Neither of these videos is a layman.

Same here brotha....

I agree the quantum biology one is really good as well. As all good documentary’s should you feel much brainier at the end of the program that you did at the start lol!

Add one more same here

For real. Had to wait like 14 billion years.

Everything said about Dirac's personality points towards a good dash of Autism.

get a room

I've never seen a documentary about nothing as long as this one.

he is only a small part of a team

But it's this emptiness that allows balance. One going around one !

Why? God needs alot of elbow room.

@@James-ll3jbRight? They don’t call him the “god of the gaps”for nothing!😅

@@tricotdiko1435 "Five Quantum Phenomena Supporting God's Existence" kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rt-Bipl7zMWaqmQ.html "More Quantum Evidence" kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jZyHiZx7va67onU.html kzfaq.info/get/bejne/epZ6gMaVqZOUgnk.html "An Investigation into Alleged Scientific Evidence for Design" kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eZuKacuQt7zMeas.html "Cancelled Science: Some Evidence Atheists Don't Want You To See": kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iqdkhNil2968aGw.html "Return of the God Hypothesis kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sMVog7OAksmlnHU.html "By Design" kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qL6Vq8SH2NzMc4E.html "Choosing between Science and God is Advocacy for a False Dichotomy" kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gt-kbKh00p66aZs.html What is the best evidence/argument for intelligent design? Modern scientific insight has revealed startling evidence for intelligent design from various disciplines, from biology to astronomy, from physics to cosmology. The purpose of this article is to summarize some of the major arguments. What is the best evidence/argument for intelligent design? - From Biology In recent years, William Dembski has pioneered a methodology which has become known as the “explanatory filter,” a means by which design can be inferred from the phenomena of nature in particular living organisms. The filter consists of a sequence of three yes/no questions that guide the decision process of determining whether a given phenomenon can be attributed to an intelligent causal agency. Based upon this filter, if an event, system or object is the product of intelligence, then it will: 1. Be contingent 2. Be complex 3. Display an independently specified pattern Thus, in order to be confident that a given phenomenon is the product of intelligent design, it cannot be a regularity that necessarily stems from the laws of nature, nor can it be the result of chance. According to Dembski, the explanatory filter highlights the most important quality of intelligently designed systems, namely, specified complexity. In other words, complexity alone is not enough to indicate the work of an intelligent agent; it must also conform to an independently specified pattern. Among the most compelling evidence for design in the realm of biology is the discovery of the digital information inherent in living cells. As it turns out, biological information comprises a complex, non-repeating sequence which is highly specified relative to the functional or communication requirements that they perform. Such similarity explains, in part, Dawkins’ observation that, “The machine code of the genes is uncannily computer-like.” What are we to make of this similarity between informational software-the undisputed product of conscious intelligence-and the informational sequences found in DNA and other important biomolecules? What is the best evidence/argument for intelligent design? - From Physics In physics, the concept of cosmic fine tuning gives further support to the design inference. The concept of cosmic fine tuning relates to a unique property of our universe whereby the physical constants and laws are observed to be balanced on a “razor’s edge” for permitting the emergence of complex life. The degree to which the constants of physics must match precise criteria is such that a number of agnostic scientists have concluded that, indeed, there is some sort of transcendent purpose behind the cosmic arena. British astrophysicist Fred Hoyle wrote, “A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question.” One example of fine tuning is the rate at which the universe expands. This value must be delicately balanced to a precision of one part in 1055. If the universe expanded too quickly, matter would expand too quickly for the formation of stars, planets, and galaxies. If the universe expanded too slowly, the universe would quickly collapse before the formation of stars. Besides that, the ratio of the electromagnetic force to gravity must be finely balanced to a degree of one part in 1040. If this value were to be increased slightly, all stars would be at least 40% more massive than our sun. This would mean that stellar burning would be too brief and too uneven to support complex life. If this value were to be decreased slightly, all stars would be at least 20% less massive than the sun. This would render them incapable of producing heavy elements necessary to sustain life. What is the best evidence/argument for intelligent design? - From Cosmology With modern discoveries in the field of cosmology, the concept of a definitive beginning of the cosmos has been demonstrated almost beyond question. The Kalam argument states that: 1. Everything which begins to exist has a cause apart from itself 2. The universe began to exist 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause apart from itself Today we have abundant data that the universe had a beginning. Given the Law of Causality, there must be an uncaused first cause existing outside of space and time. This first cause, being uncaused, must be eternal. Observations of the nature of the effect lead to the conclusion that the first cause must be intelligent and powerful enough to bring space, matter and even time itself into being. What is the best evidence/argument for intelligent design? - Conclusion This article is but a brief overview of some of the key elements involved in the design inference. The purpose is to demonstrate the wide body of support for intelligent design from a large range of disciplines, including biology, physics and cosmology. FOR FURTHER STUDY Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design by Stephen Meyer.

