Where do particles come from? - Sixty Symbols

  Рет қаралды 142,803

Sixty Symbols

Sixty Symbols

16 күн бұрын

Professor Ed Copeland discusses the origin of particles - including talk about inflation, re-heating, the Big Bang, and oscillons. More links and info below ↓ ↓ ↓
New paper by Ed and collaborators...
Formation and decay of oscillons after inflation in the presence of an external coupling, Part-I: Lattice simulations: arxiv.org/abs/2406.00108
More Ed on Sixty Symbols: • Ed Copeland - Sixty Sy...
Ed's trilogy on the sofa: • Ed Copeland Longer Int...
Ed discusses his career on the Numberphile Podcast: • An A-Class Reject (wit...
Reheating after Inflation by Kofman, Linde and Starobinsky: arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9405187
Oscillons: Resonant Configurations During Bubble Collapse: arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9503217
Patreon: / sixtysymbols
The University of Nottingham physics: bit.ly/NottsPhysics
Sixty Symbols videos by Brady Haran
Animation by Pete McPartlan
www.bradyharanblog.com
Email list: eepurl.com/YdjL9

Пікірлер: 655
@sixtysymbols
@sixtysymbols 14 күн бұрын
More Ed on Sixty Symbols: kzfaq.info/sun/PLcUY9vudNKBNtF1y-sneLuyCTE-Mda561
@conanobrien1
@conanobrien1 14 күн бұрын
Can you ask professor to explain the "flat" universe bit? I didn't understand most of what he was saying, but that part wasn't logical at all to me.
@jormam69
@jormam69 14 күн бұрын
@@conanobrien1 curvature of space can be measured by measuring angles. Say you have laser beam and direct it with mirrors in such a way that the beam makes a complete triangle. In a flat space the sum of angles in such triangle would be 180 degrees, same what is used in Euclidean geometry. If the space has a negative or positive curvature, the sum of the angles in such triangle could be larger or smaller than 180 degrees
@watchmobiletvnow
@watchmobiletvnow 14 күн бұрын
Have you changed microphones for recording or changed compressor, audio sound to polished and weird. Ed´s voice sounds different.
@conanobrien1
@conanobrien1 13 күн бұрын
@@jormam69 Would that be the same (similar) as when they say big objects (black holes or galaxies) curve space-time?
@tupublicoful
@tupublicoful 12 күн бұрын
We need more Prof Copeland on the whiteboard.
@philanderson5138
@philanderson5138 14 күн бұрын
Love hearing Brady's questions - it's like having a representative for physics interested amateurs like me - but asking the right key questions. amazing video as ever...
@biopsiesbeanieboos55
@biopsiesbeanieboos55 21 сағат бұрын
It’s the opposite of political interviews, when the journalists always seem to be half asleep and never ask the most obvious questions.
@nitinjaglan
@nitinjaglan 14 күн бұрын
Professor copeland is the professor we never had in uni/school but one we always wanted. Great to see him again on 60 symbols
@joetec6674
@joetec6674 14 күн бұрын
My favourite Sixty Symbols professor :)
@michaelsheffield6852
@michaelsheffield6852 14 күн бұрын
I do like his delivery
@xlimonade
@xlimonade 14 күн бұрын
Ye, mine too.
@SarmonOflynn
@SarmonOflynn 13 күн бұрын
His disposition is just so different from the image I have in my mind when someone says "physics professor," and it is wonderful.
@jaybertulus
@jaybertulus 13 күн бұрын
yes
@garyhuntress6871
@garyhuntress6871 12 күн бұрын
All the presenters are excellent, but i must say he is my favorite too (Tied with Sir Martyn I suppose)
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 14 күн бұрын
I love how he talked so enthusiastically about those ocelots.
@jacobscrackers98
@jacobscrackers98 14 күн бұрын
Yes, they love to vibrate when they purr.
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 10 күн бұрын
@@jacobscrackers98 THIS! YES! 🤣😂🤣😅
@robertelessar
@robertelessar 14 күн бұрын
Maybe call the initiation of inflation "The Cold Open".
@sjzara
@sjzara 14 күн бұрын
That’s brilliant!
