ARJ21 and Chinese expansion plan

Рет қаралды 47,965

Күн бұрын

The COMAC ARJ21 (Xiangfeng - “Soaring Phoenix”) is a regional jet passenger aircraft created by the Chinese corporation COMAC in the mid-2010s. In this video, we take a look at this aircraft, learn about its features, walk its journey and discover what role it should play in China's plan to win its place in the global civil aviation market.
The history of birth of this aircraft turned out to be long and complex. The project was initiated back in 2002, but its implementation was significantly delayed. The ARJ21 made its maiden flight in 2008 and began entering airline fleets only in 2016. However, despite the initial difficulties and delays of the project, the aircraft began to be actively produced and supplied to airlines, both Chinese and foreign. The ARJ21's potential lies not in technology and modernity, but in simplicity and low cost, which could make it popular in developing countries.
Welcome aboard!
Subscribe to the channel, comment, and like!
If you want to support Skyships and our work, welcome to our Patreon. We will create some special content for you there: / skyships
Our Facebook: / skyshipscom
Our Instagram: / skyships_world
00:00 - ARJ21
00:31 - Plans and first steps
04:46 - Tests
06:54 - Description of ARJ21
07:19 - Isn’t this Douglas?
08:49 - Design
10:30 - Engines
11:26 - Cockpit
11:54 - Passenger cabin
13:15 - Modifications
14:43 - Deliveries and expansion
16:07 - Conquering the market

Пікірлер: 226

@SkyshipsEng 22 күн бұрын

China's aviation history continues. As a continuation of the story, you can watch a large video about the COMAC C919: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z9p_fpuUx5u2d4U.html

@flyerkiller5073 22 күн бұрын

Will you make a video about the CR929 (now C929)?

@JohnnyWednesday 22 күн бұрын

Great video - thank you!

@frankgaleon5124 22 күн бұрын

Make the Fokkers

@SkyshipsEng 21 күн бұрын

@@frankgaleon5124 already in process

@vladilenkalatschev4915 22 күн бұрын

I don’t think that ARJ-21 looks outdated. The same we can say about the 737MEX. The difference is that the last MD regional family member the Boeing 717 was manufactured in 2006, so we don’t see a lot of the aircrafts with the same structural design.

@paxundpeace9970 22 күн бұрын

The issue for them will be sanctions and regulations. The FAA will likely not approve a plane from China because of competion and rivalry.

@Randomly_Browsing 22 күн бұрын

Then how about the airlines that already operates it?

@DrummingStig 22 күн бұрын

@@Randomly_Browsing as long as they don't fly into the US with these planes (and only flying within countries that certifies the plane) its not a problem

@Randomly_Browsing 22 күн бұрын

@@DrummingStig ok then

@baomao7243 22 күн бұрын

If an indigenous mfg like Boeing has been deemed by the FAA to be “opaque”, then i don’t see how China will be deemed anything but “less than opaque.”

@flyerkiller5073 22 күн бұрын

Maybe, they'll receive the EASA certificate. It will be enough for the most countries worldwide

@iany2448 21 күн бұрын

It is a good start. Continued optimization and volume production of ARJ21 and C919 will be the step stone for the success of China civil aviation industry.

@wintersbattleofbands1144 20 күн бұрын

No C919s since the 6 proptotypes, and only 3 of those are currently airworthy.

@theolich4384 9 күн бұрын

@@wintersbattleofbands114412 built as of May 2024 with 6 flying regular airline routes. Better update your info bro.

@blobusus 22 күн бұрын

Clearly it's an updated DC9, and I'm glad to see that my favorite airliner will be around for a long time to come.

@xuansu9036 22 күн бұрын

Well it has lineage from DC9, as it reuses tooling from the MD80 coproduction project and probably started from the MD95 which was the last version produced from that project.

@freeworld88888 22 күн бұрын

blind as a bat, dc9 was no good. It took china a long time to get it rich. many region jets are designed with these features.

