Staggering Corruption of Senator Bob Menendez

Рет қаралды 989,246

8 ай бұрын

Menendez learned the wrong lesson from his last prosecution. ☕️ Get your first bag free with Trade Coffee legaleagle.link/trade ⚖️⚖️⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! legaleagle.link/eagleteam
Welcome back to LegalEagle. The most avian legal analysis on the internets.
🚀 Watch my next video early & ad-free on Nebula! legaleagle.link/watchnebula
👔 Suits by Indochino! legaleagle.link/indochino
GOT A VIDEO IDEA? TELL ME!
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Send me an email: devin@legaleagle.show
MY COURSES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my guide to law school! legaleagle.link/lawguide
Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you! legaleagle.link/copyrightcourse
SOCIAL MEDIA & DISCUSSIONS
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Twitter: legaleagle.link/twitter
Facebook: legaleagle.link/facebook
Tik Tok: legaleagle.link/tiktok
Instagram: legaleagle.link/instagram
Reddit: legaleagle.link/reddit
Podcast: legaleagle.link/podcast
OnlyFans legaleagle.link/onlyfans
Patreon legaleagle.link/patreon
BUSINESS INQUIRIES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Please email my agent & manager at legaleagle@standard.tv
LEGAL-ISH DISCLAIMER
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Sorry, occupational hazard: This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos! All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Special thanks:
Stock video and imagery provided by Getty Images and AP Archives
Music provided by Epidemic Sound
Short links by pixelme.me (pxle.me/eagle)
Maps provided by MapTiler/Geolayers

Пікірлер: 2 200

@x6nitro228 8 ай бұрын

When lobbying is so easy, imagine how corrupt you have to be to get procecuted for it.

@MrAAgabriel 8 ай бұрын

😂

@tuxtitan780 8 ай бұрын

It seems like a lot of politicians recently have done what politicians always have done, but have been so non discreet and idiotic with it that it's finally opening the public's eyes and starting a movement to root out corruption and narcissism. First Trump, now Menendez, im really hoping that these two just exposing how awful politicians can be behind the scenes actually pushes the general public to demand change and get this country back on the right track

@tski3458 8 ай бұрын

@tuxtitan780 then there is Kenny Boy Paxton and Texas.

@michaelmcgovern8110 8 ай бұрын

In many countries what we call "lobbying" is called "illegal". Let's try that here.

@margaretwordnerd5210 8 ай бұрын

As a naive 17 year old, I believed Spiro Agnew's downfall heralded a new era of accountability for political corruption. Stay vigilant and refuse to settle for anything less than justice. Things could be much worse, so let's not allow that.✌🖖

@uncleike6211 8 ай бұрын

Can't imagine why this Supreme Court would be so invested in making it harder to convict public officials for corruption.

@justinfowler2857 8 ай бұрын

The guilty are covering their tracks?

@dielaughing73 8 ай бұрын

Yeah it's a reeeeeal mystery. Unless...

@thedekunutt8982 8 ай бұрын

We have investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing

@Wegetsignal 8 ай бұрын

Who paid the Kavanaugh debt off? The people must know.

@seewhativescene 8 ай бұрын

Stuff a couple hundred into an envelope and I'll tell you 💌@@Wegetsignal

@getnohappy 8 ай бұрын

It's impressive that the US' lobbying system is so indistinguishable from corruption that corruption is hard to prove

@JLF201 8 ай бұрын

I'm not sure "impressive" is the right word, but it sure is something!

@fynnkessels2488 8 ай бұрын

Corruption is accepting to bribes, lobbying is offering them. It‘s quite simple 😂

@rsr789 8 ай бұрын

The USA is the richest third-world country.

@superexoticshrub 8 ай бұрын

@@JLF201 "Impressive" doesn't have to mean positive.

@jakehix8132 8 ай бұрын

@@superexoticshrub No, but hundreds of millions would not have ignored it into being had it truly impressed.

@jsrodman 8 ай бұрын

I am shocked, SHOCKED that this supreme court has made it harder to win corruption cases.

@ChrisBrengel 8 ай бұрын

LOL! And to find that corruption is going on in here!

@airtale8725 8 ай бұрын

What's more with conservative judges

@Dr.Sometimes 7 ай бұрын

⁠this was in 2010 and 2016 and many democrat judges supported it and the case was against a democrat that the democrats backed him and menendiz… but yeah only Reps are bad

@davidlazerz8564 8 ай бұрын

Supreme Court: "It's not REAL corruption and bribery unless the official signs a 'This is bribery' contract with at least 2 witnesses and the contract is notarized by a sitting chief justice." Using the Courts logic then I should be able to rob a bank by asking to "borrow" money out of the register.

@innocento.1552 8 ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@JohnDoe-qz1ql 8 ай бұрын

Rules for thee, not for me.

@Willsmiff1985 8 ай бұрын

@@JohnDoe-qz1qlyou jest, but the truth is unless you own capital generating assets, you aren’t important to the federal Govt

@Joshua_Hale 8 ай бұрын

Don't worry about it. I'm sure we can trust criminals to be honest with us about whether they committed crimes.

@michaelmcgovern8110 8 ай бұрын

Vote Blue 2024 for a SCOTUS ethics policy and a few replaced "tarnished" justices.

@choczynski 8 ай бұрын

Getting bribed with literal gold bars is like comic books crooked politician from the 40s

@dielaughing73 8 ай бұрын

Traceable gold bars, at that

@marinary1326 8 ай бұрын

When I first heard about it I thought there was no way it was real, because who would want to be paid in gold bars?!

@Diovanlestat 8 ай бұрын

You guys need another Robert Ness and his Untouchables

@seewhativescene 8 ай бұрын

Robert Ness (son of Eliot) died of leukemia, why are you this way? @@Diovanlestat

@Diovanlestat 8 ай бұрын

@@seewhativescene Human and able to make mistakes? I don't know I was born like this. Thank you kindly for the correction, I'll try to to make the same mistake again.

@brendensaur893 8 ай бұрын

As a young person, it makes me really sad to see all this corruption happening. No one acts like it’s a big deal. Get those justices out. Get these politicians out.

@stefanoviczeljkors 8 ай бұрын

Just imagine how much of this happens in a "better" way. I mean the way that it's not obvious and won't get caught.

@TheSlyMouse 8 ай бұрын

@@jordy6423 shoot nvm then.

@bacicinvatteneaca 8 ай бұрын

@@TheSlyMouse writing letters is nothing, you need to protest and strike. Hurt their pockets.