@SarmonOflynn
@SarmonOflynn 13 күн бұрын
In Universe Res?
@JustinWatersJustinWaters
@JustinWatersJustinWaters 13 күн бұрын
If it's within an eternal inflation model, call it the "quick stop."
@aretorta
@aretorta 13 күн бұрын
Naaah, I suggest The Blow Out.
@SarmonOflynn
@SarmonOflynn 13 күн бұрын
@@aretorta prolapsed singularity?
@jajssblue
@jajssblue 14 күн бұрын
This is the best condensed explanation of the inflation model I've heard. Great science communication.
@swagatsauravmishra5266
@swagatsauravmishra5266 14 күн бұрын
Excellent video! 🎉 Many thanks for the kind reference to our work (and our new paper at the end). Ed and Brady rock !! Will think of a new term for the start of inflation in our next paper :-)
@robertelessar
@robertelessar 14 күн бұрын
I'm just going to give a second plug for my suggestion "The Cold Open", like the pre-credit scene in movies or shows. ^_^
@TheGeoffable
@TheGeoffable 14 күн бұрын
If something hasn't yet inflated it must be a period of flacidity? ;)
@tsuchan
@tsuchan 14 күн бұрын
Without a doubt. Ed is just one big cuddly hug of physics.
@DonDueed
@DonDueed 14 күн бұрын
I'll nominate "The Big Breath", such as one would take before inflating a balloon. It would make the creationists happy and maybe they'd shut up for awhile.
@funkbungus137
@funkbungus137 14 күн бұрын
is there a name for the sound you make right before you blow up a balloon? like ya know, the gulp of air you take as you lean back slightly and tilt your head up in preparation for blowing it up. Insufflation is the only word that comes to mind. though that's an imperfect fit.
@MichaelPiz
@MichaelPiz 14 күн бұрын
Well then. I've been following physics with a rather close layman's interest for about 45 years and this is the first time I've heard that the "hot big bang" came _after_ inflation. Quite a revelation for me and it makes me want to see an episode of Sixty Symbols or Numberphile where someone with the level of knowledge of Dr Copeland is in the middle of this sort of explanation and suddenly stops, gets a blank, mildly puzzled look on his face, says, "I've just thought of something I hadn't before," and goes into some furious computation which results in the solution to a heretofore unsolved physics/mathematics problem, yielding a massive breakthrough in the field. So let's get crackin' guys!
@crappymeal
@crappymeal 12 күн бұрын
You're got roughly a one hour in 60 years chance of that happening 😅
@schawo2
@schawo2 10 күн бұрын
HBB is not equal to BB. BB was BEFORE inflation, HBB is just a new fancy term for saying "after inflation".
@MichaelPiz
@MichaelPiz 10 күн бұрын
@@schawo2 Hm. I must have misinterpreted what the video was saying. I'll give it another look. Thanks.
@dan.j.boydzkreationz
@dan.j.boydzkreationz 5 күн бұрын
It's because the whole thing is still conjecture and we really don't know whether there even was a beginning
@NeonsStyleHD
@NeonsStyleHD 14 күн бұрын
WOW!!! That was by far THE Single BEST video this channel has produced in the last 13 years! It was deep, didn't dumb it down, explained it beautifully and filled a bloody big hole in my understanding of cosmology! I can't thank you enough! I can't wait to see what happens to the expansion rate of 1/H as Dark Energy becomes better understood; assuming I'm still here! BIG *_Thankyou!_*
@SpriteGuard
@SpriteGuard 13 күн бұрын
"you need a better term for the start of inflation" I feel like this is a good point to incorporate the term Horrendous Space Kablooie, introduced by the Watterson-Calvin-Hobbes paper.
@NoNowwwell
@NoNowwwell 14 күн бұрын
Ah I love Professor Copeland vids!
@jonathonjubb6626
@jonathonjubb6626 14 күн бұрын
Me 2
@NomenNescio99
@NomenNescio99 14 күн бұрын
Agree
@aL3891_
@aL3891_ 14 күн бұрын
cannot go wrong with an Professor Copeland video :)
@NicholasEllis-rs3nx
@NicholasEllis-rs3nx 14 күн бұрын
My 10 year subscription and I’m so excited to see a rare Ed new video dropped Thanks guy!
