Space isn't as colourful as you think | BBC Global

  Рет қаралды 113,490

BBC Global

BBC Global

Ай бұрын

Have you wondered what it would be like to see space through your very own eyes?
We spoke to the experts who process images from the James Webb Telescope to find out how close the pictures of our Universe are to reality.
Subscribe to BBC Global: kzfaq.info_global?...
For the latest news, analysis and features visit: www.bbc.com
#bbc #space #nasa

Пікірлер: 205
@Aarush1-INDIANEXO-L
@Aarush1-INDIANEXO-L 26 күн бұрын
“It gives a glimpse into the reality beyond our physical perception.” I just can’t appreciate of how advanced us humans have become and are still developing. From making fire in caves to finding miracles in the universe
@DieFlabbergast
@DieFlabbergast 17 күн бұрын
"Making fire in caves" Hah! Hardly anyone lived in caves. There are very few caves on Earth, and most of them are a long way from areas with plenty of food. The only reasons people think humans lived in caves in the Stone Age is because human skeletons are much more easily preserved within a cave than elsewhere. "Making fire in a clearing in the bush" would be more accurate.
@iownstaticz8687
@iownstaticz8687 9 күн бұрын
@@DieFlabbergastI think you missed the point of the comment…
@petergivenbless900
@petergivenbless900 Ай бұрын
This creates comon misconceptions not only about how space actually looks but also how planets appear; most images of the Earth from orbit are enhanced to reveal greater detail, so people may be surprised when they watch the live feed from cameras aboard the ISS to see how washed out and "overexposed" the Earth appears (also, the absence of visible stars jars with what conventional space photography would lead them to believe), and recently it was determined that, due to conventions around processing images from the Voyager probes, the common conception of Neptune appearing deep blue is actually erroneous; it is a pale blue-grey in reality.
@patreekotime4578
@patreekotime4578 Ай бұрын
Strangely, as a child of the 1980s-1990s, I remember the original Neptune images before they were enhanced at some point in the 2000s. Seeing that I was an adult before the enhanced images came out I never really encountered them. So I was kind of surprised when everyone was saying Neptune was dark blue because I had only seen it as pale blue. So theses effects can really be generational.
@skycloud4802
@skycloud4802 Ай бұрын
​@@patreekotime4578 it's something I'm very disappointed in finding out. I thought of Neptune as a very beautiful ocean blue, but instead it's a bit uglier, less unique,/more similar to Uranus. I hope we get a photograph a beautiful alien dark blue waterworld, one day.
@patreekotime4578
@patreekotime4578 Ай бұрын
@@skycloud4802 Even the earth looks lighter blue from far away, even though we dont have total cloud cover. So you would need a planet that somehow maintained a surface ocean and zero cloud cover.
@averyb.476
@averyb.476 25 күн бұрын
And this is why people have trust issues with certain aspects of astronomy. Lots of the images are doctored and edited.
@patreekotime4578
@patreekotime4578 25 күн бұрын
@@averyb.476 This is not even remotely the same thing as "doctoring" photos. Virtually ALL space photography is "edited" in some way because the cameras are not like normal digital cameras we use on earth. The images from space telescopes are often showing spectrums of light that humans cannot see and making them visible. They don't do it to make them pretty or to fool people, they do it so researchers can SEE the invisible light and make observation. This isn't like using a tanning filter on Tiktok.
@logangillespie7675
@logangillespie7675 Ай бұрын
Space isnt black and white but is not the color you see in many satellite pictures.
@KiyokaMakibi
@KiyokaMakibi Ай бұрын
One day they’ll no doubt be able to make eyeballs/lenses that can perceive space this way. What a sight that would be….
@SuperAloeFresh
@SuperAloeFresh 27 күн бұрын
You could do that now. Just look through the correct filter
@DrMelvinSeahorse
@DrMelvinSeahorse 19 күн бұрын
@@SuperAloeFreshare you my uncle?
@donnalambs9578
@donnalambs9578 10 күн бұрын
​@@SuperAloeFreshcan see all the deception that way
@brettmeikle
@brettmeikle Ай бұрын
If you've ever photographed (or seen a photo of) an aurora you'll get a bit of a grasp of what the human eye misses. It's a pale version of a modern camera's capacity for spectrum gathering.
