I sold mine and bought the Sony 10-18. That lens is AMAZING!!!
@MommaFromScratch6 жыл бұрын
thank you for the comparison! I going to buy the kit lens still but I did the sony 35mm, super excited to start using it!
@NavdeepTuli4 жыл бұрын
@@gsvineeth I am assuming it is because of the compactness and OSS. Autofocus is also better on sony one.
@Axiotimo6 жыл бұрын
I bought the 16mm lens with my a6500 and sold it soon after as the corners were so soft. I thought it was my copy of the lens but after watching your review I feel vindicated. Love your reviews and looking forward to the next one.
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@BradleyKang236 жыл бұрын
Thanks for doing this video, very informative. This lens was always on my “possible lens to purchase” list, but after seeing this I won’t bother. Especially because I have the kit lens. Sony needs to make a better wide angle (that is affordable :p)
@felixf46136 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favourite and most used lenses. Especially at night! Makes the A6000 super light and small and you get great shots at lowlight.
@zomgonzo6 жыл бұрын
Love your videos, but please consider when you compare sharpness, lenses can be focused in different places. This is what this looks like to me. So I think the 16mm is overall better and the way to check it definitely would be to shoot a flat control image (poster, etc.).
@markwiemels2 жыл бұрын
+1 on this, these corner sharpness comparisons are not representative of anything.
@patrickwhitehead6 жыл бұрын
The 16mm should be corrected in camera if you have lens corrections turned on. The kit lens is so badly distorted at 16mm that Sony turn on corrections automatically for it, in fact I don't think you can turn them off with it attached. My 16mm is pretty much unusable below f8 but just about okay there and at f11. Amazingly with the wide angle (12mm) and fish eye (10mm) adaptors, it improves and is quite usable. To be honest I only really use it with the fish eye now as I have the 10-18mm which is far superior.
@Htbaa6 жыл бұрын
I have both lenses and even though the SEL16 has its issues I enjoy using it, especially with the adapters. Bought the lens and adapters all used. If I would've paid full price I probably wouldn't be too happy with it. I've recently found out that in Capture One 11 with Diffraction Correction photos shot with this lens look better than in Lightroom (that might be able to do the same, but I couldn't find it). At one point I might get the SEL20 as well and the adapters are compatible with that as well.
@thawsitt6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review! Best channel for sony a6000/a6300/a6500 on KZfaq.
@littledragonmeiling6 жыл бұрын
The pancake lens has a nice central focus range, but the blurring on the edges and the blur transitions is not even/smooth. You always continue to make great lens videos and all the ones I have now are thanks to your comparisons. Keep up the great work!!
@HeartlessVin6 жыл бұрын
Cant wait for your review of the Sigma 16mm f1.4
@fatihozdemir449811 ай бұрын
I just found the 16mm/2.8 at the flea market for $3 and bought it immediately.
@Aerostarkis3 ай бұрын
Whaaaat! Score!!
@robxfong005 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for such a thorough and honest review. You rock, bud!
@andreika66813 жыл бұрын
mid 2021, these 16mm go for $50 used and at that price they are just fine for street photo. leave it at f5.6 (the sharpest f for apsc), and i'll be a great combo on $80 nex5n, it'll be as compact as x70 but at 1/4th of the price, and corner softness is fine for street, personnaly i always add i little of bit darneking vignette to my street stuff...
@jeffrey07945 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! So, in conclusion if I already have the kit lens (16-50mm) is not a really good idea to buy the Sony 16mm because there is not much difference? (Quality, sharpness, etc)
@laurencegr99784 жыл бұрын
It depends on how you use it. This lens is fast. But when it comes to sharpness, I don't care. Can you list 20 people using a 24-inch display on a daily basis and zooms in all photos at 100% all the time? None! We're viewing most of the content on small displays. I own the Sigma 16mm f1.4 and its weight alone is discouraging. I find the kit lens to be more useful than the 16mm Sigma. I want to acquire this lens since it is extremely light, thin, and sharp (check thousands of sample photos on Flickr!). Better portability = more opportunity to take photos.
@Ilya_syomin6 жыл бұрын
Hello from Russia! Please try Sigma 16 mm on the Eye-AF. Will this lens use all hybrid AF points? Or only in the central "square" as 30 mm DС DN? How Sigma 16 mm AF work in video mode with face tracking? Thank you! Very interesting channel.