@sixtysymbols
@sixtysymbols 14 күн бұрын
Thanks for your loyalty.
@reasonerenlightened2456
@reasonerenlightened2456 14 күн бұрын
​@@sixtysymbols 1) When was space-time born? 2) Where the initial insane amount of Potential Energy comes from? 3) If mass is created by interaction with Higgs and that interaction bends space then is gravity the interaction with Higgs?
@NicholasEllis-rs3nx
@NicholasEllis-rs3nx 14 күн бұрын
FreeCourseWare from KZfaq here in the states has been incredible, with that said your channel and specific content is the cherry on top. Thank you sincerely Sixty Symbols I always recommend the channel to others. Sincerely.
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 10 күн бұрын
@@sixtysymbols So he says the system of equations is nonlinear 21:00, right? So I assume whatever system of nonlinear equations he is talking about are PDEs (partial differential equations) or even combinations of PDEs and functional and integral equations. That's what we differential algebraists work on. We work on finding exact solutions. I own three large handbooks by Soviet authors on differential equationd, the largest of which is the 2nd edition of "Handbook of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations" by Andrei D Polyanin and Valentin F Zaitsev, followed by 2nd edition of "Handbook of Linear Partial Differential Equations for Engineers and Scientists" by Andrei D Polyanin and Vladimir E Nazaikinskii, and 2nd edition of "Handbook of Exact Solutions for Ordinary Differential Equations". The ODE book is especially full of exact solutions of different types of nonlinear ODEs. All of the solutions are obtained by looking at differential symmetries of the ODEs. I still do not understand quite how they are getting these symmetries. The ODE book, but especially the nonlinear PDE book, have excellent sections on the general theory of differential symmetries. But, I cannot match that general theory up with the many many examples of exact solutions they find. I would really LOVE to sit down with somebody to help me work that out together. Nevertheless, one very general pattern that arises from these solutions is that ALL of them can be expressed, parametrically, by a finite tower of intermediate variables, where one variable in this tower satisfies a linear ODE over the differential ring generated by the variable below it. i.e. given G(x,y,dy/dx)=0 there exists a tower v1, v2, v3,..., v(m), t and another tower w1, w2, w3,..., w(n), t and some final common variable, t, below it, such that x satisfies a linear ODE w.r.t. t over Z{v1} = differential ring generated by v1=v1(t) over the integers, Z, with derivation D such that Dt=1, and v1 satisfies a linear ODE w.r.t. t over Z{v2} and so on until v(m) satisfies linear ODE over Z[t]. Similarly, y satisfies a linear ODE w.r.t. t over Z{w1} = differential ring generated by w1=w1(t) over the integers, Z, with derivation D such that Dt=1, and w1 satisfies a linear ODE w.r.t. t over Z{w2} and so on until w(n) satisfies linear ODE over Z[t].
@iLLadelph267
@iLLadelph267 14 күн бұрын
i always love Professor Copeland and his giddy excitement explaining the fine details in the maths leading to the speculative conclusions and especially his recognition of their benefits and flaws. he's always ready to answer Brady's harder questions and can point immediately to the maths for any given wonderment. its stuff like this that inspires me to further pursue astrophysics as a career
@avinamerkur1484
@avinamerkur1484 4 күн бұрын
The joy this guy eminates is incredible :) I am so glad we pay him to do this kind of stuff.
@invariant47
@invariant47 14 күн бұрын
it feels like seeing the professor after 100yrs
@creatorsremose
@creatorsremose 13 күн бұрын
"...where we think these particles come from." Such an important and wise phrasing... and then there're articles and documentaries stating these hypotheses as fact. I wish more educators were like Prof. Copeland.
@MegaOoga
@MegaOoga 14 күн бұрын
I love your drive to name things, scientists are spending all their energy on doing science and leaving none left for the creativity of naming things.
