Lol 🤣

😂🤣🤣🤣 absolutely right

Rohith u are hilarious 🤣🤣🤣

i swear this guy is the biggest hippy

Simon is a flip flop tbh. On a Tuesday he'll be there ranting and raving about Man City destroying the game, the super league, money destroying the game etc. And then on Wednesday criticising Norwich for playing within their budget.

@@danwilkes8964 if he gets sacked and paid off then he doesn't have to watch his win record dwindle .

Scotty was right! He got the first option…the sack 😀

Football manager strategy

@@sarginsonjon am sure Everton and Aston villa have probably already contacted him just in case they wanna make a move. Rn he's sitting in the catbird seat

Exactly. He knew exactly what was going to happen

So many psychic people on here. How does anyone know what has been discussed? Maybe he is speaking out because he was promised everything yet received very little!!!

Parker was never going to walk away from his contract. By doing it this way in the media he has enabled the player to not perform. Now that he is sacked he will still get a payout.

Conte is an amazing manager who speaks his mind in press conferences. It's important but I guess Parker doesn't have the trophies to back it up

@@kyronne1 exactly! trying to operate like Conte and Jose without the clout or success to back it up. This will only put off other clubs within his level from hiring him in the future. Should have just kept it short and sweet 'we were not good enough today' no need to elaborate further, anyone with a brain can already see that Bournemouth are not equipped to survive in the premier league

@@michealdexter1188 sooo one person made a valod comment amd u dont reply to him ?

He understand the owner's side of story because he lived through it in the past. No Premier League owners or board of directors are so incompetent enough not to communicate with the managers with regards to budget. Parker definitely knew about it and realised his players and his abilities are limited, so he took a gamble by publicly addressing the lack of funds to push the board or get the sack. In the end he got the latter and that takes some b*lls to do that for both Parker and the board.

because football fans, pundits, players, and managers try to consistently and completely ignore or override it.

@@GIBBO4182 His comments are a consequence of the results they've had, thusly it has everything to do with results.

@@GIBBO4182 lmao

@@mrshankly213 no, his comments as Simon says are as a result of whatever conversations were had behind closed doors. He decided to use the media as leverage and it failed. He gets a payoff will get to keep his reputation and will undoubtedly land elsewhere on his feet

Nothing to do with results. Watch the video

​@@GIBBO4182 I think you meant tenuous. 🤣🤣🤣

Yeah he needed backup. But the matter is that he should’ve discussed his points inside the meeting room not out in public. You meet the man, present your requirements, try convincing him, if you win the negotiation you get what you want and if you don’t, you either do what you can with what you have or leave the club. No point whining about it after being unable to conclude the discussion with the man in charge

championship manager at best

How about Scott Parker becomes an owner and puts his money on the line.

@@dudebro3250 if you become an owner of a football club then that's what your REQUIRED TO DO....otherwise sell and buy a cornenershop and penny pinch

@@lowercentenary so lose as much of your money as possible. Spend spend spend. Try and get the club out of business. Really smart.

na. its just 3 points. Man united often got hannered 6 and 7 nil. Ferguson generally won the next match with the players

@@denisdaly1708 OFTEN during Ferguson‘s era???? 6 or 7? Mate what are you on about

@@kingvid4223 i think he's talking about the games he played on his playstation

@@jhpfdijtuiweruot 💀 exactly mate like what is my guy on about

@@denisdaly1708 when.thats mince

yes, that is the reality. 20 25 years ago it was much different

@@CC1984_ Not strange at all. His point is you have to spend millions just to keep up with those teams, let alone the top 6. As for West Ham, why would anyone mention them?

@@CC1984_ Bournemouth's spending should never be compared to the big 6, just like they aren't competing to stay up against the big 6. West Ham finished 7th... they don't need the same reinforcements as a championship squad

@@shingetsu10 Exactly, you got my point perfectly. I also have no clue what he means about West Ham

fulham spent 120 million a few years ago and went back down. That is even worse than not spending. I dont think you HAVE to buy to stay up, brentford didnt spend much last year, Leeds didnt spend much when they came up, and same with sheffield united.