@TheSlyMouse 8 ай бұрын

@@bacicinvatteneaca but it's a young person I mean maybe there something they can do alone those lines but idk

@maromania7 8 ай бұрын

@@TheSlyMouse If you're lucky they're at least somewhat reasonable, and they end up knowing you by name and ignore you. For the majority, if you're acting alone they'll get you locked up for a few days on a bogus charge and permanently remove your ability to vote. That's one of thier main tactics, grabbing people at protests and those who're too uppity and getting thier voting privileges taken. Act, definitely, it's how you win! but there's a reason these large political organizations full of people who hate each other exist. Letters they don't care about unless they're en mass. phone calls are only annoying if there are tons. You gotta get with others to have a chance at making a difference.

@Scottoest 8 ай бұрын

The fact that he turned around and did all of this after managing to wriggle free of his LAST prosecution for corruption is the part that blows my mind. The guy didn't lay low for even a minute.

@esteemedmortal5917 8 ай бұрын

Why would he? He got a pass! It was practically a thumbs up from the government!

@airtale8725 8 ай бұрын

Trump and Republicans get away with worse on a monthly basis, so why wouldn't he try?

@hopefulmonsters4407 8 ай бұрын

He learned he could get away with it.

@brianferstle6369 5 ай бұрын

Not even one minute

@personastv 8 ай бұрын

knowing that certain Supreme Court justices are accepting lavish "gifts" really changes the perspective on them ruling over cases defending government officials for taking similar "gifts"

@kieranelliott5607 8 ай бұрын

Complete coincidence, I am sure.

@bman5257 8 ай бұрын

This is an overblown argument by Propublica and other left wingers. They don’t like that SCOTUS refuted the weak and unconstitutional reasoning behind Roe v Wade, so they are trying to undermine their authority by just throwing dirt on them. How is Justice Thomas being bribed if the man “bribing” him has no cases on the Supreme Court. He’s obviously just a friend of his by the fact that they spend so many vacations together. Nothingburger.

@Joshua_Hale 8 ай бұрын

Turns out you can be the judge of your own trial simply by setting a precedent via proxy.

@bman5257 8 ай бұрын

@@Joshua_Hale If you get appointed and confirmed to the SCOTUS and then have 5 other justices agree with you.

@ingiford175 8 ай бұрын

And the SC justice does not see the need to report his 'gifts' from 'a friend'

@darkstar4494 8 ай бұрын

It always amazes me how cheap it is to buy a politician. 60k will keep you out of jail for years or get you tax cuts that save you millions.

@niteshade5783 8 ай бұрын

Business expense

@greebj 8 ай бұрын

60K ... that's what we know about ...

@Thicc_Boyo 8 ай бұрын

Of course. Those millions go to the government where it won't easily land in an individual person's wallet. The bribe doesn't.

@UrLeingod 8 ай бұрын

Makes sense. One of the main reasons for a bribe offer to be really high is because you're taking a big risk in being corrupt. But being corrupt in Washington is super low-risk to the point that nothing short of literal treason is likely to get you put behind bars, so they don't need to offer as much.

@genericscout5408 8 ай бұрын

@@greebjeven if you go all the way it's 500K for ALL their assets. but then again that's only 1 senator, you need 50+ in your pocket for a nice ride.

@tatkkyo9911 8 ай бұрын

I remember working for walmart and them telling me as a part timer that if i ever accepted and tip or gift of anykind id be fired. One of the examples they gave was you help someone take their groceries to their and they tip you a dollar your fired for taking bribes..... i hate this world.

@prependedprepended6606 8 ай бұрын

I write software and *EVERY* company I've worked for requires their engineers to take online ethics training once a year (at least) even though, except for possibly Senior Directors, we never interact with anybody outside the company. The corruption is always at the top.

@GamingWithNikolas 8 ай бұрын

Same thing at my Walmart. It pissed me off.

@Pushing_Pixels 8 ай бұрын

How dafuq is tipping someone for helping carry your groceries a bribe? Like, what exactly are they getting out of it that they wouldn't have gotten anyway? What is Walmart losing in this situation? But it does prove that the higher up you go in society, the less ethical you are required to be and the less likely you will be held accountable for your actions.

@GamingWithNikolas 8 ай бұрын

@Pushing_Pixels I don't know, but it pissed me off because the pay was already terrible then they threaten to fire me if I except a small tip that would help pay for lunch.

@tatkkyo9911 8 ай бұрын

@Pushing_Pixels it never made sense bit at the time I needed the job. They also had the workers do a stupid walmart chant every meeting that was based on the chants they made Chinese factory workers do.

@gentlemandemon 8 ай бұрын

the corruption has always existed, but the way that the governemnt has willfully and publicly relinquished responsibility is mind boggling.

@jenni4claire 8 ай бұрын

Belling the cat is a universel issue.

@dontmisunderstand6041 8 ай бұрын

The actual impact of Donald Trump's presidency. It taught them that they never had to bother even appearing to be legitimate. They don't have to hide it at all.

@kieranelliott5607 8 ай бұрын

Depressing to realise it has been made so hard to prosecute some pretty blatant corrupt behaviour through reliance on highly narrow interpretations. Any halfway competent corrupt official seems likely to escape such strictures, and that incentivises it to become part of the accepted culture. If it is not already.

@LogjammerDbaggagecling-qr5ds 8 ай бұрын

That's what happens when the corrupt people also get to make the laws.

@swordmonkey6635 8 ай бұрын

That's the potential problem with legal conservatives like Roberts. They fall back to the "letter of the law as it's written" instead of an interpretation of the law to fit cases. The narrow view leaves very little room for "right" actions and only looks at "legal precedence" and is very hesitant to change laws or past precedents to fit new cases unless it's so obvious it can't be pushed aside. That's why they backtracked on Roe V. Wade. They didn't like the more liberal interpretation of legal rights set down by Roe V. Wade, so they went back to the previous conservative law.

@sjs9698 8 ай бұрын

given who tightened those definitions & how wildly corrupt some of them are, it's hardly surprising they don't want corruption to be effectively punished :s

@Guishan_Lingyou 8 ай бұрын

@@swordmonkey6635 I may have misunderstood legal eagle's analysis, but my understanding is that the Robert's court's interpretation of corruption is not actually legally conservative in that it had go well beyond the text of the law to arrive at their extremely narrow definitions.

