Well if a small percentage of LGBT people are able to get married for example then everyone will get divorced and be forced to marry someone of the same gender and then the human race will die out, duh! /s

Obviously every single hetero has a hetero privilege sack their body near their heart. In this sack is filled with power liquid and anytime they get the feeling of being Superior this liquid replenishes itself. But as as soon as the gay person is treated equally to them the sack malfunctions. Eventually all the liquid disappears. And they die inside. As they realize that they no longer have as much power as they used.

- "If we let trans people use toilets matching their gender identity, trans women will immediately walk in and show little girls their penises!!" - "What about those that have had bottom surgery?" - "I- uh... but PeNisEs!!!!!" - "And what about trans men?" - "Oh those poor confused lesbians." - "No, what about them using the toilet?" - "Ummm..... " - "Yes?" - "... shut up and let me hate trans people!!!"

Well, obviously if I were to happily marry my girlfriend (I'm nonbinary by the way), whenever heteros saw us on the street their days would be polluted with the sight of gay. Then they would have to go wash their eyes out with soap, which would lead to temporary blindness. This blindness would temporarily stunt their ability to have social interaction mostly because they are superficial and only talk to people based on looks. Then that hetero would accidentally start dating someone who wasn't physically attractive to them. When their vision returned, they would already be married to that person. That's when they would get a divorce, but during the process of divorcing it was discovered that the person that they married was actually my sister. When the hetero realizes that they married the sister of the enby that caused this mess in the first place, they would fly into a rage. They would threaten to kill me, but that's when I would use my magical powers of gay to make them one of us. They would be so scared that they had become a gay that they would warn all of the heteros of our magical powers, who would then proceed to throw us into the center of the sun. But suddenly the heteros would realize that they just killed 10% of the population. With all of the holes that they created in the workforce, civilization would rapidly fall, all because I married my girlfriend.

@@tartagliussy529 I didn't see the /s at first, and I was just about to send a very heated and kind of mean comment back-- I am so sorry.

@@reddeadhorse4071 Johnny Trigger Warning the Toucan Man

Injecting uranium directly into their eyeballs

​@@superkingoftacos2920 Isn't that normal?

@@davemiller638 yes 😏

Wait until they hear that medical meth has been a thing since long before MMJ lmao

When even Siva speaks more facts, you know you are wrong.

@@dascreeb5205 Well, now I'm conflicted. Because last I checked, Savathûn is the hive god of deceit... though I suppose Sava-spoon may just be the hive god of cereal.

@@trickytreyperfected1482 No way, new raid boss: Sava-spoon

​@@FishyTheKobold New boss just dropped

Probably because these people don't respect consent. If they did, they would have the exact reason why people wouldn't do that.

They do meth, not math

Love is love. That's the cliche argument isn't? How does that not apply to a man loving a dog romantically?

@@jjaros964 theye are not the same species

@@jjaros964 I don’t know if you’re joking or not

@@sentientchessboard595 sure I'm aware they aren't the same speces but the argument never made that distinction so how is that a counter point? Now you're just moving the goal post lol

The exception I've found to this is when a group is warning you how a decision will allow people in power to hurt people. An example of this is people warning about how certain legislation in Florida was the stepping stone that was going to lead to more extreme stripping of rights from people. And lo and behold.

we can give people health care... but I don't think that should include the ability to kill babies. I personally think that's incredibly immoral.

@@CrunchyNF Me too! That's why I'm really glad not one single, solitary human being is suggesting that.

@@connorscanlan2167 I'm suggesting that. It's the murder of children.

@@CrunchyNF You're against the murder of children but are suggesting the murder of children...? Then how are you against the murder of children if you're suggesting it?

@@connorscanlan2167 As in, I'm suggesting that abortion is the murder of children. And people are suggesting that abortion should be allowed, so therefore people are suggesting it.

Then leave

@@wolf_demon_9249 or maybe, you know, fix it

@@HelloHello-vk5ob how can I do that hahaha, just leave then if it sucks so bad go to africa or asia

@@wolf_demon_9249 well I single person can't change a country but a movement can, instead of giving up, work

@@HelloHello-vk5ob I don't have to do anything. You don't either. If you want to stay here sure you can suffer because you hate it here so much.