That is not what honesty is about. Like Simon says,they have had that conversation in the boardroom already and Scott must have agreed with the Club's position seeing how he did not hand in his resignation. That he will come out to the media and says the opposite is NOT INTEGRITY. That is exactly the definition of "being two face" or "backbiting " . Also like Simon says,when these football managers keep going on and on about wanting more money, do they know what the finances of the club is? Is it some money they have left to the owners to keep? Managers are starting to think that they own clubs but they don't - they are just mere employees.

@@kcetebe8012 First off, that is all mere speculation that they had that “conversation”. Ideally, clubs typically do have that conversation but do we know THEY did? Secondly, the coach is very much in the right to speak out especially when coaches nowadays are easily replaced after a bad start to a season. The culture of running a club has changed: to receiving immediate results and making immediate profit. That’s why coaches push for help so they could deliver in that fashion.

i could listen to Simon all day long, hes a Top bloke in my book.. cheers talksport from Thailand

It's a pretty crude spoonerism, but okay.

@@jnicholls21 All spoonerisms are crude, Karen. 😉🤡

Exactly my thoughts. I was surprised with his after match comments and I think it was those which got him the sack. I hope he gets another team soon as he seems to be a good manager.

Yep I agree... He's more or less said 'well what do you expect, look at what I've got'.. That's no way for a manager to be with his squad so getting rid of him was the only option.

@@delanodegenie6970 he is talking the truth

@@Rocky0Road He maybe but you don't do it in public and embarrass your chairman.

Southampton weathered two 9-0 losses with Hasenhuttl, and that's working out okay. Keeping these sides up is a success.

Completely disagree... if your management team [owners] decisions mean that the season will become a train crash then they need to be told. Again and again.

Broooooo r u joking or Nottingham and Fulham all strengthen and Bournemouth did ehat

The problem with Simon is he was born, and still alive.

The reality is that clubs are paid for with real money and most owners want a return on their money, like any investment. Unless you’re lucky to be owned by Arabs who are doing this for a bit of fun and its just chump change to them, the pool of money isn’t endless and the club needs to be run responsibly. My club almost died due to irresponsible spending. Sure I want success on the pitch but I don’t want those managing my club to gamble with its future by making investments they can’t afford. I guess most fans don’t care and don’t want to see that its a business.

He always sides with ownership

Blokes a clown

@@LeoDragon34 theres a difference between wanting success on a pitch and blatantly allowing your club to drop down because u can then keep the massive promotion bonus and repeat in 2 years time when ur promoted again. owners lining their pockets

He knows that the owners have lots and lots of money, who are giving Parker an impossible job

He wasn’t sacked because of the results though he was sacked for saying he hasn’t had enough backing, watch the video and keep up!

Fulham fans coined his football “Parker ball” because it was so boring and lacked any attacking. He is almost completely disliked for his time at Fulham because we played so beneath the level of player we have. This is the manager that refused to play mitrovic. Compare how Fulham have done since silva took over. Parker is an unbelievably negative manager in tactics and man management.

If the owners are willing to sack this soon I don't see any hope for them to stay up.

Don't know why people say this, his style of football is vile, and his Bournemouth team last season underachieved.

He wasn't sacked because of the results, he was sacked for dragging board disagreements into the circus of media. Unlike at Fulham, when he disagreed with the board, he walked away. Here he tried to sink the ship, with everyone onboard, to save himself. He should've been professional and worked with what he got, or he could've just walked away again. It's Bournemouth, it's not like they promised him a big transfer budget. Most of that "promotion money" goes to salaries and "other" expenditures. If you don't really have much of any other source of revenue (by EPL standards), then there's really not much left, say £50m at best. They've signed Tavernier for £10m, Senesi for £12m and three more on free. They're limited to the amount of players who wants to sign and they can't afford to overpay. - Fulham is ultra wealthy. - Forest is a massive club in comparison to Bournemouth, much higher revenue from ticket sales to shirt sales, and most of their players went elsewhere before the season, freeing up wages massively. Forest also has a generous owner and they'll most likely sign attractive main, sleeve and training kit sponsors. - Bournemouth just signed a main sponsor deal with Dafabet worth only £4 million and training kit sponsor probably not worth much more than your own salary, so obviously, with that kind of money, they're not going anywhere other than back down. Pretty sure the board made it clear to him when he came knocking on the door for more reinforcements at some point. Now he regrets leaving Fulham and drewls at Forest. Parker is correct, Bournemouth's squad is nowhere near Premier League level, and even if they spent another 50 million on 2-3 more players, it just won't be enough to stay up. He was frustrated, jealous and had a public tantrum. He was rightfully sacked.

