its painful to see isnt it? welcome to the jungle of the internets. V_V;

I'm glad to help. A number of teachers have stated that they are using my videos to educate their pupils on logic.

@@CHDanhauser its so great :) and I love them so much!

They do it because it is what they are being taught in the schools, reflecting ideas widespread in the academic world.

I truly wish you the best in educating our youth in reason and logic. Basic science is even challenged by those who may be described as being on the opposing sides of the political spectrum. This may have potentially disastrous effects on our society at some point if the trend continues.

Truth and fact are not the same, and yes, for most of human history people have lived in their truth and passed it on to their children. Its how religion has kept hold of us for so long, among other illogical institutions.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nLeeq7mdsdfLlY0.htmlsi=hpzR8gaiD1whjWpF

I just finished a Mirror universe one yesterday. There are more coming.

@@CHDanhauser sweet!!

@@CHDanhauser I saw your newest Mirror episode and noticed Spock was keen on using the Agonizer Chamber! 👍

I agree with your logic.

A couple of teachers have reached out and I have sent them Google Drive links to allow them to use these in their classrooms.

Then again Mr. Spock has employed odds to conclude it's unreasonable that something happened by chance.

You are very welcome! I hope you consider subscribing!

Knowing logic does not mean that one is incapable of making logical errors.

@@CHDanhauser Oops - subscription made, good sir.

@@CHDanhauser True. It provides a basis, though, to provide better clarity on given subjects without the obfuscation of emotions entering into the equation until they become relevant to such.

I agree of course. Thanks!

Thanks! I bought the STAR TREK Blueprints and Tech Manual back in 1975 when they were new. So, I had to pay homage in my small way.

@@CHDanhauser I have 2 of those books (One was my Dad's and the other I picked up from somewhere) and the blueprints as well as multiple AMT kits. Keep the Fj references coming and maybe we'll see another of the Fj ships in one of your videos next?

@@CHDanhauser oh wow I had the Starfleet technical manual too. That's the one that included plans for building a Vulcan lyre. Unfortunately I don't have it anymore 😢. You're OG Trekkie. Do you remember the final episode where the idiot director had Kirk walk offstage past the camera.? He suddenly turned into a black silhouette and as he passed the camera his voice echoed off the concrete floor off set. Do

Thanks! Future ones will show other crewmembers.

Live long and Prosper !

True, but we learned much about the relativist fallacy today.

Lets give the youtuber unaffiliated with CBS/Paramount a little slack for not sticking to Canon, its bad enough that the actual producers of Star Trek today don't seem to care about Canon at all 😅 Also, I wonder: Are most of us here just because of the nostalgia of seeing 'new' stuff in the Star Trek Original Animated Series style, or to actually learn about Logical Fallacies? 😁

​@@MrChupacabra555i am here for both new TAS and logic.

"I thought Mordok was the first Benzite in Starfleet. That wouldn’t happen for about 100 years." Well, that's YOUR truth. 😁

Well spotted…. However maybe that’s true in TOS? TNG had that whole time war stuff… Plus movies with Romulan interference. 👍

I will. Thank you. I hope you consider subscribing!

@@CHDanhauser, already done!

Sadly, anyone who says that is just going to start shouting and March away in “victory”. It’s called a college “education” and a job at Starbucks with 6 figure debt. That’s The Truth!

Vulcan's ears don't really give them very much of an auditory advantage over humans, according to canon, their hearing is roughly the same. *Ferengi,* on the other hand...

You're conflating ear size with hearing ability (lol)

Yup. That cool dude was wearing throwback 1970s sideburns as well as a 'fro.

Thanks! Enjoy!

Thanks! Future logic lessons set in the hangar deck with show many other crewmembers.

Thanks! The hangar deck was always my favorite set piece on TOS and I wanted to showcase it in these logic lessons.

My truth is that I appreciate your comment! ;-)

Thanks! I think it sets the tone correctly.

You're very welcome! There are many more coming.

That's great! I'm glad you enjoy them. My father was also a big Star Trek fan and we watched the original series together when it first aired in the 1960s.

Yeah, that's supposed to happen this year, huh?

@@kiethhammer6882 yes, it is, and considering how economic implosion and inflation has been going, it's somewhat of a irony.