'I mean, after the twizzlers, where does it stop?'

or from a different perspective it has a 99.94% chance of Z not happening

@@dhans9662 well actually 99.4% but yea

​@@RandomDucc-sj8pd fuck you're right I'm stupid

@@dhans9662 don’t worry, we all make mistakes

I'd love to not see it! 🙃

I breath through my mouth right now because my little brother gave me COVID, but I swear that my girlfriend and I aren't mouth-breathers

@@thatTesstyBish haha, I hope you recover soon and your symptoms are mild!

@@thatTesstyBish get better soon! you can do this!

One question, do you consider anyone who expresses a disagreement with this, as you say - brilliant dude, a hatemail?

Fun fact! If one transitions every single surgery and the hormones are reversible so even if people did it because it's "trendy" they can just stop. But their brain isn't the opposite gender like trans people so they'll start feeling really freaked out and disgusted in their body before they get too deep

*trendy transition* M8 wtf

Even if it did somehow become trendy, who the fuck cares?

Thank you. So many people just blast their opinions in the other's faces when they disagree, so I'm glad you're respectful about that. I'm not him, but I thought I'd express my gratitude

I agree. Great voice, great composition (I particularly liked the circle of 5ths progression he did near the end), great education regarding argumentative fallacies, but I respectfully disagree on the politics.

Thanks! Just trying to add a bit more musical pizazz into the series 🕺🏻

I know I am a year late but just found these songs and wanted to comment also, they are all great but you can really tell this one is very technically well put together, excellent singing thanks for the hard work.

@@EmersonBrophy reminds me of the school house rock songs, they do something like that too!

obligatory enby pride flag like :D

@@LeafyLeafbloom thanks lol

To be honest, he could probably make this 4-5 hours if he wanted to.

Same here!

Wait...he's THAT guy???

@@jdprettynails Yes, this is him!

That’s another logical fallacy, the false equivalence. Grass seeds and fetuses are not the same by any reasonable stretch of imagination

​@@sliceofgarlicbreadthey are both complex organisms consisting of relatively few cells without any sentenience

​@@group555_ Plants will never gain the amount of sentience as a human zygote will. It's not equivalent. Plants have less inherent value than humans. Whether you’re pro choice or not, thats a false equivalence

@@hinata1ize not with my parameters. Plants have less potential sure but a fetus within term for abortions is just as sentient as a plant and just as alive. Obviously that changes later but that's not the point

@@kal1796 not saving an already existing life while you can is taking away from what already is. That's not the same thing as stopping something before it ever becomes a life. A sperm cell is just as sentient as a fetus. It has the exact same potential for life. By your logic masturbation is murder. Because every single sperm could become a full living human.

In the words of one conservative, "It doesn't have to be true, it just has to go viral." Google it if you don't believe me.

Related!

@@EmersonBrophy lol

I don't know how I feel about abortion after rape, I guess it's fine, but if you got pregnant after consent and stuff kinda feels like your fault.

@@Real_Mick3y6 “your fault” that’s a weird way to think about people getting medical care, dude. You’re making it sound like having a baby is a punishment for bad decisions.

@@awkwardukulele6077 It isn't punishment, but it's still a consequence. Because something happened as a result of you, it is by definition, your fault.

@@Real_Mick3y6 yes so people souldnt get treatmeant for covid bc they got it by not being carefull? The logic doesn't really work

@@childcannibalism5080 Your comparing apples to oranges here. Those are two very different things. Pregnancy can only happen through one thing and that's pretty intentional. A sickness, is another living thing that infects you against your will. That's why I don't know what I think about rape, it's not your own will.

There is also a phenomenon of "Specialists" being cherry-picked and touted as Frontrunners of their field when in actuality they are fringe reactionaries that go against established and agreed-upon findings because they know it appeals to people that want to legitimize their fringe opinions with the words of someone with "PHD" at the end of their name. Let's remember that someone with a college degree saying something doesn't make it a "fact" and that the important thing is consensus and peer review.

