😂

I'd rather him be optimistic than pessimistic, honestly. If it means breaking the cutscene, I think it's a better mindset to have, not saying that you don't think that.

Imagine how good FO5 could've been if all the money and time from SF went into it..

We all know they didn’t spend 8 years on it. Not even half of it, to be quite honest.

"it takes time" yea and they took their sweet time just for it to be a mediocre buggy game at best

@@ryanvandoren1519 probably not too good, as long as Emil was at the helm.

That`s what they say, IMO they took 2 years at best, remember this game was supposed to be released in 2022? Pepperidge Farm remembers. The whole game lacks vision, everything is copied and pasted from previous Bethesda Titles. -The grenades are from Fallout IV, and the quick menu access is from Fallout IV. Even the freaking computer sounds are from Fallout IV. -Starborn powers are Skyrim shouts, they didn`t even bother making dungeons to acquire the power, just flew in zero G hitting sparkly dust, there, good enough. -Fetch quests, the whole game is a fetch quest simulator, seriously just do an outside perspective without paying attention to the Lore, is literally - go get this, put there, go get 2 of these, go get 2 of that, mix and put here, now bring this there, that`s the whole game. -We have how many companions in Starfield? How many we had in Fallout IV and Skyrim again? I remember J`zargo more than I remember Sara and I`ve spent way more time with Sara. -Ships can only fit 50 or so components, can`t build star yards, no companions can fly ships, Cora keeps talking about books every time I land, almost throwing her into an airlock. -Companion questlines are, boring, and uninteresting, in fact, you can only do 2 of them every playthrough because how you acquire their approval is very limited. I`m literally meddling with a divorced couple in Sam`s questline, my brother in Christ, that`s not fun, that`s not engaging, I`m here to shoot aliens, not hear adults bitching. -And IMO the worst sin this game has, remember the Red Mile? That you do a dangerous run and get paid? Well, I did it the 30 times required so you can beat the record holder, thinking to myself it would lead to a nice weapon, a title, maybe recognition... I got a 2 line dialogue from the previous record holder and a regular rare rifle with no perks on it, that`s it, the game hints at "Amazing rewards" and it`s not there, it's unfinished lazy garbage.

Very good point. By this same point in CP2077's post-launch life, CDPR had already offered a massive apology and a very generous refund policy across all platforms (which is why Sony de-listed the game initially), had released close to a dozen significant hotfixes & 2 major patches.....all whilst dealing with the fallout of a major hack of their computer network. Meanwhile, BGS has spent most of the last 4 months creating ChatGPT replies to negative reviews and releasing 2 patches to Skyrim that have broken mods each time 😆.

Lol

literally same with me, i was dozzing off like more than 5 times when playing the game then go straight to my bed

Calm down bro you ain’t as cool as you think…

🤣🤣🤣

Wow that’s the first time I read this joke on the game , really funny

Well said and I agree with you

Nailed it!

The biggest problem is with the company's mentality. Bathesda is a AAA company with the mentality of AA.

@@rahulsar2030 I wish. Most AA studios are still in a place where they are hungry and eager to make something big and great (even if they don't quite have the budget or manpower to pull it off). That's just not Bethesda. Bethesda is a unique product of the "Bethesda pass". For so many decades, and over so many games, their fans kept giving them a pass for shoddy work. Game's full of bugs? Game crashes all the damn time? Game can't even be completed due to broken quests? Game engine barely works and graphics still look like a 360 game? No problem! We forgive you Bethesda! The modders will fix it, this is fine.. this is just fine.. That is what bred Bethesda's crappy mentallity. If you can just make whatever junk you feel like making, and all these idiots will buy millions of copies, and not even complain when it doesen't work, then why bother making anything good? The fanboys will eat up any old Toddslop they are served, so why aim any higher than that? Just make Toddslop. It sells.