@taxman3749 let's not feed the paranoia of the tin foil bonnet brigade, please ;)

Thank you!

Nerd! 😘

Glad you are enjoying it. I hope you consider subscribing!

Better yet, have Sarek correct Spock, but introduce a flaw in his own logic, only to have Amanda step in with a better argument, correct the two of them and master the whole situation with a flawlessly logical resolution of her own!

@@davidgradwell8830 So much better! I love it! Another would be Spock and security taking someone to the brig. How about a crew trying to argue out of discipline with the crew.

@@aaronatherton7431 Or a court-martial scene where Spock is acting as a major character's attorney and wins the case with a stunning display of logic.

@@davidgradwell8830 Fantastic! I want that! Of course we have to have self reflections on Galelao Seven....

Thank you too! There are plenty more coming!

Glad you enjoyed it! Please consider subscribing.

Thanks for the kudos! Yes. I have corrected it and toned down the echo effect in the upcoming hangar deck logic lesson videos.

Think this episode used the echo effect due to being in the hanger deck, but my hearing is pretty terrible

Yes. I have corrected it and toned down the echo effect in the upcoming hangar deck logic lesson videos. Thanks!

I already made one last October. It is scheduled for the first Friday in January. How's that for service?

While it's true that there are bad-faith actors that use such laws in discriminating ways, it does not mean 'because someone didn't get the recognition I thought they deserved, they were discriminated against.' is automatically true. If you have 3 promotions and 5 beings equally educated, and only the three non-Benzite have been in deep space for longer than 3 years (maybe the Benzites haven't been part of the program for that long), then it's reasonable to assume those non-Benzites will get promoted, and the Benzites won't. As she pointed out, discrimination occured due to inexperience, not how the Benzites have been perceived overall. A good example of this is in 'The Galileo Seven'. Despite how smart Spock was perceived to be by the crew, his rank, and how capable and logical he actually was, Spock had great difficulty commanding the humans in a life-or-death situation BECAUSE he was too inexperienced with commanding humans. His is second in command for a logical reason, not a discriminatory one. We also have to consider the possibility that maybe most Benzites who are capable of leadership will do so in their own fleets, not Earth's, thereby reducing the pool that Starfleet has even further, and making it LOOK like Starfleet won't put them in command, when it's just the Benzites they get aren't capable.

@@jamesproffitt6304 Indeed, seeing how benzites have problems breathing human (or more like everyone else's) air, it would be logical for them to mostly crew their own benzite vessels with their own benzite air.

Yes. I have corrected it and toned down the echo effect in the upcoming hangar deck logic lesson videos. Thanks!

All we have are the facts at hand, otherwise it's speculation (particularly when it's untestable or unverifiable). As humans (or vulcans), we can never achieve 100% truth, only probabilities. We continuously revise our "truths" with the introduction of new data and hypothesis testing.

Yes. They are also using the Equivocation fallacy. On one hand a fetus is a baby and another it is a clump of cells. It is the same physical entity, but they discuss it differently as suits they're argument.

@@CHDanhauser I've had them tell me if it can't live outside of the womb it's a parasite. My responses it can't live outside the womb without parental intervention. Is it still a parasite after it's born? I don't know who teaches them to say things like this without actually thinking about it. Child is going to be dependent on its parents for at least a good 12 to 15 years, by their logic it's still eligible to be aborted since it's dependent. Is there a fallacy about misusing exceptions to the rule? I mean no turn around and tell you a story about a nine year old that has a job and pays taxes and is emancipated from their parents. I'm always like an exception to the rule does not invalidate the rule it's nothing but an exception, the rule still stands.

Yes. I have corrected it and toned down the echo effect in the upcoming hangar deck logic lesson videos. Thanks!

Whenever I hear that statement I interpret it as " I have no arguments to overpower your arguments, so please may we call it a draw?" Hell with a draw, no retreat, no surrender, no prisoners.

I have toned down the echo effect in the upcoming hangar deck logic lesson videos. Thanks!

you must not be aware of leftist men.

It is illogical to conclude that because women you have heard make this fallacy that all women are not objective and then jump to the conclusion that men live in a more objective world. It doesn't logically follow and is therefore invalid because the form is invalid.

Well, that's your truth.

@@nathanstokes9013 Excellent! :)

Never heard anyone talk at a MAGA rally then, have you?