@lou6297
@lou6297 Ай бұрын
still looks amazing
@Jm649
@Jm649 Ай бұрын
I'd like to see a completely unedited picture of space... not saying it would look interesting but i'd still like to see it
@CallumMcPherson
@CallumMcPherson Ай бұрын
Same, the colour enhanced images are beautiful but I'd really love to see some images of objects as they would look if you were flying past in a spaceship.
@matthewrowell8518
@matthewrowell8518 Ай бұрын
Most Hubble photos are that. Just with each photo is just using a different filter then combining the images in a composite image to show the true colour with far greater detail then using all the filters at once blocking a lot of detail.
@OfentseMwaseFilms
@OfentseMwaseFilms Ай бұрын
Go to a Dark area in your country, where there are no city lights.
@Sean-Green
@Sean-Green Ай бұрын
Buy a decent telescope and astrophotography setup and you'll be amazed by the awe inspiring photos you can take of space yourself. Or just search it on youtube :p
@FleshWizard69420
@FleshWizard69420 Ай бұрын
Go to a dark area, use a telescope or binoculars. The star clusters are noticeably bluer than images would have you believe, and nebulae are more washed out in colour
@calabrais
@calabrais Ай бұрын
This video is a little misleading, I'm actually surprised at BBC. Everything they said is factual, but presented in a way that's missing context. For example, the Hubble and James Web telescopes capture very different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum. Hubble does indeed capture visible light, but using a monochrome camera, so it doesn't capture any color information per se. Fun fact, all digital cameras are monochrome cameras, but they add a Bayer matrix on top with red/green/blue filters to capture the color data. Hubble does a similar thing, but more tedious. It first takes a picture with just the red filter, then a second image with just the green filter, and a third with just the blue filter. It then combines the three images into a single image. To make it even more complicated, hubble's red/green/blue filters aren't aligned with what most people would consider "pure" red/green/blue. They capture shades of these colors. Then someone in processing make the reds more red, greens more green, and blues more blue. This is because the most interesting star data is contained in colors that most people would consider bland. Their first priority is to capture the data, and then make it more appealing to the general public. So unless you find it cool to look at a spreadsheet filled with numbers, they do this fudging for you. Then we have the James Web which images purely in the infrared which we can't see, so the colors must be interpreted to make a visible image, otherwise you would be looking at a pure black screen.
@evan2623
@evan2623 29 күн бұрын
Nice
@DesmondKarani
@DesmondKarani 26 күн бұрын
That's not the issue. The question is, if you were near these structures yourself, would you see them as they are represented..?
@real_Hamilton
@real_Hamilton 26 күн бұрын
KZfaq has longer videos on this same topic that explains in greater detail. Just look it up. This is a short one
@joshsteck7261
@joshsteck7261 25 күн бұрын
@@DesmondKaranithe video seems to imply that if there were no dust clouds blocking your view then they should look like this. If the formations are releasing the same waves but higher up in the spectrum than infrared then this up shifting should make basically the same image
@marianoguy
@marianoguy 23 күн бұрын
​@@DesmondKaranican you see in infrared?
@javierderivero9299
@javierderivero9299 Ай бұрын
Color is in the eye of the beholder....if not ask dogs
@WeeWeeJumbo
@WeeWeeJumbo 27 күн бұрын
they usually don’t have much to say. anyway they have no idea what they’re missing
@josephsamoa2290
@josephsamoa2290 8 күн бұрын
Yes, if the only way to learn about the human body was through X-ray images, there would still be so much we don't know. This is because X-rays only tell us half the story. Similarly, the infrared images from billions of light years away tell no more than a tenth or perhaps less of the story. It's important to face up to this truth instead of portraying it as if we know everything that there is out there.
@somarriba333
@somarriba333 14 күн бұрын
I kind of want to see images of space how WE would see it with our own eyes along with the images NASA provides.