Damn

This guy brought minecraft suggestions into american politics and I respect that 100%, man has his priorities straight

Same with furries 1% atr zoophiles and 99% hate them

So not like the vegan teacher at all

Saying someone is like the vegan teacher should be taken as an immediate insult

Also for abortion apparently there have been out-of-the-womb babies killed, and all abortion kills something that is alive scientifically so calling it a “live baby” is kind of misleading is the assumption is that babies in the womb are not alive, because they are. Plus, many democrats don’t normally support born-alive bills which would protect babies who are already born, so that’s an interesting fact.

​@@jadongrifhorst6221 Funny trick trying to use a both sided argument to promote absolute bs. A child in the womb is not 'alive' until the 6th month. That is when it mainly just grows (and isn't really alive still). And abortion is most common until the 3-4th month cause you need time to confirm the pregnancy. And if we go by 'oh but someone did that once' we'd ban guns. But republicans obviously don't like their own logic.

You have fundamentally misunderstood that the slippery slope argument is a fallacy in and of itself. Whether we are at the bottom, the top, or anywhere in between... it still isn't a valid argument.

@@CatOnFire why? Let's just say that someone makes a claim that due to rising carbon emissions and CO2 in our atmosphere that global warming will cause sea levels to rise and cause massive devastation within the next 20 years (a claim that I'm pretty sure has been made on this channel if I remember right), would we then say their argument for trying to lower emissions is completely useless because of a slippery slop fallacy? If anything, that's far more of a stretch than what he made in this video, some of which is literally already happening (there are academics starting to question why bestiality is wrong). So, what is inherently wrong about making a claim and then using logic to foresee the probable consequences of the action? I would say nothing. Where the fallacy comes in, in my opinion is in huge leaps of logic that make no sense, and I wouldn't even call that a fallacy, just a bad argument.

@@jadongrifhorst6221 Slippery Slope is a fallacy whereby someone claims direct cause and effect where there is none, or fear mongers about potential consequences that could be avoided reasonably. Take the legalization of marijuana. "Legalizing marijuana would reduce the number of drug-related arrests per year. This would likely eventually lead to fewer prison sentences for drug related crimes." This would be a direct cause and effect. It's not a slippery slope. "Legalizing marijuana would cause people to go to work while under the influence." This is a slippery slope fallacy. It is entirely possible and reasonable to legalize marijuana, but keep it illegal to work while under the influence, just like we have already done for alcohol. Legal marijuana directly forces fewer drug-related arrests. Legal marijuana does not force anyone to work while under the influence. Thus, one of these stances is a Slippery Slope Fallacy, and the other is not. Slippery Slope is recognized as one of the logical fallacies, a relative of the non-sequiter fallacy. It is given its own name because of how common it is and how convincing it can often sound. Given your example about climate change, it would not be a slippery slope fallacy so long as there is evidence that rising ocean waters is a direct consequence of global warming. As to your comment about beastiality, there have always been people who questioned why it was wrong and people who crossed that line. Beastiality has not been legalized and will not be legalized under any reasonable circumstances. It is unreasonable to claim that beastiality being legalized is a direct consequence of legalizing gay marriage. Therefore, the claim that legalizing gay marriage will lead to beastiality is a slippery slope fallacy.

Yeah the US government was a bit scared of a domino effect, but i could see where they were coming from in that scenario

Tell that to the eco activists fearmongers

@@rhysjonsmusic The difference is that when they say “Climate change is going to kill us” they have proof to back that up. Sure we aren’t dropping dead in the streets but we can see that our planet is much hotter than it was in the 90s. Out of everyone? Majority of the eco activists don’t need ti hear this as they aren’t overreacting neither trying to push an agenda (most of them)

😂

You have summoned me?

I HAVE BEEN SUMMONED!!!

i’ve been summoned and i very much respect this person

hello, yes, i have been summoned. i already respect, but i will be summoning more of us

I have been summoned

See you're wrong because it's not actually a slippery slope fallacy if you lay out step by step how things can go bad. For example arguing that internment camps lead to human rights abuses is not a slippery slope fallacy. But saying that gay marriage will lead to marrying animals is because the points are unrelated and require a complete jump in logic to get from one point to the next. Forcibly restraining people and taking away their autonomy leading to human rights abuse is not a leap in logic.