@AdamKlingenberger
@AdamKlingenberger 10 күн бұрын
When we let physicists name things, we get “quarks” which have “flavors” like “charm” and “strange”
@therealpbristow
@therealpbristow Күн бұрын
@@AdamKlingenberger They need a branding manager, stat. =:o}
@luckyluckyy859
@luckyluckyy859 5 күн бұрын
Favourite Professor, calm, focused, competent
@XXusernameunknownXX
@XXusernameunknownXX 14 күн бұрын
Great video. He always makes these complex concepts understandable.
@robdevries2621
@robdevries2621 13 күн бұрын
We need way more Ed Copeland on this channel!
@trespire
@trespire 14 күн бұрын
So if I understand, we now differentiate between some initial singularity and a "hot" big bang ? Wasn't aware of that. Seems everything starts and ends with scalar fields, while everything else is just a consiquence. Can't be easy to present such complex ideas in a simplified way for others to be able to grasp, great team work by Prof. Ed Coperland & Brady.
@scottwatrous
@scottwatrous 12 күн бұрын
Any day with a new video from Ed is literally the best day of the year.
@6099x
@6099x 14 күн бұрын
prof copeland is not only very nice, but always very insightful
@Rubrickety
@Rubrickety 14 күн бұрын
I eagerly await the Ed Copeland workout video.
@NomenNescio99
@NomenNescio99 14 күн бұрын
Professor Copeland, it's always very nice to listen to this gentleman. There ought to be more content with him on youtube.
@mxlexrd
@mxlexrd 14 күн бұрын
The idea of the universe being flat must be one of the most misunderstood concepts in physics. I can't count the number of times I've talked to laypeople who have heard this and think it means the universe is a flat plane. Unfortunately I don't think the professor's answer to your question innthis video helped that cause. Maybe this warrants a special video in the style of your old "does light slow down in glass" video, to set the record straight.
@1104Tea
@1104Tea 14 күн бұрын
in all fairness its not a very intuitive concept and it can be difficult to explain to people that you might call a layperson. I get the ideas needed and its still sometimes hard to wrap my mind around the idea of it.
@mxlexrd
@mxlexrd 14 күн бұрын
@@1104Tea Yeah, I've tried to explain large scale spatial curvature to a few different people with mixed success. The classic analogy people always use is the surface of the earth, but extending to 3 dimensions is tricky. One guy didn't even believe me when I said parallel trajectories on earth come together. Plus there's the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic curvature...
@volbla
@volbla 12 күн бұрын
I think i got a better appreciation of "the metric of spacetime" by playing around with simpler metrics. With chess distance one diagonal step has the same length as one axis-aligned step, meaning that a circle (i.e. constant distance from the center) has the shape of a square. With manhattan/taxicab distance one diagonal step is two axis-aligned steps, meaning a circle has the shape of a rhombus. Understanding that the very notion of "distance" depends on how/what we measure felt like a revelation. But curvature is about direction rather than distance (i think). I still don't really understand what the heck intrinsic curvature means. Maybe the best analogy is still the Asteroids video game. It takes place on a flat surface but the edges are connected making it topologically a torus 🤷‍♂️
@nickdumas2495
@nickdumas2495 11 күн бұрын
@@mxlexrd Try going with "Stand on the equator; we'll all walk due north on parallel paths. And it then gets crowded by the time you reach Canada." ;)
@tonywells6990
@tonywells6990 4 күн бұрын
It's a really simple concept. Just tell them that 'flat' means all lines on a 3D grid are parallel and straight!
@TiagoTiagoT
@TiagoTiagoT 14 күн бұрын
The curvature of space thing is better illustrated by talking about the principles of Euclidean geometry. There are a few ways to approach it, but for me what comes to mind first is stuff about infinite parallel lines. In a flat space, parallel lines remain parallel forever; in a positively curved space, parallel lines will converge, and in a negatively curved space, parallel lines will diverge. This works the same if you're talking about a 2d surface (the ball and saddle visuals there) as well as 3d space. Gravity introduces positive curvature, and Dark Energy introduces negative curvature, and it turns out it all seems to balance out at larger scales making the Universe as a whole "flat" in all ways that have been attempted to measure it (IIRC, in general the margin of error is so small in most circumstances the curvature is treated as just being perfectly zero).
