The Puritans Were Not Tolerant of Other Religions

Рет қаралды 60,865

4 жыл бұрын

In 1630, the Puritans fled England to the Massachusetts coast, looking to evade religious persecution. Within 20 years, they had become the persecutors, directing their wrath at the Quakers.
From the Series: Aerial America: Boston bitly.com/2rd1crm

Пікірлер: 261

@WickedScott 2 жыл бұрын

Who'd a thunk a group called the 'Puritans' weren't all that tolerant of other religions? Huh.

@uganda_mn397 11 ай бұрын

Who would have thought. Are you a Christian?

@stephenwright8824 Жыл бұрын

I have ancestors that were both Puritans and Quakers. Imagine living in Massachusetts one's whole life and knowing that one part of the family harassed, arrested and executed another part in the way-back-when. That's what I deal with every day. ☹️

@dfhdghdgcfg Жыл бұрын

Why would you care what they did hundreds of years ago. None of it has anything to do with you. There is no reason to deal with it at all. Stop playing the martyr. The puritans were just religious fanatics that were upset that they themselves could not be the oppressors so they came to America and tried to oppress everyone else. When that didn't work, they did what any good religion does, they started murdering people that didn't conform to eliminate the competition and to subjugate their own people through fear.

@MassachusettsTrainVideos1136 Жыл бұрын

Relatable for me, replace Quakers with Catholics and you have my family, still squabbles about it today and everyone tried to convince me to not be Eastern Orthodox.

@matthewshore2533 Жыл бұрын

I wrote my bachelor's thesis on Roger Williams, the founder of Rhode Island; a safe haven for people of different religions.

@FIREBRAND38 4 жыл бұрын

17 Puritans disliked this video

@rogermetzger7335 Жыл бұрын

I thought all the puritans had decided to call themselves congregationalists. Are there still people who call themselves puritans?

@stephenwright8824 Жыл бұрын

@@rogermetzger7335 Sure. Those who want 300 years of history ignored. Remember that the original Puritans governed Massachusetts and Connecticut by the laws of the Old Testament, not the New. Looking backwards is second nature to them.

@maemae7063 2 жыл бұрын

Puritans got Massachusetts while Quakers got Pennsylvania

@charlesdeleo4608 10 ай бұрын

They forgot to mention why the ideals of Puritanism began to fade in the late 17th century. One was because of the horrors of King Philip’s War: the bloodiest and most destructive war in American history, which although was a victory for the Puritans, deeply shook their ideals. The other was the Salem Witch Trials, which caused many to lose faith in the Puritan movement altogether. As increasing trends of cosmopolitanism and trade between the colonies increased, New England was absorbed into the British Empire. By the dawn of the 18th century, the Puritan movement was effectively finished.

@Jeremyramone 4 жыл бұрын

The oatmeal cant have been that bad surely

@MargaritaMagdalena 3 жыл бұрын

I'm eating oatmeal porridge right now 😆😆

@MargaritaMagdalena 3 жыл бұрын

With pineapple jam 😋😋😋

@lloydtucker5647 3 жыл бұрын

🤣😅

@Wanderer1991 2 жыл бұрын

Lol everyday

@TruePluto 3 ай бұрын

They were founded by quakers not puritans

@lloydtucker5647 3 жыл бұрын

Let's not forget, towards the late 1600s these dangerous fundamentalist developed an unhealthy obsession with a Bible verse that says _"Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live."_ A lot of innocent people died because of this insanity.

@marcustuliuscicero4605 2 жыл бұрын

Yep, may such innocent people never be forgotten.

@horticasey 10 ай бұрын

Maybe they shouldn't have been witches.

@iprobasco 2 жыл бұрын

The thing this documentary gets wrong is that the Puritans weren't really fleeing religious persecution in England, most of them were already in Holland which had religious freedom and it would be far easier for members to just move there. The problem they were having in Holland is that the members were exercising that freedom and leaving the congregation in droves.

@stephenwright8824 Жыл бұрын

I'd just add that the Puritan and Separatist leadership were wary of their communities' children being raised in a country speaking a language other than English.

@rogermetzger7335 Жыл бұрын

As interested as I am in history and as much as I've studied about that era, I'm reasonably sure I hadn't previously heard about high rates of defection before the sailing of the Mayflower. I don't doubt it at all but can you direct us to some primary sources?