@macbomb 22 күн бұрын

@@xuansu9036 From Aviation Week article on the ARJ21 ""The ARJ21 is built with manufacturing tooling from the MD-90 Trunkliner program. As a consequence, it has the same fuselage cross-section, nose profile, and tail."

@saitmardin3332 10 күн бұрын

clearly not. Every single dimensions and components are different.

@demonlordking6635 5 сағат бұрын

yeah I think its heavily inspired by the DC9 ngl, just my opinion.

@Nafeels 22 күн бұрын

Rear-mounted engines and T-tails are so retro, and yet still relevant in many countries with hot and high airports. I’m glad the legacy of the DC-9, BAC-111, Tu-134 and the Fokker 70 continues on.

@DrummingStig 22 күн бұрын

Sure, it might be lacking behind in technological advancements (when compared to other regionals jets) but the thing is as long as they're selling like hot cakes in China, they'll be doing just fine.

@Randomly_Browsing 22 күн бұрын

How about outside market?

@SuperChodot 22 күн бұрын

Former Soviet Republic, Africa and some Asian countries are a very big market.

@Randomly_Browsing 22 күн бұрын

@@SuperChodot ok

@jamieammar6131 22 күн бұрын

@@Randomly_Browsing They don't need to worry about outside market for at least the next 50 years to a century. If they can completely self sustain within their borders, it is a big plus for them. Then they can expand.

@YSKWatch 21 күн бұрын

half price of the most expensive in the same class. not make sense if it's as advanced as the most expensive, even though it's not impossible, probably in next 5 decades after some iterations and gaining more knowledge.

@flyerkiller5073 22 күн бұрын

For some reason, I remember the Fokker 100

@SkyshipsEng 22 күн бұрын

yes, I remembered it too

@godfreypoon5148 22 күн бұрын

F70 and F100 are great. I like flying in them.

@BobSaint 21 күн бұрын

I don't fly much, but I flew on Fokker 100 once. It was the best landing I've experienced. And it was all-female crew too. 😊

@JohnnyWednesday 22 күн бұрын

It's very pretty for a commercial plane! hope I get to fly on one!

@davidchen3503 20 күн бұрын

image, China replace half its domestical airliners with ARJ21 and C919.

@user-ii3zn8gw1t 10 күн бұрын

c919只有6架在飞

@loading_notfound 4 күн бұрын

It needs plenty of time,but of course we'll do it,the rest of the market are likely to be given to Airbus

@awantrucks 22 күн бұрын

Thanks sky as always ❤

@benkerry601 20 күн бұрын

Thanks for making the video without much political elements.

@nightowldickson 22 күн бұрын

Their first step was to release their own version of similar models by others. Comac C919 is their future. Cleansheet design. It's not easy to expand overseas, supply chain, maintenance, airworthiness support, language and cultural barriers are also factors that make it hard for it to attract overseas buyers. Same issue faced by the Sukhoi Superjet's western customers like CityJet and Interjet

@johnh4434 22 күн бұрын

not " language and cultural barriers " - have nothing to do with it - it is the plane itself - good or not good - why people drive Toyota not Lada etc ...

@sethalexis6741 22 күн бұрын

@@johnh4434 toyota is japanese...

@bearmotorcycle7305 21 күн бұрын

Wings are supposedly Russian, but the fuselage is DC-9 carryover. If reusing still qualifies as a "clean sheet", then the Boeing 717 was a clean sheet too! I recall McDonnell Douglas sold MD-80/90 tooling to China. Several MD-80's and a couple MD-90's were supposedly built in China. When I just Google'd the tooling sale, the U.S. indicted MD as China had diverted tooling to military manufacturing sites.

@navajojohn9448 22 күн бұрын

The quality coming out of Boeing will make Chinese quality seem acceptable.

@kittytrail 22 күн бұрын

don't hold your breath. them chinese will not let "Boing" do better in the Temu-quality plane market! 😗👍

@Randomly_Browsing 22 күн бұрын

Not a chance

@baomao7243 22 күн бұрын

I’m skeptical.