For context, I enjoyed and continue to enjoy both games. That being said, there was heaps of criticism towards Cyberpunk 2077 from day one, including its "great core". There were numerous people criticising the lack of impact a majority of decisions in Cyberpunk had, the relatively generic characters, gunplay that was decent but fairly cookie cutter, underwhelming hacking/cyberware, terrible vehicle handling, lack of immersion in the city through dumb npcs/lack of real police/lack of any sort of reaction to the player in any big ways, fairly repetitive quest design, poor performance, etc. These are just a few of the criticisms, I'm sure I have missed some. While some of them have since been fixed, I think people are quick to forget and quick to criticise. Not to sound cynical but a lot of the renewed positivity in Cyberpunk was in large part due to the Edgerunners anime, which fuelled excitement for an expansion that ended up being quite good. BGS may not ever have the same redemption arc but I also think people refuse to give it the chance to win us back, which Cyberpunk didn't receive until relatively recently. In the perfect world, we would just get games that work, unfortunately, this is our timeline.

Funny thing is that's usually the case anyway, we end up spending more time modding our game than actually playing it, because oftentimes while we are modding our game we run into a bunch of fucking conflicts and sometimes the tools that we use don't tell us which mod is causing the problem, and we end up having to check an uncheck mods down or load order in order to figure out which one is fucking it up, unfortunately that's what modding is all about, eventually we get to that perfect tear list where it all just works like Todd Howard says, it just takes us a fuckload of time to make a stable good experience.

Starfield doesn’t deserve a redemption. Nor did Cyberpunk. It’s best to uninstall, forget about it, and never touch it again

@@istealpopularnamesforlikes3340relax

I did this with Cyberpunk after being on the hype train for years and it definitely soothed the burn and ended up being a really nice surprise

The game’s mechanics and its world are forever fucked. Mods may help a little but the way you “travel” in space is not fixable. The world is limited by design in a way that leaves little room for improvement.

I get what you're saying, and I agree. But let's not pretend that an externally made mod created using limited tools and visibility of the games internal systems and code is the same thing as an official internal fix or feature addition by the developer. And a modder has zero responsibility for the associated effects of any changes they make, such as to performance or the correct functioning of other systems. They are not the same.

Yep, pretty amazing that BGS made a game that is less innovative than a game made over 12 years ago.

Just played the legendary edition, great games and the story is interesting from the start. Did not feel that with starfield.

@@marcosdgonzalez5270 durpa durpa

Meh, they're rolling out updates at the very least. I don't think anybody expected bethesda to be as on point as larian

I never cared for BG3 I tried and really couldn’t get invested. Plus the top down combat just takes me out of the game

I get the feeling that this game won't be good or considered good until 3 to 5 Years From now, I want it to be 3 years from now, because that's how long it took cyberpunk to actually get good, but because this is Bethesda and they're slow as hell when it comes to updating their game, I say 5 years is more realistic because they take forever to get any fucking thing done, and sometimes they'll focus on the most retarded shit like who gives a fuck about moonshadows and shit, what the fuck? Focus on the shit that actually matters bethesda, you can always work on this stupid moonshadows way down the road you know shit you know prioritize on shit to get done don't fucking work on retarded shit first. That's where my criticism lies with bethesda, I just don't want them to focus on retarded shit first I want them to prioritize on the things that matter the most and then work on the retarded shit later when it doesn't matter anyway.

Let me bring up a scenario, I break my leg, well a normal person would go to the fucking hospital immediately, but with Bethesda it's go to the store and maybe get some Band-Aids, oh and while they're at it look in the mirror and make sure they're presentable for some fucking reason because that matters somehow before you go anywhere, Bethesda are like women, they have to check to make sure everything matches before they go anywhere it doesn't matter that they're fucking leg just broken, nope nope nope can't do that can't let the doctor see you when you're not as pretty as you could be, nope no need to save that fucking leg, that leg is the the lowest priority at this point because Bethesda are women LOL.