@ultravioletpisces3666 Жыл бұрын

It was the Pilgrims who went to Holland

@rogermetzger7335 Жыл бұрын

@@ultravioletpisces3666 In the United States, the word, "Pilgrims"especially when capitalized and especially when combined with the definite article - "the Pilgrims" - is a reference to people who came to North America from Holland (I think it was then called "the Dutch Republic") on the Mayflower. Most (maybe all) of those people had left England to go to Holland because of persecution in England. Those People were puritans (or, more specifically, belonged to a more radical branch of the puritan movement called separatists). They appreciated the freedom of the Dutch Republic but also "hated' living there because they considered the Dutch to be to "worldly" and considered the worldly Dutch to be a bad influence on their children.

@trollol_ 10 ай бұрын

The problem was a lack of economic and financial opportunity in Holland as well as England because of the religious associations. A colony in American had more opportunity because there was not authority already present there to oppress them in economic ways, as the Puritans would be the authority once established. Investing in a Puritan settlement also had the potential to be profitable for speculative nonsectarian investors since the Puritans would establish order via religious doctrine, which means the colonists would be more likely to work hard and be productive and so produce profit and appealing financial return for investors.

@daithiocinnsealach1982 4 жыл бұрын

They didn't want religious tolerance. And not much has changed with their spiritual ancestors today.

@TheInfiniteFrequency 3 жыл бұрын

Good for them.

@macvena 3 жыл бұрын

Very tolerant.

@tchactvalimee1878 2 жыл бұрын

@@TheInfiniteFrequency nope.

@flipfloplogic 4 жыл бұрын

In other news the sky is blue

@maclanty5324 2 жыл бұрын

🤔😯

@Chamelionroses 4 жыл бұрын

Funny how people don't learn from history and are doomed to repeat similarly. Shrug

@Chamelionroses 4 жыл бұрын

@Jonathan Edward true. I wasn't expecting anything put out. Just matter of factly saying how predictable humans can be, but many play moral and mental games even politically as cult of personality leaders pretending to save the planet. Many are gullible and believe such people.

@dwightschrute900 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, I have no sympathy for the puritans. LOL

@NMChe56 4 жыл бұрын

Puritans were 17th century European ISIS.

@jacobhodge5257 4 жыл бұрын

NMChe56 but with more nooses and less bombs

@elizabethsabatino6347 4 жыл бұрын

The persecuted become the persecutors. Well, well...🤔

@andresd3104 4 жыл бұрын

how the turntables...

@erikkr.r.m7380 4 жыл бұрын

That ALWAYS happens in history, ALWAYS

@donuts9549 3 жыл бұрын

ehh

@qjtvaddict 3 жыл бұрын

They were persecuted for a reason

@danbreen1916 2 жыл бұрын

The Puritans didn't leave England to be free of persecution ......they left England to be free to persecute.

@wingitprod 4 жыл бұрын

Their battle cry must have been "REMEMBER OLIVER CROMWELL"!!!

@categories5066 4 жыл бұрын

Oliver Cromwell was the man tho...

@cindysavage265 4 жыл бұрын

The other thing not covered.....the Puritans commissioned the ships that carried them to the North American continent. They were not poor people. A ship then cost thousands of pounds, millions today.

@Greg29 4 жыл бұрын

So, today's counterpart would be evangelicals. Rich, intolerant, power hungry.

@MargaritaMagdalena 3 жыл бұрын

Isn't traveling always expensive? How many people can afford to travel to another continent today?

@lloydtucker5647 3 жыл бұрын

@@Greg29 It is not possible to hit a bulls eye with more dead center accuracy than your statement.

@abhratalukder8462 3 жыл бұрын

@ThePark 627 no they are not

@abhratalukder8462 3 жыл бұрын

@ThePark 627 no Abrahamics and eastern religions very different. Don't speak without studying each and every religion

@reriuqne0-ny1er 2 ай бұрын

In fact there was more religious intolerence and perscution in New England during the subsquent centuary than in England. They were in fact religious bigots, Puritans that stayed in England did not suffer persecution.

@mariaweston5477 2 жыл бұрын

Aaaand this is why religion and politics should be separate-which they are not. So. Let’s tax the churches.

@ucntcit 4 жыл бұрын

The Puritan spirit is still alive in America.

@thegamethemovie9605 2 жыл бұрын

It's creepy, right?

@XSilver_WaterX 3 жыл бұрын

I can imagine how the population was hard to maintain. They beaten or killed anyone with the slightest un-Christian thought.

@escritoranonimo2959 2 жыл бұрын

nowadays they'll attack you if you have Christian thoughts!

