SLIP TEST - Audi Q7 3.0 TDI Quattro vs Dodge Durango 3.6 V6 AWD -

No video

SLIP TEST - Audi Q7 3.0 TDI Quattro vs Dodge Durango 3.6 V6 AWD -

Рет қаралды 11,266

4x4 / AWD slip tests on rollers channel

Күн бұрын

Stacja Kontroli Trakcji - join us on Facebook: / stacjakontrolitrakcji
Follow us on Instagram: / 4x4.tests.on.rollers
Audi Q7 3.0 TDI AT Quattro (2009)
vs
Dodge Durango 3.6 V6 AWD (2015)
#duszaniespokojna #dodgedurango #audiq7

Пікірлер: 44

@Jack.driver Жыл бұрын

The only not nose heavy Audi, very nice 👍

@tsakitx8190 Жыл бұрын

I think that's how the quattro works.... Brakes the wheels that spin

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

@@tsakitx8190 All systems do that.

@tsakitx8190 Жыл бұрын

@@4x4.tests.on.rollers yeah u right idk why I said Quattro 😅🤷‍♂️

@dundee1080 Жыл бұрын

@@tsakitx8190 How's that even related to Q7 not been nose heavy?

@tsakitx8190 Жыл бұрын

@@dundee1080 I was replying to another comment but KZfaq switched them I guess.... Idk YT does that lately for some reason 🤷‍♂️

@WolowitzsMother Жыл бұрын

Solid performance of both.

@abrahamgarcia7064 Жыл бұрын

Dont lie. pretty better Audi

@1wasinAlpha Жыл бұрын

both cars suck! self-binding AWD is the worst

@kordaxmint533 Жыл бұрын

@@1wasinAlpha self-binding?

@WolowitzsMother Жыл бұрын

@@abrahamgarcia7064 More brakes doesn't say it's better.

@lonewolf1300 Жыл бұрын

2 similar vehicles in power body style and maybe weight too. the dodge may be better in some cases than the audi ,but the audi would do better on rough terrain (if some people would use them on that). in overall i'd say audi is a better choice in the awd systems .

@justexclusive6886 Жыл бұрын

There is no any case where Dodge would be better than audi…this is so set up and test drivers should be shamed! When Dodge get up on rollers driver flor it every time! With audi they if there is any way to show audi as bad they would do! But audi is audi and was, is and going to be best!

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

@@justexclusive6886 There's more rev (higher engine rpm) in Audi than in Dodge...

@justexclusive6886 Жыл бұрын

@@4x4.tests.on.rollers you are blind obviusly!

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

@@justexclusive6886 I'm not blind but you must be deaf if you don't hear the Audi engine.

@dundee1080 Жыл бұрын

@@justexclusive6886 Please, don't make a fool of yourself here. At your home is enough.

@spongebobsquarepants2656 Жыл бұрын

Audi did pretty well, but with ESP off the wheels are not turning .... Not good.

@Softroader Жыл бұрын

Which transfer case on the Durango? On the V6 version, I think it's the MP2010 with open center differential and 50/50 torque bias.

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

I think the number was MP3010.

@TnTTyler Жыл бұрын

Its an MP3010 with a fixed torque split

@Softroader Жыл бұрын

@@4x4.tests.on.rollers I ask this because there are 3 different transfer cases on the Durango: The MP2010, with a free centre differential and fixed torque split (50/50, sometimes 48/52) The MP3010, which is variable torque split active on demand transmission (initially 47/53, sometimes 35/65). The MP3023, which is an active on-demand transmission with low range. These transfer cases are also used on the Jeep Grand Cherokee WK2. And in addition, the MP3010 is apparently coupled with a mechanical wet clutch and electronic limited slip rear differential And apparently the MP3010 is only fitted to the V8. The MP3010 would be the standard on WK2 SRT8 Hence my questioning.

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

@@Softroader That will be MP2010 then. QUADRA-TRAC I with open center diff.

@Softroader Жыл бұрын

@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Exactly. For Jeep. MP2010 -> Quadra Trac I MP3023 -> Quadra Trac II MP3023 + electronic limited slip rear differential -> Quadra Drive II MP3010 + electronic limited slip rear differential -> Quadra Trac SRT

@arturgrams9189 Жыл бұрын

It seems to me that the Audi has to give much smaller throttle inputs than the Dodge to free itself. It could also be that the Dodge's driver just has an overly eager right foot... xD

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

Actually there's quite a lot of throttle in Audi, I would say that even more than in Dodge but brakes are keeping the wheels and they do not allow them spin.

@dundee1080 Жыл бұрын

You can easily hear that Q7 is revving.

@igorsocha46 9 ай бұрын

Audi is diesel while Dodge is petrol, very different behavior...

@4x4.tests.on.rollers 9 ай бұрын

@@igorsocha46Different behaviour comes from AWD systems, not engines.

@enmanuelleonardo Жыл бұрын

Ese tipo que usa la dodge siempre es un animal la acelera mucho

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

He uses it normally. Otherwise it would move of the rollers.

@valhallabroken Жыл бұрын

No acelera mucho, giran mucho las ruedas porque no bloquean bien los diferenciales.

@13macias84 Жыл бұрын

Torsen always win with Haldex

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

Not always. Besides - none of these cars has haldex.

@13macias84 Жыл бұрын

Audi - permanent mechanical drive of both axles witch central diff case = Torsen. Durango - viscous clutch adds axle if are need = Haldex, am I wrong?. In my Fiat Freemont/Dodge Journey is second one, so i presumed that Durango had same

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

@@13macias84 Unfortunately you are wrong. Durango also has permanent all wheel drive system, with mechanical center differential. Actually it's borrowed from Grand Cherokee. Freemont/Journey is completely different from Durango.

@13macias84 Жыл бұрын

@@4x4.tests.on.rollers Thanks, for the clarification

@jacobusehlers7707 Жыл бұрын

It sounds like the q7 uses its brakes for the test

@4x4.tests.on.rollers Жыл бұрын

Both do that.

@dundee1080 Жыл бұрын

lol Literally every modern AWD system uses brakes.

@1wasinAlpha Жыл бұрын

honestly both vehicles system sucks! It's binding itself by itself. When both front wheels lock up at the same time, because the center diff is also locked it's causing the goddamn whole drive shaft to fcking seize, thus no power to the rear axle, and if you don't get power to the rear wheels how the fck is the car suppose to move? The computer on these systems still don't understand which axle is slipping and which axle has traction at all. Which is a fail. It should know that if both front wheels are slipping or not and if 2 wheels on 1 axle are both slipping it should only focus the E-LSD to work on the axle that actually has traction... This is why tesla performs best on these tests. Front and rear axles are independent from each other so don't matter what happens one axle only has to work on itself.