Special Relativity simplified using no math. Einstein thought experiments

  Рет қаралды 667,704

Arvin Ash

Arvin Ash

4 жыл бұрын

Einstein's Special Relativity Explained Simply - no math
This entire revolution in physics started with a simple thought experiments, in the prolific imagination before Einstein even graduated from high school. Einstein’s theory of special relativity is convention today. But to understand how revolutionary it was for its time, it is helpful to look at what the conventional understanding of physics was during the time of Einstein’s teenage years.
In 1801, Thomas Young had conducted a simple double slit experiment that showed that light behaved like a wave. So the theory about light at the time was that it was a wave. The problem is that a wave, it was thought, had to move through some sort of medium. They called this substance the luminiferous aether.
But in 1887, two scientists by the name of Albert Michelson and Edward Morely came up with an idea to test the existence of the aether. The background ether was believed to be unmoving and static, so if the wave was traveling in the same direction as the earth, the speed of the wave should be higher in the direction of the speed of the earth. Michelson and Morley showed that there was no difference in the speed of light of the two measurements. This seriously jeopardized the aether theory.
Einstein knew this, so he came up with a thought experiment as a 16 year old. His thought was to imagine that he was chasing a beam of light while traveling at the speed of light himself. What would he see? If young Albert could catch up to the beam, he should see a stationary wave.
Yet that was impossible. Einstein knew such stationary fields would violate the equations of electromagnetism developed by James Clerk Maxwell 20 years earlier.
So he came up with two postulates, and tried to figure out what the physics would be if the two postulates were true.
Postulate 1 was that the laws of physics are the same for all inertial reference frames.
Postulate 2 was that the speed of light in a vacuum is constant for all inertial reference frames.
The first postulate had been assumed for hundreds of years. The second postulate, however, was the revolution.
This meant that young Einstein would never see the stationary, oscillating fields, because he could never catch the light beam.
But this solution seemed to have fatal flaw. Einstein later explained the problem with another thought experiment:
Imagine firing a light beam along a railroad embankment just as a train roars by in the same direction at, say, 2,000 miles a second. Someone standing on the embankment would measure the light beam’s speed to be the standard number, 186,000 miles a second. But someone on the train would see it moving past at only 184,000 miles a second.
If the speed of light was not constant, Maxwell’s equations would somehow have to look different inside the railcar, and the first postulate would be violated. The solution to his thought experiment was that observers in relative motion experience time differently. This completely overturned hundreds of years of classical physics in which time was absolute in the universe. Einstein showed that time is relative, and varies in different frames of reference. The idea of the aether was no longer needed.
This one realization that reality is not the same for different frames of reference also led to other implications of special relativity:
That Fast moving object appear shorter
That Fast moving objects appears to have increased mass
And finally, the most famous equation in science E=MC2
That mass and energy are equivalent.
So, how did Einstein come up with his most famous equation based on his original two postulates? Let’s look at this conceptually.
If conservation of mass is interpreted as conservation of rest mass, this did not hold true in special relativity. Since different observers would disagree about what the energy of a system was, the mass and energy taken together must be conserved, not just the mass on its own.
It turns out that for the laws of physics, namely conservation of energy and momentum, to be consistent in the two "reference frames" of two observers moving with respect to each other, there has to be an energy associated with a body at rest, not just a body in motion. And that is what E=MC2 implies - the M in the equation is the mass at rest.
Some people point out that much of the actual work for special relativity had already been done by the time Einstein presented it. The concepts of time dilation for moving objects, were already in place and the mathematics had already been developed by Lorentz & Poincare. Einstein still deserves the accolades because he rejected the idea of the ether all together which other scientists had not done, and the idea of mass and energy equivalence via E=MC2 is solely Einstein. Scientists who had done prior work like Thomson, Larmor, Lorentz, or Poincare had never implied such a bold proposition.
#specialrelativity
#einstein
#michelsonmorley

Пікірлер: 1 300
@LaplacianFourier
@LaplacianFourier 3 жыл бұрын
I am failing my high school, failing to get into desired colleges, failing to get desired jobs... I'd say I'm on track to be the man of the century :'D
@amitshetty6359
@amitshetty6359 3 жыл бұрын
But you are stuck on internet...a chance lost
@yogeshsaxena8217
@yogeshsaxena8217 3 жыл бұрын
U never know, maybe u might become someone who would discover the undiscovered universe..... and reality .....
@chimetimepaprika
@chimetimepaprika 3 жыл бұрын
You got this, man!
@pern1044
@pern1044 3 жыл бұрын
LOL
@christiansutterlin7127
@christiansutterlin7127 3 жыл бұрын
It’s a watered-down vision for children. Relativity is the Truth and nothing can exist apart from the Truth! Amen! Reality is darker! This video only talks about two or three phenomena consistent with relativity. What about black mass? What about dark energy? What about the total incompatibility between the mathematical and therefore continuous relativistic view and the discontinuous view of quantum mechanics? What about the Sagnac experience? What about Professor Allais's statistics? And so on and so forth, and some of the best! Check out the list in the video: the collapse of physics kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h6dllZCe1M6Yn2Q.html
@robertgoss4842
@robertgoss4842 4 жыл бұрын
Superb, as usual. Here is Einstein himself, describing relativity: "Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a second. Put your hand on a hot stove for a second, and it seems like an hour. That's relativity."
@alexandertownsend3291
@alexandertownsend3291 3 жыл бұрын
Does it cancel out if I put my hand on a hot stove while sitting with a pretty girl?
@DiabloNemes
@DiabloNemes 3 жыл бұрын
Alexander Townsend No it cancels out when the Girl is hot
@lindseylim8026
@lindseylim8026 3 жыл бұрын
@@alexandertownsend3291 It would last forever, because you would chastise yourself why you behaved so stupidly in front of the pretty girl. Doesn't cancel out.
@ojasdighe991
@ojasdighe991 3 жыл бұрын
@@alexandertownsend3291 yeah but this is true only from the simp's frame of reference
@ysys1404
@ysys1404 3 жыл бұрын
I once dated a girl online, our first meeting lasted for about 1 hour but for me it was like 1 day,.. can someone explain this in theory of relativity..