@droppedpasta
@droppedpasta 14 күн бұрын
I had been wondering what Dr. Copeland was up to. I don’t understand it, but it’s good to hear from him anyway
@flymypg
@flymypg 14 күн бұрын
This specific area is worthy of at least a dozen more videos, perhaps with collaborators, such as other channels in the "Bradyverse", and Matt at PBS Space Time. Or perhaps start with a master playlist of the best videos in this area, with new content only to fill gaps and/or generalize the whole. The Hot Big Bang starts with the unification of almost all fields, where at increasing energy levels the electromagnetic and weak fields unify into the electroweak field, and the other fields unify at ever higher energies until all are unified into a single "grand" field. It is thought the Higgs is the second field to separate, preceded only by the inflaton, with the others following in short order. The "Cold" Big Bang creates (or is created with) the unified field (that also includes the inflaton), and it is the separation of the inflaton field that drives the HBB. Or at least that's what I gather to be the case. I've not kept up well with research in this area. As the temperature of the universe continues to drop, each combined field separates in turn, excitations in that field create both the specific force-carrying particles and the particles upon which they act, such as the photon being the force carrier between charged particles for the electromagnetic field, and gluons being the force particles between quarks in the strong field. With other fields for the quark colors and flavors. However, the photons in the plasma presumed to be present in the electromagnetic field when it separates is NOT what we see as the CMB! The CMB was generated much later, by a different mechanism. What determines the temperature at which each field will separate (with cooling) or will unify (with heating)? What determines what happens within each field as it separates? (The Higgs in an especially delicious example.) Professor Copeland shows that even superficial exposure to the math can yield fascinating diagrams that in turn can motivate high-level discussion in a generally comprehensible manner. I had not previously heard of "oscillons", yet quickly comprehended how they fit into the overall picture. More please!
@dlamont2636
@dlamont2636 7 күн бұрын
I love this channel so much, and Professor Copeland has a true gift for explaining what I'm sure are immensely difficult topics. Thank you from California for all the great work!
@vinzent1992
@vinzent1992 14 күн бұрын
Love Ed he's one of the best, you can always feel his enthusiasm and it's contagious.
@MrSottobanco
@MrSottobanco 7 күн бұрын
Fascinating! Nice delivery from Professor Copeland.
@witr
@witr 14 күн бұрын
so glad to see this channel still going 👍👍👍
@WhoLocke
@WhoLocke 14 күн бұрын
While this was a higher level video, I truly enjoyed watching this one. Really opened my mind about the nature of what we think of as the start of everything. Thank you Brady and Mr. Copeland!
@theograice8080
@theograice8080 13 күн бұрын
Mr Copeland seems like the kind of guy who I could find at a pub and still learn from after I've had a few drinks
@dexterrity
@dexterrity 14 күн бұрын
Always love Professor Copelands videos! Especially the one on cosmic superstrings.
@jacobcasey28
@jacobcasey28 14 күн бұрын
More maths on sixty symbols!! This was incredible. We need more of this! There is no accessible physics that show maths!! Please Brady!
@ernestoyepez5103
@ernestoyepez5103 14 күн бұрын
Its always a great day when the new video its with professor Copeland
@t.c.bramblett617
@t.c.bramblett617 9 күн бұрын
This was mind blowing and enlightening to me! Well explained and intuitively taught
@DwainDwight
@DwainDwight 14 күн бұрын
Ed is a top presenter. great guy.
@samowens3
@samowens3 14 күн бұрын
Wow I have been studying physics and cosmology on my own since 13 years old now I am 52 . That Professor explained the Hot Big Bang and inflation better than anything I have ever heard or read . He should write a book on it I never heard anything close to that simple of an explanation without hardcore math involved.
@n20games52
@n20games52 13 күн бұрын
So interesting and intriguing. I was just thinking about where particles come from yesterday and then this video appeared! Yay!
@firstplacelast2
@firstplacelast2 14 күн бұрын
Fantastic video! This is what I'm here for!
@itsnothardev
@itsnothardev 14 күн бұрын
Yesssss this is right up my alley, can't wait to hear Prof Ed speak on this
@GeoffryGifari
@GeoffryGifari 14 күн бұрын
Would be cool if there were a 3D simulation of curved space and objects in it, so we can experience it more vividly
@ErlendBarkbu
@ErlendBarkbu 14 күн бұрын
Professor Copeland. My favourite. Thanks for a very nice video
@MusicLover-bp2cc
@MusicLover-bp2cc 6 күн бұрын
Thorougly enjoyed this! Thank you!