@marshallc6215 8 ай бұрын

@@swordmonkey6635even worse than that. They can reinterpret the actually broad enough laws to be so narrow as to be useless. Note how just the definition of "official act" was described as "too broad" when applying to a job whose title carries weight 24/7, in every single action a person takes. If the action is in any way related to anything your position holds power to affect, it is an official act to me, because that decision carries with it the weight of your office, whether you want it to or not. If I'm the chairman of the committee on widgets and I play sport widget in my free time, you'd bet your ass that any time I talk with my coworkers about my favorite widgets, that's an official act, because that's affecting their decision-making by conflating their opinions of my opinions with their opinions of my opinions of politics. There is no "something more" required, because official acts aren't criminal, so there is zero reason to view them in a limited light. Politicians commit official acts in their personal lives *all the time,* unless you consider spending most of their time campaigning *not* official acts, despite them commonly making explicit promises of their forthcoming actions if re-elected.

@amberkluga8949 8 ай бұрын

I had a vendor send a basket of christmas cookies and was told I could not keep them as it was a conflict of interest. The laws governing public officials have been weakened to the point they seem written to protect corruption, not catch corruption.

@JoeOvercoat 8 ай бұрын

Congresscritters exempt themselves from all such restrictions, much like the Supreme Court.

@johndododoe1411 8 ай бұрын

Yet in this video it's not a congressional law change but a weird interpretation endorsed by the supreme court, which could be overturned once the court majority changes and a differently worded appeal is presented to the new judges .

@NavigatorBR 8 ай бұрын

Yeah, really something else to read my company's policy on that and see how many times over I'd be fired if I behaved like any of these corrupt bastards.

@kennethferland5579 8 ай бұрын

You mean 'interpreted' to protect corruption. The laws plain language when written was fine, but the courts invert them in truly Orwellian fashion.

@Demmrir 8 ай бұрын

@@johndododoe1411The court majority won't change for decades because of a large number of recent appointments since they're all lifetime appointments. It's great that the most impactful body in American politics is an unelected group of lifelong rulers.

@Patterrz 8 ай бұрын

I want the confidence to be this outwardly corrupt, gold bars is crazy

@ncooty 8 ай бұрын

It seems "justice" is now little more than punishment of the poor. Power is exculpatory.

@ianrau6373 8 ай бұрын

Now? When was it fair exactly?

@ncooty 8 ай бұрын

@@ianrau6373 I agree. I meant that even our conceptualization of justice is now corrupted.

@pafnutiytheartist 5 ай бұрын

"Now" is questionable. Arguably, it was always the case. Justice is a lie told to people with no power and it always has been.

@ncooty 5 ай бұрын

@@pafnutiytheartist I agree. See prior reply.

@johntorres2565 8 ай бұрын

The case with governor McDonald should’ve been open and shut. He was being bribed. The fact that the Supreme Court vacated this and made it harder to try politicians/judges/etc. for bribery makes me think either the judges are being bribed to hand down that decision or they are worried that they could get in trouble for being bribed.

@JoeOvercoat 8 ай бұрын

And the prosecutor dropped the case. We will never know if the prosecutor had done the right thing and pursued the charges instead of walking away because it was not a sure win. That is its own kind of corruption.

@susanavenir 8 ай бұрын

@@JoeOvercoat - It was *DOJ* that decided not to re-try McDonnell. A prosecutor does not have that power as an individual and usually, by nature, does not want to relent, especially having won at trial as Jack Smith had in the McDonnell case. Further, the Supreme Court had rebuked the prosecution and warned that “the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors is a threat to our separation of powers.” That slap-down from the Roberts Court may have weighed heavily on DOJ's decision not to re-try McDonnell, not out of cowardice but out of respect for the Supreme Court's authority to interpret U.S. law.

@davechongle 8 ай бұрын

@@susanavenirthis context doesnt really mean much. especially since one of the justices on the court was being bribed for a different matter. in fact the context makes it worse, they kind of threatened the DOJ for pursuing an obvious case of bribery..

@kermitwilson 8 ай бұрын

With Supreme Court judges openly accepting “gifts” it is in their best interest to protect politicians who are also accepting bribery. Circle the wagons or they could all be prosecuted. It’s treasonous.

@Thicc_Boyo 8 ай бұрын

It's easier to just assume every politician is being bribed to some degree.

@linamishima 8 ай бұрын

As an employee of a European company, not personally involved with sales, I’ve had to agree to anti-corruption policies that are significantly stricter and more risk adverse than the weirdly high bar that SCOTUS now insist is met. Senior government officials should be held to a higher standard than some random Jane bloggs employee, this is bonkers

@mikevignola4213 8 ай бұрын

The Supreme Court itself isn't even held to the same standard as any lower court in the country.

@vaska00762 8 ай бұрын

Anti-Bribery and Corruption laws are typically much stricter across the EU. I've had to complete countless compliance e-learning modules to confirm that I understand what corruption and bribery looks like and what to do if I spot it.

@timdunn2344 8 ай бұрын

Same in Canada. I work for a bank. If I go for a drink after long working sessions with a vendor, I cannot buy one drink for them or them for me, on pain of being fired.

@doomsdayrabbit4398 8 ай бұрын

@@mikevignola4213To be fair, the Supreme Court's existence is practically the only thing about it mentioned in the Constitution. No number of justices, no qualifications for their citizenship, even - Congress and the President both have that.

@Diovanlestat 8 ай бұрын

NHS UK - Cannot accept gifts over £5. Prevents queue jumping. It's only cheap chocolates and biscuits for us but still the thought that counts. 🍻

@Nightstick24 8 ай бұрын

Man, it'd sure be nice if the ones making the rules about what you can call bribery and corruption weren't the same ones facing numerous allegations of corruption and bribery themselves.

@tessat338 8 ай бұрын

The only way that we can change that is by VOTING!!

@tejaswoman 8 ай бұрын

@@tessat338unfortunately, we don't vote on the Supreme Court.

@Justanotherconsumer 8 ай бұрын

LOL, the Virginia court is basically saying “but that would prohibit influence peddling!” Our justice system is a joke sometimes.

@SM-nz9ff 7 ай бұрын

Try the Mexican system, or the Russian system, or the Romanian system, or the Turkey system or the....oh yeah its almost like its every system. How are people this simple?

@milohdd 8 ай бұрын

Its interesting to see how much the SCOTUS opinion is clearly worded to excuse their own behaviour

@bwofficial1776 8 ай бұрын

As it should be. Would you punish yourself for some perceived wrongdoing?

@isaac3140 8 ай бұрын

@@bwofficial1776Corrupt politicians like that should be convicted. Who's side are you on?

