She's playing classic squash. BUT also shes on the ball so fast she has all the time in the world to pick her shot.

Nothing wrong with that decision. Crap it’s auto stroke. Have u played squash?

@@imatilda I suggest you get a hold of the squash book of rules, read it, and save the game yet another woeful referee, there are already too many of those.

@@stevehughes1510 rule 8.6.6 if there was interference that the opponent was making every effort to avoid and the striker would have been able to make a good return, a let is allowed;

@@imatilda That's the 'general' rule as we know, read a little further on to the rules under 8.9 Racket Swing, therein lies your answer.

@@stevehughes1510 Hey Steve : here is the rule re racket swing 8.9 Racket Swing A reasonable swing comprises a reasonable backswing, a strike at the ball and a reasonable follow-through. The striker’s backswing and follow-through are reasonable as long as they do not extend more than is necessary. If the striker requests a let for interference to the swing, then: 8.9.1 if the swing was affected by slight contact with the opponent who was making every effort to avoid the interference a let is allowed, unless the striker would have made a winning return, in which case a stroke is awarded to the striker; It's always up to interpretation of the rule right - my interpretation was that of point 8.9.1 - there was only slight contact - Hammamy made every effort to avoid the interference and I don't think Siva would have hit a winning return