@keith6371 22 күн бұрын

@@kittytrailTamu was designed for poor people who are barely above homeless, if you mainly buy from tamu, then you need to improve yourself so you can afford better quality products.

@JohnnyWednesday 22 күн бұрын

Stereotypes about Chinese hardware are just that. Chinese people are just as capable as any other human. Underestimating them with cruel jokes is exactly how you lose.

@ccbill2852 16 күн бұрын

Brilliant sharing, thanks

@drdewott9154 21 күн бұрын

It is pretty interesting overall. And all around one has to admit one thing about Chinese developments in recent years. They've become much higher quality than before, which can be mostly seen in countries that are either allied to China, or to a greater or lesser extent neutral. China is quickly dominating sectors, especially vehicle manufacturing with a combination of quality and price. But not always. Some chinese vehicle manufacturers reign supreme on quality and price, like BYD and X-peng for cars, Yutong for buses, all of which are now firmly planted across the globe. But other sectors like the rail industry is where they still struggle. The national chinese rolling stock manufacturer, CRRC, has vastly different quality standards across its several factories so its often a gamble as to if a CRRC built train will be good or bad. And the ones trialled so far in Europe have all been from a plant with a less than satisfactory quality record.

@user-ce6el8tt6e 14 күн бұрын

You're posting your rumors again

@leftycobra 21 күн бұрын

Thanks Sky! That would be great if you could cover the Avic/Harbin Y12F

@lucky-gh5ox 20 күн бұрын

As an airline pilot Im glad to be retiring soon....

@craigslistseller9354 22 күн бұрын

Thanks for another EXCELLENT and informative video!!! GO CHINA!!! 🇨🇳

@wertGR 18 күн бұрын

Well if COMAC develops a 2nd gen with GE Passport engines then this plane will have a bright future. After all DC-9 style planes are still efficient aerodynamically if modern technologies are adopted.

@robertoperezaguirreeliasca7559 20 күн бұрын

DC-9 MD-80's B-717 With few differences! The Mad Dog nickname came not only from its MD initials but also because it takes off like a rocket and makes a hell of a lot of noise. Unlike later automated planes, the Mad Dog also needs full hands-on attention from the pilot during takeoff and landing. Having made its first flight in 1979, the McDonnell Douglas MD-80 went into service with launch customer Swissair in 1980. The aircraft, which was developed from the Douglas DC-9, became affectionately known as the Mad Dog. But how did it come to get its nickname? After the delivery of 976 DC-9s and 108 MD-80s, McDonnell Douglas stopped DC-9 series production in December 1982, The DC-9 family is one of the longest-lasting aircraft in production and operation. Its last family member, the Boeing 717, was produced until 2006. What is the oldest DC-9 still flying? The final active DC-9 is with African Express Airways, based in Nairobi. This is the only DC-9 to still be registered to a scheduled passenger airline.

@keith6371 22 күн бұрын

I flew on ARJ as well as E190, from passenger’s perspective, I much prefer ARJ. It is noticeable bigger inside, quieter in business class, had a much bigger onboard kitchen(so variety of available food are more. Lastly, E series is so small it didn’t have a closet for coats and such for business class passengers. For me, ARJ is comparable to A320 in business class experience whereas I immediately noticed how small E190 was.

@YSKWatch 21 күн бұрын

and the price is literally half the A320.

@DirkLarien 20 күн бұрын

Great video thank you. Love these these lesser known birds. Do you by any chance have any information on Harbin Y-12F ?

@charleschoy2327 Күн бұрын

A thousand mile journey starts with the first step.

@anotheruser9876 22 күн бұрын

@3:38 Fan spins in the wrong direction.

@MASMIWA 19 күн бұрын

Looking like the ARJ-21 will be China's DC-3. Not exotic and state of the art, but for domestic flights in developing countries, a good design, good reliability, and a good price.