well he knows a lot more than you or any of us in the comment section

@@24SparrowJack he was the owner of Palace when they went into administration, he knows how to f&ck a club up.

@@24SparrowJack got pubes in your teeth bro

@@NLGNATHAN exactly his hate for players and managers is unparalleled

@@NLGNATHAN would you do better though

Deserved better how? He is a multimillionaire football manager. Not some kid working in sweat shops 18 hours a day for less than minimum wage.

@@dudebro3250 Doesn’t matter if it’s a millionaire he still a hard-working guy who’s got feelings. He got Bournemouth back to the Premier League and this is how they treat him. That’s not okay. If they don’t invest in the team, they could have Pep and will still get relegated.

Decent fella? You know him well, yeah?

@@lebontv6921 He would have known what the budget was, he should have walked if it a figure not acceptable to him, but then you don’t get the payout of a sack if he did that

I have to agree with Simon Jordan, I’ve got sacked for something very similar. U gonna get sacked anyway for not delivering. Might as well go early

A money pit you say...do you think that's it's a sound business decision then?

He’s delusional mate. And it just shows how petulant the owning is that he fired a decent manager because he felt a bit disrespected. “I guarantee you” you have no way of knowing that at all. Why’s he talking about West Brom lol. “I battered Norwitch for bad decisions” Not buying players is a bad decision lol.

@@nicholasbaldwin4897 Absolutely not. Owners typically have done very well in business to be in the position to buy a club in the first place but must go into club ownership understanding that very few clubs are profitable and most need propping up by the owners. True is isn't Parker's money on the line but Simon's sympathy for the owners doesn't really wash.

Was he asking for sympathy? Sounded to me like he was saying the owners don't publicly ask for sympathy and it should be expected professional etiquette for managers to act in the same way. If a manager behaved like this in any other industry they would be marched out the front door in a flash

@@jhpfdijtuiweruot but the manager needs backing to do his job. If they dont back him it's his career that takes the hit.

The first time? Wow

No it isn't. Keep the core, keep the cash, have a free season in the Prenier League.

@@shabba7829 Simon Jordan hater?

@@thewiggster2 Simon Jordan fanboy?

@@shabba7829 answering a question with a question. Nice deflection. Simon usually bases his opinions on facts and at most he is harsh but never usually wrong. Only other thing I can think I disagree with is that fans didn’t get super league cancelled; I think they did

Spot on lad. I’ve been saying the same this for ages, much much smaller salary’s with big performance bonuses

He wasn't fired for the results, he was fired for going against the board publicly.

@@popmonika If they're not backing him he has a right too. He's the one who takes the flack

£10 for every successful pass

Sadly if it came In what would then happen would someone else would start a football organisation and all the players would move to that

Not really

calm down they've only lost games that they should've

Ahh yes, no doubt if a staff member or your child were told something by you and then continued to pester you about it you'd have nonissue with that

Totally agree , we can all say what we think , we don’t live in a dictatorship, he’s an employee , don’t we all have gripes ? Don’t we all have the opportunity to publicly vent those gripes?! Totally ! It’s these rabid , capitalist morons who think we should all be bowing to our betters, getting sacked for speaking the truth. Bournemouth hierarchy don’t care either way it seems.

You've gotta love live radio LOL

He talks polarized nonsense.

@@davidr1138 he always seems to make sense to me

It's TRUE though, you can't just do whatever the hell you want, respect for the people paying you very very good money every week is needed!

And he’s 100% right

@@NeverTrustaSocialist Ofcourse

Some people might say this is a stronger epl than 2015

@@perrybarbe7789 And some might say that this is a much weaker LFC side than the one Howe faced

Yeah, but every other team is stronger.

