Could you elaborate more?

Tell us more please.

Look up the pepcon disaster. Fire and explosion at rocket fuel plant

Scruffy's gonna die how he lived.

Not really that dangerous until it's lit by ignitors.

NO SMOKING PLEASE.

By the cheapest bidder😂😂

People always assume if something is powerful, it must be dangerous. Well, I only need a droplet of a certain chemical to kill a town: Thats Dangerous. If something needs a specific routine to be lit in a controlled way: Thats not.

@@mrsmith2904 you are confusing socialist countries where there is no competition.

How do you steal a comment and get more likes

Looks delicious

I just hope they didn't forget to put up no smoking signs

Haha

Me me me! I prefer hydrogen and methane doe

edwin hennum DOE

Bold guess

Most likely 2021...

Most likely never... they’ll just keep collecting the funding from the government while a private company with no government funding takes over

@@dyllonmalone5617 private? Yup. No government funding? No :)

@@NoName-zg2te well said. Many private companies wouldn’t exist without NASA’s backing

There is a pin in it that needs to be manually removed in order for it to work. Additionally, it needs an electrical signal of at least 20 volts to fire it. It would be exceptionally difficult to unintentionally activate one. So I doubt it would be stressful, given the relative difficulty of accidentally triggering it.

Might want to double check your antistatic strap

@@PeterPaoliello Take every reasonable safety precaution.

@@PeterPaoliello you know there are shoes that ground you? might wanna double check before you talk useless shit :)

@@chriseffpunkt4333 you know that jokes are made to be funny and not scientifically accurate? Might wanna double check your level of humor before talking useless shit

I'm watching how humans looked like in 21st century... I'm watching this video in year 4130... Found "KZfaq" and this video in something called a "smartphone" i think which has been kept in a box for more than 2 thousands years.. This box I've got from my ancestors also contains "pictures of my ancestors (and also other humans), this phone with some applications installed like youtube and things... So I'm watching this video after 2115 years! And in my days we invented time travel... Simple as going 2times the speed of light through mediums and loophole... So i came from the year 2130 n the time travel last only for about 1mins and 59sec, just have the time to watch this video and write this comments and I'll be gone! And if i wanna come back it will cost me only $1Trillion.. I mean 999Billions994millions927thousands990hundreds99! This is not so much like time travel is really cheap! Spoiler : our cats and dogs can talk human language and has wings to. Fly too, most of them are robots. We still dont have flying cars as our president which is also a robot classified flying car as lame and ugly. We can enlarge the penis to any length and girth desire! Women can be stay virgin for as long as they want even if they have sex 5 times a day which is optional ( women needs to have sex at least 3times a day which is compulsory) just by taking some prescribed pills... If a woman cheats, we converts her into a robot which shall then be a slave to its owner. If men cheats their penis shortens by 7cm every time he cheats and shall wait 1 year to grow back his penis and shall pay a fine of $7Trillions... And only after that that he will be able to enlarge to his desire size... If he continues to cheat the court will punish him by removing his penis and giving him a vagina... If anyone wanna cheats, they need to buy a premium citizen membership and pays $15trillions every 3 to 6mnths depending on the membership... -The punishment for rape is " they cut the rapist penis and boil it in front of them and make them eat it live, and they shall get anal fuxked by a really big dick [length : 1meter to 2½Meter, Girth 20 to 40cm](depending on the gravity of the case) all day, every single day till their sentence is over. That's probably why the cases are really rare! I mean that's why you should do LSD and shrooms and blue magic n heroine and top it up with some synthetic weed!

me

Not me

Rockets are a lot bigger than you think!

They're fucking uge! As Trump would say lol

12 foot diameter if I remember correctly

@@vampov thanks for the reply

I stood by the nozzle. It was huge.

Lmfao

@Walter B it's sooooo yummy in my tummy

*Flame exists at mach 3*

Google "ammonium perchlorate composite propellant"

@@josephastier7421 yeah thanks mate

Should be about 10 to 15k C°

@@janav5624 damn!! TY!