@aosteklov
@aosteklov 14 күн бұрын
Great video. Please make more advanced videos like that!
@polares8187
@polares8187 13 күн бұрын
Brady coming in hot with the banger questions again. Always a pleasure to watch
@GeoffryGifari
@GeoffryGifari 14 күн бұрын
Did the inflaton field vanish completely (from the Lagrangian?) or is it like the top quark field whose particle can still be accessed at the right conditions? Does it contribute to the universe's vacuum energy density?
@kentscoffey
@kentscoffey 14 күн бұрын
I love Professor Copeland's amusement. He obviously enjoys what he is doing.
@sdal4926
@sdal4926 14 күн бұрын
Please more with Professor Copeland.
@grins047
@grins047 11 күн бұрын
Very informative. I am none the wiser but I really enjoyed listening.
@Life_42
@Life_42 14 күн бұрын
I love Professor Ed Copeland!
@shawncalderon4950
@shawncalderon4950 14 күн бұрын
An excellent presentation!
@guyh3403
@guyh3403 14 күн бұрын
Thank you so much! Very interesting.
@sixtysymbols
@sixtysymbols 14 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@Altorin
@Altorin 14 күн бұрын
Flatness is best described with triangles. Triangles made in flat space are 3 angles that add up to 180 degrees. Very very large triangles measured across the observable universe likewise would have 3 angles adding up to 180 degrees.
@jeroenvandorp
@jeroenvandorp 14 күн бұрын
Amazing explanation. 👍
@mpmpm
@mpmpm 10 күн бұрын
This is complicated.
@celo2043
@celo2043 14 күн бұрын
I love this corner of youtube!
@sorlag110
@sorlag110 13 күн бұрын
There's something real strange going on with the sound, like robotic, sounds like adobe enhanced audio??
@sorlag110
@sorlag110 13 күн бұрын
14:53 sounds especially like adobe enhanced speech, the way his voice drops down very artificially
@11pupona
@11pupona 14 күн бұрын
This Copeland guy is fantastic! cheers from Spain!
@coachj.landham1254
@coachj.landham1254 8 күн бұрын
Thank you for this video.
@bierrollerful
@bierrollerful 12 күн бұрын
This channel remains a true gem.💙
@grantparker3054
@grantparker3054 14 күн бұрын
YES more of the latest research like this please!!!!
@jhonbus
@jhonbus 13 күн бұрын
The part about the oscillons' role in cosmological phase transition made me think of an emulsion that arises during a chemical phase transition. Phase separation can occur in a solution when a change to its physical or chemical properties means that the lowest energy state will now be achieved when one component becomes a separate phase instead of part of the solution. Sometimes this occurs rapidly, but sometimes an emulsion forms, in which the phases form intermixed bubbles or particles. These bubbles are inherently unstable, since the lowest energy state is for the phases to be completely separate. But they can sometimes take an extremely long time to gradually disappear.
@michaelsheffield6852
@michaelsheffield6852 14 күн бұрын
I was just asking myself this question this morning! Timely😊
@ericisawesome476
@ericisawesome476 2 күн бұрын
I wish Professor Ed had his own podcast or something
@helvio89
@helvio89 14 күн бұрын
A reference to a Brazilian scientist, Marcelo Gleiser. Let's go 🇧🇷
@migfed
@migfed 14 күн бұрын
Any recommended book about this reheating phase of universe?
@backwashjoe7864
@backwashjoe7864 14 күн бұрын
I feel like we just got let in on some physics secrets. A fascinating glimpse of how these scientist really think and view things. Thanks Brady and Dr. Copeland! :)
@ericlindell3777
@ericlindell3777 13 күн бұрын
Love seeing some of what’s at the forefront of physics research!
@3_letter_animal
@3_letter_animal 14 күн бұрын
Loved it!
@Ian.Murray
@Ian.Murray 14 күн бұрын
Is there some sort of effect or compression on Ed's voice in this particular video? It almost sounds like his audio is clipping or he's been autotuned.