@@jhpfdijtuiweruot and they would be wrong.

@@perrybarbe7789 ...in your opinion

Hes not though, owning a football club is not the same as owning a normal business.

He's literally never been more wrong in an opinion and completely blowing things out of proportion based off of irrelevant past experiences from a terrible failed stint as an owner. But his fanbase are low IQ, incompent, uneducated bin dippers who can't think rationally but that's why he's brought on: to pander to the dole dippers, so makes sense they'd think he's bang on.

Don't mix up your Brighton Seagulls with the Trawler ones....!

@@woodenseagull1899 or wooden seagulls for that matter 😂

A Cantona at Selhurst Park moment aimed at Sinclair would have been funnier

Ohhhhhh him.saying we need quality players and fans protesting bahahahaha but nobody saying a bad word

This. Parker is playing chess with the owners. Probably is frustrated with them and then got paid off

@@nazwansabli9275 Yes, he was right because 4 months down the line when Bournemouth are rock bottom of the table they’ll pin the blame on the manager and sack him regardless. Parker has got a good cv having just won promotion and if he’s dealt a poor hand by ruthless owners who couldn’t care less about him or the club or the fans or the players, then he’s right to leave.

@@jimmorrison8203 Agreed... and he's still young. Better get paid off and being stress-free. PS Jim Morrison is my favorite frontman of all time

thats gulible people for you. easily convinced

But if that’s what he meant then he would’ve just said that

This!

@@SenorSupreme176 Maybe it's simply ignorance of proper definitions. .but I give him more credit than that. He dribbles rubbish a LOT.

the sad thing is the amount of fans, pundits, players, and managers who don't even want to hear it or give it credence.

I think there’s a difference between loyalty to a club (not the business but the football idea) and loyalty to an employer. I’m not saying I like it but Jordan clearly differentiates strongly between the two

You need to be competitive though.

The owner wants the parachute payments. It's all about the business! Football is irrelevant

@@michaelwatson7223 without football, there is no business.

@@filmc3887 no it’s all about the business, look at Utd, if the Utd fans want the Glazers out they should all stop going to the football matches, buying the shirts etc, but they don’t and as long as the money comes in the board don’t care about the fans.

well then those cheap ass owners are gonna be mad when Bournemouth gets relegated again, if you have a football club you have to think of how to make it better, not how u can save money and you can't tell me that they can't buy a single player to make the team better, this just shows that owners are thinking just on money and not the club

Jordan was correct both times

You don’t know the financial situation at Bournemouth and Forest any more than I do. And as a Leeds fan I absolutely want my club to be run responsibly financially - I know what it feels like when my club implodes and tumbles down the leagues, to fester for 16 years, because of financial mismanagement. Simon Jordan is right here - the board will have told Scott Parker exactly what the financial situation was before this summer. He could see that the team wasn’t good enough and has agitated to get himself sacked so he doesn’t have another relegation on his CV. But you can be sure that other owners will be wary of hiring Scott Parker after this. Publicly going against your own board does not sit well, and he did it at Fulham as well.

Overspending 😂. They’ve bought one player for £12 million when they made 150 for being promoted. No one is expecting them to spend all of that but that’s fucking pathetic

There are people that actually agree with what they are saying?woww. Bournemouth got 100m when they got promoted and finished second behind fulham who were 12 points ahead of them . Fulham after winning the efl with a land slide still spent quite alot of the money to stay up and Bournemouth didnt spend any pep Guardiola himself wont be able to let them stay up

Crowd income is almost irrelevant at prem clubs...a tiny percentage of overall funds

@@MrJeffHead what a stupid comment. Next year they’ll be back in the championship with a team 2 years older from the championship 2nd place then. That’s without the better players leaving for better clubs. They will need to invest to even make a show of it

Hmm.. I thought their performance reflected the quality of opposition they had to face.. Anyway, the clever board will hopefully bring in a manager who will be content with losing games 👍

Palace have also had three windows of investment under their current manager, plus a decade of Premier League football to supplement that. Not the same situation at all.