@zukisamkhize4303
@zukisamkhize4303 10 күн бұрын
you mostly see darkness,just go outside an view the naked sky there isnt much to see
@somarriba333
@somarriba333 10 күн бұрын
@@zukisamkhize4303 No stars at all either. Like white dots in a black field?
@odeyemiopeyemisamuel
@odeyemiopeyemisamuel Ай бұрын
Colours add values to our life. Well done to the team
@auhsoj308
@auhsoj308 Ай бұрын
Interesting, I love looking at pictures of space. Nice explanation. I also make science videos, want to see them?
@BlueRice
@BlueRice Ай бұрын
Color grading and adding color to it would also be nice. The detail makes it color looks vibrant
@pdenigma9444
@pdenigma9444 25 күн бұрын
Are there special glasses by chance which will allow me to see the night sky with such vibrancy?
@jocopowell
@jocopowell 13 күн бұрын
We can see bones with our eyes. Trust me.
@takashitamagawa5881
@takashitamagawa5881 Ай бұрын
The question I have is what the human eye would see if someone were close enough to the nebula to see it as a broadly extended object. Even though the eye cannot see infrared or ultraviolet I imagine there would be color in the luminescence of the ionized gas, and perhaps passively from the starlight penetrating through the gas clouds.
@simon04.10
@simon04.10 Ай бұрын
Good question.. well the Orion nebula for example looks pretty grey through a telescope so I believe if you could see a nebula when you're in space it wouldn't appear in bright colors
@ivaerz4977
@ivaerz4977 Ай бұрын
Maybe there are plenty of other things in space which is still invisible to us 😮
@FleshWizard69420
@FleshWizard69420 Ай бұрын
​@@ivaerz4977someone discovered a colossal oxygen cloud near Andromeda so there's definitely plenty more out there to find
@tajuddinahmed3379
@tajuddinahmed3379 4 күн бұрын
It would be grayish cloud
@Mitchell527
@Mitchell527 Ай бұрын
It's because our eyes can't see.
@shankarbalakrishnan2360
@shankarbalakrishnan2360 15 күн бұрын
So is our planet make it better❤❤🎉🎉thks
@Manxzey
@Manxzey 17 күн бұрын
I knew this since 2007. Haha I read so much on the computer in those days.
@LuisHumanoide
@LuisHumanoide Ай бұрын
This video came one day after the QuantumFracture video, coincidence?
@Mrgolden1174
@Mrgolden1174 12 күн бұрын
I love how astronomers are convinced they just know everything about the universe when out species has barely been able to get into space.
@jameswarren6719
@jameswarren6719 Ай бұрын
Lots of people see colors differently so even if someone makes colors for the picture people might be swing that picture differently
@mikeyd946
@mikeyd946 Ай бұрын
Oh well then what can we do. So I can’t see infrared. My life must be over. dear diary. What is the point? We all know. Well done James Webb.
@martf1061
@martf1061 Ай бұрын
You cant SEE infrared .. but you can FEEL it !! It's Heat. Cant SEE ultraviolet.. but you FEEL it !! your skin knows when there is UV .
@carolynallisee2463
@carolynallisee2463 21 күн бұрын
I am fifty five years old, and, for all that time, I've been used to seeing Neptune with a glorious deep blue colour. Then, less than a year ago, I learned on another astronomical channel, that it is a much lighter colour indeed, its true colour is, in fact, much closer to that of it's neighbour Uranus.That wonderful vibrant blue hue was laid on its images to help astronomers discern various features on its 'surface'... and decided to release those enhanced images for public viewing, for whatever reason, rather than switching back to its true colour. So thank you, whoever you are, for perpetrating the biggest deception ever. I'm not sure when that first enhanced image was releases, but since then it's been repeated and disseminated across the planet. Millions of people my age and younger have spent their lives believing we had a beautiful sapphire jewel in our solar system when nothing could be further from the truth!
@meowzzies
@meowzzies 3 күн бұрын
Depends what you mean by colorful. Humans can only see in a small spectrum. So sure.. it's not that colorful, but what are we missing out on in terms of color
@Duke_Dickinson
@Duke_Dickinson Ай бұрын
Do we alter images to display non-visible light with any other form of photography?