@kevina.2269 8 ай бұрын

@@isaac3140 If i had goals to be a senator i would talk exactly like that guy

@Pushing_Pixels 8 ай бұрын

@@bwofficial1776 So you're in favour of corruption and think politicians and judges should do whatever they can to make it easier for themselves to be corrupt. Okay. That tells us everything we will ever need to know about you.

@MrClickity 8 ай бұрын

@@bwofficial1776that comment says a lot more about you than I think you intended to reveal.

@adissentingopinion848 8 ай бұрын

The later end of September 2023 has got to be the most extreme workload for the people at LegalEagle. We got union strikes, government shutdown with a special GOP infighting kicker, senators getting super bribes, SC judge getting bribes, former President with current reelection platform indicted 4 times across 3 states, current President being impeached because of... something???, and the general non-US issues of Ukraine, Russia, China's Evergrande. This sounds more like a nightmare law exam's extra credit section. Go for it, Law Avian!

@Joshua_Hale 8 ай бұрын

One point I can clarify: the reason he's being impeached is that the Republican party doesn't want to pit a candidate who has been impeached against an opponent who has not. If both have been impeached, it levels the playing field and makes the decision less clear for 'independent' voters.

@margaretwordnerd5210 8 ай бұрын

🦅✌🖖

@christopherb501 8 ай бұрын

@@Joshua_Hale But isn't it STILL imbalanced? If that's the case, wouldn't they have to impeach Biden again to "even the score"?

@aliceputt3133 8 ай бұрын

Sounds like a Soap Opera As The Corruption Turns.

@adissentingopinion848 8 ай бұрын

@@Joshua_Hale Indeed, I suggested that it is "something" in good faith, mainly because I'm sure they can dig up some Bill Clinton-esque political theatre. A more accurate description would be "digging for and airing out the most lightly stained dirty laundry of the opposition's President". The phrase "the smoking gun is a trickling water pistol" from the impeachment hearing was the best way to describe it.

@user-wy7mc6km7v 8 ай бұрын

It's disgusting that the Democrats defended Menendez the last time for political reasons. Justice must be carried through regardless of politics, whether the defendant is Menendez or Trump.

@tejaswoman 8 ай бұрын

Agree. Seriously gross.

@pafnutiytheartist 5 ай бұрын

Did you just suggest that politicians should do something "regardless of politics"?

@FrostedParadox 8 ай бұрын

Thank you Legal Eagle for summarizing the craziest news and making the legal ramifications easy to understand!

@geneard639 8 ай бұрын

So, what I'm hearing is if he was a Supreme Court Justice, this would not be a problem just a private gift among friends.

@ellicel 8 ай бұрын

So he got away with criminal behavior once and then went on to commit *more* crime?! Well, color me surprised 😂

@benoithudson7235 8 ай бұрын

Evidently he learned his lesson.

@baranbeytemur5451 8 ай бұрын

@@benoithudson7235 dont think he did he wants to run for election again and didnt resign from all positions

@GamingWithNikolas 8 ай бұрын

@@baranbeytemur5451that was the lesson, that sence he got away with it once with no consequences he learned he could keep doing it.

@supernenechi 8 ай бұрын

Literally gold bars?? If a cartoon depicted a corrupt politician that would be EXACTLY how it's portrayed!

@1brianm7 8 ай бұрын

I think it’s important to note that he didn’t step down from his post on the Foreign Relations Committee for altruistic reasons, democratic rules nullified his chairmanship the moment he was indicted and he will not regain the post unless acquitted. The same thing happened in his last indictment.

@Pushing_Pixels 8 ай бұрын

As it should be.

@elenadirectorofmiiss7942 8 ай бұрын

Considering Menendez was also on the Finance and Banking Committees and that has been deregulated heavily in the last decade... I wouldn't be shocked if a new indictment related to that comes down too.

@conniethesconnie 8 ай бұрын

It was over a decade ogo that banks were too big to fail and the government used money taken through taxes from the public to reward bank managers for being incompetent at their jobs. The big banks made money despite being bankrupt and the leaders received huge bonuses. Congress held hearings to basically say that their kickbacks were not sufficient. This is far from a last decade thing, as long as the politicians get paid the banks are allowed to keep charging more fees for providing less service.

@elenadirectorofmiiss7942 8 ай бұрын

@@conniethesconnie in just the last FIVE years, there has been: Wells Fargo opening fake accounts in it's customers' names, US Bancorp getting caught money laundering, UBS, Bank of America, and Deutsche Bank caught price fixing gold and silver markets, and Wells Fargo being caught forcing their auto insurance customers to buy coverage they didn't need. This doesn't count problems like FTX or Robin Hood. So yes... Again, would not be surprised to be see another indictment related to the banking and finance committee.

@mountainhun 8 ай бұрын

Taking bribes in gold bars seems like an idea that would make Saul Goodman howl in frustration. Seems like it would be the hardest form of wealth to launder.

@Pushing_Pixels 8 ай бұрын

You could melt it down to get rid of the serial numbers at least.

@gerstein03 8 ай бұрын

Not really. Metal is a lot less traceable than cash. You get gold, you melt it down, find someone to fence it, and then you just launder that money into your business

@M1ch43l33 8 ай бұрын

@@gerstein03or you could just take money instantly to launder lol

@renwhit100 8 ай бұрын

every developing case like this makes it that much more laughable how damn offended the supreme court gets over people questioning their ethics, and by "laughable" i mean "gotta grimly laugh or I'll have a breakdown over how damn broken this country is"

@timwright3218 8 ай бұрын

This isn't just corruption. This is a US senator acting as a foreign agent. Personally, that feels pretty treasony to me. I know it won't happen but my preference would be to bring him up on treason charges.

@Hatecrewdethrol 8 ай бұрын

Clarence Thomas ruling on whether these gifts count as corruption makes a lot more sense now that we know he was getting the same gifts

@bman5257 8 ай бұрын

He pretty clearly wasn’t. The gifts to Justice Thomas were from a close friend of his not bribes like in the case of Senator Menendez.

@michaelmcgovern8110 8 ай бұрын

Vote Blue 2024 for a SCOTUS ethics policy and replacement of a few "tarnished" justices.

@oblivnow 8 ай бұрын

@@bman5257A bunch of close friends, you mean. Like, several dozen really close friends who are very generous to very new friends and who also have business in front of the Supreme Court. Don't be silly about this, corruption is deeply normalized in the US, and that media has trained people to accept the framing you present is how it is maintained. Have higher standards

@bwofficial1776 8 ай бұрын

@@bman5257 When journalists started digging into the alleged Thomas gifts, they found out that all of the other justices were in similar situations with their friends. They all do it. Hanging out with a close friend doesn't need to be reported. They were desperate to pin anything on Justice Thomas but that went away pretty quickly when they found out that the justices on "their side" were doing it too.