@@bovax6259 wait you replied after a year of your comment Man ! I wasn't hoping this thanks ☺️

@janav5624 Your comment came up on my KZfaq notifications that you'd posted a reply. I'd forgotten about my posting, but KZfaq hadn't until your reply. In all my KZfaq watching of nasa stuff or the Scott Manly channel who does space and rocket stuff, no one talks about how hot rocket gas is, and I've always wanted to know. Finally, Ive got a rough approximation from you and it deserved a TY! 👍🤘 I NERD out over weird shit like that. 😁

Stand there and watch.

Helicopter veiw(main mix)

What music? I just heard boring, rhythmic noise. But I guess you're actually being ironic (at least I hope so).

I believe it's because it's aluminum

It is not melted down at all. It is a thick dough like material when all of the ingredients are mixed that then cures after a curative is added and mixed in. Like adding hardener to the resin of an epoxy. It then forms a hard rubber like material after it is cured.

velcro

Tightly.

Flex tape

Indeed. I had seen this video before. I remembered the imagery from way back. It just happened to pop up in my suggestions today lol.

Aluminum powder fuel, perchlorate oxidiser, and epoxy rubber binder. The aluminum powder gives the silvery color

What ratio?

@@random3250 If you just want to make an APCP rocket motor you can just look up for "Cherry Limeade APCP" formulation. It was made by the MIT rocket team

@@random3250 "The propellant mixture in each SRB motor consists of an ammonium perchlorate (oxidizer, 69.6 percent by weight), aluminium (fuel, 16 percent), iron oxide (a catalyst, 0.4 percent), a polymer (a binder that holds the mixture together, 12.04 percent), and an epoxy curing agent (1.96 percent)."

Thank you

Ammonium Perchlorate, Aluminum powder, and Polybutadiene Acrylonitrile epoxy binder, plus a few other proprietary additives.

@@TheExplosiveGuy thanks

Cinnamon, flour, eggs, sugar and a smattering of chutney.

Also the upcoming starship from space-x is going to have a total trust of 65mega-newtons

@@marinkovachev4694 no its not

@@dgafbrapman688 you are right i just cheked the true amount of trust the Super Heavy booster will have and that is 72 Mega newtons. Here's a link to a wikipedia page for proof en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starship

@@marinkovachev4694 im saying, its easy to say to say something, alot harder to deliver, especially for spacex. Its not that i thought u were wrong, i just doubt spacex's capability. A rocket company not even 20 years old is going to make the most powerful rocket stage ever developed? Fat chance.

@@dgafbrapman688 correct me if I am wrong but isn’t this less than 20 year old rocket company the same one that created the first ever reusable rocket and changed the rocket industry for ever. As space-x has shown us already it is capable of doing things never done before using methods no one has ever thought of.

No..

Yes. In the sense that Archimedes said "Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world." The logistics however wouldn't

Your problem is that the exhaust isn't anywhere near escape velocity, meaning any torque on the planet is countered somewhere down the line as the exhaust slows down/falls back down. So unfortunately, it can't. Neither could you push the earth this way. For that you need a rocket with an exhaust velocity exceeding 11km/s (vs this booster's ~3km/s)

@Walter B It's not actually about thrust or power, but about how fast your exhaust gases are relative to the back of your rocket. The amount of momentum applied to earth is actually your total momentum MINUS the momentum lost due to gravity (MfVf = Mi(Ve-11.2km/s) ) You can have the most powerful rocket in the world but it won't matter if the exhaust falls back to earth. Conversely, even a tiny electrical thruster can slowly change earth's orbit if its exhaust is fast enough.

Really I'm not a rocket scientist bit what if they were lined up around the planet and set off at the right time.

jea and also tose wonderful rs-25 engines

That makes no sense

Same lol

Eh, you mean a machine, capable of sending humans back to the Moon? The exact thing that SLS and Orion proved on Artemis 1? They only thing we're waiting on is that colossal boondoggle that is Starship...

They are paying spacex in form of development contracts. They are planing a moon base. They are operating the space station....... aso 😉

SpaceX wouldn't exist without taxpayer money. So they're the same thing with less accountability and oversight.

