at lest dark forces is good.

i’m also going to wait for reviews on the ubisoft star wars game.

You could have just bought the originals for like $5…

@LNR65 true, but they don't have controller support.

​@@aFLYER1980it's not dedicated controller support but you can map the controls for a gamepad in the settings, just takes a minute

Never preorder

@@drowningin I know, I simply thought it would be really hard for anyone to mess up a port of a ps2 game, and well modern devs are always ready to prove us wrong.

On Xbox and Steam, you can still buy the original versions

Because they upscaled the textures using AI and didn't bother to compress any of them. Furthermore, the game wasn't designed with this in mind: every "map" is a separate package, which has models and textures in it. Meaning, when you play on Bespin and see clones running around, those models are backed into the Bespin map. And the ones on Utapau are backed into the Utapau map. Nothing is shared across maps, even stuff that's the same. When you add AI upscaled textures into the mix, you end up with a gigantic file size, because the same exact floor texture is in there 8 times, cause it's used in 8 different maps.

By definition of a renaster it is, dir the original assets have been upscaled, exactly like tales of syphoniarenaster, wich only hasmd its assets upscaled to 4k for switch and ps4 snd xbox , so yes its a remastered

Dumb ass

The biggest disappointing moment was going from Republic Commando's Super Battle Droids to BF2s --- how they moved in RC was menacing, they looked heavy and deadly. In BF2 they moved like people in droid costumes, had no weight, and didn't come apart when shot, they also weren't balanced to be as menacing as they were portrayed in the films. The new BF2 actually did a way better service to these guys to be honest, though I'm definitely still not a huge fan of the game as a whole.

I know it's your opnion, but online was not the main point of these games but offline was. The fact aspyr marketed the game collection for its online feature was very mind boggling and very misleading. "I have no idea how fans looked back at the original games fondly except just because they were massive star wars fans with giant blinders on." because it was a great game for its time (Maybe not for you). But it's nothing amazing for nowadays especially when compared to modern shooter games. What made the game special was its galactic conquest mode. I only play the original bf2 nowdays just for modding. "how they moved in RC was menacing, they looked heavy and deadly. In BF2 they moved like people in droid costumes, had no weight, and didn't come apart when shot" because it was like that in the original battlefront 2004 game that came out 6 months before republic commando came out. Also, they did come apart when getting shot, idk what made you come up with that odd conclusion. If they did use RC elements for the supers, the balancing would be much worse. I will agree with you, EA's BF2 did better about the things you described, despite the awful lootbox and mtx controversy, and it's a real shame the game is no longer supported by the devs since its EA after all.

@@sting_ray96 I understand that and I have also spent thousands of hours fighting bots but I don't mind because I can't do online and prefer games with an offline option anyway(which is becoming less and less of a thing these days).

"It wasnt labelled as a remaster" They literally upscaled the entire game and now it has 60GB in file size. And why would PC players complain about the "lack" of aim assist, thats the opposite of what a PC player normally wants. Just shut up.

The original game is deliberately designed around the aim assist; if you're playing a character with projectiles it's almost impossible to hit anything and even harder to tell if you actually did due to a lack of feedback.