Played Skyrim again before starfield came out hoping to get an immediate upgrade right after I finished and got an immediate downgrade

The fact, that Fallout 4 looked like a masterpiece for @LandynG137, compared to Starfield... Fallout 4's BoS had like 4 or 5 quests and boom, you were grandmaster. Oh yeah and you had this black haired racist sidekick, forgot his name, the puffed up ignorant dude in his pilot jacket.

@@bignagile4699 im waiting for nolvus v6 skyrim. certainly skyrim will be bethesda studios most beautiful game in 2030 and 2040!

I don't know why he always compares them Bethesda is pretty much a dishonest company at best.

That's good, hopefully Bethesda won't release a broken game missing most of the RPG elements, and abandon it in under 3 years like CDPR.

@@iyziejane i hope this is sarcasm. I agree Cryberpunk is lacking. But so is Starfield.

True....they are better

@@iyziejane What an absolutely horrible take. At least with Cyberpunk 2077 the core content was there from the start and good. (They made almost 0 story changes and the builds even became worse in 2.0 in my opinion. Skill trees have almost no synergies with each other now.) Cyberpunk 2077 had so many inexcusable bugs at launch but Starfield is missing an entire game. It’s hard to have bugs when there isn’t a game to begin with. And what is the horrible take on Cyberpunk missing RPG elements while you’re defending Bethesda’s games? If you were to compare Cyberpunk with CRPGs, sure, but Starfield? Every bit of “rpg-element” in Starfield are head-canons you have to make yourself because the only help the game gives in furthering your roleplaying is you picking an option in character customisation that says “You are a professor”, which next to never gets brought up again. I can count on my one hand how many times Bounty Hunter came up in dialogues in my 200h gameplay. The only real flavour that came from the choices in character customisation was the annoying fan and having parents. Cyberpunk’s Nomad/Corpo/Street kid background is super plain and limited but they had more impact on the dialogue than Starfield’s backgrounds. And in classic Bethesda fashion you have zero commitment to anything you would think would have one. Swear yourself to the Rangers? Can do their quest and do every other faction quest too without any repercussions or impact on anything. What was IN the game that you could roleplay that you couldn’t do with other franchises? If I played Prince of Persia I can have the exact same amount of roleplaying by making up a head-canon that Dastan used to have a part-time job at a hotdog stand. “They abandoned it” Starfield was abandoned before launch.

I think basically every dev team has lost its talent. They all still have management but the actual people that made the magic happen are gone.

DLSS requires a secong graphics team, testing, time, resources... just so you can see your benchmark improve. 30 to 60 fps is the best the human eye can see. Monitors and TVs std refresh rate is 60Hz, or 60 frames a second. Above that, your brain cannot see one stream... Hence Starfield looks broken on your amazing system because of your eyes. I suggest DLSS off, and 60fps max.

@@aforbes2nd what are you smoking bro haha I just said it took 3 months and companies can do better then that

​@@ryanvandoren1519And they keep saying the execs are to blame lmao. They're just salvaging whatever bs these devs are pumping out nowadays. I doubt they want to give us shitty games on purposes

@@TheUltimateHacker007 the fact is Microsoft is at blame for quality control, and Bethesda is to blame for putting out shit

But the difference is the base game was good, the main issue was the bugs, fair a bunch good stuff came on updates but something like police chases doesn't really enhance the experience, especially when there's literally no benefit to triggering them, starfield the base game is kinda eh

I don't know how people played that game without the movement abilities they added. Would have been a completely different game for me and not in a good way.

And yet people said how shitty it is. Just like this and no man's sky. I played and beat cyberpunk and starfield on release I don't sweat what other people are saying.

A lot of people like me bought CP77 at launch and were disappointed by the lack of open world RPG elements. The gigs are minimal side content, and the emptiness of the city reminded me of the GTA games on the PS2. The main quest feels padded after the first 8 hours and I struggled to like any of the characters. So a lot of the backlash was not about bugs, but lies in the marketing, and CDPR never redeemed themselves in the eyes of those millions of those fans. The brief "redemption arc" came from younger fans of the TV show that listen to KZfaq influencers and were hungry for a GTA type game.