@csabagrunfelder6 жыл бұрын
Hey илья, my 30mm DC DN use all hybrid AF points... Not sure, but maybe you should update the lens firmware? Regards
@NandR6 жыл бұрын
What camera do you have?
@csabagrunfelder6 жыл бұрын
+Rabon Ragan Sony a6000
@Ilya_syomin6 жыл бұрын
I'm using Sigma 30 mm with 6500. I'll check the firmware version later. The hybrid AF uses the frame height completely. And the width is the same as the height. But not completely frame. Thus, a square is formed in the middle of the frame. It's like in the video "Sigma 30mm 1.4 DC DN + Sony a6500 autofocus test on f / 1.4" I'm sorry, I do not know how to insert a link. You can find it by searching. Sorry for possible errors. I'm using Google Translator.
@siuyongyong6 жыл бұрын
the 16mm F2.8 w/ the Sony VCL-ECU1/2 Wide Angle Converter can provide better image quality at the edges!
@Mishka1Husky6 жыл бұрын
Great evaluation! Saved me a lot of time, money and avoided future frustation :)
@slr70756 жыл бұрын
Sony 55-210 please!
@robstravelsadventures6 жыл бұрын
Great video and nice comparision to the lens kit. It seems Sony never updates old lenses (like Canon does with II and III). They just keep selling the lenses even if they are not that good. Would love to see a review of the Sony 85mm 1.8 in the future to see if it is worth it compared to the 18-105. I know primes are supposed to be better and sharper, but like this video proves, with Sony is not always the case. Keep up the good work.
@robertwagendorfer69766 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this comparison. But for me, there is no need for the Sony 16mm or the Sony 35mm, having the SELP1650.
@jpvk-jack53556 жыл бұрын
Robert Wagendorfer low light
@robertwagendorfer69766 жыл бұрын
I wrote: "But FOR ME ....".
@robertwagendorfer69766 жыл бұрын
I wrote: "But FOR ME ....".
@25myma3 жыл бұрын
What this review misses about the 16mm quality is that it's that soft only focused far or close to infinity; selfies, portraits andd close stuff is a lot better, this (and the 20mm) are basically vlogging lenses and they have compromised the quality of far focusing. Peoblem is this and most reviews test these lenses like they were landscape lenses, which is not correct, both in usage and expectations.
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I’ll continue with the Kit 👍
@sappysnuggles6 жыл бұрын
request for a Rokinon 12mm vs Sigma 16mm battle!
@giuseppeminervini3086 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your comparison. I was thinking that this lens is not to useful but after your video I'm still more convinced on that. Fine thanks.
@jpvk-jack53556 жыл бұрын
Finally a decent review of this lens!
@ColinBloodworth6 жыл бұрын
Great review as always. I picked this up for the native AF shooting some video, but I'm looking forward to the Sigma 1.4 soon.
@florianpyllioen9116 жыл бұрын
I got the Sony 16mm f2.8 with the fisheye converter and the 18-55 for 180usd. Do you think it is a good deal ? Would you recommend other lens for that price ? Thanks for all your videos
@kjgksjbchegjvc50286 жыл бұрын
Exc video. Could you compare sony 20f2.8 vs 16-50 kit lens and samyang 12mm vs canon 10-16mm, please.
@redjmototrips6 жыл бұрын
can't wait for your sigma 16 dc dn review, thx..espacialy if you could compare FOV, sharpness and low light with the rokinon 12. I'm looking for a great landscaper, and astro wide lense. ;)
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
It came today!
@Patrickhyng6 жыл бұрын
Love your reviews! Can you also review the 20mm pancake?
@jeremyjdl713 Жыл бұрын
Recently saw this same lens only difference I could tell was the one I saw had Hasselblad branding. Couldn’t find any reviews of the Hasselblad one.
@muhammadgirindra70296 жыл бұрын
Should go with this or the 20mm ??
@gustavkirsch6 жыл бұрын
Wide angle adapter do not fix the problem of the sharpness in the eges 😉. I have the 16mm f1.4 and I am wating for your opinion. You must test it by night. I make some shots with 8 seconds on f2.8 and there are amazing sharp...
@aabakri6 жыл бұрын
Hey love the shots! were they all shot using Auto mode?
@hackapell236 жыл бұрын
Please do the 20mm/F2.8, I heard it's much better then 16mm
@ChrisOlfers6 жыл бұрын
Great review! I reviewed this lens on my channel and even did a 4K video test on the a6500. I can’t wait for the Sigma!!