@TalooshDaBoss
@TalooshDaBoss Ай бұрын
ultraviolet flashlights are common to find and photograph, infrared vision is also seeing outside of the spectrum in thermal cameras
@Geletin911
@Geletin911 Ай бұрын
not at this scale...they do so to keep a narrative alive
@patreekotime4578
@patreekotime4578 Ай бұрын
Actually we do the opposite. Digital cameras have filters on them to keep them from picking up light frequencies that humans cannot see. So we actually ALTER digital photographs so they align with what we THINK the world should look like. Basically, your brain is telling you a big lie about what the universe looks like, and cameras have had to be adapted to continue this lie, otherwise your brain would get upset seeing things you don't normally see.
@patreekotime4578
@patreekotime4578 Ай бұрын
I wrote a whole reply explaining this, but KZfaq deleted it for some reason. 🤔 The reality is that every digital camera image you have ever seen is altered to make the world look the way your brain thinks it should look. Digital cameras have filters on them to remove the frequencies of light that we don't see. Early digital cameras often would display weird purple or pink flares around heat sources or solar reflections, as well as to some degreee, to see through clothing. So yes, we atler every digital image to look more human vision.
@patreekotime4578
@patreekotime4578 Ай бұрын
Yes! But the opposite! All digital cameras use filters to remove spectrums of light humans cannot see. Older digital cameras without these filters showed weird purple/pink fringes around heat sources and solar reflections and were known to see through clothing. So yes, every modern digital camera image is altered to look more like human vision.
@irisf.5575
@irisf.5575 16 күн бұрын
That's right, show us more of the color pictures and less of the grey. It's not like we came here to see the unedited images.
@bijoychandraroy
@bijoychandraroy 29 күн бұрын
first of all, all those starts are in a patch of sky equivalent to the area of a grain of sand an arm's length away, so we can't even see it to begin with, so let's not think much about colors here.
@mark3464
@mark3464 19 күн бұрын
Yeah. Newsflash. Many telescopes etc aren’t made to detect visible light
@SquizzMe
@SquizzMe 19 күн бұрын
Imagine all the things in the universe we'll never be able to perceive.
@mikw1809
@mikw1809 Ай бұрын
The diffraction spikes of stars are also an abberation but the likes of Nasa seem happy enough to exagerrate these Bethlehem stars at their studio. A Maksutov design is more accurate, when you see Arcturus with a perfectly colimated Mak, you soon realise that stars have more of a round disc like shape, just like our own Sun.
@muhammadtayyabtayyab1944
@muhammadtayyabtayyab1944 Ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@Diceman88
@Diceman88 Ай бұрын
Right. So 1968's 2001 A Space Odyssey is infinitely more realistic than any Marvel multi-rainbow HDR space scenes.
@djayjp
@djayjp Ай бұрын
Very problematic video title. Look at visible spectrum captured Hubble images.
@kyle-eu2vu
@kyle-eu2vu 22 күн бұрын
most people watching this video are human, not a Hubble telescope
@JordanWallace-nb4id
@JordanWallace-nb4id 15 күн бұрын
And trust Satanic NASA? Your crazy
@ahorfandinn
@ahorfandinn 27 күн бұрын
No, it is more colorful than we think.
@onlyheadbutt7066
@onlyheadbutt7066 26 күн бұрын
Gazes have no color to the human eyes so nop
@Squishmallows24
@Squishmallows24 12 күн бұрын
I actually kinda somewhat knew this lol
@programmer1840
@programmer1840 16 күн бұрын
Wish they didn't edit the photos. Bad analogy with regards to X-ray images, it would be equivalent to arbitrarily colouring the x-rays.
@OfentseMwaseFilms
@OfentseMwaseFilms Ай бұрын
I completely love how they Edit the JWST photos. It's incredible. Many astro photographers come up with similar coulours, so to me they are definitely real.
@bigbobelow6147
@bigbobelow6147 Ай бұрын
So if we could see the full spectrum of light would these clouds be different shades of red?
@patreekotime4578
@patreekotime4578 Ай бұрын
Like they said in the beginning.... they would be mostly grey... it's dust lit by stars giving off mostly "white" light.