@benoitb.3679
@benoitb.3679 14 күн бұрын
Yeah! I was looking for this. Sounds like it been pitched down or he's got a cold or something
@benoitb.3679
@benoitb.3679 14 күн бұрын
I'm not complaining or trying to be rude!
@viceyyy
@viceyyy 14 күн бұрын
Glad I wasn't alone in this thought. Feels like there may be distortion from any audio level normalization is my guess, since Ed isn't wearing a microphone and his distance from the mic probably isn't constant
@pmcpartlan
@pmcpartlan 13 күн бұрын
Mic broke, so we had to fix up the camera audio the best we could
@xtieburn
@xtieburn 14 күн бұрын
Its been too long since Ive seen a Prof Copeland vid.
@Egofever
@Egofever 10 күн бұрын
My favorite speaker
@andrewmarkowski308
@andrewmarkowski308 13 күн бұрын
Please more videos like this one.
@PaulG.x
@PaulG.x 14 күн бұрын
"Yahweh , what are you doing?" "I'll just be a moment dear, I'm reheating this melon." "Be careful , the microwave has been on the blink lately."
@ronanrichardson1309
@ronanrichardson1309 13 күн бұрын
Missed you Ed!
@jasonhildebrand1574
@jasonhildebrand1574 5 күн бұрын
Excellent video ! And this did remind me of my 9th grade research paper and oral presentation in 1994 on this topic. I think that I only had less than 5 minutes, and the chalk was flying all over the place as I tried to demonstrate the various epochs. I do believe that the rough draft of this must be stored in a box somewhere, but alas I have not found it yet. On a side note, something is off with Ed's audio signal there is a strange modulation and/or reverb that is occurring. Please take a look at this in post production, as it was slightly distracting.
@BigCrowsVideos
@BigCrowsVideos 14 күн бұрын
Fascinating!
@nicholascmcneill
@nicholascmcneill 14 күн бұрын
Ed! My favorite!!!
@theultimatereductionist7592
@theultimatereductionist7592 10 күн бұрын
So he says the system of equations is nonlinear 21:00, right? So I assume whatever system of nonlinear equations he is talking about are PDEs (partial differential equations) or even combinations of PDEs and functional and integral equations. That's what we differential algebraists work on. We work on finding exact solutions. I own three large handbooks by Soviet authors on differential equationd, the largest of which is the 2nd edition of "Handbook of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations" by Andrei D Polyanin and Valentin F Zaitsev, followed by 2nd edition of "Handbook of Linear Partial Differential Equations for Engineers and Scientists" by Andrei D Polyanin and Vladimir E Nazaikinskii, and 2nd edition of "Handbook of Exact Solutions for Ordinary Differential Equations". The ODE book is especially full of exact solutions of different types of nonlinear ODEs. All of the solutions are obtained by looking at differential symmetries of the ODEs. I still do not understand quite how they are getting these symmetries. The ODE book, but especially the nonlinear PDE book, have excellent sections on the general theory of differential symmetries. But, I cannot match that general theory up with the many many examples of exact solutions they find. I would really LOVE to sit down with somebody to help me work that out together. Nevertheless, one very general pattern that arises from these solutions is that ALL of them can be expressed, parametrically, by a finite tower of intermediate variables, where one variable in this tower satisfies a linear ODE over the differential ring generated by the variable below it. i.e. given G(x,y,dy/dx)=0 there exists a tower v1, v2, v3,..., v(m), t and another tower w1, w2, w3,..., w(n), t and some final common variable, t, below it, such that x satisfies a linear ODE w.r.t. t over Z{v1} = differential ring generated by v1=v1(t) over the integers, Z, with derivation D such that Dt=1, and v1 satisfies a linear ODE w.r.t. t over Z{v2} and so on until v(m) satisfies linear ODE over Z[t]. Similarly, y satisfies a linear ODE w.r.t. t over Z{w1} = differential ring generated by w1=w1(t) over the integers, Z, with derivation D such that Dt=1, and w1 satisfies a linear ODE w.r.t. t over Z{w2} and so on until w(n) satisfies linear ODE over Z[t].