@tchactvalimee1878 2 жыл бұрын

@@escritoranonimo2959 Nope. They'll attack you if you enforce that though on others. People have the right to their own person and if you try to force them into your religion, they're gonna hate you for it.

@farkasvilkas 2 жыл бұрын

@@escritoranonimo2959 Not true, plenty of evidence that modern media and governments discourage religious belief, often directly, and make religious people seem crazy. The latter is always represented in movies and on TV where the Christian characters are often villainous and mentally insane.

@m.wallace2705 2 жыл бұрын

@@escritoranonimo2959 Islam is more likely to get bashed in today's society. I remember back when people panicked over an Islamic prayer in class (though they were fine with prayers of other religions).

@m.wallace2705 2 жыл бұрын

@@farkasvilkas Given the current Catholic president, the pro-Israel stance of the US government, and the last president's large base of Evangelicals, that seems a bit hard to believe.

@eric69571 4 жыл бұрын

Name me a religion that was tolerant of others back in the day?

@daithiocinnsealach1982 4 жыл бұрын

Many Christian sects are non violent and whilenthey are not open they are tolerant. Amish, Quakers, Jehovah's Witnesses comes to mind. And in the East many religions are officially non violent. Jainism and Buddhism are two.

@araucaria5173 4 жыл бұрын

Or even today !

@Jeremyramone 4 жыл бұрын

@@daithiocinnsealach1982 buddhism is not really that nonviolent, they ve fought with islam for a long time..

@-wvx- 4 жыл бұрын

Vaul, Dog Warrior look up for rohingya genocide

@AlexKS1992 3 жыл бұрын

Can’t think of a religion that’s tolerant.

@JLS639 2 жыл бұрын

I like how you left out the part about how Dyer and the other Boston Martyrs demanded to be executed and threatened to keep coming back and disrupting local worship services unless officials executed them. Or that Dyer's family had a long history of supporting dissidents in Boston. Or that the only reason the anti-Quaker laws existed at all was because the Quakers spent the decades before the Boston Martyrs disrupting church services and rioting

@MrZed_11 2 жыл бұрын

Quakers did that because you people are insane. Your kimd was chased from England for being a terrible lot.

@freeeggs3811 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for the information

@NoliMeTangere1163 2 жыл бұрын

Feel like supporting the many witch hunts too? (Salem isn't the only one)...

@stephenwright8824 Жыл бұрын

Don't forget _converting Bostonians._

@trollol_ 10 ай бұрын

You're correct. People still today hundreds of years later unfortunately don't understand what law and order means.

@johnritter5951 2 жыл бұрын

The Puritans had no charge to be "tolerant of other religions." The charge they had is called "The Great Commission" in Matthew 28. It is important therefore, if you must condemn someone or something, to condemn Christianity not its followers for intolerance of other religions. You may charge the Puritans only of being faithful to their charge, given by the one they believe to be their Lord and Savior, Jesus the Christ. So the task before you is to show that the Great Commission is intolerant of other religions as is the one who spoke the Great Commission...and that would be Jesus himself. Bear in mind that it would a good idea to first establish the truth of the assumption that tolerance is an absolute of the first order. People such as G. K. Chesterton is quoted as having said: "Tolerance is the last bastion of the scoundrel." He meant that he was opposed to these weak-kneed people who cannot take a stand on anything and therefore cluck-cluck about tolerance in stead.

@noahtylerpritchett2682 2 жыл бұрын

Tolerance is for the weak who cannot defend their beliefs.

@johnritter5951 2 жыл бұрын

@@noahtylerpritchett2682 Hi, Noah. Good words. I was a pastor in Maine back in the 90's. That is when the issue of tolerance came to the fore having been brought forth by liberals who wanted to neuter traditional Judeo-Chistian values and mores. What they were saying, in essence, is that if anyone disagrees with our disagreeing with historic Judeo-Christian values and morals, you are intolerant. It was okay for them to disagree but it was not okay for others to disagree. They were upholding "freedom of speech," but everyone else was being intolerant. With the liberals having won the culture wars, we are now seeing the truth. They have no interest in tolerance whatsoever. Intolerance was simply a tool they used to shut down conservatives. Liberals are the most intolerant people on planet earth, as the woke movement and censorship my social media demonstrates. Notice their foaming at the mouth over Elon Musk and Twitter.

