up

A pity that there is not yet an addon from ITS

The central core is discarded, because the required escape velocity does not allow it to be recovered.

2/3 boosters recovered > 0/3 boosters recovered

It is not available yet and I decide to do it with a standard Dragon. "Hummel gets the rockets" Hans Zimmer The Rock Sountrack

@@rseferino1 i love this piece of mysic

Yes, it has been reviewed from my mobile and is not available. I do not know why the other videos are visible.

Use iPad IOS

Just enjoy it.

:D

:)

There isn't a good Dragon v2 for Orbiter yet as far as I've been able to find. I could 3D model the Dragon v2, but trying to animate anything from Blender to Orbiter is a huge headache that just ends up pissing me off. lol I would want at least the solar panels, the nose cone hiding the docking port, and landing legs to be animated. However, I would think someone is already well on their way to having a good Dragon v2 package at the Hangar website soon. There is a Falcon Heavy package, but to work in Orbiter 2016, you need the beta patch to install over the top of it. However, the heaviest payloads won't get all the way to orbit like they will in Orbiter 2010. He is working on a new package to be fully compatible with Orbiter 2016. Maybe he will include a Dragon v2 with both a Falcon 9 (for low orbit) and Falcon Heavy launch configurations in the new package, or at least, I hope he does. A one stop shop for a 'SpaceX Falcon Complete' Orbiter 2016 package would be ideal for my particular interests simulating an interplanetary space program. I'd much rather just deal with making 'spacecraft3' type interplanetary vehicles assembled from parts I use the Falcons to launch into LEO. In the near term, any other reusable rockets made by other manufacturers are just going to be copycatting the SpaceX Reusable Falcon System anyways, so may as well just go with it. ;-D

Entering orbit means using more fuel. For the landing only fuel is used in the terminal trajectory because part of the braking does the atmosphere. More fuel is used by entering orbit and landing.

Rseferino Orbiter Filmmaker Thanks for the explanation. I thought entering orbit would be helpful because then when you land, you're entering the atmosphere at a lower speed than you would be if you were coming in on a direct landing trajectory, but I guess if the Dragon can handle it, there's no reason to orbit.

Yes, in addition the real Red Dragon must use supersonic retropropulsion to perform precision landings, which they have practiced with the first stages of Falcon 9.

Sounds ambitious. I hope it goes well.

Yes. It's also due to the kind of fuel. To go interplanetary, you need hypergolics. Cryogenics would just boil away in that duration.

I also have a source for an accurate 3d model of psyche

Soon.

Thanks is it taking a long time

No

@@MimeHTF5 ok

Only 7 weeks have passed since the last update, each video requires a time of investigation, tests and recording, because this is not Kerbal when they do things without thinking much, without respecting historical events. At the moment I am in a change in my life, but soon I will restart with new videos. :)

Pedro Lucas Rodrigues pra mim também

Yes, it has been reviewed from my mobile and is not available. I do not know why the other videos are visible.

Aqui está exibindo tranquilamente

Visit my facebook page to know about updates ...

It does not

I will do more uploads, I have some other things to occupy in these times :)

He is still active, and thus you will only get dislikes on this comment.