@bigbobelow6147
@bigbobelow6147 Ай бұрын
@@patreekotime4578 It would be grayscale using our eyes now because we cant see infra red that passes through. They say that's what James Webb is seeing not whit light, I am wondering if we could see the full spectrum of light would we see the clouds as shades of infra red
@patreekotime4578
@patreekotime4578 Ай бұрын
@@bigbobelow6147 I mis-read the question. But yeah... infra-red not "red".
@icinnalatte
@icinnalatte Ай бұрын
Guys space with your raw eyes is NOT greyscale, only the raw picture data are, because it’s essentially recording how much brightness is in each point of the data. With ur eyes it wouldn’t be greyscale, but it would be like the pictures show either. It would be in the middle, leaning more towards greyscale
@haaendaaz3619
@haaendaaz3619 29 күн бұрын
@@icinnalatteno it would be grayscale
@Tagel____
@Tagel____ 26 күн бұрын
I watched this video on mute while am high it was actually amazing ❤‍🔥
@Lovethemusic385
@Lovethemusic385 11 күн бұрын
It actually pisses me off that they do this. Oversells space, and then gaslights me for wanting the pictures to be, you know, EFFING PICTURES.
@sephxus9379
@sephxus9379 21 күн бұрын
We can take infrared pictures of everyday life. However, it would be disingenuous to pass off an infrared image as a regular photo without an obvious disclaimer. Infrared images are just as real as regular photos, but they are not the same thing. Think of how much different infrared images look. They look cool and tells us a lot of information, but they would not represent a regular photograph.
@hippiehillape
@hippiehillape 2 күн бұрын
Static
@xevenex
@xevenex 11 күн бұрын
Pimento? what are you doing there
@TheDenn14
@TheDenn14 23 күн бұрын
I understand the use of the edited images, but it would be nice to know what space actually looks like to the human eye, should we decide to consider space as a possible vaca destination in the future
@KPad87
@KPad87 Ай бұрын
Space is pitch black
@2painful2watch
@2painful2watch 18 күн бұрын
I agree. If we were aboard a spaceship and looked out the portholes, we would see black, black and more black. As long as you're facing away from the sun, you may be able to discern the very distant stars as bright pin points. It would be a boring and depressing ride until you've reached your destination e.g. Mars etc.
@alexbowman7582
@alexbowman7582 Ай бұрын
I knew this already.
@thelastone9416
@thelastone9416 26 күн бұрын
1:58 am I the only one seeing this?!?!
@shoutucker3726
@shoutucker3726 21 күн бұрын
wait your narrator is a intern?
@FARDEEN.MUSTAFA
@FARDEEN.MUSTAFA Ай бұрын
This is true that we can't see many things with our eyes, but we can feel them. NASA's views and imagination about Universe are nice and to dispute either, especially about scientific theories of time travel.
@KENKENNIFF
@KENKENNIFF Ай бұрын
What people want to see is the view from a space ship if you were flying near to these objects, like if you magnify something a 10 billion miles aways, 1 million times, we want it to look like we are in a space ship 10000 miles away from the object. No an xray
@patreekotime4578
@patreekotime4578 Ай бұрын
Yes, but the images are not made for the general public's entertainment. They are made so scientists can visually differentiate things that are otherwise invisible.
@KENKENNIFF
@KENKENNIFF Ай бұрын
@@patreekotime4578 Its still a bit disappointing to find out that what you will see if you fly near these object is not what you see in these photos. Also, that flying near to these objects would probably lead to instantaneous death.
@patreekotime4578
@patreekotime4578 Ай бұрын
@@KENKENNIFF I mean, if we have the technology to do a flyby of a molecular cloud, presumably we would have the technology to be able to just wear glasses and see them this way if you wanted to. Or like the view screens in Star Trek... just display a false color image. They never took advantage of that ability enough in the show.
@KENKENNIFF
@KENKENNIFF Ай бұрын
@@patreekotime4578 The technology would be far beyond anything we have at the moment, to the point of impossibility.