@noahtylerpritchett2682 2 жыл бұрын

@@johnritter5951 I don't tolerate most Christian doctrines. Just Anglicans. The rest of you are heretics. Especially Catholics. Anglicanism is the truth. God demonstrated it by allowing our church the largest Imperial state in history. Convert to Anglicanism.

@maargenbx1454 2 жыл бұрын

The Great Commission is to convert others to the Gospel of Christ through teaching. There’s nothing at all intolerant about teaching and allowing others to choose conversion - or not. The Puritans had no charge to eradicate other belief systems or to punish or shun those who rejected the teachings. So if they’re not charged to punish, eliminate, or shun, what option do they have left other than tolerate?

@johnritter5951 2 жыл бұрын

@@maargenbx1454 Amen to that, precisely my point. By the way, the narrator said that the Puritans had a problem with the Catholic Church. They had no interest in trying to reform the Catholic Church. It was the Anglican Church, of which they were a part, that they wanted to reform...and failed...so fled.

@anneeq008 2 жыл бұрын

Are they still around?

@LesBell 4 ай бұрын

"The Puritans left England for America not because they couldn't be Puritans in their mother country, but because they were not allowed to force others to become Puritans; in the New World, of course, they could and did." --- Gore Vidal

@underconsideration2427 2 жыл бұрын

Okay the line that the quakers believed in a personal relationship with God is extremely vague. That line would fit even the puritans in that believe. The reality is much more complicated.

@RavenclawFtW3295 2 жыл бұрын

I've thought about it quite a bit, and I think the two differed in how they thought of human beings. Puritans were influenced by the teachings of John Calvin. John Calvin's teachings are what we today call "total depravity." It's the ultimate pessimism of human nature. The idea that every human is so corrupted by sin that everything we do is in some way touched by our sinful nature. When you think that way you'd be much more willing to think that an entire community is best centered around a single institution. In this case the Puritan church. To have a personal relationship with God would mean you can know Him independent of the church. That's not something the Puritans were fond of. That's how I understand it.

@richardglady3009 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you.

@gregoriogalindo2512 3 жыл бұрын

Did you guys hear that Steve is in Smash?

@ConservativeAnthem Жыл бұрын

Just like WOKE allows no dissent?

@maryfrump7937 27 күн бұрын

Ooh my Ancestors would not have gotten along with my other Quaker relatives!

@yolandagrabowski6043 5 ай бұрын

So, that's why my Irish neighbor resents catholism.

@debrac3391 4 жыл бұрын

The Puritans hated the Quakers largely because their Christian philosophy was more closely aligned with that of founder, Jesus of Nazareth. Quaker tenets- integrity, egalitarianism, and more significantly, a love for one's enemies, was very threatening to the Puritan hierarchy. They could not abide such heresy- so they sought to destroy them.

@rrondon3280 4 жыл бұрын

Oh come on. Puritans did not hate Quakers for being more "Christian". I could make that the argument for whichever side I favored whenever two or more sects squabbled. The Quakers at that time could be as vehement and self-righteous as anyone else. They interrupted other sect's church services, yelled at people, made noise, destroyed property. They were even accused of ripping their clothes off in public to get attention. Thank God they were pacifists! Lol. And yes, they were more forward-thinking than most groups when it came to equality but many early Quakers in the North American British colonies owned slaves. Even many years after the American Revolution, the U.S. Quakers at least were hesitant to admit black members. And later on they would have many schisms although all sects would try to stay "friends". Other than that I guess they were pretty woke.

@debrac3391 4 жыл бұрын

@@rrondon3280 Wow, paint with a wide enough brush, R? Not a fan of context?

@Velakowitz 2 жыл бұрын

@@debrac3391 he’s 100 right. Quakers we’re the biggest heretics that ever lived.

@ayanlethesomali7357 2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, i’m sure a Christian sect hates another sect for being too Christian. Makes absolute sense.

@voiceofreason2674 Жыл бұрын

Dude this explains the stereotypical neurotic New England attitude

@jhake67 2 жыл бұрын

sinec constantine tolerated christianity in the edict of milan... christians persecuting other christian is what makes christianity great!

@andronomisneltron3231 4 жыл бұрын

Who would want Mormons around anyway?

