That’s cool, I just got a job as an A&P AMT yesterday in Fresno! I noticed they pay 25hr 5 bucks less than the major airlines, but it looks like a nice employer to work for. What was one thing you liked the most and why did you leave?

@@arcerudy3 SkyWest has great flight benefits. I was forced quit because my husband became terminally ill. I would probably still be in the system if the story was different

The 175s are better say for a few quirks, like the aliron disconnect and the apu fuel crossfeed bullshit

It’s a very stabler jet. Beautiful shape

No. I’m pretty sure a CRJ pilot would wreck a Navajo they had to hand fly on steam gauges with no flight director... or a Republic SeeBee doing a glassy water landing... or a Pitts Special trying to take off.... etc etc etc. Push buttons, and don’t use VS mode to climb to FL410... and you’ll be fine.

Bartonovich52 what do you mean? 100% use VS to get to 410. If you climb in speed mode she porpoises like crazy after 340.

@@Bartonovich52 As a lifer at OO, I have over 9,000 hrs. on the CRJ series...not sure what makes you think I'd be too dumb to fly other airplanes without wrecking them but it's a pretty arrogant (ignorant) assumption to troll other pilots like that. Long ago, I earned a type on the 737-200, which makes a Navajo look like a tricycle. I would never suggest that you (as a pilot) would be incapable of earning the same type certificate with enough training and practice. ...unless you aren't capable of course. ...still not for me to decide. Pilots (real pilots) are typically pretty diligent about safety, no matter what they fly. You are 100% wrong about the use of vertical speed mode by-the-way. The CRJ really isn't happy at 410...no matter how you get there. ...and you probably won't be "fine".

Lmaoo no. This plane has all types of automated systems, the ERJ family 135-145 doesn’t even have auto throttle.

@@jaredkeller6208 neither does the CRJ lol

yeah I’m 6’1” and my girlfriend is 5’11” (about 182cm each) and we flew in a couple of these recently and disembarking sucked because either we had to remain seated or one of stand in the isle which felt rude. My father was with us and he’s 6’4” and he is unable to shut the restroom door on these planes standing up lol.

I am Canadian and 6'2" and I know of which you speak. They I think decided to keep a similar diameter fuselage as the business jet Challenger.

Uh..... about 25 years later than the Caravelle... 35 if you count from the CRJ vs the Challenger.

I agree, it is a beautiful airplane on the outside. I really love the way it looks! But Embraer now has a better product with the E-190. It has a better passenger experience, roomier, more comfortable, etc. But the CRJ still looks better in my opinion!

@@flightmaster999 The ERJ looks goofy, has a weird rake to it. CRJ is a very sporty look, which I've always liked. Of course.. these things don't matter.

They existed, but hadn’t moved into aviation yet. Since then they have spun off the Ski-doo production.

Peorhum they build locomotives, streetcars, subway/metro car's.

@@frankdenardo8684 Don't forget if it wasn't for Montreal mayor Jean Drapeau, Bombardier might have never have built metro cars. He's the one that convinced them to build their MR-73 cars in the 1970s. They had never built anything but snowmobiles. Montreal Locomotive Works and Canadian Vickers also put out tender for the 2nd generation of Montreal métro cars which Bombardier won and built at the plant at La Pocatière, QC.

Snowmobiles were invented in the 1960s last time I checked.

@@spingebill8551 In 1935 Joseph-Armand Bombardier assembled and successfully tested the first snowmobile. It was a vehicle with a sprocket wheel and a track drive system, and it was steered by skis.

Actually, my problem with these small planes isn't my width - it's my height. I'm fed up of having to contort my neck and upper back like a pretzel just to avoid giving myself a concussion while getting into or out of my seat.

CJWJR yeah I’m 6’1” and my girlfriend is 5’11” (about 182cm each) and we flew in a couple of these recently and disembarking sucked because either we had to remain seated or one of stand in the isle which felt rude. My father was with us and he’s 6’4” and he is unable to shut the restroom door on these planes standing up lol.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

go keto

I’m 6’9 lol

Except the CRJ 700 and 900 and 1000 those are better

if i have 1B i would rather take the Global 7500

Yeah I find it really funny that Bombardier and Embraer are huge regional competitors and Skywest Operates both Airliners. CRJ 200/700/900 ERJ-175's They also used to operate the Older EMB 120's but retired them back in 2015.

I agree, Skyships is the best.

There’s a Bombardier Q400 behind the CRJ on that portion of the video. CRJ had never had propellers.

Yes, his voice is clear and i undestood all words. nice voice from the narrator

pete5668 all the cigars come from Cuba.

Ignorant comment!

Lol, I live in Quebec and there is a cigar factory near the bus station I go to.

pete5668 most places can make cigars Frank Denardo I hope you’re joking

Bombardier always makes the best aircraft in the world

Total insanity...considering the Billions of Taxpayer support...over the decades.

The Embraers have more roomy cabins. Even the ERJ with its3 seats in a row

Trash4Cash If you’re flying alone the single seat on the left side of the ERJ is perfect.

Unless you've flown on the CRJ1000, it's not really a fair comparison. The E190 is a mainline aircraft with 100 or more seats; the CRJ 700/900 tops out at 76-78 seats.

Mirza Ahmed Yeah but the E170/175 are about the same size as a CRJ-700.

Bombardier I know have seen the driver and they are unanimous that the crj have better structures and built quality/parts. They are safer and more reliable..and more quiet. Have you flown both? I did!

We don’t have that many swamps in MS. A lot of Delta to the northwest. Lots of hills in the northeast and east central. Lots of coastal area to the south. But southwest? Yeah it gets yee yee Cajun swamp over that way. We don’t go that way.

No. Bill Lear did most of the preliminary drawings and concepts. About the only thing that was changed was the position of the tailplane... which perhaps contributed to one loss during testing.

Theye serve a different purpose in todays market. The CRJ is still fairly economical to buy and operate. The CSeries (aka A220) is a modern aircraft that comes at a much higher cost and much more technology.

Well, that's because it is smaller than a 737. It is in a totally different segment, the 737 is a huge plane in comparison. The Airbus A220 is also smaller than the 737, and the 220 is bigger than the CRJ. The CRJ is basically a scaled up business jet, the 737 is a scaled down 707.So, yeah, it would be hard to make it seem as big as a 737. On the other hand, the smaller size has many benefits in cost and performance, which is why people buy it.

It’s where the market shifted. Those aircraft-along with the 737-600-completely disappeared because there were smaller aircraft that fit markets better. Remember when there were 19 seat aircraft like the Metro and 1900? Or 30 seat planes like the SAAB 340, Dornier 328, and Dash 8 100/200? Or larger single aisle planes like the 757-300? All gone because of planes like the Dash-8 Q400, the CRJ Series, the 737-800, the A320 and A321 etc etc which fit airline’s needs perfectly.

Christopher Coke Robinson what about the cseries?

DiegoTheGreat89 I sincerely believe the CSeries is playing in a different league.

Too bad the C series went to Airbus. It's lame having three aircraft manufacturers. I miss MD and Lockheed being in the mix.

Expect to be uncomfortable.

Ummm. What budget airline has RJs? Unless you’re counting the E175/195. Which are fairly comfortable airplanes. I don’t know of any?

I rode in a NWA Mesaba CRJ900 one time. I didn't seem cramped to me. It seemed to move quicker than an a319,a320 and b737-600.

And people equate discomfort with value... as surely as they do seeing the beams and girders and pallets and forklifts in their local Costco.

I flew on the Air Canada CRJ900 a few months ago from Edmonton to Toronto and as someone who is 6'3, I can tell you that it felt cramped and uncomfortable. For the price Air Canada charged me (nearly $600 after taxes and fees), it was a very bad value for the comfort and experience I got. Should've flown on WestJet's B737 instead. The interior design of the CRJ900 didn't look modern or premium compared to a Boeing or Airbus aircraft. That will probably be the last time I fly in a Bombardier commercial jet. Boeing or Airbus only from now on.

I'm working on it)

Don't worry mate, not everyone is a native english speaker (yours truly included). Your accent is very easy for me to understand and I love watching your videos. Keep up the good work!

CaptainOShow is

I also love your accent.

CaptainOShow Which accent is it? It sounds a bit like Finnish but I'm not sure.

yeah, i love this airplanes too

Tim Wynn And Dash 8 Q300/400 too.

my favorite

Well, I hope that you got over your freekiness. Mesa are fine, as are all the regionals for the job they do servicing little places like Caspar and Fargo, et al.

Cole Phelps he made video about MC21

Эрдэм Эрдынеев Yes. I watched it already. I meant I want more Russian and or Soviet aircraft besides those

My guess: Sukhoi SuperJet 100.

Correction: reply to Junayd Shahid's question.

aaaand they regret it..

@@MNHambali why they regret it?

Because it's not efficient, bring loss to the airline. right now their fleet CRJ1000 are being transfered to their subsidiary, Citilink.

Their CRJ1000 is transfered to Citilink meanwhile Garuda's new CRJ1000NG has arrived.

How many crashed?

Yeah, I'm waiting E2)

Frank Galeon i think, next video will be about Embraer

The alternative is to put them so high up the fuselage you can only see upwards. There is only so much you can do with a small diameter fuselage. if you put the windows at eye level, it means they will be on the upper part of the fuselage slope and will lean steeply inwards, making it hard to see down. I suspect in customer surveys they found that people found that being able to see downwards was more important than being able to see out easily.

David 747-400 wants some 747-400)

Frank Galeon exactly

Everyone waits Boeing marathon)

I feel like there isn't an airliner around with more videos about it than the 747.

RumpelForeskin how about all the modern shit like the A350 and 787?

thomas M tordel jr Bombardier bought the CRJ program from the Canadian government for $63 million back in the early 80s. Canadair received over a billion dollars from the Canadian taxpayer before the government sold it to Bombardier. Bombardier received tax money from the Quebec government and the Canadian government, the money was coming to an end leaving Bombardier no choice but to sell the C series or close the program down.