@rafaelwilks 21 күн бұрын

10:30 these ultra-reliable GE CF34-10A powerplants are most assuredly the ARJ-21's greatest asset. Sure, they're not as efficient as the P&W Geared Turbofan, but they're far more reliable, which matters more. Isn't it interesting - the bargain-bin ARJ-21 comes with more reliable engines than the expensive, fancy Embraer E-2! That being said, GE has the Passport - a new-technology, more fuel-efficient alternative to the CF34-10. If GE puts the shelved NG34 program into production, it would both be more efficient and more reliable than anything P&W has.

@sagmilling 21 күн бұрын

So, what is the fuel burn like compared to the competitors? Usually one expects high operating costs with low capital costs, and vice-versa.

@loading_notfound 4 күн бұрын

Not very good compared to A220s and the ejets,so we're looking for an update

@williamgray8499 2 күн бұрын

If a country can launch people into space, then they ought to be able to build an airliner.

@AntonyBlinken-rm2nx 4 күн бұрын

0:40 this is the best position for an engine on an airplane. You lose one motor your plane was still fly straight

@ronparrish6666 22 күн бұрын

Looks like a bit of CRJ and DC 9 got together and had a party

@stradivarioushardhiantz5179 22 күн бұрын

AR-21 remind us to Tu-334

@sarahkhan2310 21 күн бұрын

China civil aviation industry is amazingly impressive. Well done China 👍♥️🇨🇳

@ABCantonese 22 күн бұрын

Tupolev had no hand in this? It just hit me that this is not unlike the Tu-334

@SkyshipsEng 21 күн бұрын

It's closer to the Fokker 100. It is unlikely that Tupolev has anything to do with this

@romank6606 2 күн бұрын

COMAC ARJ21 it is hidden existence McDonnell Douglas MD-80. Actually it is similar upgrades to what the Boeing 737 is doing but Chinesse model is minor problems space for new and bigger models of engine.

@benjaminmcclatchey9814 22 күн бұрын

The key is to get approved by the EU and the FAA. This will sell like hotcakes if there are no corners cut like on the 919 computer systems only having a 2 redundant system set up with all the other commercial planes having 3 systems.

@Luggr 12 күн бұрын

Good balanced video no racist approach

@wintersbattleofbands1144 20 күн бұрын

Well, the major airlines in China are state run, as is Comac, so there's no real profit in selling your own merchandise to yourself. The benefit is not paying for it from somewhere else, I guess. Airlines aren't stupid, though. They'll pay more for an airliner that's 10% more efficient knowing they'll more than make up for it over 20-30 years of the airframe's service. That's why most of the four engines jobbies are gone; not that they'd reached the end of their lifespan, but because they're not as efficient. Not to mention, better technology often also includes reduced maintenance costs.

@dezbriel9981 21 күн бұрын

Wish them the best, aviation needs more comfortable aircraft

@tswong2409 Күн бұрын

Bravo Mighty CHINA 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

@victorjefry8025 21 күн бұрын

Pk TJA, TJB, ALC, comac ARJ 21 700 operated Trans nusa Indonesia

@OUSSAMA10815 19 күн бұрын

and maybe we will see the Tu-334 in the near future too

@SN57ONE 7 күн бұрын

Many = People from the USA. TBH I don't think countries other than the United States are concerned about China's Aviation Industry.

@timothyshiu2263 9 күн бұрын

is AR21 a copy cat of boeing 70's airplane?

@razorsharpview9090 21 күн бұрын

COMAC'S Strategy is to build a Factory in the US and find an American Investors. In that way they can somehow circumvent America's hostilility towards them. It will be a win/win situation.

@simon199418 20 күн бұрын

Width of fuselage: 3.14. Someone wanted the math to work out easily.

@ibrahimtouman2279 21 күн бұрын

the Russian SSJ-100 is not dead at all, it is the real phoenix because it will be resurrected in 2026 with a new name (SJ-100 for the moment, but it might change again) and new engine (UEC PD-8) and new wing (with added winglet) ✈

@SolarMoth 9 күн бұрын

more competitition is good

@ianendangan7462 21 күн бұрын

The problem with buying Chinese planes is Washington has a habit of slapping sanctions to the airline and its govts country. Lots of security and maintenance issues before we could even fly to the mainland USA.