No president has ever wanted to make the country better lol

@@Ry_TSG What about Abe, FDR, and JFK?

The propaganda type?

@@michaelronward1569 only if you say it in a british accent

@@BrainDent "only if you say it in a British accent" bro what does that even mean 💀 100% agree tho

The problem is y ou think the endgame is a good thing.

What?

@@MajorZH y ou replying with NPC clapback #5 is pretty much the extent of the intellect I've come to expect form y ou folk.

I said “what”? I was confused as to what you meant, as I said “wheeeeeee slippery”

@@reddeadhorse4071 i appreciate you attempting to explain it to me, but I don't think you can change my mind. Sorry. Just personal experiences.

@@reddeadhorse4071 just to add on though: my uncle is a veteran with ptsd, but even then I know he would never resort to using weed to calm himself down, because he knows that it has a possibility to harm him more than help him

@@Jellybellyjellybean how can it harm him?

@@dip9995 addiction. First it's something simple such as Marijuana, but then it might be something harder, and so on. Also, he has 10 children so I doubt it would be a good choice to have that around young children.

@@Jellybellyjellybean You can lead a horse to water

please touch grass

It has been true many times.

A slippery slope is when you say one thing and then say it will lead to something completely unrelated.

Example. If I eat this apple the sun will explode.

​@@gammaphoenix5893 like which one.

Care to give a few proven examples? Which one came true?

🤨📸

I respect none of his views because they are almost all wrong

@@mousejackson2523 Sounds like every other conservative to me "I dont care about this person because they're a liberal so everything they say must be wrong by default!"

What bothers me is when “news sources” don’t differentiate between their facts based reporting and opinion pieces

I mean, it did. The ban expired in 2004 and the average number of yearly deaths attributed to mass shootings from 2004 to 2017 is 25, compared to the 5.3 during the 10-year tenure of the ban.

@@lexxpowered8836 that's not completely invalid but you should also consider that the grounds for what a mass shooting is was changed to require less people

@@pancakedestroyer5289 The definition of mass shooting in the report I used and in most of them is 4 or more people, and that has been the standard since 1982

@@lexxpowered8836 proof

Yah, thats the one point I argue with this song

@@Xander-mn1bi Simplifying version of the all political opinions to make a song like this just made me think of the overton window. Especially when it came to the abortion and statue parts.

You can make something sound like anything when you misrepresent a quote. On the topic of non-viable and severely deformed foetuses (to the point of major health ramifications), here's what Dr Northam _actually_ said: "If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother,” Any suggestion that this is about killing birthed children is purely inference and a bad-faith argument. A DNR is not murder. Withdrawing life support is not murder.

@@notadev1590 I agree that context is everything, but when you have people having conversations about why we should have late term pregnancy termination and allow abortion at 9 months, that's exactly what they are doing... Killing actual developed babies that are viable outside the womb.

Getting an abortion affects the baby just as much as never getting pregnant with the baby, are you saying all women should be required to be pregnant?

i see where you're coming from, but i don't think that many people were aware that trans people existed before gay marriage was legalized, so there weren't really people saying "if we let gay people get married, then we'll end up letting trans people in the bathrooms they want to be in, too" or anything to that effect. looking back on it and seeing that gay marriage legalization likely emboldened the trans community to come out of their own closet can't really be used to justify slippery slope arguments if they weren't really made to begin with. the slippery slope arguments that were being used were generally "if we let gay people get married, we'll end up letting people marry animals and children too." neither of those have happened or will happen anytime soon, of course (and it is generally conservative politicians that advocate for lowering age of consent, funnily enough). tl;dr "slippery slope" is not simply the fact that things can influence other things, it is taking a situation and becoming concerned over highly unlikely scenarios that it could only hypothetically lead to.