Isn't that just a better of projection and mistaken interpretation related to scale jumping ? People relying on their perceptions of their 5 primary senses resulted in stuff like The Bible and FlatEarthers. Unable to accept the limitations of their observations and the apparent surprises and contradictions, elaborate mythological storylines were created. Eventually, bit by bit, clever people made observations and derived interpretations therefrom which varied from the conventional habituated storylines. The *surprise and shock" of each new and increasingly subtle and precise observation was tightly linked to the clinging to the old.

Absolutely right this gonna look like cheating with viewers

I wouldn't know...ever heard of KZfaq Red?

Dude I’ve watched almost everything on this stuff I was bummed too.

@@festeCanuckI have it but it doesn’t skip on this. Only music.

Same video, different channels, maybe?

I know nothing about everything

Having watched both parts of this documentary in immediate succession, I can confidently confirm both of these statements. I'm doing so, I, too, know EVERYTHING and NOTHING.

You know nothing if you claim you know everything 😂

There is nothing to know about nothing because it doesn't exist , only the word ! . .

indeed; space is sth that gravity disform that and when gravity pay too much with space create BLACK HOLES

Shouldn’t it take 0 seconds to travel through nothing? Surely space is something. I just don’t understand lol

Artifacts of scale- and perception-jumping... Take the cat out of the box - now it's empty. Look more carefully - cat hair and dander... Remove those Now it's empty. Look more carefully and use sensitive instruments - there are gases... Evacuate them NOW there is nothing. and on it goes .. Are EM fields, cosmic rays, quantum fluctuations non-nothing ? Depends purely on the scale of sensitivity / perfection / esoterica one chooses to fetishize

Human brain can't conceive Nothing, as as soon as you think of nothing it still becomes something.......st*ner view

​@@dominicsamf2895You are correct, but you have to travel at the speed of light. A photon does not experience time or distance.

i love how there's like 100 people with different definitions of nothing thinking they're smarter than youtube science communicator man

If you traveled at light speed, time stops for you, so you would effectively live forever. It takes light time to travel, but for the photon, the travel time was instantaneous

@@_quandary_ correct. Photons don't experience time so photon is never aware of its location or existence. Time doesn't stop and traveler gets to go everywhere and do everything. Time traveler will be near frozen in spacetime and trillions of billions of years will pass in mare seconds for the traveler and universe ends in a whimper from time travelers point of view.

Good analogy on infinity, but I think it still draws out, and leaves unanswered, the actual conundrum. In your analogy, the universe could still have an edge but be functionally infinite because the rate of expansion vs. c at any given distant points. But if we could pause expansion (not that we could, but since it seems the rate has fluctuated over time, and it seems to have a starting point, I think it’s “okay” to manipulate this variable and what’s left over would still represent reality. Because again, it seems it’s changed within that reality before), would the universe be actually spatially infinite? I feel like where on the surface of a sphere, something akin to that, so functionally infinite to us, but not actually infinite. But that’s just my coin flip; I don’t think we’ll ever know. Interesting example.

That may be the subject of another presentation.

An artifact of perception and scale. There exists a strong thread of insistence that everything exists and occurs at all scales... Which simply us not true. Consider the two-slit experiment ... Has it ever been successfully conducted at large scales? i.e. a human running toward two human-scale slits (or the American version - a car driving at two car- scale slits. Consider quantum effects ... To build quantum computers , the extremely rarefied exotic esoteric conditions for quantum states to occur must be carefully created and suitable interfaces provided to achieve the programming and data exchange. The. Presumption that "quantum is everywhere always" by the meatsuits is just silly. Meanwhile the existential predicaments and MetaCrisis perpetrated by centuries of colonialism and willful deliberate hyper-consumptive hyper-emissive eco-cidal psychosociopathic dominator cult-ure gets actively ignored and denied - often with fraudulent esoteric rationalizations

Nothing does not exist. If it did you could travel a billion light years instantaneously because nothing would be between you and where you are going. Space itself is not nothing as far as I know.

At the fundamental level some things are just brute facts. That's not to say we know what those are yet.