@albertsunaga8802 20 күн бұрын

US Boeing quality keeps declining and China COMAC quality keeps increasing. If this continues, at some time there will be some point where one will replace another one.

@Horizoneng 21 күн бұрын

The business jet vertion. Range 6,000 km is not serius, theEmraer Lineage flies 8,500 and the ACJ200 over 10,000

@john_cockpit 7 күн бұрын

Right now I will trust this chinese manufacturer more than I trust boeing

@freeworld88888 22 күн бұрын

China took a lot of risk and spent a lot of time and money in these jets, china learnt alot from soviet unions.

@tonywei423 Күн бұрын

Soon will be ABC，then ACB in 15 years, CAB in 25 years. They will success.

@JetmanMD90 22 күн бұрын

It’s a DC-9 with winglets

$@diffractionlee3639$

@diffractionlee3639 21 күн бұрын

Nah its a MD90 with winglets

@user-oj4xp2lh4d 15 күн бұрын

Nice to hear you say lavatory and not restroom or bathroom as is the current American way of saying toilet which appears to be a dirty word.

@windanthonystream 22 күн бұрын

The interior overhead bins and sidewalls are the same as a Boeing 717…

@xuansu9036 22 күн бұрын

yes, because China was all set to produce MD95 before it became B717 and Boeing ended the coproduction deal. There were a lot of tooling in China for parts of that aircraft and they reused as much of it as possible.

@victorradu9645 22 күн бұрын

Should it be called DC9 Neo or DC9 MAX ?

@anotheruser9876 22 күн бұрын

A Temu version of a DC-9

@rafaelwilks 21 күн бұрын

@@anotheruser9876 but with much more reliable engines than anything from P&W 😎

@leeoldershaw956 21 күн бұрын

Essentially an upgraded DC 9-10 mission aircraft that first flew 49 years ago.

@Turbo.M 22 күн бұрын

Onboarded the ARJ two times, HET-XIL and right back on the same aircraft, Genghis Khan Airline. The ride is adequate, nothing really to complain about, not bad for a regional airliner. The rear part IS noisy, but the front part is not, so it's ok on average. But I don't really believe it will have a great future in the foreign market since Chinese planes got a bad bad reputation from some foreign airliners for it's MA60 and Y-7. And those airliners who bought MA60 and Y-7 have already represented those countries with the best relationship with China, but now even they did not choose to pick the ARJ. A very similar situation is Iran, which would rather choose to treasure its antique F-14 but not go for modern military planes from China and Russia, since they know who's really better and with greater reputation.

@MrTiomanu 22 күн бұрын

Better than Boeing, Safety is first, no revenues

@300guy 22 күн бұрын

It doesn't matter what they call it, it still an MD80/90. Which they built under license for years.

@johnh4434 22 күн бұрын

doesn't matter much , not under license any more it's not MD it's AJR

@300guy 22 күн бұрын

I am aware, they didn't try to hide the parentage at all though. Look at the cockpit windows with the classic dips beneath the pilot and copilot positions. Classic Boeing and MD, while still features of the 737 and 767, Airbus and other European manufacturers stayed away from that particular styling trend. I think it is brilliant of China to get as much out of the west as they can, while they can. All those American and European vendors of avionics and precision machined bits and pieces are required to team with Chinese companies and share their intellectual property till the Chinese companies are capable of shoplifting that Int Prop for themselves. @johnh4434

@peekaboopeekaboo1165 22 күн бұрын

@@300guy Funny hater losers 🤡 Shaped of the nose and tail are different to the MD-80 . China is smart to have most components to be sourced from key NATO countries... a form of leverage to prevent the Yanks from ordering international barring of the ARJ .

@YSKWatch 21 күн бұрын

just like chinese car before 2021, not as good as other manufacturers, but not anymore. will be the same story in a few decades.