@shevek2954 8 ай бұрын

In a functional democracy Thomas and Menendez would be prison.

@bentoth9555 8 ай бұрын

I confused a friend who's a Republican (I'm not.) I said Menendez should have to resign and, if found guilty, go to jail. My friend's response: "But he's a Democrat, shouldn't you support him?"

@butareyoureally1868 8 ай бұрын

That sums it up, doesn't it? They just don't get it...

@JohnDoe-qz1ql 8 ай бұрын

WOW, just sad!😬

@normanmai7865 8 ай бұрын

Your friend when people have beliefs that aren't entirely supported by one of two major parties that covers a wide range of beliefs: 😮

@HappyGingerWolf 8 ай бұрын

Some people just really see politics as team sports and don't care who lies and cheats as long as their side wins

@ryanreedgibson 8 ай бұрын

I don't want any corrupt official representing me or my family. But if I were a corrupt person who broke the law I wouldn't care.

@nezhali1637 8 ай бұрын

The corrupt supreme court ruled against finding corruption? Colour me shocked, shocked!

@grevberg 8 ай бұрын

Reminds me of the Abscam sting in the 70's and 80's. One of the politician was filmed getting money out of a briefcase and stuffing it in his pockets. His attorney told him that the only thing that could save him was playing the tape backwards.

@Daugueffxi 8 ай бұрын

Hard to prosecute anyone for bribery when it is legal.

@dielaughing73 8 ай бұрын

For some...

@commonsenseisntcommon1776 8 ай бұрын

Its not

@Inquisitor6321 8 ай бұрын

This is not a simple act of bribery. This is allegedly quid pro quo to benefit a foreign nation. This is at least unconstitutional, if not an out right act of treason.

@omegaminoseer4539 8 ай бұрын

You're wrong, simple. Around these parts, we call that, "lobbying."

@maromania7 8 ай бұрын

@@omegaminoseer4539 ...yeah, and? I can call the sky Steve, doesn't stop it from being the sky. It is a gift given to act in the giver's favor. The definition of bribe includes money, but is not exclusive to it. Offering to give tax breaks, donating to your organization so that you get a bigger bonus, doesn't matter. Calling it lobbying doesn't matter. It's bribery.

@danielschein6845 8 ай бұрын

Apparently back during Chicago’s political machine heyday, when the cops pulled you over they would offer to sell you a pencil with different colors having different prices. The faster you were driving, the more expensive the pencil you were “encouraged” to buy. Under the Supreme Court’s new standard, I wonder if one of those cops could beat the bribery charge.

@christopherb501 8 ай бұрын

...with that kind of coded BS around, no wonder SovCits believe what they do with cops.

@alexdurain3753 8 ай бұрын

No cause they aren’t politicians. Rules for thee, not for me and all that.

@jdantigua1999 8 ай бұрын

So sad that SCOTUS GOP are crooks. They do not represent the citizenry😢😮

@jlev1028 8 ай бұрын

@@alexdurain3753But cops have the same immunity. That's why you've hardly seen any corrupt police actually be convicted over the past several years.

@alexdurain3753 8 ай бұрын

@@jlev1028 Maybe watch the body cams. Might prove a tad enlightening.

@StrickerRei-Chn 8 ай бұрын

Holding a public servant accountable is a must in a democratic society.

@ignitionfrn2223 8 ай бұрын

1:15 - Chapter 1 - The 2015 case against Menendez 3:15 - Chapter 2 - The supreme court's public corruption jurisprudence 9:50 - Chapter 3 - The new Menendez indictment 16:10 - Chapter 4 - Menendez monopolize meat market 21:25 - Chapter 5 - How does McDonnell impact the 2nd menendez prosecution 21:45 - Chapter 6 - The criminal charges against menendez 23:55 - End roll ads

@Werevampiwolf 8 ай бұрын

Oh hey, you're here too. I always see you on the comments of the Whistler-verse channels lol

@NybergCarl 8 ай бұрын

The defining feature of the Roberts Court is creating large gray areas where rulings can go either way.

@MarkALong64 8 ай бұрын

It is true what they say. America really does have the best politicians that money can buy.

@felicitygee381 8 ай бұрын

😆

@Pushing_Pixels 8 ай бұрын

Best judges too.

@dontmisunderstand6041 8 ай бұрын

Not the best. Just the ones that money can buy.

@dontmisunderstand6041 8 ай бұрын

@@Pushing_Pixels Judges are politicians. Always have been. Always are.

@chrisdray5325 8 ай бұрын

The fact that he literally hid his corruption money in his Congressional Hispanic Caucus jacket is too on the nose for a fictional character. Literally hiding his corruption behind his identity. This guy is a comic book villain.

@lucyj8204 8 ай бұрын

"you really want a coffee milkshake, and that's ok" - deserves an entire video and upvote on its own!

@butareyoureally1868 8 ай бұрын

"THIS is what happens when the rule-makers make rules about themselves."

@ewanmackenzie6264 8 ай бұрын

It doesn’t happen everywhere. Of course, some places are even worse, not that that makes it ok.

@conniethesconnie 8 ай бұрын

Remember we elect them. The voters are supposed to be the check on their power. Want to change things vote against the incumbents, vote against the party insiders, vote for the person who is being pushed into the corner and out of the spotlight.

@GamingWithNikolas 8 ай бұрын

@@conniethesconniewon't make a difference whatsoever. I don't even bother voting anymore because my vote doesn't matter out of an ocean of uneducated voters.

@pafnutiytheartist 5 ай бұрын

@@conniethesconnieUS has a two party system, if all your options are corrupt, you can't fight corruption by voting.

@JackieSchulkin 8 ай бұрын

Oh dear😢 As a New Jerseyan this hurts me... wow... really bad. This guy was at my school once. What a disgrace to our community.

@IICopycatII 8 ай бұрын

Our state is a bastion of bribery and where it's prospered for decades, idk what you're talking about, watch the Irishman or The Sopranos

@AnacondaHL 8 ай бұрын

I mean, did the first version of Menendez's corruption not do anything to you? The hung jury? This second go around shouldn't hurt at all, you should be numb to it by this point.

@waldemarsikorski4759 8 ай бұрын

Wow, found guilty already, what was the sentence?