@vivienli19356 жыл бұрын
i think you should use manual forcus, seems when comparing the forcus point are not same... btw, I also buy sigma 16f1.4, big expectation for that...
@jimlingmusicchannel2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the comparison, for me the contrast is more significant than the sharpness, I like my kit lens more for this matter.:)
@Stormannormanphotos6 жыл бұрын
Good review, I was looking at this lens.
@anupammahato15 жыл бұрын
which one is good for recording video , which one is oss, thank you
@AkshayTravelFilms22 жыл бұрын
Love it... This is what exactly i was looking for👌❤️
@robertbartok15512 жыл бұрын
I have the 16mm f2.8 pancake Corners at 2.8 soft 4.0 fair 5.6 very good 8.0 excellent
@JoJo-eg6qv3 жыл бұрын
This lens only supports contrast autofocus. There is no firmware update to fix this. The old 18-55 kittens has V2.0 update and supports now phase detection autofocus. Hope this pancake lens gets an update to.
@itsjamesherz6 жыл бұрын
I see you repping Austin out there at the Oasis! Great video
@antonk54146 жыл бұрын
The only reason I considered buying this lens is to have the Fish eye and Ultra wide adaptors. Is there an alternative option of Fish Eye/UW with another wide lens with great quality (like sigma)? Thank you!
@WhoIsDoxify6 жыл бұрын
Nice video, I did a Sony a6300 AutoFocus Review and I think you'll be surprised at the results, they are insane!
@daviidhannu6 жыл бұрын
Please try out the Sony 85mm 1.8 Emount!
@BitWolf6 жыл бұрын
OK... had to watch it in HD after all because of sample pictures and my thoughts are like this: 16mm is not as soft as everybody describe but it's not good either. I had real thinking about what to choose to my small room where I'm recording and 16mm was one of the options. But... because of OSS which is deal breaker for me because I have only manual lenses and I probably would go with 16-50 cuz after all I was using F2.8 few months ago but now I have a softbox and LED light so I have that much light that I can record in my room at F5.6 and ISO 160. And... If you would want to sell your kit lens Mafia then I'm winking my eye to you ;)
@manurajm7336 жыл бұрын
I ordered the 7 artisans 25mm lens for my A5100 after seeing your video.. waiting for that to get it delivered☺
@soulkens6 жыл бұрын
Manuraj M had that one for about two weeks and can’t put it down you won’t be disappointed
@manurajm7336 жыл бұрын
soulkens cool.. that's good to know..🙂
@HuynhPhuc276 жыл бұрын
Hey guy, very interesting and appreciate all your review videos. Pls take a review for Sony 18-200mm and compare with Sony G 18-105mm, i think it will be useful for many persons who need a multi functional lens :)
@GilbertTV6 жыл бұрын
thanks for sharing your findings ...I think I'll give this lens a miss
@erwinvdakker Жыл бұрын
7:04 The 16mm doesn't capture the 3 cars in the middle, I'm going for the kit lens!
@SoyaDanial4 жыл бұрын
I'm bout to buy this lens, would you recommend me to buy this for bokeh
@Rani-gj8yc4 жыл бұрын
Can this lens be used for astrophotography?
@ZeroBBS2 жыл бұрын
Nice comparison!
@Nudelwanne6 жыл бұрын
Hey. I'm looking for a pancake wide angle lens. I'm not gonna buy the 16mm after I watched this video but will stay with the kit lens. But what about the 20mm ? Could you compare the 20mm pancake with the kit lens at 20mm. Is it wort buying it or is it as bad as the 16mm?
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
Watch my most recent lens comparison - the 20mm and the kit lens perform virtually the same.
@kenschaub411910 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@sudipchand23713 жыл бұрын
Does it works for fullframe
@tase254 жыл бұрын
Do you post edit your photos before adding them to your videos?
@Rushfan746 жыл бұрын
Love my home! Georgetown, Tx!!
@gugob222 жыл бұрын
thank bro.
@william1232674876 жыл бұрын
thank you for the comparison!
@GFOCUS3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for a good review
@crispymcfrankie2 жыл бұрын
is this aspen?
@en1m40312 жыл бұрын
I own a 16mm for a few months and honestly it's the crappiest lens i've used for a while, except it's fast AF and lightweight, the pictures are not near usable, i don't recommend buying it at all except if you use it for holidays
@juansalazar556 жыл бұрын
Your ISO was different for both the lens. So you get different results on the brightness and how the final shot looks.
