😂😂😂

Many of us can relate to that. 😂😂

😂😂😂

It's down the street from the Rhine County Watermelon Festival. Instead of the watermelon crawl, they do the pumpkin smash.

😂

Therefore , they should be considered tourists , and if cannot for some reason abide by the laws of the country they are visiting ( in this case USA ) , should be expelled to their country of origin . They are not our citizens , so let their government deal with them * Pass it on * re- post

Yes it is.😂

Yah, they cherrypick their half truths... Best is when they whine and complain roadside about what ought to be... as if the trooper isn't at risk of getting smoked by some dummy drifting over the line.

Yes

Yup

I've seen some people think the Constitution (state or federal) is law, but the regular old laws passed by the legislature aren't.

Great comment Douglas.

Exactly Douglas!

They also pull over for police but say police have no authority 🤔

The sad part is a person or a book has convinced this impressionable young man that our laws and courts are fictitious. Very sad.

Yup 😂😂😂

I just spit coffee on my dress and puppers. It’s too funny 😂

Awww 🥰😂

BAM!! lol

😂

😂😂😂😂

👍

Well I do see an encouraging trend in having less patience with it. 👍

Oh no I have to see that 🤦‍♂️😂

@@LawTalkWithMike kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rpZ-g7NenKiomZs.html

First of 2. You can find the second one on his channel.

👍

Yup 🤦‍♂️

Must be some obscure legal term. Probably Latin

😂😂😂

Took in????

Yes he is all in😂

Did they break his window again?

He's the reason I bought stock in Safe-T-Glass. 😂😂😂😂

🎵Safelite repair, Safelite replace🎵

😂

A fruitless search, never happened… never will. Their idea of scoring a W is pleading out and not paying the fine. Isn’t there some guy on YT who offered $5000 for any sovereign idiot who can show proof they won a case based on their faux legal argument (and not because the officer was pulling a double shift and couldn’t make it in to testify)? I’m guessing he still has his $5000.😂

he certainly does, no one has claimed the 5 grand and never will but i do like watching them try @@skwak3041

Yes 🙌

Given what he had to fight with, I think this kid was making as good a case as he could, in a respectful manner, for a cause which needed reform. He was light years from the present day morons whose only motivation seems to be getting on camera, looking for an argument, and swearing at people.

@@greghill7759 Whilst I agree cannabis should be legal it's people like him that do "the cause" more harm than good. I've never used the argument that cannabis should be legal because it's harmless. Partly because it's not true and partly because the other side could just point at people like him and raise their eyebrows questioningly. What honest answer could I have but "Yeah... You have a point"? Even the most fleeting glance at social media shows a correlation between believing ludicrous nonsense and cannabis use. Whether or not there's a causal link and if so in which direction is a different issue but either way they're not helping.

@@xxxggthyf This case has nothing to do with the SovCit movement. They want to wave a constitutional 'Get out of Jail Free' card, and abdicate financial responsibility towards society, whilst this boy wanted to be accepted INTO it. Forgive me, Anthony, but firstly, it is arrant hypocrisy to equate harm with legality. The truly harmful effects of alcohol, tobacco, and scores of other products put cannabis in the shade, but provide Governments with much needed revenue. Secondly, I fail to see how the Other Side "has a point", (and more importantly, a logical argument) in merely choosing to "point at people like him and raise their eyebrows questioningly". Thirdly, I trust you're not implying a direct connection in your statement that "Even the most fleeting glance at social media shows a correlation between believing ludicrous nonsense and cannabis use". That would be as absurd as saying there's a relationship between believing ludicrous nonsense and watching social media, studying Hinduism, or walking on your hands. Listen to the Judge's wry comments ten years ago @8.47, and I think you will see what HE REALLY thought of this nonsense.