The thing is, gay marriage leading to gender identity debate is literally human rights leading to more human rights

"People wanted gay marriage now they want more rights?? 🤯" yea dude. Not to meantion that would be a normal slope, "If we give them 1 rights theyre ask for more exc exc" Slippery slope however never happened. They have yet to come true.

@@happystoryfamily4830 normal people would say a slippery slope happened after seeing 4 year olds changing their gender only a little after gay marriage happened and if you question the change then you're considered a bigot. Just because you call something a right doesn't mean it is. What about Jack Philips' or Lorie Smith's right to freedom of association, you know... an actual right? Were their trampled rights not an example of a slippery slope? Give me a break.

@@GrandpaBaner Bro was definitely malding cause someone called them a bigot. Looks like one too.

Yeah, I wonder how these divisions started 🤔

You're absolutely correct

Fucking what? Lmao

No ones “coming after all of your firearms”, we just want them regulated and we don’t want the general population to be able to buy military grade weaponry

@@maxisatypeofmoss7151 ar-15’s are civilian grade semi-automatic weapons. All automatic weapons created after like ‘86 are already illegal. Semi-automatic means hold the trigger and only 1 bullet flies. Also, check out H.R 127. It’s a fun bill that makes ALL magazines over 10 rounds illegal. Most HANDGUNS come with 12-16 round magazines. So those will be illegal. Also, every time in history gun registration has happened, inevitably, the government enforced mandatory buy backs. If you think the goal is innocent you’re not paying attention. Collin noir is a great representation of how ludicrous they become. The most recent gun buy backs have shown only law abiding citizens return the weapons meaning that criminals keep them. I will strongly disagree with what your saying. Also the argument that firearms are for hunting is also just plain ignorant. The idea of our second amendment is so that the citizens are not out gunned by our government. It’s used to ensure we can always fight back on a government that tries to take our rights. They’ve confiscated guns after hurricane katrina. They kicked in an old lady’s door and threw her on the ground to STEAL her revolver. 6 rounds.

@@maxisatypeofmoss7151 final thoughts, background checks are already required. The idea of forcing it on private sales is to ensure we register our firearms (which is ILLEGAL). Again, this leads to MANDATORY not OPTIONAL buyback. Collin noir check him out

@@danieltirico6593 You've kind of proved our point. There is already very minor gun control in place, yet you're still allowed to keep guns. Also, you just did the exact thing that this song is talking about. Please show me your peer-reviewed source that says universal background checks explicitly leads to *mandatory* buyback.

Thanks for the well-written comment. I was aware of how this could appear strawman-y, hence why I included the headline screenshots to indicate that people have actually made each of the "you said that" arguments. Yes I had to simplify the point of the articles, but I don't think I misrepresented any of the key arguments that people have made.

That “fake person” is Eric Zemmour, Candidate for the french presidential election Or maybe it’s Trump, idk

Around 2016 I was on the right, and I made many of these arguments and watched people around me make these arguments. Some are older than that but all of these arguments are ones that are documented and established. The only one I disagree with abortion because any abortion is ending a life, but something just being alive without sentience etc. Brings up moral debates.

What is this even supposed to mean?

Yeah I thought that was a strange one to include too

Yeah for real lol did people just forget about that?

Wait they want what to be available...!

Never heard of that exept by conservative dogwhistles. And I am very active in pro-choice, childfree and feminist spaces. Show me the source.

Fucking who? Literally who says killing a baby just before they're born is what they want?

Which just shows that the school system really needs to be overhauled. I have chronic pain and medical marijuana has basically 0 side effects, but it's illegal which is why I got pumped full with opioids. Which had tons of of side effects. The logic is...not there.

But that's not because of same sex marriage.

Lord Quentin Trembley III. Esq

@@Marcel-2174 It kinda did.

@@dinky_comments uh, no. Try to educate yourself. It's not.

@@Marcel-2174 I am, and like I said before it kinda is. The People in same-sex marriages are a part of the LGBT+ movement and their message is Love is Love. So, people committing Beastiality will latch onto that narrative and want the same rights as they have. There is a lady in the Uk rn I don't remember her name but she married her cat and claims to be a part of that movement.