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
No, it was the same for the shots that I did at the same settings. Wide open, it is 2.8 vs 3.5 with a different ISO on each.
@HardiKhu6 жыл бұрын
Hi, please please review sigma 16mm f1.4
@mattduncan55005 ай бұрын
i dont know if my kit lens is a one off. but it was horrrrrrible . anything shot with it is soft and foggy. when i got a 35 prime. i couldnt believe the difference
@sermelipharo6 жыл бұрын
What about Sony 20 mm pancake?
@SwagnOutDaFrame6 жыл бұрын
did you ditch your a6300 ? if so why
@geopapa806 жыл бұрын
Do the Sony 20mm 2.8..
@BitWolf6 жыл бұрын
Oh... almost forgot... You totally have to check Sigma 16mm F1.4. It was released like week ago and it's great! Heavily improved MF in comparison to 30mm F1.4.
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
Lol did you watch the video....?
@BitWolf6 жыл бұрын
TechnologyMafia What? You were talking somewhere about Sigma 16mm? Didn't hear that sorry :D OK now I see... 14:25 xD
@Ishikawa06 жыл бұрын
BitWolf he also talks about it at 0:20 lol
@Oberroxxor6 жыл бұрын
And also at the end of the video.
@windsofmarchjourneyperrytr28236 жыл бұрын
Thomas Ishikawa ah, its an ADD society, isnt it? :)
@FallenChaituGaming3 жыл бұрын
I have a Sony a5100l . Would you suggest this in 2021? Cuz its price is really liw
@FallenChaituGaming3 жыл бұрын
Low*
@frankgu8316 жыл бұрын
very good review
@Nahhmah6 жыл бұрын
What is the best pancake lens for my a6300? I want a lightweight prime lens for pics and videos. Thanks!
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
The kit lens. Lol. The other pancake lenses are not great. The Sony 20mm is the best pancake that Sony makes, but youll be way happier spending similar money on the Sigma 30mm F1.4.
@GrayScaleProject Жыл бұрын
can use with A6400?
@Tuhueleamierda1991 Жыл бұрын
It works with any E mount camera
@kalef12346 жыл бұрын
Worst thing I noticed about it was the bokeh wasn't smooth at all
@jgaskell806 жыл бұрын
Mushy edges outside of center. I hate mine. 20mm sony was meant to replace this.
@robstravelsadventures6 жыл бұрын
Would be interesting to see the 16mm compared to the 20mm Sony in the future.
@Lord3K6 жыл бұрын
I was sold sel16f28 and sel1650pz (low quality pics) and bought sel1670z... top lens
@losoloaded50286 жыл бұрын
Hey how are you I have a couple questions about the a6000 just got into the hobby. Is there any email or way I can contact you?
@TiagodeJesusManifesto4 жыл бұрын
review For video?
@PaganiTypeR6 жыл бұрын
Sigma did what? 16mm F1.4??? that's crazy... My god, can't wait for the review.
@PaganiTypeR6 жыл бұрын
I wonder what's better samyang 12mm f2 or the new sigma?? how much wider does samyang goes in practical terms and how much darker it is?? hmm.. For astro photography sigma will be better for sure.
@psyysp1716 жыл бұрын
I don't know the new sigma, but when shooting landscape the difference between 18mm and 24mm (because of the crop sensor) is quite noticeable. The Samyang is also extremly sharp and very easy to use (just set the focus to infinity and go). The best lens I own so far. I am however exited for the sigma as well, especially because of astro photography. But the Samyang is hard to beat.
@anindyabarman62356 жыл бұрын
Can i use it for capturing potraits with great bokeh ?
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
No, this lens isnt ideal for portraits. F2.8 isnt great for bokeh, either. The Sony SEL50 is the best portrait lens for the money: amzn.to/2LpLOQM
@anindyabarman62356 жыл бұрын
And what about neewer 35mm
@anindyabarman62356 жыл бұрын
I have sony alpha3500 it will fit ?
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
No, that is not a mirrorless E Mount camera.
@anindyabarman62356 жыл бұрын
That is mirrorless e mount ..
@elliemetzen19722 жыл бұрын
What shooting mode you use for your wife holding a guitar?
@jonathanselby11626 жыл бұрын
Why did you compare them at different ISOs for the wide open test? Makes no sense. Also don't understand why you didn't just use ISO 100 for every single shot since you're on a tripod. Shutter speed didn't matter for practically any of your shots.
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
I just shot them wide open in Aperture priority, which is how most casual users would use the lenses. Shutter speeds matter if I am trying to take a shot at a faster aperture while maintaining a low ISO....
@dejayrezme86175 жыл бұрын
Just a nitpick. Or maybe I'm wrong. But E 2.8/16mm makes no sense from what I understand. The diameter of the aperture is aperture = focal length / f-number (from f-number = focual length / aperture). So 16/2.8 actually means something in camera terms, but the inverse does not. And the aperture actually means something, the size of your bokeh balls should be the size of the aperture when filming a ruler against a point light in the distance. End of random rant haha. Thanks for the video!
@floridaofiowaaerialsandpho14406 жыл бұрын
Nice reminder about this lens, and it's mediocre performance. Can't wait for your Sigma 16 review!
@The_Millionaires_Path6 жыл бұрын
How is it that the kit lens is sharper in this video compared to the 16mm? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hpxgg7t6y7i4p30.html
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
The results in that video are the same. 16mm has a sharper center, but softer corners.
@pidiepoo6 жыл бұрын
so worth it or not?
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
No. Sigma 19mm is a better lens. If you want wide, go with the Rokinon 12mm.
@pidiepoo6 жыл бұрын
TechnologyMafia aye capt. thanks for respond 🤘🏿🤘🏿🤘🏿☕️
@JaredCobb856 жыл бұрын
It is a shame there isnt a good Meike or Kamlan 16mm. I would love a good MF cheap lens at this focal distance.
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
The Rokinon 12mm is good.
@andivax6 жыл бұрын
Jared Cobb samyang
@andreshincapie99946 жыл бұрын
There is also a meike 12mm 2.8.
@MrPourekkis5 жыл бұрын
what happens if you put this in a full frame sony lets say a7 iii
@dbs_jd5 жыл бұрын
Why would you put a cheap, APS-C lens on such great body?
@dbs_jd5 жыл бұрын
Answering your question, you'd get a 11 Mpx photo, but you may use it for video (super 35mm). But in my opinion, I'd get a better lens. You should consider the 14mm f/2.8, or the 28mm FE (this is a great lens).
@satrya115 жыл бұрын
16 mm f2.8 have OSS?
@wudipest4 жыл бұрын
Nope
@OutlawFarmersRC6 жыл бұрын
The OG kit lens 18-55mm is way better that the new power zoom.
@ArthurR6 жыл бұрын
I've done that comparison and the new power zoom is significantly better (sharper and less distorted).
@OutlawFarmersRC6 жыл бұрын
TechnologyMafia not for my own comparisons. Maybe you got a bad one. The are just kit lenses. Sharpness wise on my A6500 anyway.
@Asmoc236 жыл бұрын
Great review!
@ro306 жыл бұрын
Sony 20mm f2.8?
@soulkens6 жыл бұрын
This lens is just worthless...
@MuhaSore6 жыл бұрын
This 16mm is terrible! I'm glad I ended up buying the 12mm samyang instead.
@lopatovich6 жыл бұрын
does Samyang that you mentioned have autofocus? At the same time I am 95% sure that it's a full manual lens with built in follow focus gears.
@adokapo5 жыл бұрын
@@lopatovich Drzi se ti svoje lopate sine ;)
@SkaterChick19723 ай бұрын
@MuhaSore I just barely bought it:/ why do you say that?
@simplemr60176 жыл бұрын
nice
@JeremyGalloway6 жыл бұрын
Don’t get this lens, just use your iPhone! I wonder why Sony even bothers selling a lens like this...
@andivax6 жыл бұрын
Jeremy Galloway cheap sony lenses are crap. Even my 35 f1.8 is not hood in comparison with sigma 18-35 1.8
@JeremyGalloway6 жыл бұрын
andivax, yeah, even some expensive ones are crap (10-18 and zeiss 16-70...)! The quality is a wild card with sony lenses... I have the sony/zeiss 24mm 1.8 and love it but I’m pretty scared to use any other lens lol
@andivax6 жыл бұрын
I have tried 10-18 and it was good.
@andivax6 жыл бұрын
Zeiss is very expensive and quality is average.
@BitWolf6 жыл бұрын
Probably I'm too early here, that's why have to watch it in 360p... but doesn't matter.