@ironox8480 4 жыл бұрын

other mormons

@rogermetzger7335 Жыл бұрын

Religion is the sum of those beliefs, practices and prohibitions that pertain to a person's concept of the highest powers of the universe. The puritans were wrong to penalize people who didn't agree with their concept of the highest powers of the universe, people who didn't subscribe to the puritans' religious practices and especially people who violated the puritans' religious prohibitions. Today, the dominant religion in North America is based on a very different concept of the highest powers of the universe. The religious practices and prohibitions of the people who subscribe to that (thousands-of-years-old but only recently dominate in North America) concept of the universe have their own list of requirements and prohibitions. It is just as wrong for those people to impose their concepts of ethics on the rest of the population as it was wrong for the puritans to impose their theistic religion in their colonies. Now the question is whether we can agree on a name for this only-recently-dominate religion. Any suggestions?

@carrielikethemovie1806 4 жыл бұрын

Yea they haaaaaated Quakers. HATED! Omg this video is about Quakers! Haha

@srouji6 4 жыл бұрын

Quakers have the best Oats

@BirdieSenpai 9 күн бұрын

I absolutely adore the theology of the Puritans, but I absolutely abhore their politics. Take Reformed Baptists, for example. The only real theological difference between a Puritan and a Reformed Baptist is on who should be baptized and associated implications on covenant theology. Puritans put a great many Baptists to death for that sole difference. On top of that, the Puritans' descendants soon after parted from their ancestors' orthodox faith rooted in Scripture but kept their persecutory politics; see the radical terrorist John Brown, often described as the most rightly executed man in American history, as an example. It was that type of puritanism that led a million Americans to die in the 1860s, not a religious puritanism, but a political one.

@josron6088 3 жыл бұрын

Religion.

@Gigsick 2 жыл бұрын

👌

@rev.stephena.cakouros948 9 ай бұрын

This video has flaws in it.

@Solmom03 4 жыл бұрын

We know this!! Salem...

@louise-yo7kz 4 жыл бұрын

😣😨

@b_uppy 4 жыл бұрын

This is more reflective of Puritan leadership, not necessarily most of the Puritans.

@b_uppy 4 жыл бұрын

@Rogue JediKnights No, it is exactly as written. It means the leadership did nor necessarily reflect followers. Leadership often is more about securing its position...

@hqb117hqb7 4 жыл бұрын

B uppy that can be said to most of the leadership, isn’t it?

@ItalianIrishguy Жыл бұрын

Neither has any other religion throughout history. Especially Islam.

@karenreaves4098 4 жыл бұрын

More than that escaping Baal worship.

@TruePluto 3 ай бұрын

Just like Islam lol

@GregorSamsa000 4 ай бұрын

I'm surprised they were not 😂

@boxfox2945 Жыл бұрын

Very vague, and much left out..

@Cukito4 4 жыл бұрын

Puritans failed. How mediocre.

@categories5066 4 жыл бұрын

nah their descendants became weak and destroyed the progress of their fathers

@Gigsick 2 жыл бұрын

@@categories5066 isn't that great

@tchactvalimee1878 2 жыл бұрын

@@categories5066 you say that like its a bad thing.

@PunishedFred 2 жыл бұрын

Can someone explain to me how this is different than leftists today?

@est9949 Жыл бұрын

Leftists want separation of church and state, which is the opposite of this. The right, on the other hand wants ONE religion to take control of people's lives, which is exactly this.

@PunishedFred Жыл бұрын

@@est9949 Once you realize the leftist equivalent of church, you realize that they also want a union of church and state

@spiritualherald Жыл бұрын

The bias is real.

@henkymizella6421 4 жыл бұрын

*In essence: If the Human Soul is Made Smaller by Their Actions towards Other Humans, it is a Sign that People are from the Dust Class! Or They are not from the Classy Genetics of Great Nation's Leaders!

@Jmenez.07 10 ай бұрын

Dayanara a witch ong

@johnc4774 4 жыл бұрын

Puritans bad Quakers good. Prejudice thy name is the Smithsonian channel! That was a hit piece with no attempt made to explain why the puritans held the position they did. I hope that's not symptomatic of the Smithsonian's approach to all history?

@michaelfisher7170 3 жыл бұрын

Which position do you mean? The position in the old world, where they were seen as an aggressive, obnoxious intolerant sect? Or their position in the new world, where they could establish and run their own colony along their own aggresive, obnoxious and intolerant lines? Then get into conflict when other groups arrived? They weren't pleasant people. You wouldn't want to live in a place they run.

@qjtvaddict 3 жыл бұрын

Can’t handle truth criminal

@qjtvaddict 3 жыл бұрын

@@michaelfisher7170 so this country then?

@araucaria5173 4 жыл бұрын

Religion is just mad !

