And so on and so on

Is that even legal?

The temptation to comment on his inability to leave his nose alone is indeed great. But some informed person would probably say he's suffering from some Rhino-something-something illness, and what a horrible person I am to make fun of that. But still, I can't help but wonder how he is doing under covid19, now that we shouldn't touch our faces and all.

When you don't? I'm doing it wrong. Step 1:Get wife.

Imagine a comment section under a convicted rock spiders monologue where people comment his grooming techniques instead of his behaviours and body count.

lol

So-on means noise in Japanese

Soh Ona is my token Japanese friend. She agrees, a majority of words mean noise in Japanese and all of them do if spoken.

Larks Tongues in Aspic - great album!

id say its elephant talk

EU is a minor partner of the US's gendarme activities in the middle east and africa. It's also screwing its own weaker members through economic warfare, like in greece. I'm not against european identity, but the EU has to go

Look at asia, look at india

@@lucianoosinaga2980 How exactly are they screwing up the weaker members when it literally pours so much of their budget into these countries? Greece honestly did it to itself. It took billions from the EU and wasted it carelessly. Now they refuse to pay their debt. Why do people have to always nlame the EU for problems that go solely for a specific country? And tell me, how exactly would Europe survive without being united? The only thing a breakup of the union will lead to is more wars caused by imperialist authoritarian nations like Russia, China, Turkey, etc.

Pan-europeanism is on the rise? As an outsider, I notice that nationalist movements are on the rise in some European movements. Even if you ignore Brexit, the only best event of pan-europeanism being on the rise is probably the Euromaidan movement in Ukraine.

@@beyond_modernity8554 Lol. them lazy greeks! you are a fascist pig

Not hard when the competition is so bad lol.

I prefer chomsky but he's pretty decent as well

@@talhabedir3812 I often find myself agreeing with Chomsky when it comes to his analyses of particular political issues, but on more general philosophical issues I tend to prefer Zizek, whom I find to be more nuanced.

@@talhabedir3812 Chomsky thinks that Zizek is an incomprehensible charlatan clown, BTW.

@@aprescoup zizek is incomprehensible more often than not, but I disagree with chomsky if he thinks zizek is a charlatan.

Sift penis'

And disinfect it after

@@davideb.4290 Yes, that's crucial too. And the popfilter in the washing machine on 90 degrees.

the bad guys are european

@@marisa7976 Some are, Orban for instance is a fucking monster, but Putin and Trump are next-level evil and both hate the EU

@@strausan because the EU stops Russia's influence in the east, and American influence in Europe. And also the EU is a generally pro government welfare and much more progressive than other unions in the world. That is why I like it.

@@marisa7976 Fuck you, not sorry, Europa Invicta !!

If we hope to ever achieve global human cooperation, we must start with Europe

It's the basis of capitalism, there is no debate to be had about the fact. "Exploitation" has negative connotations nowadays, because of the excesses of the 19th century, but originally it just means to make use of what you have. Resources and opportunity. Workers are exploited, self-exploitation is a thing. The contention is about how much is too much. It is naïve to think that you get the most use from labour by having them work 24/7. Humans do not work that way. As Paul Lafarge mentions in his famous essay, productivity went up when working hours went down. In hindsight it should be no surprise that people work better when they are well-rested. And people want to be productive. One thing Marx and Engels criticised about the trade unions was that they demanded better working conditions instead of seizing the means of production wholesale. Workers went on strike to demand conditions in which they could be exploited more profitably. And the reason Marx disowned Lafarge is because Lafarge pointed out that the capitalists don't want to exploit the workers, they don't benefit from productivity and the wealth of nations, they benefit from inequality. They shortened the work hours to decrease productivity, because supply already exceeded demand and drove down prices, only for the workers getting more sleep to have the opposite effect.

David McDonagh how was it before?

Spinner1312 I think he had a stroke and because of it his face was paralysed for a time. Nothing current though.

@@ArmLegLegArmHead47 He didn't have a stroke, he had Bell's palsy. It's pretty harmless though it looks scary. It can happen to anyone at any moment. My mom had it for a while as well.

@Rudi Eva & The Baron Be careful, everyone! We've got a badass over here.

Rudi Eva & The Baron how uncivilised

yikes

thats the beauty

That's just one shot. What about when he says "and so on and so on"? Does that constitute a double?😆

you need liver of steel for that, imagining slavoj will only accept vodka challenge

Mazklassa haha. One would drunk so quickly

Kefir & Yakult true. It would be hardcore

idiot

He is not wrong.

SNFF is the answer.

Social Non-Fictional Friendly Forums

Underrated comment. Lol

Never stopping to doubt yourself. You explained it much better than he did.

when you have enough strategy then you must act

he made 0 points

I'd say it's his worst I have seen so far. His main point is well-made, but he gets side-tracked by Descartes and fatalism, and he does a poor job on elaborating on fatalism. His defence of Eurocentrism seems irrelevant to the point.

He is onipresent. And very wize.

Ljubljana is not far away.

I like Zizek, but when he speaks about forming regional and/or global structures, I remember that he's a classical socialist/communist and not a libertarian-leftist. What have all of the most aggressive or repressive political states had in common throughout history? They were the largest. USA/USSR/China/Rome/Carolingian Europe etc. Whether they were hunting down 'Commies' or invading the Third World, disappearing Democratic activists or killing trade-union advocates, and locking up half the population. And some people want a *global* state? They're out of their minds...