@User-54631
@User-54631 9 күн бұрын
I’ve always knew the pictures were bullshit!! lol
@lukepynhon
@lukepynhon Ай бұрын
Alternate title: Space sucks
@daniels.2720
@daniels.2720 Ай бұрын
... and the Director of Animation just adds that little touch here and there...
@Derpy1969
@Derpy1969 Ай бұрын
Don’t tell me what I think.
@martf1061
@martf1061 Ай бұрын
1:08 " we are taking shorter wave length and longer wave length and assigning them to visible wave length.." BUT JWST ONLY "SEE" INFRARED... So HOW can you tell if it's ANYTHING ELSE than infrared?? You only have infrared spectrum.. Short and long wave length infrared spectrum.
@schuylergrace
@schuylergrace Ай бұрын
I'm disappointed in this because I was hoping it would show unmodified, true color (visible light) images of space objects. Most of the images sent back from our orbiting (and terrestrial) telescopes are monochrome, but some are various spectra of visible light, which could be combined into an image showing what the view from a spaceship's window would be. Unfortunately, I've never seen any processed that way. Also, I'm curious what it really looks like on Mars at noon because most of the images we've seen are enhanced to show brighter light than actually exists.
@patreekotime4578
@patreekotime4578 Ай бұрын
Well, the second part is a bit of a trick question because your eyes and brain don't operate on absolute exposure values either. If you step outside your house at night it might seem really really dark... but if you stay out there for a long time, your eyes adjust and eventually you should be able to see fairly well... although you won't see all of the colors because the rods and cones have different sensitivities. So the world at night looks roughly monochrome bluish. On a full moon night you might be able to see well enough to read a book. And the longer you stay out in the dark, the less you are aware of how dark it is, it just begins to feel normal. And of course, all of that experience is subjective... different people may experience these things differently. So honestly, the only way to really know what it will look like on Mars... is to go there.
@schuylergrace
@schuylergrace Ай бұрын
@@patreekotime4578, I agree and understand that. Being a photographer (including doing some amateur astrophotography), I know our modern cameras automatically adjust, too (when we let them). But I'd like to see some approximation of what it would be like to walk out of a normally lit room onto the Martian surface at a given time of day, or to look out of my spaceship window at the Pillars of Creation or the Orion Nebula. I notice every sci-fi flick has very colorful things going on outside, but I suspect most of the structures we picture from the beautiful false color imagery is much more mundane in real life (but I'd still like to know).
@Snow.2040
@Snow.2040 Ай бұрын
Pretty much all the emission nebulae in space (such as eagle nebula [pillars of creation])are actually almost completely red because of the hydrogen-alpha emission line (which is red). Lots of people capture them in real color with unmodified DSLR/mirrorless cameras and you can even see them with your eyes under dark skies with binoculars. Hubble images of galaxies or reflection nebulae are in real color (though they are not captured in color straight out of the camera), it is because galaxies and reflection nebulae emit light in the broad spectrum which means that narrowband filters don’t work on them, so scientists use RGB filters to form a real color image. Everything out of JWST is in false color because you can’t even see the colors in captures.
@marvib100
@marvib100 16 күн бұрын
Please next time do not deceive the people about the color of the universe. I prefer the real colors over fake ones even if it's black and white or gray.
@JordanWallace-nb4id
@JordanWallace-nb4id 15 күн бұрын
What universe? This is it my friend the earth is the center of everything.
@PikaPluff
@PikaPluff 29 күн бұрын
Why does the narrator sound like shes forcing her indian accent to be american
@2painful2watch
@2painful2watch 18 күн бұрын
I thought she was just British.
@ziaurrehmanbaloch
@ziaurrehmanbaloch Ай бұрын
I knew it, first image was also stolen from Elon musk's kitchen table.
@noreengulalai6325
@noreengulalai6325 Ай бұрын
Does this means if we were able to see space through our own eyes it would be the same colourful?
@squintps
@squintps Ай бұрын
No, the color is made up, photoshopped.
@noreengulalai6325
@noreengulalai6325 Ай бұрын
@squintps thank you…as it’s in the infrared and other range of the spectrum in which we can’t see. I missed it in the very start of the video.