@jonathannepoose7588
@jonathannepoose7588 3 жыл бұрын
"Why don't you explain it to me like I'm five" -Michael Scott. lol great channel.
@aduts1177
@aduts1177 3 жыл бұрын
Right. Like you explain infinity war to a friend that hasn’t even watch a single hollywood movie..
@meyou3362
@meyou3362 2 жыл бұрын
Ur 5
@tylercash367
@tylercash367 2 жыл бұрын
“No matter how hard I try to explain spec relativity to your cat, you will fail” Brian Greene
@jt4369
@jt4369 3 жыл бұрын
"And just like in life, history tends to favor the bold." Thank you. I needed that reminder.
@someonesomeone529
@someonesomeone529 4 жыл бұрын
Man... your channel is simply amazing. it is just one of those few things that makes internet useful for humanity nowadays.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching brother.
@babycat5001
@babycat5001 3 жыл бұрын
The free market😉
@shelby3347
@shelby3347 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah this vid is good if you don’t want to live in reality because you do realize that Einstein used another theory called gravity in his conceptual theory you can’t make this stuff up to funny. And people buy it hook line and sinker maybe it’s because people have given up their minds and their god given right to think for themselves.
@marksimpson2321
@marksimpson2321 3 жыл бұрын
@@shelby3347 You appear to have misunderstood something about Einstein's theories. Gravity is explained more accurately and can be predicted more accurately with Einstein's General Theory of Relativity than using Newton's equations especially when considering large masses. General Relativity takes into account changes in acceleration. Special Relativity explains the fixed speed of light in a vacuum and it's consequences for time and space.
@shelby3347
@shelby3347 3 жыл бұрын
@@marksimpson2321 thank you for showing your ignorance of science and by the way you never disputed anything I said. You interjected mathematical construct into the convo , math isn’t science it’s a descriptive tool of reality and non reality. And light in a vacuum ??? Where on earth literally is there a vacuum in nature ?? There isn’t any. And it’s people like you who prove what I said in my original comment don’t believe me ?? Well let’s settle it real quick and simple please provide me the experiment that backs the claim of Einstein’s theory and it is a theory ( not even a good one ) built with mathematical construct and pseudoscience. And by the way it’s been changed at least 15 times since it’s conception but you probably knew that right ??Your priests are telling you for the last 5 years that gravity isn’t a force. George Musser 2019 “gravity isn’t a force but we can think of it as one” Brian Cox 2015 “ gravity isn’t a force at all” So I’ll just need that link for the scientific experiment that proves Einstein theory thanks.
@wizzy3548
@wizzy3548 4 жыл бұрын
*Time* magazine named Albert Einstein the Man of the Century. How fitting.
@danno1800
@danno1800 4 жыл бұрын
You have a gift for explaining complex things in words we can all understand. Thank you!
@hugbeaver
@hugbeaver 4 жыл бұрын
he sure does. amazing.
@sultanmalik4530
@sultanmalik4530 4 жыл бұрын
Soo true.. brother soo true.. wish we had such teachers in our school times
@TheUser04460
@TheUser04460 3 жыл бұрын
Because hi really understudy the subiect
@rayarcher2004
@rayarcher2004 3 жыл бұрын
What if you explain it the simplest way but nobody still get it?
@JL-fh4qw
@JL-fh4qw 3 жыл бұрын
I will write here that Arvin Ash is wrong that Einstein was the first to put all this together. Many of the 'original' ideas presented by the 1905 Einstein paper was all established by Poincare in 1902 and years before, and stated more completely. Einstein refused to acknowledge Poincare until much later, in fact he has a history of being called a plagiarist due to his lack of crediting others and pretending the ideas were original. Physicists have not done their research on how relativity was constructed so they have perpetuated the Einstein myth, despute there being a completely valid reason why Einstein did not receive a nobel prize for special and general relativity.
@buddy.abc123
@buddy.abc123 4 жыл бұрын
I'm the type of person who leaves the club to go home and watch Arvin Ash when he uploads
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
haha...thanks for watching my friend. But why not watch it at the club?
@stringedassassin
@stringedassassin 4 жыл бұрын
At 3 to 5 ads per vid nowadays I wouldn't rush home too early.
@pecfree
@pecfree 4 жыл бұрын
You freak
@luizaugustopires7727
@luizaugustopires7727 4 жыл бұрын
He is great !!
@robertgoss4842
@robertgoss4842 4 жыл бұрын
Me too.
@pawankhanal8472
@pawankhanal8472 3 жыл бұрын
You are genius, man !You simplify the most famous but less understood theory.
@alabidavid4674
@alabidavid4674 3 жыл бұрын
Least understood
@Brinta3
@Brinta3 6 ай бұрын
Little understood
@valeriataylor8337
@valeriataylor8337 3 жыл бұрын
I love how imaginative Einstein's way of coming into an idea was. He used to put himself into a scene and "feel" it
@johnstrawb3521
@johnstrawb3521 Жыл бұрын
@Valeria Taylor I'd love a link to this assertion, please. I've read a lot of Einstein's work and haven't come across a statement such as this. Thanks in advance for any help you can give me,
@ericephemetherson3964
@ericephemetherson3964 Жыл бұрын
Einstein was a plagarist.
@davidmudry5622
@davidmudry5622 Жыл бұрын
Gravity as a fictitious force. Main article: General relativity The notion of "fictitious force" arises in Einstein's general theory of relativity. The way all masses in free fall descend at the same rate led Albert Einstein to wonder whether gravity could be modeled as a fictitious force. He noted that a free falling observer along with various items in a closed box would not be able to detect any force, for they would all have no weight. In other experiments a consistent force gives various items various weights; hence, free falling reference frames are equivalent to force free inertial reference frames (the equivalence principle). Developing this insight, Einstein formulated a theory with gravity as a fictitious force, and attributed the apparent acceleration of free fall due to observers watching from a non-inertial reference frame while they are being accelerated by a force, and to the curvature of spacetime, which is a force free inertial reference frame. This idea underlies Einstein's theory of general relativity. NIST WTC FAQ 31. How could the WTC towers collapse in speeds that approximate that of a ball dropped from similar height in a vacuum (with no air resistance)? NIST, "Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance the building section above came down essentially in free fall." "History Favors the Bold"
@kayamann321
@kayamann321 2 жыл бұрын
This approach, specifically in this video, should be the standard. I’m 30 and finally have a grasp on this subject. Too well done, bravo 👏🏻
@joshua_dlima
@joshua_dlima 4 жыл бұрын
It's so wonderful looking at the velocity at the which his mind could think, that superb 'never give up' attitude just gives us so much to learn from.
@zanderallan4373
@zanderallan4373 2 жыл бұрын
I know you trying to sound sciency but using velocity in that concept is just malapropism his thoughts do not have a direction although you could say he thinks fast so really speed makes alot more sense
@HugeGamma
@HugeGamma 4 жыл бұрын
I've watched many videos /documentaries on the subject and this is the best one I have ever seen.. the present/illustrations/examples are expertly assembled and intuitive.. congratulations on the excellent work.. explained simply indeed
@jayaramgopal3048
@jayaramgopal3048 4 жыл бұрын
Great video.Perfect understanding.Time did it in.Mass is not absolute.Now everything is clear.Never felt so delighted.Clear voice and excellent explanation.
@kylorenkardashian5518
@kylorenkardashian5518 4 жыл бұрын
this video was amazing. I showed it to my neighbors & they agreed, amazing. we are currently looking for a projector so we can show our entire village
@funkyflames7430
@funkyflames7430 4 жыл бұрын
Justa Fool Copypasta?? Seriously, where do u get this funny commentary.
@funkyflames7430
@funkyflames7430 4 жыл бұрын
Justa Fool Oh, so you were actually serious. Then I will note for now that you seem to be confused. I mean, I think a lot of people would notice your points and people have tried to debunk the theory, so try to rewatch. If you are still confused, I am not able to help now, but maybe within 12 hours?? I will probably forget tho, so no promises.
@funkyflames7430
@funkyflames7430 4 жыл бұрын
Justa Fool Ok, so maybe I was overestimating on the time but here is my explanation. Einstein says the equations are identical for all inertial frames of references, not the actual values of things. Also, in regards to the observer field inconsistency, the field does not have a speed, because if it did, it would be relative and make the speed of light relative, which Maxwell did not calculate. So just try to better understand this idea that has predicted many phenomena and given real experimental data. Even if the assumptions are slightly wrong, it is science and it is the best we got. I think most people recognize almost all our equations are somewhat wrong but they are the best we got.
@xiaoxiao-kg5np
@xiaoxiao-kg5np 4 жыл бұрын
@@funkyflames7430 No, Im not satisfied with the rather lame and child like explanation that "its the best we have got". If you think that einstein's is probably wrong, but we don't have a better story, well that's not sufficient reason to overturn classical physics which does give 100% accurate results. Also, SR is NT the best explanation by any measure! Its probably the crappiest explanation ever proposed! First of all, its an explanation or a solution for a problem that does not actually even exist! Its all make believe. Where exactly does Einstein say that "the equations are identical for all inertial frames of references, not the actual values of things". ? If the equations are the same, and you say the values are different, then the only conclusion must be that what you measured to get your values MUST not be what I was measuring. Try measuring the same things please, then you must always get the same values or results as i get, because we are both using the same equations... 2+2=4 here MUST still equate to 4 over there, because physics and math MUST remain the same in all frames. so no, if you get 2+2=5 over there, then you are not applying the same physics laws. If your answer of 5 IS REALLY TRUE, then this is PROOF that physics is NOT the same in all frames! Make up your mind, pick a side and stay with it. Is physics the same in all frames or not? "Also, in regards to the observer field inconsistency, the field does not have a speed, because if it did, it would be relative and make the speed of light relative, which Maxwell did not calculate." How do you know that "the field" (what that is no body knows) is not moving? This CANT be correct, because that would then comprise as the ABSOLUTE stationary frame of reference, and Einsteins expressly forbid any such thing. So, no, you cant claim that "the field" is stationary, rather must be moving too, and its relative to everything else that's moving, or else Einsteins is wrong right here at this statement. Maxwell never calculated a moving frame because he already assumed a stationary aether, which was his belief. Einstein contradicted Maxwell because he said that Maxwells equations are not invariant when motion is involved. To make Maxwells equations invariant when motion is involved, Lorentz suggested that things shrink in the direction of motion, and that "explained" the M&M experiment's null result. Einstein just took it from there, but proposed that we can still have no aether, no absolute stationary frame of reference if we just say that Time also shrinks. What an idiot. Maxwell in fact never suggested that light speed was a constant in all frames of reference, neither did M&M ever suggest this. Maxwell said that light speed was in fact relative to the medium, and so did M&M. M&M could not find any measurable medium, and Maxwell never even bothered to look. So EInstein's solution opposes Maxwell in one claim. Maxwell said light is constant "relative the medium", (being the vacuum, or water, or air, or glass, or plastic) but Einstein said that light is constant "RELATIVE TO ANY OBSERVER". This is clearly an irrational statement by a simple minded person, not a genius.
@prithvitimalsina399
@prithvitimalsina399 4 жыл бұрын
@@xiaoxiao-kg5np if you want to learn then you must leave behind your arrogant nature and your pre existing reasoning and go for the full details and then only start to make some analysis. Everyone finds it (SR) super confusing and somewhat unintuitive (not as much as QM though) but the postulates and the predictions of Special relativity has been tested so many times and proven in it's favour, it explains the nature of nature. What more do we want? If you find the theory not compelling then you might come up with one of your groundbreaking ideas, which we are all waiting for. Stay motivated sir!
@petercoxable
@petercoxable 4 жыл бұрын
It really is mind blowing stuff, and I truly appreciate you, for simplifying this and other complicated subjects. Knowledge is power, and if we take it slowly, the things we learn from your videos will help us to understand the world we live in. I have subscribed and look forward to your next videos. Great work.
@aquimicadomecanico6132
@aquimicadomecanico6132 4 жыл бұрын
The most I listen to this video, I learn more to teach my students. Thank you so much!
@arthello2353
@arthello2353 4 жыл бұрын
Excellent, just what I was waiting for, will have to watch it a few more times which is understandable considering the subject. Thanks again.
@antoniomontana5778
@antoniomontana5778 4 жыл бұрын
Lucky you!! I'll have to watch it many more times!!!
@astyanax905
@astyanax905 4 жыл бұрын
Wow, you have a very good way of explaining things in simple terms. Subbed, keep up the great videos!
@watchfordpilot
@watchfordpilot 4 жыл бұрын
I enjoy my vacations but I always miss not being able to watch my favourite KZfaq channels. I thought I had a grasp of relativity from my school days, but i was kidding myself, I didn't. Today I have a much better (but not complete) understanding. i'm working on the missing bits - thanks Arvin.
@ZahidAli-oy4lk
@ZahidAli-oy4lk 4 жыл бұрын
i like the peoples whose are concise, brief and conclusive on the subject matter, ervin u are one of them ,i always wait ur videos and learn a lot
@CasianMerce
@CasianMerce 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, you really do great videos. You are one of a few who can explain high level science in the way that ordinary people can learn something
@fab4fan173
@fab4fan173 4 жыл бұрын
Awesome to find someone who can explain something complex and make it easy to understand. Thank you!!
@BladeRunner-td8be
@BladeRunner-td8be 3 жыл бұрын
As a math lover who doesn't remember much of it from college, this video is peerless. I have watched dozens of scientists discuss this subject on KZfaq and other sources; they covered the same ground as shown here and were superb for the most part. But this presentation was over-the-top, at least for me. The reason I say that is because I feel like I can explain this one concept to another person and actually have them understand it to a significant degree. I could never say that before. Cheers
@harivadher7271
@harivadher7271 4 жыл бұрын
Good explanation with deep understanding !!! Deserve more views
@neilwitton3540
@neilwitton3540 2 жыл бұрын
I wish I would have had more teachers at school who could explain things as well as you do Great vids
@jack.d7873
@jack.d7873 3 жыл бұрын
Just to say Arvin Ash's video's depict abstract scientific theories brilliantly. As in, no other channel I can find has 3D models of spacetime. They all use that trampoline curvature of spacetime but it does not give the general public the right idea of the full picture. They still don't know what spacetime is, or means, or its relevance within their own lives. Great job!
@johnhuldt
@johnhuldt 2 жыл бұрын
Your videos are amazing Arvin. Thank you for making these concepts available to people without training in advanced math and physics.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 2 жыл бұрын
I appreciate that!
@manurmad1539
@manurmad1539 3 жыл бұрын
I am taking a high school physics class, and for our final project we have to research a modern physics subject. I am researching relativity, and your videos have been helping a lot. Thanks for the great content.
@davidmudry5622
@davidmudry5622 Жыл бұрын
Gravity as a fictitious force. Main article: General relativity The notion of "fictitious force" arises in Einstein's general theory of relativity. The way all masses in free fall descend at the same rate led Albert Einstein to wonder whether gravity could be modeled as a fictitious force. He noted that a free falling observer along with various items in a closed box would not be able to detect any force, for they would all have no weight. In other experiments a consistent force gives various items various weights; hence, free falling reference frames are equivalent to force free inertial reference frames (the equivalence principle). Developing this insight, Einstein formulated a theory with gravity as a fictitious force, and attributed the apparent acceleration of free fall due to observers watching from a non-inertial reference frame while they are being accelerated by a force, and to the curvature of spacetime, which is a force free inertial reference frame. This idea underlies Einstein's theory of general relativity. NIST WTC FAQ 31. How could the WTC towers collapse in speeds that approximate that of a ball dropped from similar height in a vacuum (with no air resistance)? NIST, "Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance the building section above came down essentially in free fall." "History Favors the Bold"
@user-fs5sx2uh2h
@user-fs5sx2uh2h 6 ай бұрын
manurmad, The theory of relativity is a complete lie. It is based entirely on convoluted and deceptive mathematical models. Nikola Tesla’s statement about the modern methods of scientists like Einstein is revealing. ‘’today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. Nikola Tesla was the most brilliant scientist and inventor of his time. So advanced were his discoveries that upon his death in 1943 his research papers were seized by the FBI and classified ‘’Top Secret’’ at the request of the U.S. War Department. One of Tesla’s most notable discoveries was alternating electrical current (AC) that is today used to power most homes and businesses. Tesla understood true science and knew a scientific scam when he saw one. In 1935, Tesla called Einstein’s theory of relativity ‘’a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king…, its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.’’ plagiarization is intellectual theft. the unimpeachable record proves that Einstein was not a genius, but was simply a very clever con man, with powerful backers. Gwynne concludes that ''the truth about Einstein is that he was no more than a puppet.'' Gwynne presents compelling evidence that Einstein was selected to play the specific role of refuting the Michelson/Morley experiment (which proved that the earth was motionless) and reestablishing the rotating globular earth. and Time magazine actually put him on their cover and named him the Person of the Century.
@joewilde.
@joewilde. 4 жыл бұрын
Love love love..... so glad I found this channel.... it's fantastic!
@vispi1944
@vispi1944 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation. Truly, you make complex theories, conceptually so simple.
@sarahmueller335
@sarahmueller335 4 жыл бұрын
Well thought out, good graphics, and well presented. I could of used this when teaching high school physics.
@frankyjayhay
@frankyjayhay 4 жыл бұрын
That was a very good foundation. The idea that high speed astronauts come back younger, the twin paradox, sums up the mystery of relativity for most of us. It would be brilliant if, in a future video, using a just a bit of maths you could do an animation showing visually why the time dilation must occur and where the time for the astronaut actually gets lost. I haven't seen any really convincing ones and I know it would be very difficult because there are several different theories why it happens, Einstein linked it to acceleration, others didn't - big mystery.
@ishansharda6202
@ishansharda6202 4 жыл бұрын
You really make it physics interesting for us thank you so much!
@potawatomi100
@potawatomi100 4 жыл бұрын
Outstanding video Ash, and extremely well narrated.
@richardlow2947
@richardlow2947 4 жыл бұрын
What a great explanation. This should be compulsory viewing for anyone who's about to start special relativity
@ShannonMcDowell71
@ShannonMcDowell71 4 жыл бұрын
No math? But that's my favorite part! :-D Seriously, thank you for your great videos!
@FugieGamers
@FugieGamers 4 жыл бұрын
you can't handle the math.
