Yeah but "entry level" only relates to uts subsequent level - its a 60mp camera , find me one that is in a comparable level at a near price

don't worry, some sucker is gonna buy it and then sell it after a month for $500 off after realising that photography isn't for them

@@elliotw.888the shops will stil resell at 2999$ :,(

@@elliotw.888 probably after dropping it to the floor too 😂

I realized that when when tacos went from 4$ to 10$

Yes! I love the challenge ideas! 😃

Single card slot... 😢

⁠@@stuartwalker121Leica Q3 also has one

@@stuartwalker121 The Leica Q2 also.

I just got one, and It's basically the same as a7r IV with a small body and a cheaper price tag... better for travel due to it's size tho.

What did you end up doing? I’m in the same boat I go at the end of March

@@AlecJulianGarza I actually ended up going with Fujifilm and got the Xpro3 :)

Yes

yes

The design is a consistent continuation from Sony's APS-C a6x00 line, which in turn continued the a5x00 line. Fuji looks old-fashioned in comparison, as if made by old men for old men 😉

​@@tubularificationed its really not the a6000 , its from the nex line . Your comment on the fuji design undermines the fact that taste differs and unlike your comment which is plainly wrong - is just ignorant.

@@tubularificationed The A7c looks like many classic range finder signed bodies. The contax g2, for example. No comment on your doofy bias.

The new A7C remind me actually much of today's Leicas. Both speak the same design language. Very handsome. Whereas most Fuji, or the new "retro" Nikons, or Pentax are just cameras for old men, who are nostalgically looking back to the era of their younger days, when their photographic juices were still flowing 😉 Nothing wrong with such a marketing strategy, there's lots of money to pull from. Old men are valuable customers, because often they have more money saved, than they have remaining active / agile years left to spend that. That's why old men often buy the most expensive stuff. No surprise that Fuji and Nikon attempt to harvest that market segment. I like though that Leica doesn't fall for this cheesy retro opportunism. Neither does Sony.

@@tubularificationed That's all just nonsense conjecture. Totally unsupported by reality in any way. Honestly, I'd be surprised if you know a single photographer. Your info is just so spectacularly far off base it can't come from any sort of first hand experience. So, yeah. I'm out.

… shooting LOG gamma!

Save the money and get a lens or sell and get the Leica q2 used . Watch the Tony and Chelsea review - there’s no Sony lens that is compact and can make use of those 60megapixels.

Older teen maybe...

208g difference is not nothing. I can tell you it is massive. I have an old a7c 509g and added a smallrig cage of 210g, then now i feel the a7c too heavy despite a top notch handle grip. You have a grip identical to a full body camera. But i loose the compactness and the small weight. Finally i removed it as i have a gimbal and don’t want to add the weight on the gimbal. It is already too heavy. I am fine with the a7c grip, small evf, small media file, smaller sensor with less noise at high iso, smaller 1080p60 and 120 no crop, 4k24 no crop. With upscaling 1080p is rendered like 4k. It is very good 1080. The result would not be far better with the latest cameras.

cannons are red Nikon's are green Sony's are crap

“Improved color science” has nothing whatsoever to do with the display. It’s about how the scene colors are interpreted, recorded, and rendered to the image file. Accuracy is the foundation of it, but the next stage goes beyond that. Any color scientist will tell you that if you show a person the same photo with “accurate” colors versus “pleasing” colors, people pick what’s more pleasing almost every time. It’s like how choosing color film always has been: You choose the film that most closely matches how you *prefer* the colors to be rendered. Maybe a scientist needs color that is absolutely colorimetrically correct but aesthetically very dry, but the rest of us want colors that render landscapes, people, and sunsets in a way that makes us go “wow…yes”. Another way people think of better “color science” is that it takes you a lot less time to edit it to get the colors you want, because the colors look so much better right out of the camera. With bad color, you waste more time fighting with the image on your computer to make the colors look the way you want.

Sony's color science is, and has always been horrible. They refuse to improve it or correct it.

Also, no way am I going as high as 60MP for a hybrid camera. I won't more than about 40.

R8 has no ibis and its a "smaller" 24mp sensor , not really comparable

Still overeating?

but only for slow photography (static stills), such as landscape. Not good for people photography or anything else which requires at least some amount of agility or spontaneity.

🤫🤫 I haven't got one yet. 😉 Maybe for Christmas. 🙏

​@@tubularificationedI have a photo published in a calendar that was shot with my (still working) Canon EOS T1i. It's not the camera. lol

Your Canon T1i calendar photo was only slow photography (static stills), such as landscape. It wasn't for people or anything else which requires at least some amount of agility or spontaneity 😉

​@@sweettooth5737People who say it's not the camera are the same people who think you can set a nurburgring record in a Fiat Panda.

The design is a consistent continuation from Sony's APS-C a6x00 line, which in turn continued the a5x00 line. Fuji looks old-fashioned in comparison, as if made by old men for old men 😉

Lenses unfortunately rely on optical design that doesnt really like to be miniaturized. Anything wide will be large and anything long will also be large. 35 to around 60 can and might have some room for space improvements - but not much.

Lol Lok

too funny 😂

He's compact, and high resolution.

​@@riparianlife97701 and stabilized.

@@8020Alive troll, lol good one

This video was excellent 💯

The secret trick is, to first swivel the screen out, and then tilt it to your liking 🙂 Especially for tripod usage, it makes NO difference if it is with or without prior swiveling. Just requires an additional 0.5 seconds.

@@tubularificationedoh no! you've just asked a "stuck in my ways" dude to change his ways!

@@tubularificationed that is the difference between nailing the shot and having nothing when street shooting with the A1 & 50GM. That half second to setup and take down delays the ability to get in the action at the precise moment and you will continue to lose chances by having a slower screen mechanism

The a7CR comes with an additional grip you can screw onto the bottom of the camera. It is not a grip that adds additional battery life or allows for camera control, but it does increase the grip size for those who are ultra sensitive to this sort of thing.

An enthusiast may certainly still want a camera that allows for the amazing crops you can only get with this kind of camera, for example, and not need a camera one might be more inclined to get for wedding or event photography like the a7RV. Yes, the a7CR is expensive. But if you can afford it and if you can use its myriad features and advancements, why not? It is a superb, all-around camera.

You can always add to a small body, but you can't take away from a large one.

These Sony alpha are easy to rig up and make larger. So that is NOT a valid request

@@8020Aliveagreed, but I do wish there were new battery grips that utilized the multifunction dial and had consistent button layout

Mount too small

Kai's presentations are always a delight to watch