las lenas has epic snow BUT the resort is expensive and super ugly.you could consider staying in malague and driving up for a cheaper deal.

@@optout5350 Thank you. A friend said Chile might be better due to Argentina financial status. I am from the US.

argentina is sooo cheap though if you have US cash, and also Argentina has way better food than Chile and the women in Argentina are 10x hotter than Chile @@scotthorns5576

food in Chile is woeful,agentina has awesome food and stunning women!Skip baoriloche its awful the Argentinians call it the "mar del plata of the andes"after an ugly overcrowded beach on the coast.Cerro castor and chapelco are better options.Las Lenas is epic but the village totally lacks any culture and is heavily used by foreigners on package tours.(I teach in Austria ) but that's another storey! @@scotthorns5576

Hi Scott. Las Leñas is great, but unfortunately, I hadn't yet been there when I shot this video. Biggest pros are the quality of the snow (for some the best in Argentina) and good infrastructure. Cons are the not-so-breathtaking landscape (yet so beautiful, not even close to Bariloche) and distances and access, which means most people spend the night in the resort in expensive hotels.

which are?

cerro castor@@Denussy

infrastructure got much better at catedral in the past years. Artificial snow to the base of the mountain, new slopes and new chairlifts that help to not get stuck that much at the waiting lines. I mean, how do you call poor infrastucred, the mos developed ski resort in south america?. Despite the crowds at high season, it has the best terrain to ski and much more variety than cerro castor.

mucho mejor que el castor, lo unico bueno del castor es que casi no llueve y que noy hay fila en general@@ronamusic8630

there is not one chilean ski resort with better insfrastructure, this last years big investments have really improved the resort