@FrozEnbyWolf150 8 ай бұрын

He's been corrupt (allegedly) as long as he's been in office. This is why I voted for his primary opponent, Lisa McCormick, in 2018, and then voted for Madeline Hoffman of the Green Party in the general that year. If this doesn't take him down, then he sorely needs to be primaried again.

@erikanders3343 8 ай бұрын

@@waldemarsikorski4759 you can have the opinion that someone is a disgrace without a conviction. Clearly you are a trump supporter, but remember you all were saying to lock of Hilary just on the word of a pathological liar who was running for office.

@exoZelia 8 ай бұрын

I'm glad you're here to break this stuff down for us. Gonna hire your firm later, I need to sue some people

@sreif78 8 ай бұрын

Imagine how much he had to piss the other people off, possibly blowing up the entire system for them to want to charge him?

@clawsoon 8 ай бұрын

With everything coming out about Alito and Thomas accepting lavish gifts, these Supreme Court decisions look a lot uglier.

@tuxtitan780 8 ай бұрын

I hope so badly that this makes public perception of lobbying even worse and pushes people to start wanting to overrule the supreme court and finally get rid of this. Lobbying is by far my biggest grievance in this country, and i have full confidence that if public opinion finally sways against it so much that new laws are created outlawing it, this country will be leaps and bounds better off

@Ajv516 8 ай бұрын

Ending lobbying as it currently stands in the US will require roadblocks to be put into place that prevents the obscenely wealthy from also acquiring power. This is no an impossible feat and has precedent in the second quarter of the early 20th century.

@javgamer722 8 ай бұрын

While I agree with everything you said, considering the only people who could change it are the ones taking those bribes, call me a pessimist but I wouldn't bet money on it. It's the same reason why we will never fix our 2 party system even though we so easily could (or at least takes steps toward doing so.) because the very people who would make those laws are the ones it will take power from.

@haruhirogrimgar6047 8 ай бұрын

Mandatory voting would absolutely demolish any concerns about lobbying is the issue. It doesn't matter who lobbies rn tbh because the majority of people voting are already in-line in beliefs with the lobbyists. We get more than 20% of young people to turn out and just about every part of our government gets new faces and better priorities.

@MrTheAngryLlama 8 ай бұрын

Easier solution. Let's just make it fully legal and fully transparent. Let them be like sports stars and get full-on sponsorship money, BUT they have to wear the logos all over their clothing so you know exactly who you're really voting for

@prependedprepended6606 8 ай бұрын

The problem that everyone misses is that the ones that can change the laws are the very people that benefit from the law (or lack of) the way it is. What motivation is there for a congressman or senator to outlaw lobbying? What's even worse is that public officials can easily come back as lobbyists themselves, already having access and knowledge of the legislative bodies.

@Valeo1993 8 ай бұрын

You see if i get more than a $20 tip from a customer as a federal employee i get slammed with bribery, but this guy can literally influence a foreign government and it's uncertain if he'll get a big sentence?

@pafnutiytheartist 5 ай бұрын

Yes because poor people must follow the rules

@jerodwolf5582 8 ай бұрын

In a country with millions of qualified individuals who could run for office, truly limitless possibilities - yet we always find ourselves with the worst politicians, which also happen to be 2000 years old.

@relaxedsack1263 8 ай бұрын

when you have George Santos defending you, you know you have messed up

@ChrisCapoccia 8 ай бұрын

Bribery and corruption are serious charges, but Menendez might also have committed espionage

@1RandomToaster 8 ай бұрын

This level of corruption makes me proud to be a New Jersian, almost as proud as when I met Bob not long after he first took office and the Governor (who Bob replaced) got into a car accident at 90mph getting to a meet and greet with a radio DJ. Bob gave a great speech about all of the grants and benefits he’s been able to get for my company. On an unrelated note we donated quite a bit to his election… To make a long story longer: “Corruption? In Jersey? Yeah that tracks, we’re really good at it!”

@haldosprime3896 8 ай бұрын

I like this recent trend of pointing out corruption in the government. Keep holding the corrupt accountable. Political sides don’t matter. No one is above the law, and if the law has been broken then it must be upheld.

@politickz6591 8 ай бұрын

I still can’t believe he was this blatant with it, like Jesus at least use an offshore bank account or something, gold bars is some cartoon villain shit

@flickcentergaming680 8 ай бұрын

Right? Dude should at least have had a bank account out of the Canary Islands like the rest of the corrupt politicians.

@andrewrivera1054 8 ай бұрын

Only thing worse would be a burlap sack with a dollar sign on it.

@bjornodin 8 ай бұрын

@@andrewrivera1054But what if the sack only contained Euros?

@johnladuke6475 8 ай бұрын

@@andrewrivera1054 I fully expect that to be a surprise exhibit at trial.

@someguy1ification 8 ай бұрын

I listened to devin go over the allegations and was like "ok, he has to be joking with that part..." and then he went on to say that investigators found a ton of them at his house. I was flabbergasted. Who the hell pays in gold bars, anyway? Cashing that out would cause so many problems...

@jomojas5786 8 ай бұрын

In no reality, does someone see you with gold bars and does not immediately think “What shady shit did you pull to get those”?

@kayeka4123 8 ай бұрын

Unless they're doomsday preppers, I suppose.

@eansmith4925 8 ай бұрын

It's amazing what politicians and judges do to line their own pockets. We the People deserve better

@draconis17 8 ай бұрын

Just giving someone a monopoly over a whole food industry by revoking everyone else's licenses is insane though. Imagine how screwed over all the legitimate businesses were, waking up one day and finding out they're not allowed to operate in egypt anymore for no reason.

@captiannemo1587 8 ай бұрын

The amount of research, done so quickly… what a team.

@prependedprepended6606 8 ай бұрын

I'm not sure what you saw, the investigation has been going on for years.

@terrafirma5327 8 ай бұрын

Limiting the amount of "gifts" people can receive as public officials would be a smart move. For example, no more than 10,000 dollars a year would be solid... these are already wealthy and well-off individuals... they do NOT need bribes/gifts. If they want to have powerful friends, they can move to the private industry. I don't care if a CEO gets a huge gift, but I do care if its my lawmakers.

@dominicfranzen7932 8 ай бұрын

They have something like that in that when gifts exceed a certain amount it will be taxed. So he's also commenting tax fraud/evasion for not declining the money

@terrafirma5327 8 ай бұрын

@@dominicfranzen7932 that's true. Taxing it isn't enough though imo

@andiward7068 8 ай бұрын

There are. There are already restrictions on gifts, donations, preferential treatments and assorted other situations. Our officials seem particularly adept at ignoring them, and getting caught at it lately.