@peekaboopeekaboo1165 21 күн бұрын

@@YSKWatch Fake news. Chinese cars were already good in 2021.

@drtak4512 11 күн бұрын

Looks like dc9

@leonawdisho6609 22 күн бұрын

Good morning from Toronto.Canada

@SkyshipsEng 22 күн бұрын

Hello, Canada

@ishiddddd4783 22 күн бұрын

Looks like the child of a DC-9 and Fokker, DC-9 body, and Fokker windshield

@macbomb 22 күн бұрын

To quote Aviation Week : The ARJ21 is built with manufacturing tooling from the MD-90 Trunkliner program. As a consequence, it has the same fuselage cross-section, nose profile, and tail.

@MeaHeaR 21 күн бұрын

thiss plains will no doubt once popular be fitted withé ALL Sorts ov device lyké ir kamera, scanners, zoom lesé etc that will photographer und surveyle military aire basé und area 51 etc

@Bintang1302 17 күн бұрын

I think still Airbus and Boeing still strong in the market, Russia much longer in this industry still far below them.

@user-mm1nt1it5v 22 күн бұрын

“They had to make a clean sheet design” the arj21 is based on the md80 just made smaller into regional jet size. This is a pretty well known fact. Mcdonnell Douglass moved a production line of the md80 to china and thats how they got the experience building this plane. Its not a clean sheet design at all.

@zalo_tuandriverga 21 күн бұрын

yea..................but.......... so?

@user-mm1nt1it5v 21 күн бұрын

@@zalo_tuandriverga so nothing. He just said its clean sheet, so I pointed out that it isnt.

@bd5av8r1 22 күн бұрын

The Chinese DC-9. :)

@frankgaleon5124 22 күн бұрын

Half Fokker half DC-9

@drbendover7467 20 күн бұрын

I don't think people would be fly Chinese anything:)

@ginaanastas3851 18 күн бұрын

Well done China, all the best from Australia.

@davidchen3503 20 күн бұрын

I cried when I saw C919 soared to the sky in Singapore are show!

@TsLeng 20 күн бұрын

Better than boeing

@bigsarge2085 22 күн бұрын

✈

@vladimirassalukas6726 21 күн бұрын

Intonation is like dictor hates everyone and wants to kill you, as soon as video will end 😂

@SkyshipsEng 21 күн бұрын

The dictor doesn't hate anyone. Besides the editor

@maestromecanico597 21 күн бұрын

Baby steps.

@heronoch9205 22 күн бұрын

Где видео на Русском канале?

@SkyshipsEng 21 күн бұрын

Через пару дней

@Russinh0 22 күн бұрын

Bros Just Copied MD-83 and make it Safer than McDonnel Douglas and Boeing

@WNDWSTIDN 21 күн бұрын

The MD-80 & MD-90 are once made under License in China back on its day. However, since they still own the tooling, it also makes the plane resemble the MD-80.

@joecrammond6221 22 күн бұрын

i wish them good luck but i get the feeling much like european aircraft builders prior to airbus, these planes might not have much luck outside of China

@sarahkhan2310 14 күн бұрын

China civil aviation industry is incredibly impressive. Well done China 👍❤️🇨🇳

@zalo_tuandriverga 21 күн бұрын

China copy this copy that! China copy what?

@jing2x87 19 күн бұрын

Updated Fokker 100.

@TheTeaParty320 22 күн бұрын

I’m thinking of replacing one of my two Gulfstreams and I’m considering a Chinese jet this time. My family has been Glufstream customers for three generations, but I’m thinking of breaking the mould.

@air-headedaviator1805 22 күн бұрын

8:27 these kinda assumptions are so funny, cause there’s so many planes with the exact same elements that how could anyone design something at all unique?

@icarus_falling 2 күн бұрын

I'm not travelling on a temu jetliner lol. I'd rather fly Boeing than made in China and that's saying something

@wsmithe2209 Күн бұрын

Yeah, flying without door and tires. Have fun at 1000ft.