@akpanekpo6025
@akpanekpo6025 Ай бұрын
It's all very confusing. Does it mean if I were close enough to the photographed objects, I wouldn't actually see the colours? If so, why am I able to see the Milky Way in its splendid colours with my naked eyes?
@icinnalatte
@icinnalatte Ай бұрын
It’s not grayscale in real life, but it’s also not as vibrant, somewhere in the middle, maybe leaning more towards muted colors
@XPJV
@XPJV 16 күн бұрын
Space simply doesn't exist! We're all under the roof - FIRMAMENT.
@JordanWallace-nb4id
@JordanWallace-nb4id 15 күн бұрын
Exactly but be careful people shudder at the truth, and it might make them scared.
@XPJV
@XPJV 15 күн бұрын
@JordanWallace-nb4id , Yes, but we still cannot be ignorant or silent.. And one day, liars will be shamed to its fullest !
@JordanWallace-nb4id
@JordanWallace-nb4id 13 күн бұрын
@@XPJV absolutely agree Jesus Christ said this, everything hid will be revealed. Amen 🙏
@erselo2477
@erselo2477 Ай бұрын
Clickbait. There was no Supernoba since 1604 AD.
@spooky9030
@spooky9030 17 күн бұрын
Space isnt black and white. But its not colrless either. Got it.
@the6ig6adwolf
@the6ig6adwolf Ай бұрын
First, I found out my wife has been lying to me about having a boyfriend, and now telescopes are lying to me about the colors in space? FML!!
@alialias3913
@alialias3913 Ай бұрын
We need more fake images of earth....
@martf1061
@martf1061 Ай бұрын
Hahaha !! yeah! 🤟
@guff9567
@guff9567 Ай бұрын
Space is full of colour: * X-rays * Gamma rays * radio waves * micro waves STOP LYING BBC
@relwalretep
@relwalretep Ай бұрын
Given colour is the visual interpretation of the electromagnetic spectrum, and we can't see at those frequencies of the electromagnetic spectrum without the assistance of shifting them to frequencies we can see... I would humbly submit your posited theory is bunkum.
@Geletin911
@Geletin911 Ай бұрын
@@relwalretep i would humbly submit u have had at least 4 gene therapy shots, minimum
@guff9567
@guff9567 Ай бұрын
@@relwalretep stop with your BLIND nonsense. Have you really never heard of Tetrachromats or Thermoreception (Nobel Prize 2021) or aphakia? Go back to primary school
@streamofconsciousness5826
@streamofconsciousness5826 Ай бұрын
If we are here to observe the Universe for God, as some Philosophers and Theologians have suggested, then these images are the Universe as God would see it.
@JordanWallace-nb4id
@JordanWallace-nb4id 15 күн бұрын
That's just the point isn't it, they want to hide God from you.
@martf1061
@martf1061 Ай бұрын
2:00 Bad comparison.. Cant compare images of our bones taken with Xrays, with images taken with JWST. The reason is that ; we CAN CONFIRM that the Xray images are REALLY our bones because we ALREADY SEEN bones with our eyes in real life. On the other end, for all we can be absolutly sure about the images of the JWST, is that they are only REPRESENTATIONS and INTERPRETATIONS.
@martf1061
@martf1061 Ай бұрын
0:55 "IMAGE CREATED" by definition... NOT REAL
@ChildhoodGamingPH
@ChildhoodGamingPH 25 күн бұрын
All we see on the internet are lies... They keep feeding us the wrong interpretation of what the space and universe really look like. Why won't they show us unedited images?
@marianoguy
@marianoguy 23 күн бұрын
What would the "unedited image" be? A string of bits on a file? If it’s not information that our eyes can capture you need to translate the different wavelenghts into visible ones. And those are what we perceive as colors
@JordanWallace-nb4id
@JordanWallace-nb4id 15 күн бұрын
Because God is true and every man a liar. They don't want you to see God's handiwork. Psalm 19 KJV
@JML_Astrophotos
@JML_Astrophotos 20 күн бұрын
horrible, dishonest headline. space is very colorful. I and the tens of thousands of other astrophotographers around the world know this
@2painful2watch
@2painful2watch 18 күн бұрын
That's cuz the cameras can pick up colors the eye can't see right.