@terrafirma5327 8 ай бұрын

@@andiward7068 had no idea!

@johndododoe1411 8 ай бұрын

As a shareholder I would object to others bribing a CEO nominally on my payroll .

@coreylazy 8 ай бұрын

Really appreciate the sentencing guideline explanations! Thank you!

@roberthaig2133 8 ай бұрын

Why isn't there a lower bar of proof and conduct to get sacked as a senator? We are only discussing his criminal case. I work for a global firm and if I did 1% of his conduct I may not be charged but I would definitely be sacked!

@kayeka4123 8 ай бұрын

Because he's an elected official. Lowering the bar for sacking like that would make it incredibly easy to get rid of "troublesome" politicians by those higher up the foodchain. Much like how easy it is for corporations to get rid of "troublesome" (read:unionising) employees with only the thinnest veneer of just cause.

@insidespin2698 8 ай бұрын

I mean, why would we want expansive definitions of public corruption? It’s not like keeping powerful public officials honest and working in the best interests of their constituents is vital to a functioning democracy. This Supreme Court is truly reprehensible.

@kingace6186 8 ай бұрын

The brazenness of Menendez's and Thomas's corruption is comical.

@Joshua_Hale 8 ай бұрын

Well... when one makes the law and the other interprets it, it makes sense that they're not too worried about legal repercussions.

@austinestep8461 8 ай бұрын

I would laugh at it more if these people didn’t have very broad powers to change laws.

@DawnDavidson 8 ай бұрын

Or tragic … 😢

@Articulate99 8 ай бұрын

Always interesting, thank you.

@mw66683 8 ай бұрын

Term limits are an issue, but corruption is worse.

@michaelmcgovern8110 8 ай бұрын

Ungerrymandered voting districts are the real term limits. Guess which party loves gerrymandering, especially racial?

@blackjacktrial 8 ай бұрын

Goes hand in hand - can't be bribed if you can't provide a benefit back.

@onikin 8 ай бұрын

And voters will never accept responsibility for congressmen staying in power a long time. They'll keep voting for the same one, over and over again, while complaining about limits.

@kyallokytty 8 ай бұрын

@@onikinyes, but here's the thing. in a functioning democracy it forces itself to get rid of issues like that

@michaelmcgovern8110 8 ай бұрын

@@blackjacktrial Well, no: Will Rogers said the problem is when politicians effectively bribe taxpayers with their own money.

@jakebeal8095 8 ай бұрын

Wow this is better than any news story I’ve read or seen about it thus far. Bravo. These are a public service.

@KuariThunderclaw 8 ай бұрын

There really needs to be a flat ban on elected officials receiving ANY kind of gift outside of family and even then, if it is from outside family, goes to family member and then the elected official, that counting as a banned practice. Like I can understand paying for meals. Maybe you can have an exception of like $50 per person, adjusted for inflation, that someone can pay for a meal at a restaurant, but beyond that? Just end gifting entirely. We all know those gifts are for political purposes as they wouldn't receive such gifts without being politicians... so just cut them off entirely. Make it where no evidence is required beyond receipt of the gift (without turning it over to authorities so that it can't be used as a form of political assassination) to be guilty of a bribery crime.

@MrKingbowd 8 ай бұрын

This is always such amazing content. How many Lawyers and para-legals does it take to gather all the info/ laws that "may" have been broken?

@fraliexb 8 ай бұрын

I wish we had politicians that weren't corrupt and passed laws elimination of campaign finance, period.

@tin-n-tan 8 ай бұрын

Democrats have taken it to the parliament and voted on it every single year for the last about 15. So ya know. Don't blame politics, we know which side voted it down and took it to the supreme court.

@rogueninja1685 8 ай бұрын

Can you imagine such a comprehensive investigation into trump? He has 91 counts just scratching the surface. I mean, it's refreshing to see an old school corruption investigation, but only one "side" has to play by the rules?

@blankityblankblank2321 8 ай бұрын

I just wish they did their job to begin with. Instead we have both sides yelling over each other, more interested in shaming the other.

@yndsu 8 ай бұрын

@@blankityblankblank2321your enlightened centrist is showing. You known that Dems and GOP are not the same, and to present it as they are, as you do, is disingenuous at best. One side wants to get stuff done, the other side tried to impeach the sitting president without any evidence, and to shut down the government, again. So no, they are not the same.

@joachimschoder 8 ай бұрын

@@tin-n-tan But if you look at the facts you can't use the both-sides-ism most of media loves to do. One side is calling for their corrupt colleagues to resign and the other side wants their corrupt colleague to be president again. But we have to pretend both sides are the same. Otherwise something might actually get done against corruption.

@kieranelliott5607 8 ай бұрын

I really need to get better friends. I don’t think any have ever offered me lavish gifts of cash, trips, or baubles, no matter how much I drop hints. Menendez must be a lucky man.

@jimbotheimpaler4756 8 ай бұрын

Baubles. 😂 Top mate.

@MrAmptech 8 ай бұрын

Glad they are cleaning things up.

@VivBrodock 8 ай бұрын

As a new jersey citizen, honestly just surprised it took the rest of yall so long to figure out.

@FrozEnbyWolf150 8 ай бұрын

Same. This has been going on for years, but it took this long for his corruption to make national headlines.

@relaxedleisure4766 8 ай бұрын

Yes, people don’t seem to be aware that Jersey Democrats (especially in Hudson,Essex,Union,Passaic and South Jersey) are probably the most corrupt in the nation along with ILDems and both parties in Louisiana.

@ericaschner3283 8 ай бұрын

Maybe the laws governing the people who write the laws should be written by someone else. Jeez, it's ridiculous how blatant corruption is no big deal

@anna9072 8 ай бұрын

Yeah. Never a good idea to put the fox in charge of the chicken coop.

@prependedprepended6606 8 ай бұрын

Okay, but to have a law permitting another to write the laws for them would need to be written and passed by the Congress and Senate. It's a catch-22. The only way it could happen is if the majority of both bodies was replaced by ethical lawmakers. And that's difficult, because the alpha personalities required to go through the election process normally weeds out the altruistic.

@conniethesconnie 8 ай бұрын

Until the public starts voting them out this will continue. Til voters are willing set aside hard core partisanship and say that they will vote for honesty over party allegiance this will continue. Til voters are willing to embrace independent and third party options when the two corrupt majority parties are unable to field decent choice this will continue. Til the voters make it difficult for incumbants to make the case that after meeting with voters across their district they decided that once again they can not step down since they decided no one else can do the job of accepting bribes as well as they do this will continue.

