma has just incredible lens. I'm looking at the 24/28 to 70/75 line of lens from either company.

It has been improved all around.

Any Sony APSC from the a6000 line (based on your budget) or an A7c if you want full frame! I

Myrmidon they won’t until RF / Z have as much user as sony.. companies are all about ROI and supply demand.

@@HwL01 Of course. But both Canon and Nikon FF mirrorless have more users than Panasonic FF mirrorless. I looked it up and it's because Sigma have a partnership with Panasonic. That would make R&D much cheaper as they don't have to reverse engineer the AF.

@@nikanj that's the L mount alliance with Pana n Leica.

And yes I know if you're comparing FF to APS-C that "one stop" aperture difference compounds with the sensor size to consume two stops of High ISO ability. Fuji's OIS would counteract some of that though, more or less depending on the IBIS capabilities of your individual camera. And don't count on using the 70mm-80mm range of the Fuji lens for anything critical. Still, saving half the weight (and a few hundred dollars) is nothing to scoff at. I guess the bottom line would be if you're really "pro" then Fuji needs to build an f2.0 16-55mm lens before they'll have a direct equal to this Sigma, but for the vast majority of people the existing Fuji 16-80mm might be worth a good hard look.

Yes. Sigma makes the 24-70mm f/2.8 for canon EF mount just make sure you select the EF version and not the E mount for sony.

@@jonathanhnunez thank you

Most mirror less cameras have a easier time dust collecting than DSLRs. This is mainly just because they miss the extra 'shield' Infront of the sensor. Some manufacturers like canon with te Eos R try to battle this by closing the shutter when detaching the lens, but this also makes the adaption of old glass more tricky since the software does not support to shut this feature off. The general body design at Sony, which is relatively blocky compared to other cameras, also allows for more nooks and crannies inside the body - but since it's stuffed with technology anyway the only place to let dust can even settle inside is directly on and around the sensor. This issue might be even bigger with f.e. Canon since the body is more round and square parts have to fit in there, but that's a stupid argument. Sonys biggest disadvantage is really just that the sensor lies relatively close to the outside, this not leaving a lot of room for isolation and they have, in contrast to Olympus f.e., no rubber ring at the bottom of the lens mount socket in the camera to stop dust and water. So in the end it boils all down how isolated your lenses are and what measurements the manufacturer took. Sony is in a good spot and we'll handled it's not a bigger problem than with other mirrorless cameras, but companies like Canon or especially Olympus went other ways to combat it better - with other consequences like weight or adaptability.