@JML_Astrophotos
@JML_Astrophotos 17 күн бұрын
​@@2painful2watchless about our eyes not being able to see those wavelengths. Its more that our eyes are just terrible at seeing color in the dark. Our cone cells (the ones that see color) need a good amount of light to actually differentiate color, so in low light theyre practicality useless. Thats why you cant see the color of nebulae when you look through a telescope eyepiece
@2painful2watch
@2painful2watch 17 күн бұрын
@@JML_Astrophotos Okay thanks for responding. So if you were a passenger on a spaceship looking out portholes would you still be able to discern some color of say, a distant star i.e. red giant etc and nebulae or the Ring Nebula?
@JML_Astrophotos
@JML_Astrophotos 17 күн бұрын
@@2painful2watch stars are easy since they're bright. But nebulae are harder since they're dimmer. You'd have similar problems as on earth
@2painful2watch
@2painful2watch 17 күн бұрын
@@JML_Astrophotos Thank you so much sir.
@Arcticfox7
@Arcticfox7 15 күн бұрын
Also, Mars isn't red or orange. It's gray. Pictures are photoshopped.
@losmerolhead
@losmerolhead Ай бұрын
Liars!
@JT-qw1cn
@JT-qw1cn 6 күн бұрын
TIL Space is boring and I'm a dog
@d.anthony4363
@d.anthony4363 20 күн бұрын
That thing is called AI generated image
@JordanWallace-nb4id
@JordanWallace-nb4id 15 күн бұрын
Its Called the Firmament and the Heavens, and it declares God's glory and His handiwork. Psalm 19 King James Bible. BBC you will be judged by God for every deception and lie you have ever told. The more you lie, the more God judge you on that day.
@ogloc4478
@ogloc4478 16 күн бұрын
ID LIKE TO THINK OF IT AS PLAYING MUSIC but you ARENT. You are giving us FALSE images. Showing pictures and playing music are 2 completely different things idgaf how you justify it.
@Geletin911
@Geletin911 Ай бұрын
normie narrative is starting to crumble
@michelmilaneh8963
@michelmilaneh8963 Ай бұрын
Is your iq that low that you didn't understand the purpose ?
@JordanWallace-nb4id
@JordanWallace-nb4id 15 күн бұрын
We've all been lied to about existence. Creation is true.
What if we could see Spacetime? An immersive experience
12:10
ScienceClic English
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Why most images of Neptune are the wrong color #shorts
1:00
New Gadgets! Bycycle 4.0 🚲 #shorts
00:14
BongBee Family
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
CAN YOU HELP ME? (ROAD TO 100 MLN!) #shorts
00:26
PANDA BOI
Рет қаралды 36 МЛН
Black Magic 🪄 by Petkit Pura Max #cat #cats
00:38
Sonyakisa8 TT
Рет қаралды 27 МЛН
КАК СПРЯТАТЬ КОНФЕТЫ
00:59
123 GO! Shorts Russian
Рет қаралды 3 МЛН
What happens when you send cancer into space? | BBC News
3:10
BBC News
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
A once-in-a-lifetime star explosion is coming | BBC Global
2:04
BBC Global
Рет қаралды 125 М.
The debate over the Anthropocene, explained
9:44
Vox
Рет қаралды 981 М.
The secret ghost town near New York City | BBC Global
3:37
BBC Global
Рет қаралды 67 М.
Four Weird Ways to Make Electricity
10:58
SciShow
Рет қаралды 124 М.
Is this why Venus lost its oceans? | BBC Global
3:12
BBC Global
Рет қаралды 38 М.
Why Sfogliatella is so hard to make
0:52
The News with Kamera Jr.
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Jupiter: The Largest Planet in our Solar System | BBC Earth Science
37:52
BBC Earth Science
Рет қаралды 221 М.
The mind-bending physics of time | Sean Carroll
7:47
Big Think
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
New Gadgets! Bycycle 4.0 🚲 #shorts
00:14
BongBee Family
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН