No Let was far too harsh but neither was it a Stroke imo. The ball was still too far away from him and he still had another step to reach it. The correct decision should have been Let imo.

Let, all day

Firstly, an opponent should not expect a direct route to the ball. Secondly, the opponent must be in a position to not only play the ball, but arguably be able to play a winner had he not been hindered, to be awarded a stroke. The opponent was lucky to be awarded a let, as the ref may have taken the view that he didn't make sufficient effort to get to the ball.

I look at it as, if Dussourd were not there, then Mueller would've made the shot. Dussourd needs to clear the line to the ball. He actually moved back into Mueller's path. Should have been a stroke.

Please be careful. I have no idea why he is saying it 🤩

I say no let cause the ball already went past and he shouldve gone round the back to have a chance to get to it

Let ball, Mueller playing the man, but also Dussourd is backing up to get in the way and pretending to be dumb. 2 dumbs make a let.

Yes let. I would only add a conduct warning if it seemed the match was going to descend into rugby. If this was just an isolated incident then its a pretty normal bump into the other player.

The rules used to state that your opponent should be allowed a clear and unobstructed path to the ball. Not sure if thats still the case or if the interpretation from the ref's is to reduce the amount of lets given. Sometimes its just a let!!!

Stroke all day long. The direct path to the ball was blocked. The ball bounced back to the service box. Nicolas would have played this easily without the opponent being on the way.

That's why it'll never make it to the Olympics, too messy and silly refereeing like this. It was a traffic issue, play a let, ball was still bouncing and he was attempting to play it.

yes let for me. ball second-bounced midcourt while orange-shirt. if blue-shirt hit it deeper than would be different story.

Let

Stroke ball was coming directly in to his path couldn’t play a clear shot

I would have given him a conduct warning. There was no need to run into the outher player like that. He ran into him on purpose.

No let and Warning 👍, too aggressive

no let. looks like a winner to me

So squash has had consistently terrible officiating. Good to know!

No let. Dudes not even close to getting that ball

Would have been Let, but he put his arm around his opponent and carried him to the ball. No Let

Squash as much as I love it has this problem. Too much subjective refereeing. Tennis got rid of linesmen which eliminates issues…much too Ostapenko’s dislike…;-)