@nikitaelizarov7444
@nikitaelizarov7444 2 күн бұрын
When professor Copeland retires, he has an ASMR-artist career waiting for him.
@11_phamxuanhoang70
@11_phamxuanhoang70 13 күн бұрын
this is definitely the most confusing lesson. It's awesome but posing so many questions, like why does the process when the particles got diluted by the inflaton field stop? It's because the potential energy of the field reached a certain frequency at that point. I really need more explanation on the energy, frequency parts, like some example maybe. Thanks Sixty Symbol and Professor Ed a lot for this amazing video.
@20000lbs_of_Cheese
@20000lbs_of_Cheese 14 күн бұрын
always a pleasure
@petrisz
@petrisz 10 күн бұрын
fascinating.
@YTAliasJoeCool
@YTAliasJoeCool Күн бұрын
very nice
@danprateratl
@danprateratl 14 күн бұрын
amazing.
@Charity4Chokora
@Charity4Chokora 14 күн бұрын
How is this not Roger Penrose's cycler universe
@martinmckee5333
@martinmckee5333 5 күн бұрын
This video makes me wish I had gone into cossmology (I very nearly did). Great video all around!
@CWHolleman
@CWHolleman 14 күн бұрын
Absolute legend.
@iambiggus
@iambiggus 14 күн бұрын
Professor Ed!!! 🎉❤
@nicksamek12
@nicksamek12 14 күн бұрын
The animation with the sled reminds me of Line Rider :)
@Luke-mr4ew
@Luke-mr4ew 14 күн бұрын
This is profound - one of the first bit of theoretical physics that seems both grounded and groundbreaking. There are so many ideas here I've never heard of - is this an established area of research, or is Prof Copeland giving the pre-amble to a massive publication from his team?
@tonywells6990
@tonywells6990 4 күн бұрын
The idea of inflation (slow roll and eternal) has been around since the 1980's.
@joe_malott
@joe_malott 13 күн бұрын
Ed Copeland. I've never clicked faster to watch a vid.
@jacobscrackers98
@jacobscrackers98 14 күн бұрын
What does it mean for a field to decay?
@davidmcc8727
@davidmcc8727 14 күн бұрын
A great video very interesting. One point are any of these ideas testable or is it just hypothesised
Inflation & the Universe in a Grapefruit - Sixty Symbols
24:08
Sixty Symbols
Рет қаралды 660 М.
Space oddities - with Harry Cliff
54:22
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 575 М.
I Can't Believe We Did This...
00:38
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 70 МЛН
你们会选择哪一辆呢#short #angel #clown
00:20
Super Beauty team
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
아이스크림으로 체감되는 요즘 물가
00:16
진영민yeongmin
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Attosecond Lasers (2023 Nobel Prize in Physics) - Sixty Symbols
23:05
Sixty Symbols
Рет қаралды 420 М.
The real intuition behind Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle!
21:23
FloatHeadPhysics
Рет қаралды 85 М.
The Problem with Wind Energy
16:47
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
5 Things You Don't Understand about Gravity
19:40
Sideprojects
Рет қаралды 389 М.
Is pool actually just mathematics?
26:40
Stand-up Maths
Рет қаралды 515 М.
The Numitron: An obvious idea that wasn't very bright
23:21
Technology Connections
Рет қаралды 985 М.
Black Holes and Dimensional Analysis - Sixty Symbols
19:58
Sixty Symbols
Рет қаралды 135 М.
Epic Expansion: The Case for Inflationary Cosmology
1:28:42
World Science Festival
Рет қаралды 44 М.
Solving the secrets of gravity - with Claudia de Rham
1:01:17
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 266 М.
Что не так с яблоком Apple? #apple #macbook
0:38
Не шарю!
Рет қаралды 483 М.
Опыт использования Мини ПК от TECNO
1:00
Андронет
Рет қаралды 284 М.
iPhone 16 с инновационным аккумулятором
0:45
ÉЖИ АКСЁНОВ
Рет қаралды 4,3 МЛН
cute mini iphone
0:34
승비니 Seungbini
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Хотела заскамить на Айфон!😱📱(@gertieinar)
0:21
Взрывная История
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН