Slavoj Žižek: Subject as Void

Рет қаралды 3,600

2 жыл бұрын

Clipped from: • 666 and Subjectivity: ...
TREY’s book “Aphesis: The Impossibility of Subjectivity”: amzn.to/3hzxZAR
WE make at least 3 videos a week on Patreon discussing everything from philosophy, to theology, to biblical typology, to music, and to whatever else comes to my head. / telosbound
TELOSBOUND THEOLOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION: docs.google.com/document/d/1g...
THEOSBOUND: / theosbound
DISCORD: / discord
INSTAGRAM: / telosbound
ODYSSEY: odysee.com/@telosbound:c
GET The Philosopher's Notebook amzn.to/3h7Iyrn
HASHTAGS:
#philosophy #theology #metaphysics #ontology #orthodox #christianity #orthodoxchristianity #communion #church #jesus #christ #catholic #bible #hegel #negation #dialectics #epistemology #psychoanalysis #logic #ethics #theory #socialtheory #apologetics #God #aphesis #subjectivity #paradox #contradiction #reading #books #intellectual #politics #conservative #politicaltheory #sigma

Пікірлер: 18

@O.G.Rose.Michelle.and.Daniel 2 жыл бұрын

Truly excellent, and I rarely hear Fichte brought up regarding this topic, as well as the crucial distinction between “positing” and “reflecting.” Fichte is invaluable for understanding what is meant by the self as constituted by its own act. Again, extremely well done!

@RichInk 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for the reminder.

@zxjacko 2 жыл бұрын

I don't understand how this definition of objet a relates to the one that i am familiar with, that of the object's certain je ne sais qua that makes us desire it... the excess of the object which makes us desire it, the excess that we see only when looking awry at the object. Could you please clarify how these two definitions are constitutive of the same concept? I acknowledge that my knowledge of Lacan is cursory.

@mikitz 2 жыл бұрын

What was that thing about hats again?

@Nothining 7 ай бұрын

Is Zizek's ideology tapping into Buddhism, into concepts like emptiness and no-self?

@stargazer5822 3 ай бұрын

He does in some videos where he comments in the common ideas of the non-existence of the self between psychoanalysis and buddhism.

@Normvids 2 жыл бұрын

Hmmm interesting

@stargazer5822 3 ай бұрын

Please give us an example of the subject as negativity and objet a as its core.

@jonathonray6198 Жыл бұрын

I dont understand lacanian theory well. Instead I am acquainted with the british and american psychoanalysts, following freud's move to england the development of object-relations and british independents, and his influence in america via federn and horney into ego psychology and interpersonal analysis and the jungians. In this anglo tradition a standard psychoanalytic aim (written in my own words) is of symbolizing and mastering the trauma of this lack, which theoretical and experientially internalises the goodness of what was missing. A process of grief bring eternity inside, so we can tolerate death and disappointment in life, while at the same time seeing the good that reflects the now internalised eternity. This makes us far more than a void - and much more like a portal, a window, a container, or a well.

@bradspitt3896 Жыл бұрын

Do you think this void has it's place in an EO ontology? After rewatching, I see you said you think it's hell. Still trying to understand it all.

@bradspitt3896 Жыл бұрын

@@telosbound So, I guess what's confusing me is what is the thing "doing "? What do you think hypostasis is? A mystery?

@bradspitt3896 Жыл бұрын

@@telosbound Guess I need to pick up a copy of that book being as communion.

@johnnytass2111 9 ай бұрын

Yes. In EO ontology, the Fall of man created the darkness of the Nous (the eye of the soul, the heart of the mind/psyche), a separation from God through corruption and death; thus we lost our likeness (Communion with God) but not our image of God (our free Will to choose good vs evil). Complete loss of Communion with God, the Divine and Sacred is the abyss of Hell. Don't go there.