@GamingWithNikolas 8 ай бұрын

@@conniethesconniethis will only get worse then. No way in hell that a 3rd party runner will win an election outside of the election for mayor of a tinny town. The population is dead set on voting R or D litteraly no mater who the candidate is. Hitler could probably win the election if he ran as a Democrat in a Democrat district or republican in a republican district. I honestly don't see a way out if this because you would have to completely change the way 90% of the population thinks.

@Pushing_Pixels 8 ай бұрын

The politicians wrote a law that actually did hold them somewhat accountable, but SCOTUS watered it down and made it nearly worthless. Law abiding politicians opposed to corruption are a threat to this SCOTUS. They want corrupt politicians in power because they will look the other way when justices do the same things.

@williamhenry8914 8 ай бұрын

Interesting that obstruction only considers whether the defendant *knows* there is an investigation against them, but not whether they believe there will or could be one.

@HarvestStore 8 ай бұрын

I appreciate you and thank you for making content.

@plastix6041 8 ай бұрын

Could you go over the alleged corrupt case of billy mitchell. It will be going to court very soon and would love to hear your take on it Edit: I have to say alleged to keep from getting sued also lol

@Kazmahu 8 ай бұрын

And please throw in a cameo/recap from the main channel covering/involved in this story just so we get to hear Devil get called an absolute legend.

@plastix6041 8 ай бұрын

@@randomsomeguy156I have. I've asked on the past few videos

@DefgirRZawa 8 ай бұрын

@@Kazmahu"Hello, LegalEagle Karl Jobst!" "Hello, you absolute Legend Devin!"

@Onodera1980 8 ай бұрын

Gee, I wonder why the supreme court would be so pedantic regarding corruption...

@stevofinj 8 ай бұрын

Scary imagining how rampant this could be...

@exoZelia 8 ай бұрын

Why even accept gold bars if you're not gonna bury them places?!

@Phosypha 8 ай бұрын

Imagine being elected to a position known for making people rich with minimal effort (via insider trading, lobbying, etc.) and then somehow managing to screw it up

@Synesthesia_chan 8 ай бұрын

Tacodachis for justice!

@clocksurfer 8 ай бұрын

What's MOST tragic about this is the fact that nobody stopped the Senator early on.

@Jehty_ 8 ай бұрын

That part shocked me. Why did no one of his colleagues object? Some of the stuff he did should have been quite obvious to everyone close to the topic.

@isaac3140 8 ай бұрын

@@Jehty_because they're in on it too, they're just more subtle

@conniethesconnie 8 ай бұрын

This was answered. It was about party numbers and political power. When there was a Republican governor who would appoint a Republican Democrats were fine with a corrupt politician. When there is a Democrat governor who will appoint a Democrat replacement they are more than eager to enter the next election with a Democrat incumbent who does not have a dark cloud hanging over them. You will also see Republicans circling the wagons to keep disgrace members when they need their votes.

@jayclean5653 8 ай бұрын

@@Jehty_Becasue 99% of the people in the Senate and House do that same damn thing.

@maryhales4595 5 ай бұрын

"...And I regret to inform you that we have video footage." Thanks for the laugh, Devin 😅

@hmmmmm2555 8 ай бұрын

"i regret to inform you, we have video.."

@TheScourge007 8 ай бұрын

Also worth noting, Menendez's parents were 1) working class when they came to the US and so wouldn't have had much to seize and 2) arrived in the US in 1953, six years before the Cuban revolution won and while Castro was in Bastista's prisons. AKA, the story about having property seized by Castro would likely have to be more distant family if its true at all (the fact that both his parents were working class, a carpenter and seamstress makes this dubious). In essence he's using the (incorrect) stereotype that all Cuban-Americans were people fleeing Castro to defend himself in a bribery case.

@GamingWithNikolas 8 ай бұрын

This is important information I didn't know.

@reverse_engineered 8 ай бұрын

He's also literally playing the race card. There's nothing about his connections or the crime that have anything to do with his lineage. At no point did anyone say anything about his race other than him. It's one of the most insincere defenses imaginable.

@P0SSPWRD 8 ай бұрын

Gotta love the sheer weight the poor word "allegedly" carries in US law lol

@Jehty_ 8 ай бұрын

Allegedly carries.

@dontmisunderstand6041 8 ай бұрын

It doesn't carry any weight. That's the entire point of using it. Because if it did carry weight, you could get in trouble for saying it sometimes.

@dzonbrodi514 8 ай бұрын

He should be charged with treason or at least espionage. He was an informer for a foreign state.

@joanfregapane8683 8 ай бұрын

Another great episode. WTH is up with the Supreme Court? Should be an interesting trial if it goes that far.

@insane_troll 8 ай бұрын

Why are they complaining about him having gold bars at his house? Where else are you supposed to keep your gold bars?

@glarynth 8 ай бұрын

You're supposed to share some with people who find them at your house.

@insane_troll 8 ай бұрын

@@glarynth But then I'd need to find something else to use as paperweights for all these stacks of classified documents!

@Scarter63 8 ай бұрын

You'd think that the guy, after dodging the first bullet, would play it straight.

@icin4d 8 ай бұрын

Getting away with it just encourages more bad behavior when it's people with power and authority.

@JoeOvercoat 8 ай бұрын

Nope. He learned his lesson the first time: he’s untouchable.

@gund89123 8 ай бұрын

He thought Supreme Court will make corruption legal by the time feds build a case against him 😂.

@heyo423 8 ай бұрын

Hopefully there will be more to come

@thenameiswater2921 8 ай бұрын

Anyone else hear about the mortgage relief and immediately think something like “he can get his large house paid off just for being there and I can’t even afford a studio apartment with a full-time job”???

@johnladuke6475 8 ай бұрын

The real bombshell will come at trial when they show the actual cartoon brown sacks with dollar signs that he used to carry his bribes around.

@onyxa3144 8 ай бұрын

another day another corrupt politician. How shocking

@anonnymouse2402 8 ай бұрын

When you showed the picture of John Roberts, I though you were being unfair by picking a photo that made him look so smug. I then did a google image search and realized that I owe you an apology.

@kacktustoo 8 ай бұрын

Omg how is the corruption so blatant. "Whoa this is a monopoly we can't have that" "Stay out of it" It's like going out of your way to state you're benefiting from something illegal