@jacobnelson3081 Жыл бұрын

So. Many. Lies.

@derek8564 4 жыл бұрын

I though diversity was our strength?

@tchactvalimee1878 2 жыл бұрын

It is. It'll be awhile before the US gets its act together, but since the US changed culturally from the 1800's and 1940's, that future may not be so far away.

@trollol_ 10 ай бұрын

Too bad the Puritans didn't settle in the south as well. Maybe the hordes of yokels running around down there would have been civilized much sooner and be more civil then they are even today.

@doctor1alex 3 жыл бұрын

This completely misrepresents Puritan belief.

@raymondsaint4156 3 жыл бұрын

Not it doesn't. And it's awesome.

@Pilum1000 4 жыл бұрын

of course... the puritanism is early version of fascism :>

@jandreid1056 4 жыл бұрын

Lol, like there are any religions that are truly TOLERANT of any other religions.

@stevebilliter 4 жыл бұрын

Jarod--True Christians should be like Jesus,completely non-violent. In fact He taught, Mat_5:44 "But I say to you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which spitefully use you, and persecute you." Jesus tried to lovingly teach His gospel to all who would listen--if He was attacked by unbelievers, He followed His own teachings. It doesn't get any better than this!

@jandreid1056 4 жыл бұрын

@@stevebilliter Jesus had often been described as the Prince of Peace, though Mat 10:34 had some foreboding warning from him... and then there's that scene at the temple.

@stevebilliter 4 жыл бұрын

@@jandreid1056 Yes, but when He drove out the money changers, that was righteous indignation--not real violence. And this: Mat 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. He's not speaking of Him and His followers doing violence--it's all about the enmity of Satan against Christ, and His followers. He also spoke of how families that were not all His people would be divided and torn asunder, as it were. A good example would be the Roman Catholic papacy. For hundreds of years they tortured and murdered an estimated 50 to 150 true saints of God. The papacy is not Christian--it is in fact the anti-Christ.

@randomheadful7190 3 жыл бұрын

Umm Buddhists

@bbob70 Жыл бұрын

Buddhists are not that tolerant of Muslims in east asia today.

@Greg29 4 жыл бұрын

Nothing good comes of religion.

@Konoronn 2 жыл бұрын

Objectively untrue.

@m.wallace2705 2 жыл бұрын

It brought humans of different clans together under a common belief, especially back in prehistory. This is evident from the "Neanderthal Bear Cult" that existed at the height of the Ice Age.

@aleidarodriguez2001 3 жыл бұрын

im in class

@Mc_Qiqi 3 жыл бұрын

Same here

@shaneboone5911 4 жыл бұрын

Like you really know.

@categories5066 4 жыл бұрын

I pray that we in the future return to puritanism, such a glorious time to be a christian.

@azazel166 3 жыл бұрын

Yes, must be really glorious going after anyone who isn't like you for Jesus.

@randomheadful7190 3 жыл бұрын

I’m so thankful every day that I’m not a Christian!

@m.wallace2705 2 жыл бұрын

Given Islam is predicted to become the biggest religion over time, and it's already spreading to Europe and N. America, it seems it will be a glorious time to follow Muhammad and become a Muslim.

@bbob70 Жыл бұрын

Puritans were just a sect of revolutionary maniacs. They were the woke crowd of their day.

@originalrush5884 4 жыл бұрын

Jesus is the One who can save your life .. just saying

@randomheadful7190 3 жыл бұрын

🤦‍♀️

@jeremysnead9233 3 жыл бұрын

She had her self hung. They banished her and she came back. Here martyrdom went virtually unnoticed and gave christyans a black eye. Christiananity was still better than paganism especially with all those bridges made.

@thegoodshepherd8212 Жыл бұрын

Good, because the Puritans were right.

@TheUuhhh 4 жыл бұрын

Thank god. Can u imagine life on earth if this were an Islamic nation?

@FortoFight 4 жыл бұрын

"Life on Earth" because US = Earth apparently :|

@TheUuhhh 4 жыл бұрын

ULOIRAR 🥴🥴 Fortunately for all of western and even some eastern societies.....yes, US =earth You’re welcome

@fabiana7157 4 жыл бұрын

@@TheUuhhh Nope. Not even close.

@m.wallace2705 2 жыл бұрын

@@TheUuhhh China is the nation that most of Asian nations tend to center around, even today. Given China was the most powerful civilization in history for a span of 3,000 years, that makes sense. Though its choices can be questionable or even bad, its power is something to admire..