Nah, theres always room for more honesty in everything including football, thats why we respect pundits such as Roy Keane.

@@davidr1138 that’s what I like my man….say it as it is unfortunately majority of ppl don’t like it

because football clubs are a business with unique financial circumstances independent of their recent history. Perhaps Forest was run better?

for a start, forests capacity is over double bournemouths.

Forrest are gambling with the hope of staying in the premier League, however, relegation could be fatal for the club, whereas, Bournemouth have secured the future of their club If they are relegated or not.

@@Kennycheeseman almost triple. Bournemouth don't own there stadium either, nor have much infrastructure. The first team training complex is a temporary building, the academy doesn't really have any facilities... they spent all their money to stay in the prem last time and had nothing to show for it when they came back down...realistically a league one club and all the fans know that, Scott Parker knew it wasn't a money pit so is saving his reputation by getting himself the sack...but Nu-Metalfan wouldn't know any of that because they are to ignorant to do any research on the history of Bournemouth... clearly the board are taking a different approach this time and plan to build the club instead if spending it all on players.

Yeah has to treat everything like its the worst event in history and judge the protagonist as a criminal lmao. Broken record

@@Invin_cibles he's a broken record because he always has to explain very simple things to very stupid people

@@jackcollins6218 he explained how it all goes down between owners and managers and Trevor just blurts out "hes just being honest" 😆🙈

@AVRO yeah I'm stupid I'm sorry

@OH Oh I'm very sorry I'll just shut up

but he is not wrong unless your Matiew Flammini and can come and buy the club just do the job

Not all opinions are equal, no one is depriving anyone a right to voice an opinion, if you can’t read a balance sheet you won’t understand the point being made.

No it isn't

Brighton have really been through the mill over the years . They lost their ground and were bankrupt for years, they are a success story.

Almost as if he wanted it to happen...

@@jhpfdijtuiweruot he did mate.

@@steve13191 Yes, pal. I know

Different times now

Sitting in the fence much

@@SeanBeatsMapson not really I’ve said Bournemouth squad needs backing but if your mentality is we are relegated before we’ve kicked a ball you should be sacked. Your mentality as a coach feeds down to your squad so no wonder they conceded 9 goals

Lol you think this league is at the same level as the one Blackpool joined?

Parker said something similar with Fulham at the start of the season in a post match interview and you just knew they were going to get relegated. Shocking leadership to announce in public that you don't trust the men in your team

@@jhpfdijtuiweruot exactly

He has that kind of Dragon's Den smugness about him that can't help but annoy people even when they agree with what he is saying.

The internet needs more people like you 👏

They should sell the club then.

@mrshankly213 I disagree. I think the board are being incredibly responsible. Bournemouth are not a big team. When it comes to fan support, infrastructure and revenue they massively smaller than all clubs in the league. It makes no sense then spending £80 million, risk getting relegated anyway and bankrupting the club like derby. They shouldn’t gamble the entire future of the club just because one morning Scott Parker woke up and decided he wanted to take on clubs 5 times the size of them

@@adamspimbly4706 So why don't they invest money in club infrastructure? They could have done that in the Howe era, built a bigger stadium etc, but they didn't. Where has all that money gone? Where will they money they get from promotion and relegation go? No players will be bought, no infrastructure will be upgraded. Seems like there's TV/PL money there that's not doing anything. I bet the owners and shareholders have alll upgraded their houses though.

@mrshankly213 okay let’s say they spend 200 million building a massive new stadium... Oops they have no fans to actually fill the extra seats with. So that would be pointless. It’s incredibly easy to spend money, but that alone won’t get you anywhere. Bournemouth are an incredibly small club compared to others in the premier league...they can’t compete long term with teams that have the revenue waaay above them. The owners may have taken some funds sure, but they aren’t wrong for not trying to compete with clubs 5 times the size of them

@@adamspimbly4706 Bournemouth are a lower end championship/ league one side which is massively punching above its weight. That’s not me digging at them, I have huge respect for Bournemouth and what they have achieved.

You don’t sack managers after one game, no matter how bad

Wow I didnt know he used to own a football club so I googled him and discovered that he did and yesterday he has just bought another football club XD