@@greghill7759 OK... 1) His arguments are pure sov-cit whether he identifies as such or not. 2) I never equated harm with legality and I can't for the life of me see why you would think I did. 3) I am well aware of the harm of alcohol and tobacco having lived with an alcoholic for over a decade and having smoked my lungs into oblivion over 42 years and counting. So spare me the lecture. It should be obvious to even a moron in a hurry that the arguments for criminalisation of weed based on harm are no more valid than the the argument that it should be legal because it is harmless... Because it isn't. There are many good arguments for the legalisation of weed. You don't need to make up bad ones. 4) Whether or not this idiot's detachment from reality is down to weed or not is irrelevant. He's up on a cannabis charge and that makes him a poor advert. 5) I said there was a relationship on social media between believing ludicrous bollocks and weed. Because there is. I quite clearly said I would NOT ascribe a causal relationship to the connection and that even if there were one it wouldn't mean the weed caused the batshittery.. It could be the other way around. The plain truth of the matter is that just as some people don't know when to say "That's enough booze for me today thank you" others are incapable of saying "That's enough cannabis for me today thank you". They turn into such a particular type of incoherent cabbage that I can spot them a mile off because... 6) I have been smoking weed nearly as long as I have been smoking tobacco. Well over 40 years. Tomorrow is one of my Big Cigarette Nights and I can't think of a nicer way to finish the week off than getting stoned and watching Carry On Up The Khyber for the 687th time. As a matter of fact if you want to know what my attitude to weed is do a google search for Indica Marketing Board. The dot com... That's me. Yes it's a joke but then I refuse to take weed seriously.

Yup😂

I know someone like that. My husbands ex is that way. I try to get along with everyone but she makes it impossible. She won’t talk to me anymore after I proved her wrong in front a large group of people. Wasn’t trying to call her out like that but she kept on going and I finally got fed up.

👍

I believe it's referred to as the "dunning kruger effect".

😂

By that logic, didn't the judge have the marijuana in his possession when he showed it to the defendant and thus is guilty of the same crime

No it was evidence in a case sealed with a chain of custody. That is specifically exempted.

Near the beginning

Yes time for a victory lap 🙌

Love it! 😂

Or .. My Favorite Moortian ... 😉

😂

Omg 😂

Moormish 'merican nashonal, show me your judisriction, the show could be sponsored by AutoGlass. 😁🇲🇦

👍

Agreed

I completely agree with you. Basically don’t bite the hand that feeds you.

He reached the bottom of the grave but keeps on digging

And the federal court is going to run over him like a freight train

😂😂😂

Agreed I do give that guy credit for being straight about his beliefs and all in.

They should have given him his weed back like he asked and then arrested him again for possession.

I was thinking that 😂

@@Chew1964 I heard a story on KZfaq a while back where the cops posted, as a joke, found one bag of heroine will return if you can prove ownership on a facebook community group. 4 people showed up with more heroine as proof and one came with his hospital discharge papers.... from his overdose. Some people just wanna be arrested

😂

🙌🤩

Thank You 😊

😂

😂😂🤣

Nope 😂

Yup

Correction: He is just vexatious person.

😂

🙌😂

👍 thank you 😊

Agreed

The corollary to that is that a sov-cit who represents himself has an idiot for a lawyer.

😂

👍

Your system of assigning costs of suit IMHO is far superior to the peculiar American system which simply invites abuse of court process.

Agree, in Belgium they have to pay all costs as well !!!!

Yes it is a tough pill to swallow 😂

😂

😂😂😂

Hey, leave him alone. He's Mormish. 😀

wasn't it Herbert that was arrested once and he asked the cop why, and the cop told him he had 9 warrants out on him??

" Again ? " asked the officer " This is that first time that I've done it ! "

And they love you for it! 😘🐶🐶

😂

Thank You 😊

Awww thank you 😊

😂

Good 😘

Yes and it conveniently wipes out the whole court system where everyone involved has to pass the bar in order to participate.

Aww thank you 😘

Yup 😂

😂😂😂

😂

Another shorthand might be “my last two brain cells abandoned me”

😂

Yup😂

Fool of a Took.

😂

That would have been spectacular! 😂

😂

Yes that was good 😂😂😂

😂😂😂

He sure did😂

Pour a pint of county names into a shot glass of a brain, naturally grammar sloshes out. (Apologies to Bud and Kelly Bundy. Doorbell!)

😂😂😂

It gets too cost in some small jurisdictions for sure

I grew up in a very rural area also. You didn't want to say something bad about anyone because someone within ear shot was probably related to him. But I would go back to those days in a heartbeat. It was a hard life, but a good life.

👍

I too live in a very small town where my husband is a probation officer. Way too many times my husband has stood before a judge and asked to not be given a person to him to supervise because they are related to my wife. The judge always denies his request, lol.

😂

😂

How can he afford a car?

@@GaylordBuzzard I didn't even think of that. Good point!

Good question

👍

Yes 🙌😂

Some SovCits are also Flat Earthers! 😲

🤩😂😂 I know it’s too good to be true!

Flerfers aren’t as fun because they never suffer consequences from their delusions. No smashed windows, no tasing, no jail time. Just potential embarrassment over being wrong which they don’t seem to feel.

Chille scholar, may by??😅

😂😘

Said no man ever

That might just happen

Thank You