The EU was created in part by the USA and is heavily influenced by it and even more so by the neoliberalist ideology that comes from there.

Myopic and one dimensional Eurocentric view that does not acknowledge the agency of literally everyone else throughout the entirety of human history.

Europeans only started asking themselves the questions on the nature of humanity and who we are after interactions with people who had completely different views on the nature of reality. It is not a European tradition, it only seems that way because you have extinguished all other traditions of thought that your thought was actually based on.

@@blah55044 even if those people had different views (and most of the main players didn't) they did jack to change the status Quo that existed for 100 000 years. Then Europeans invented the modern wolrd in 2000 years

@@Tonixxy Imagine thinking centuries of history that much of European thought is based on is "jack shit". You are utterly one dimensional, disregard entire histories of cultures far older than yours. Read Dawn of Everything, it's a nice little primer that will help you deconstruct your notions of European exceptionalism.

No

Is America= USA ?

@Simon Eminger "The ideals [...] are still carried by the EU" I disagree vehemently with that statement. The EU at it's core is undemocratic because parliament the European people are voting for doesn't have any legislative power and are basically just yes-men for the European commission. Today the EU is little more than a cartell that has a stranglehold on the entire European economy. Easy immigration keeps wages low, even in the leading nations like Germany, by using the people of the economically weaker country to take over the jobs the native population in a given country isn't willing to take anymore because of low wages or other factors. On top of that it allows manufacturing to be outsources to economically weaker countries because there are no customs fees between the cou tries. The EU makes the rich richer and the poor poorer.

"The crisis is not political; the crisis is not economic, nor religious, but the crisis is in consciousness, in our minds, in our hearts, in our brain." "The crisis is there. And the politicians, however capable, and the scientists, the biologists, the micro-biologists and so on, they are not going to solve our problems - they have not. Perhaps they will increase more and more our problems." I don't know if you even realize, but your arguments are in direct conflict. If the politicians do nothing to solve it, it's a political crisis; if the banks, one of if not *the* main economical forces on both the global and national stages, do nothing to solve any problem, it *is* an economical problem, etc. But it's funny how you include the scientists here. They are not a magical solution to all the problems of the world. They may discover or create stuff, but that is the result of time and work. "It is because we are nationalists, ready to defend our sovereign States, our beliefs and acquisitions, that we must be perpetually armed. Property and ideas have become more important to us than human life, so there is constant antagonism and violence between ourselves and others." The problem is people like you, who think everyone else should fix everything and this random youtube comment will move anyone, and that's ignoring how abstract it is. "By maintaining the sovereignty of our country, we are destroying our sons" If you had written that now.... By your logic, if a country is going to get attacked, they should just accept it? Or what if a society accepts something that is inadmissible for another, and a person moves from one country to another? Surely nothing will happen. Like, ever.

War existed from the moment an overgrown ape picked up a stone and bashed another ape's brains in. Let's not be so naive

you're an idiot

He is crazy a priori.

Still interesting to listen to.

It's a tapestry that he meanders around but the whole image is glorious.

Behave yourself lolz !!!!🤪 😂😜

Comparing Rome to the EU is a stretch

cant have economic union without legal union. cant have legal union without political union

This guy really had the balls to say "wrong" and then provide a one line explanation to a 13 minute speech by Zizek. lmao.

Why are talking on behalf of "people"? Speak for yourself.

Unfortunately, globalisation demands it. The economic system and the political system are one and the same as they both work for the same people and the same goals: capitalists and capitalism.

I doubt smoking cannabis will help him gather his thought when he speak in front of a bunch of people. Cannabis is also unhealthy, it also decrease ambition which will hamper his productivity.

Once you scrub your mind and intellect with some kind of cleansing soap and study the notion/concept of communism itself, come back to this video and rewatch it.

@@ZainKhan-sm8gr That came nowhere close to addressing my question. I tend to like Zizek, but I find his romanticisation of modern Europe to be a bit inconsistent with his claimed economic ideology.

If you think everything left of Attila the Hun is communism, as Chomsky characterises the view of Peterson, then you'll probably have a problem reconciling the two. If you can think of the word "social'" as in "not being a predator on the poor", then there may be a way to.

@@GwennDana I don't think that. He himself has before identified as a communist. That's why I said "claim to be communist".

I’ve watched several clips of him and in some he says after being called a communist that he calls himself that to provoke. Perhaps that makes it a little more clear.

Can you really imagine it I mean that's ALOT of coke?

I would've loved to listen to debates of him, but I can't stand his slobbering, so no.

Keep sharing your dismay, don't make an effort to accept and overcome

@@FromThe3021 I will

stop projecting yourself and your inner circle onto others (you mainly disagree with). Zizek has never tried drugs and is vocally opposed to drugs. [Source: the guy himself, look it up] PS: your favorite sophist is an addict, though. How sad.

I just managed to suck the tip of my dick

@@Rammbock Wow

Capital M M its a tick, always does this, check out his old stuff.

Cyb3rg33k his tick represents his true nature . As all communists he is permanently lying so his tick is permanently with him.