@thomass3769
@thomass3769 4 жыл бұрын
I spotted some equations in the video...was I seeing things?
@lukiepoole6701
@lukiepoole6701 4 жыл бұрын
W=mc^2 is BS. Using magnetic field in the opposite direction is capable of completely destroy hydrogen. Yet, the energy produced doesn't agree with the equation. The REAL formulae of energy is W=(1/2)*L*I^2 and W=(1/2)*C*E^2 The natural inductance and capacitance of free space, or rather, the *Aether* itself.
@lukiepoole6701
@lukiepoole6701 4 жыл бұрын
@TheAnax 11 Light moves with the same velocity as earth for god's sake. Static aether doesn't even change the direction of light. Not to mention they think of aether "moves". How stupid. The device they are using is moving at the same direction as light. Light is NOT limited by the medium it propagates in. It still has inertia! For example, it moves in a direction in x-axis, then a mirror reflect it to y-axis. It wouldn't magically slow down or speed up because aether is STATIC and does NOT magically inhibit light to the point it diverge from it's path. Those experimenters are pure trash of humanity. Now, science is pure trash without aether. And no. Light does not move with "space". Light propagates IN "space"/AETHER.
@lukiepoole6701
@lukiepoole6701 4 жыл бұрын
@Joe Duke Insane? Keep yourself indulged in pure math is the one that is really insane.
@lezliebeans5639
@lezliebeans5639 4 жыл бұрын
No, thank YOU Arvin! For such an easy representation.
@rajeshchandrasekharan3436
@rajeshchandrasekharan3436 3 жыл бұрын
Sir,I have watched some of your videos.Your explanation is simple and any Physics enthusiastic person is able to understand. You are explaining, even Relatively in a possible and simple way.I am addicted to your videos.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks and welcome
@maricelacervantes23
@maricelacervantes23 4 жыл бұрын
I finally understand at least the basics of Einstein's theory of relativity. My only problem was that I had to keep rewinding the video because of your accelerated speech. Thank you very much for the comprehensible vocabulary. Awesome video.
@maxsteele3686
@maxsteele3686 4 жыл бұрын
I’m so glad I found this channel and subscribed. I recommend various videos in physics and astronomy subreddits because I think this channel deserves more exposure to science enthusiasts. Have you considered collaborating with PBS Spacetime? Also, I’m extremely curious about the number of anti-relativity and anti-Einstein comments your videos must get on a constant basis. I can’t go to any physics video and not see at least one comment about someone talking about pseudoscience like the electric universe nonsense. Have you considered making a video addressing that nonsense and debunking it?
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your patronage! Regarding debunking videos - the scientist in me wants to make them to try to get "believers" to think more scientifically, but my impression is that it is a losing proposition. Why? Because the scientifically minded people do not need a silly concept to be debunked, and the true believers never seem to be convinced. A perfect example is my Bob Lazar video. I am open to doing this though if enough of my subscribers want it.
@FriedrichHerschel
@FriedrichHerschel 4 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Einstein never got a nobel prize for the relativity theories. He got one for the photoelectric effect.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
Indeed you are correct. The Nobel committee usually does not award revolutionary ideas until those ideas are confirmed over decades in dozens of experiments.
@phscsantos
@phscsantos 4 жыл бұрын
Yes.. but why the huge space? Lol
@phscsantos
@phscsantos 4 жыл бұрын
Oh.. I get it. lol funny
@Gam1n4eva
@Gam1n4eva 4 жыл бұрын
Einstein even took Planck's idea for photoelectric effect
@misko933
@misko933 4 жыл бұрын
Probably they just didnt understand him because it was theoretical, so instead of that they gave him a Nobels prize on something that is observable
@Nugg3tTV
@Nugg3tTV 2 жыл бұрын
Been using your videos for my class. Keep making videos for knowledge. Thank you Sir.
@KingTaiChiSirPang
@KingTaiChiSirPang 4 жыл бұрын
An excellent piece of work to physicists. For a layman like me, a retired biology teacher, I try to explain this way to the general public. The speed of light is known to be constant for different observers. An observer on the ground sees the speed of tennis ball by suming the velocity of train and that of the ball. The observer inside the train sees the speed of the same tennis ball by that tennis ball alone. But if on the train, a beam of ligjt is projecting, the ground observer would see the speed of light the same as the observer on the train because the light insist on the same veolocity to all observer. There is only one equation to calculate the speed of everything, length/time. Therefore in order to let the light keeping its constant speed, the length(and time, they change together though not in direct proportion) of the train travelled has to be flexibly experienced and spacetime dimension(in length travel) has to alter in that reality. This is an incredible conclusion that could stunt people around. As they immediately see the length of the 3D space are flexible or elastic, so connecting to the concept of spacetime being warping around. Of course, Einstein another achievement is figuring out the relative velocity of spacetime into pythrago's theorm of a right angle triangle for the train, the light and the ground observer. Layman could then understand the quantum related area because the emptiness is in fact something a 'fabric' there. Before when vacuum is emptiness, then there is nothing important to particles travel here and there because nothing in between. Since now there is a fabric of the universe which can be twisted, scientist had to find an explanation of how and why they come into existence, why they travel with different spead, even the sperpositioning, quantum entanglement, dark matter, dark energy, vacuum catastrophy, the black hole features, holograpgic universe, multiverse etc, finally pointing to a possible way of solving out the ultimate physics problem of the interaction and creation of our own universe! Of couse, the String theory, Field Interaction, knownledge from backhole provides some pieces of the whole puzzle.
@haydenhattenbach8223
@haydenhattenbach8223 4 жыл бұрын
he explained this so well that it seems simple
@eugeniag37
@eugeniag37 4 жыл бұрын
Great video, as usual. I'll watch it again, paper and a pen in hand, take notes and read MY notes, then I'll surely understand the whole thing. Lol.
@Name-js5uq
@Name-js5uq 3 жыл бұрын
Wow Mr. Ash that was just so amazing I've seen that at least two times and I love it more each time
@jeancorriveau8686
@jeancorriveau8686 2 жыл бұрын
I appreciate that you gave some credit to other physicists and mathematicians.
@bassimkiani5504
@bassimkiani5504 4 жыл бұрын
Ah, so you are using the Feynman technique! Brilliant!