@@peterLoO100 the question is more about things like: Spacex: 2003/2005/2011(thoughts/concept/official plan) --> 2018(first flight) Cost: wikipedia says "more than $500milion" let we even assume, that was $1Bilion for development, manufacturing and flight. NASA: ULA SLS 2011(official plan) --> today(still in development, flights moved in time like premiere of cyberpunk 2077) Cost: $18B (2011-2020) and it will be more

Ehh, we have already explored the entire solar system, using nothing but "big firecrackers"... Sent out interstellar probes, using nothing but "big firecrackers"... And landed humans on the Moon, using nothing but "big firecrackers"... What are you babbling about?

"Thedolt" is an apt moniker...

@@codymoe4986 can you say light years? I thought not… Love you guys.

No.

hi 7 Y A... ' nope... earth is the strong turnning rotatry than rocket

With starship, even more Worst case scenario would be sth like $10B (some random source says, that elon said, it will be sth between 2 and 10 billion) for development and then he hopes that it will be sth like 2mln per launch (LEO i guess), so let we say, that it will go up to 20mln up to 2020 cost of sls development was sth like 18bilions So u have 8bilion difference which goes into launches xD 8bln/20mln= sth like 400 flights 😀

Source: Trust me dude.

Bill I don't think you have to worry about being called up!

@@SMHman666 nobody asked you. Shut up and read the comment.

How?

@@crippleddiego9226 Why build an expensive expendable one-time use booster when we now have cheap reusable rockets for a fraction of the price with a fraction of manufacturing time? And thats just with Falcon 9/Heavy. Once their Starship design becomes operational they can carry 100 metric tonnes to orbit while being fully reusable (1st & 2nd stage). Space X plans to manufacture 1 Starship every 2 weeks. Shit will be cray cray :D

@@omfgstfuandgtfo simple. They supply a lot of thrust. Also, they don’t have to be fully expendable. Even though the space shuttle program did a bad job with it, I think that SRBs could at the least be partially reusable. They could be picked up by a helicopter like RocketLab plans to recover their Electron rockets. Reusability cuts costs. If SRBs could do that I don’t think they would be hellishly expensive like they are right now.

@@omfgstfuandgtfo Bruh, boosters are used several times, where did you get that idea from?

Something, something about this comment, not aging well?

Who cares

Like a yeti

It burns aluminum with ammonium perchlorate (yikes!) with epoxy rubber binder and iron catalyst. The rubber will likely vaporize, and you get some nasty stuff from the perchlorate.

@El Fo That is for liquid oxygen - hydrogen rockets, this is a solid rocket.

@El Fo technically correct for the oxygen. In this case its ammonium perchlorate though the fuel is aluminum.

Specially child molesters...

@@dirtyharry1844 nah, too quick.

@@dirtyharry1844 adrenochrome child traffickers

That would vaporize prisoners once the booster is ignited or before those they would choke to death from the smell of those powders

lol this guy sciences

No it doesn't lol. None of the byproducts of these boosters cause ozone depletion.

@@TheExplosiveGuy actually yes but it depends on which guel you use, the fuel containkng clorine does, since ozone is 3ox combined and therefore unstable, it eould when the solid fuel burns, it will create an exaust containing, co2, h2o and clorine

@@TheExplosiveGuy but indeed *these* rocket boosters are safe, but still dirty compared to the liquid, but hey, they provide alot of thrust

Think very carefully about what you just typed.

Vous avez entièrement raison 👌

😆 🤣 😂

If you want to wait until everything is fine down here, space exploration will never happen. We're already benefiting from space exploration now and will continue to benefit exponentially. In the not too distant future, we will be protecting the earth from asteroid impacts. That's a huge goal and it will not wait for everything to be cool down here. No one is going to stop it. Arguments about war and famine and poverty and anything else political carry no weight as far as space exploration is concerned. Given that you object to the money spent on exploration, can I assume that you know that the amount spent on it pales in comparison to so-called defense spending and that you're okay with that? Why don't you target the money spent on aggression down here? Leave those that want a bright future alone. I believe that anyone making the "don't spend on space while people suffer" argument are myopic in the mind's eye.

@@AnotherGlenn You’re certainly entitled to your opinion “benefit exponentially” perhaps further expenditures should be further justified and then voted on.

@@craigewing3054 We are all entitled to our opinions. You didn't answer the question about so-called defense spending. Just keep ignoring the fact that you're okay with a gigantic military expenditure and a tiny space exploration expenditure. Your position is untenable. I hope other people can see this.