@chakirbani6006 11 күн бұрын

only the russian module ... chineese there is no innovation ... and very big desing

@GabbieGirl007 22 күн бұрын

The arj is nothing but a DC-9/ MD-80 . Made by the same company that made licensed production models of the md 80 and dc9

@GabbieGirl007 22 күн бұрын

Not to mention look at the physical shape of the fuselodge and the aft emergency exit by the engine then look at that same location on the Dc-9-30. This is nothing new however I do respect China's recent offers to the aviation table. They offer cheaper and different alternatives to the aviation table

@Randomly_Browsing 22 күн бұрын

@@GabbieGirl007but at subpar quality

@GabbieGirl007 22 күн бұрын

@@Randomly_Browsing how so

@Randomly_Browsing 22 күн бұрын

@@GabbieGirl007 one of the Australian airliner had to stopped operate MA60 due to several issues

@keith6371 22 күн бұрын

@@Randomly_Browsingma60 was not certified to fly in Australia, what fk are you smoking?

@mcal27 22 күн бұрын

I think it’s a flaw relying on US engines… I hope for China’s sake they have plans to find a domestic..or maybe Russian engine solution when or if required?

@JohnnyWednesday 22 күн бұрын

There are advantages, it makes the aircraft more attractive in the US and it allows Chinese companies to build good relations with US companies.

@mcal27 22 күн бұрын

@@JohnnyWednesday the way the world is heading the last part maybe a lower concern sadly

@YSKWatch 21 күн бұрын

I think their local engine is getting better already sooner or later they'll have local engine for ARJ.

@rafaelwilks 21 күн бұрын

But those US engines, being the ultra-reliable GE CF34-10, happen to be the ARJ-21's greatest asset 😎

@YSKWatch 21 күн бұрын

@@rafaelwilks no use if the administration decide to ban the export, backup plan is a must.

@senthilsudha2006 19 күн бұрын

Fake version of the mad dog (md-80)

@ridhobaihaqi144 17 күн бұрын

Sell it to undeveloped countries 😅😅

@patolt1628 21 күн бұрын

And another copy ... When will they really design something by themselves?

@flightmaster999 21 күн бұрын

So COMAC (i.e. the Chinese gvt) built a very basic plane with no technological advancements, copying a VERY old MD-80 design, using outdated engine technology and, most importantly, an infinite budget from the CCP. And this is what they came up with? I looks pretty obvious to me that the project would have been cancelled a long time ago if it wasn't for two things: 1. National pride (hence the infinite budget), and 2. Political (and physical) pressure on the manufacturer (mostly the workers) to deliver a plane, or else. I love your videos, but this one was a bit too patriotic. Don't you think?

@exfa7094 20 күн бұрын

Who give a shit about you and your thoughts?

@huachen3836 Күн бұрын

Wrong, everyone knows that this is an aircraft with backward technical standards, but it has to be built because China needs to build a passenger plane from 0 to 1 to familiarize itself with the airworthiness certification process of passenger planes and pave the way for the development and airworthiness certification of the C919 large passenger plane. In the eyes of a stupid person like you, what kind of national pride is this plane? I don't know where you came to this conclusion. Maybe you are used to making rumors and lying on youtube. I don't understand how you came to such a stupid conclusion that "the CCP provides an unlimited budget". Do you really think the CCP is stupid? If this is true, 1.4 billion Chinese people will not support the CCP, especially under the propaganda offensive of democratic lies by Western countries led by the United States.

@huachen3836 Күн бұрын

Japan's MRJ regional jet of the same level is far more advanced than ARJ21, but the MRJ prototype has been destroyed. The entire project wasted more than a decade and billions of dollars, but was stuck at the stage of passenger aircraft certification. MRJ, a very advanced regional jet, must be very meaningful to people like you, right? You must think you are insightful and have pointed out the reason why the CCP made an aircraft with backward technology like ARJ21 for national pride and face? Do you really think that others are stupid, but you are smart? In my opinion, you are neither smart nor have real wisdom, like a typical Indian.