@DonSolaris
@DonSolaris 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but Einstein never used miles per hour units. More like kilometers per hour. :) Also Energy is not equal to Mega x Capacity squared, because that phrase makes no sense, yet it was written all over the video. So... get those units and letters right next time. The channel will look more professional, and gain more viewers. ;) Cheers!
@CVBrennan
@CVBrennan Жыл бұрын
One of the best explanations I've experienced. Thank you.
@paulg444
@paulg444 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much for this one Arvin!... What a great story!
@julianstaniewski1371
@julianstaniewski1371 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you alot, great explanation
@trombone7
@trombone7 4 жыл бұрын
Excellent. I got chills. This video is a review for me as well highlighting my many overlooked "loose-ends" when it comes to relativity. I hope this is someone's first doorway into relativity (Newtonian physics, and quantum physics for contrast / comparison). As I had so many years ago (Brief History & Chaos (James Gleick)). Thank you so much, great work !
@jacobjulin
@jacobjulin 4 жыл бұрын
your videos are a breath of fresh air, thank you!
@isisbarfuss558
@isisbarfuss558 Жыл бұрын
GREATEST VIDEO OF ALL TIME! I AM ABSOLUTELY MIND-BLOWN! I have always wanted to see something like this, and now I have. You have opened my mind to the possibility of AMAZING things. AND everyone knows it to be true. I now know the meaning of life. I now know everything. I now have purpose. And it's all thanks to you.
@jkshallinheritearth3883
@jkshallinheritearth3883 3 жыл бұрын
Average teenager : Imagines Women Curvature, Teenage Einstein : Imagines Space time Curvature!
@LuisSierra42
@LuisSierra42 3 жыл бұрын
Einstein was a womanizer as well
@praveenreddy6156
@praveenreddy6156 3 жыл бұрын
@@LuisSierra42 😂 what !
@LuisSierra42
@LuisSierra42 3 жыл бұрын
@@praveenreddy6156 he was. He constantly cheated on his cousin wife
@aduts1177
@aduts1177 3 жыл бұрын
He Was pervert as far As i know. He would be a victim of porn and other stuffs in the modern world
@aduts1177
@aduts1177 3 жыл бұрын
Bollywood should be banned. Thats why you dont get Einstein in subcontinent
@quicksilver3431
@quicksilver3431 4 жыл бұрын
3:56 that's where Einstein came up!
@VijetaDahiya
@VijetaDahiya 3 жыл бұрын
Sir, thank you firstly for explaining these concepts in such simple language that even people with non-physics academic background can understand, or at least try to understand this stuff and be marveled by it. I have some questions that propped in my mind after seeing this video - What I understood is that for two people in different frames, on ground (Vijeta) and in a slow-moving train (Arvin), there is relative motion. If a third person person Virgina moved inside the train in opposite side of train (let's assume her speed > slow train's speed), and Arvin watched her move, then it's a simple thing : time = (Distance covered by Virgina)/(Virgina's speed). Whereas for Vijeta, it would be (Distance covered by Virginia's footsteps - Distance covered by train)/(Virgina's speed - train's speed). The time for both frames is same, whereas both distances (w.r.t Vijeta and Arvin) and both speeds (w.r.t Vijeta and Arvin) are different. But if Virgina is replaced by light and speed of light doesn't get subjected to Newtonian relativity, then the speeds (w.r.t. Vijeta & Arvin) remains same. Distances are different. So, time for Vijeta and Arvin must be different. - But how do we know for sure that if the train were moving at a very high speed nearing 300,000 km/s, then the Miss light walking in the train would not feel staggered a bit? That its speed won't be different w.r.t the two of us? - Secondly, it is well known that speed of light in various mediums like water, air and glass is different. We haven't gone close to Mercury, and can't exactly say about the medium near Mercury. What if it tempers with the speed of light and hence our calculations? - Thirdly, knowing that even the Sun and entire solar system also moves at such a high speed and is drawn by the forces outside our solar system making it move around centre of milky way, then the same forces also don't affect the adjacent and much smaller Mercury? - Fourthly, if Miss light now moved in same direction as train, then the displacement w.r.t Vijeta would be different, than if Miss light were moving in opposite direction of train. However, for Arvin, her distance stays the same. So, with respect to Vijeta, her displacement in both cases (i.e. her movement in both directions) is different. So, how could time (w.r.t Vijeta) be same in both cases? Time should be faster than Arvin's time in one case, and slower than Arvin's time in other. Waiting eagerly for your replies. Thank you.
@manohartamhankar9813
@manohartamhankar9813 4 жыл бұрын
Explained very well without complicated math. Enjoyed the video.
@hansturpyn5455
@hansturpyn5455 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks great vid,.. so how faster the object goes the more mass and thus energy it has? Compaired to the "mass/energy in rest" That was something i didnt grasp from other videos.
@cazymike87
@cazymike87 4 жыл бұрын
Also, it dumps into space at least 100, 00000000...........01 % energy in the oposite direction .
@DennisSantos
@DennisSantos 4 жыл бұрын
It's funny how the two gravitational wave observatories resemble the Michelson - Morley Experiment.
@vincentling8115
@vincentling8115 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for explaining quantum physics to those of us who haven't had the benefit of a hard science education. I am a constantly curious person & I rely on videos like yours to educate & inform myself. P.S. math is essential..to understanding our world.
@TheSreerammohan
@TheSreerammohan 8 ай бұрын
Really high quality videos with narration that motivates the viewers to be the cause for next physics revolution!
@kylorenkardashian5518
@kylorenkardashian5518 4 жыл бұрын
Arvin, I really do enjoy your content. I would love to see you do a crossover episode with "the science asylum" [youtube channel] & "Captain Disillusion" [youtube channel]
@entoythedragon8463
@entoythedragon8463 4 жыл бұрын
Blows my mind when some say Tesla is smarter than Einstein. SMH
@malikaamirmamoon4268
@malikaamirmamoon4268 4 жыл бұрын
Yes He was
@entoythedragon8463
@entoythedragon8463 4 жыл бұрын
@@malikaamirmamoon4268 Tesla doesn't have a clue how the universe work and no idea about our reality. lol
@arc46789
@arc46789 4 жыл бұрын
@@malikaamirmamoon4268 Tesla is dead.
@erik-ic3tp
@erik-ic3tp 4 жыл бұрын
@@arc46789, Einstein too. :)
@ThomasNoname
@ThomasNoname 4 жыл бұрын
Tesla was a genius in his own right. Comparing scientist by who is smarter is pretty dumb. Einstein even said "Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid." Or at least, it's very often associated with Einstein.
@mohammedzikar9781
@mohammedzikar9781 3 жыл бұрын
You have explained amazingly such a wonderful theory of physics in simple words and I has become a fan of your nice explanation. Thank you so much sir......
@leopardtiger1022
@leopardtiger1022 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for excellent clear explanation of complex physical concepts. You are a Professor many will watch your video. Thank you.
@deanjelbertaustria6174
@deanjelbertaustria6174 4 жыл бұрын
This reminds me of John :p Fortis fortuna adiuvat :p fortune favors the bold
@Goofy_face1
@Goofy_face1 4 жыл бұрын
Can u make mathematical version of this video
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
I will make one on General relativity and include the math. GR derivation is much more complex than SR. I think you'll like it, if you love math! Stay tuned.
@freddan65gbg24
@freddan65gbg24 3 жыл бұрын
Very good video and presenter. He explains it so well. Always interesting to listen to people of great knowledge and also can present it in the best pedagogical way.
@skartstudio8824
@skartstudio8824 3 жыл бұрын
I love science, so i love you sir, your videos answer to many of my questions in a very simpler way that otherwise i am unable to grasp, because i am an amateur
@phscsantos
@phscsantos 4 жыл бұрын
Can I just emphasize the fact that photoshopping young Einstein's face into the sketches made them kinda funny? lol
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
Have to admit. You are right! lol.
@billnorris5318
@billnorris5318 4 жыл бұрын
Well done..Its trendy to suggest general relativity CANNOT be right due to its conflicts with QM on gravity. Perhaps the predicted quantization of gravity is WRONG.. perhaps I'm just a relativity chauvinist..Excellent show.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
I will be tackling General Relativity in a future video. Both QM and General relativity are correct. There is way too much evidence in favor of GR for it to be wrong.
@meps8472
@meps8472 3 жыл бұрын
i know im late but your video is amazing and what really suprises me that you have an acutal description many channels dont have that and just put tags
@wallacewithoutgromit
@wallacewithoutgromit 4 жыл бұрын
Glad you included the Michelson Morley experiment. Many explainers of this theory leave it out.
@cranjismcbasketball2118
@cranjismcbasketball2118 4 жыл бұрын
If i was driving at the speed of light and I turned on the headlights... would they work?
@FobbitMike
@FobbitMike 4 жыл бұрын
LOL, good one. I've seen this question before, and the answer is: since you can't drive at the speed of light, the question has no meaning.
@cranjismcbasketball2118
@cranjismcbasketball2118 4 жыл бұрын
Mike Petersen Its actually a steven wright joke!🤣🤣
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
That's actually a great question! I would like to give two answers. The first answer is, if you somehow could travel at the speed of light, you would not need to drive anywhere because you would already be at your destination. Realistically though, in our universe, you can not travel at the speed of light if you have any mass. But if you travelled even 99.99999% the speed of light, your headlights would indeed work normally from your perspective. The remarkable thing is that an outside observer standing still would also measure that same speed "C" for that beam of light. How is this possible? This is the crux of special relativity. Time would slow down dramatically for you if you travelled at that speed, from the perspective of a stationary observer. Speed of light will always be the same for every frame of reference.
@cranjismcbasketball2118
@cranjismcbasketball2118 4 жыл бұрын
Arvin Ash Haha I will relay that information to steve wright!! hahaha!!🤣🤣🤣Love your videos!
@bryanhendrix1113
@bryanhendrix1113 4 жыл бұрын
Yes... is the answer. Just ask the peeps on Earth 2 in a galaxy way far away on the other side of the universe.
@christianheichel
@christianheichel 4 жыл бұрын
I know light can red shift and blue shift but is there a limit were it stops being light/no more power (referring to red shift)I think blue shifting results in a black hole because as the bandwidth shrinks the power is still there but takes up less and less space resulting in a Kugelblitz eventually but at what is it's Schwarzschild radius power/bandwith. With red shift is there a limit other than the size of the universe?
@FobbitMike
@FobbitMike 4 жыл бұрын
Hi Chris ... That' a great question. The largest measured redshift is z=1089, the redshift of the CMB. That number will gradually increase as the universe is still expanding. However, that is not the highest possible redshift. That would occur at the event horizon of a black hole. As an object falls into the black hole, its emitted light will be more and more redshifted by the incredibly intense gravitational field near/at the event horizon. Theoretically it would continue to redshift until it fades from our possibility to measure it. The energy of the light will keep decreasing until the event horizon is breached. But, if you have viewed Arvin's other video on black holes and his explanation of what happens to his hypothetical astronaut "Adam", you will see where this is going. Adam will never be observed by anyone in the universe as having fallen past the event horizon. He is trapped there forever because time will slow to 0. But Adam won't notice it. From his point of view nothing has changed. He passes the event horizon uneventfully. So, what's up with that? Now you see what your question has led to, so I really suggest you check out Arvin's black hole video. Hope this helps!
@jonwatson654
@jonwatson654 4 жыл бұрын
@@BillyBob-qk6vy The expansion of space eventually exceeds the speed of light. Which strangely doesn't break any laws. The speed of light and the expansion of space are not connected.
@christianheichel
@christianheichel 4 жыл бұрын
@@FobbitMike awesome input and thanx for sharing I just went and checked out the video do you know if my blue shift hypothesis is correct
@FobbitMike
@FobbitMike 4 жыл бұрын
@@christianheichel Yes, you are correct in your blue shift comment. Way to go!
@jonwatson654
@jonwatson654 4 жыл бұрын
@@BillyBob-qk6vy I fully understand the concept, I'm still not sure what your question is about there being a limit.
@kmrao06
@kmrao06 4 жыл бұрын
Nice introduction! Waiting for next video
@Herecomesthethruth
@Herecomesthethruth 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for helping me understand these complex things on a simple level.👍
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful.
@smarthalayla6061
@smarthalayla6061 4 жыл бұрын
Yes, but who's the blond at 1:53?
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
haha...I was waiting for that question. She is a model. Don't know her name.
@ganjalfthegreen5312
@ganjalfthegreen5312 4 жыл бұрын
Priorities, this guy has them
@PeterManger
@PeterManger 4 жыл бұрын
Please use scientific standard units.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
I am using the units that were used during the time of the scientists. It felt weird to me to be using 20th century SI units for this video.
@dariushmilani6760
@dariushmilani6760 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Arvin. well presented.
@ednorton3026
@ednorton3026 4 жыл бұрын
I don't your current profession but as a teacher I really hope you are one of us. You are excellent !!!!
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you. I appreciate that very much coming from a teacher! I taught as a grad student in college, and loved it. But I'm afraid I missed the calling and honor of full time teaching, choosing instead to pursue corporate management. But YT has given me a forum to pursue my inner passion.
@stevemcivor3784
@stevemcivor3784 4 жыл бұрын
No job is 'lowly'.
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
I don't disagree. My description was perhaps dramatic.
@RichardFletcher
@RichardFletcher 4 жыл бұрын
Einstein was clever but even he said Tesla was the genius
@ImYourProblem
@ImYourProblem 4 жыл бұрын
no, no, none of that tesla malarkey in here, just stick to the virtual particles and magical fields and "dark" stuff...
@ognjenmarkovic7251
@ognjenmarkovic7251 4 жыл бұрын
@@ImYourProblem If there wasn't Tesla, you'd probably be the one in the dark.
@ImYourProblem
@ImYourProblem 4 жыл бұрын
ha, i was just being sarcastic.. Tesla is the man.
@brad8786
@brad8786 4 жыл бұрын
@@ImYourProblem foot in mouth
@donniseltzer7718
@donniseltzer7718 4 жыл бұрын
Einstein was just being sarcastic
@michaelsdenney
@michaelsdenney 4 жыл бұрын
Good mini-documentary. Thanks!
@sonamtshering194
@sonamtshering194 Жыл бұрын
The introduction and conclusion were really inspirational
@anandsuralkar2947
@anandsuralkar2947 4 жыл бұрын
I love ur videos channel content and everything but dude that miles?? Thats sucks..plzz never ever use miles plz use proper unite please speed of light is measured in meters per second easy 3*10^8 and not some rediculous number miles per second Noone uses this unit not even americans its miles per hour.i m pissed of.bcz..even though i know speed of light but many dont
@ArvinAsh
@ArvinAsh 4 жыл бұрын
That's the units that were used at the time that the speed of light was determined. But there's an easy fix, every time I say 186,000 miles per second, just think in your head 300,000 kilometers per second instead!
@nidhinparambath3141
@nidhinparambath3141 4 жыл бұрын
"Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists" NIKOLA TESLA
@brad8786
@brad8786 4 жыл бұрын
He stole many patents when working at the patent office Einstein was a thief
@donniseltzer7718
@donniseltzer7718 4 жыл бұрын
Tesla was a great engineer but a very bad physicist. And you conpiranoic anti semitic lunatics, please stop kidnapping Tesla. He has nothing to do with you. weirdos
@DylanWagerMusic
@DylanWagerMusic 4 жыл бұрын
Holy crap it’s clicking. I never understood how time could be different but it’s all making sense. This is like blowing my mind
@Boogieplex
@Boogieplex 4 жыл бұрын
Dude I just love your channel!!!
@robertquick6690
@robertquick6690 4 жыл бұрын
Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. Nikola Tesla
@erik-ic3tp
@erik-ic3tp 4 жыл бұрын
@polka, How exactly? Sabine Hossenfelder's a modern physicist who says something like that today.
@brad8786
@brad8786 4 жыл бұрын
Einstein was asked something like what would the smartest man in the world think about that Einstein replied "I dont know ask Nicola Tesla he was the real genius
@smd4878
@smd4878 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the clear and interesting explanation of Relativity. I think you have missed to talk about Lorentz transformations as a precursor to Einstein development of his theory where Lorentz showed time dilation and length contraction when he theorized the result of Michelson-Morley experiment.
@balajisambasivam9525
@balajisambasivam9525 4 жыл бұрын
I have been grappling with the ideas of special relativity for a long time but no one could explain them so lucidity. Particularly Einsteins thought experiment with light beam. Thanks
@TheBrickagon
@TheBrickagon 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I really needed this! :D
@romin7255
@romin7255 Жыл бұрын
A big A+ for your video ; clear and concise. 👍 I must say, however, that being a completely non-mathematician myself, some concepts would deserve a bit more of an explanation... 🙂
@quantised1703
@quantised1703 4 жыл бұрын
kudos for keeping it simple!
@shiwanaLS
@shiwanaLS 2 жыл бұрын
Well explained Sir ! 👌🏻
How Can SPACE and TIME be part of the SAME THING?
15:46
Arvin Ash
Рет қаралды 549 М.
СҰЛТАН СҮЛЕЙМАНДАР | bayGUYS
24:46
bayGUYS
Рет қаралды 824 М.
Be kind🤝
00:22
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 22 МЛН
Они убрались очень быстро!
00:40
Аришнев
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
General Relativity Explained simply & visually
14:04
Arvin Ash
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
The EPR Paradox & Bell's inequality explained simply
18:18
Arvin Ash
Рет қаралды 562 М.
What is Relativity? | Sean Carroll on Einstein's View of Time and Space
30:04
What Was There Before the Big Bang? 3 Good Hypotheses!
16:58
Arvin Ash
Рет қаралды 263 М.
iphone fold ? #spongebob #spongebobsquarepants
0:15
Si pamer 😏
Рет қаралды 815 М.
wyłącznik
0:50
Panele Fotowoltaiczne
Рет қаралды 24 МЛН
Нашел айфоны в мусорке!
0:32
По ту сторону Гугла
Рет қаралды 207 М.
iPhone 12 socket cleaning #fixit
0:30
Tamar DB (mt)
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
😱НОУТБУК СОСЕДКИ😱
0:30
OMG DEN
Рет қаралды 3,2 МЛН