I find that odd too but I can also see where they are coming from. I bought it on pc, had very little issues but I saw all the videos of the bugs. And was like damn, I guess I was just pretty lucky. Besides rushing release I think their biggest mistake was launching it on previous gen, from the bug gameplay I saw a lot of it came from last gen. I felt like I was one of the few people that enjoyed the game at launch, but then again it's all about expectations, besides the teaser I stayed away from all promotional and marketing materials. I was just expecting an rpg lite fps with a decent story in a cyberpunk dystopian world, and that's sort of what I got. However I wasn't a fan boy of the game, I found if there could be improvements to the game due to the valid criticism from the community it would be welcomed. And it worked the game got far better than I would have ever expected. This is also one of the reason why I don't understand the fan boying over starfield, even if you love the game as it is now, if BGS takes the constructive criticism all it would do is improve the game you love so much. It's a win win win.

I totally understand what you're saying now. You're talking about the external monologue from players and game journalists. I just had to read it a second time and then it made sense😂

Like you, I played the game day 1 on PC & had absolutely no issues. In fact, for a studio that had previously only ever made 3rd person fantasy ARPG's, I felt the game was quite groundbreaking.....even if it didn't live up to the hype. It was clear, though, how trying to get the game to work on last gen hardware hurt the game for everyone at release.

Especially with 450 people working on it for over 8 years.

They can’t and they won’t

Yep the writing is my biggest gripe, lack of good companions second. A few hours in and I honestly began to get angry at just how poor the storytelling is.

Such a remake... Nothing new again. D&D has a little more content to draw from, why do we get recycled crap?

Cool are you a table top style game fan? I wanna try it but am unsure if that play style will appeal to me?

​@@aforbes2ndspoken like someone who has clearly not played BG3. Go troll elsewhere.

@@TEEANVEE I hate turn based games but I have finished the game 3 times so far. I was a bit bored when I first started, but the story ended up hooking me. It's very dialogue heavy, but the choices you make during a lot of those moments have actual impact, sometimes big sometimes small. Plus for a turn based game, the combat feels intense at times, looks great, and sounds fantastic. Watch some reviews and stuff to see if it could be up your alley, then give it a try :)

@@TEEANVEE ive never played dnd in my life, i love high fantasy. And bg3 does it amazingly. It gives me lotr vibes. But alot darker. Its very good if you like to just dissapear into a really in depth fantasy world.

hopefully they focus on ES6 because Starfield is a dumpster fire that smoke will ascend from forever

Indeed. Starfield set in the solar system would have been better. Plenty of asteroids and planetoids in the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud to host countless procgen spaces.

​@@ElijsDimaYep, the TV show Expanse is set in just our solar system and of course there's plenty of great storytelling.

This drove me nuts and is such a BASIC option. Just one of a thousand baffling decisions.

You can't fix bad writing and lame fetch quests. Honestly I think they're toast as a studio.

What I hate is when they'll add shit to the update that doesn't matter, like who gives a fuck about moonshadows? Why was that and needed update? It wasn't, but they did it anyway, I think when it comes to updating their game they should prioritize on the most important things before they ever do an update. That retarded shit can always come later, but the more important things need to be done more importantly right away God dammit!.

No seriously he reaches huge he said starfield would age like new Vegas I was dying 🤣 😂 😭. Absolutely not. I do like his content but they got to just admit this game was a flop to what it should have been.

Well he did say out of Elder Scrolls, Fallout and Starfield, he likes Starfield the least. His review was even more harsh than Gamespot where every fan lost their shlt over. If you think he's doing great PR for Bethesda than you clearly haven't seen his review of the game.

@@eugeneaubry4308new Vegas was considered a terrible game on release. Nostalgia is one hell of a drug

It’s so cringe to watch ngl

​@@shifterzxI definitely agree with you. He is a good reviewer and he shunned starfield where it lacked according to him. Also even if he likes the game he has the right to have an opinion.

do you work 😏

Yes! Thank you.

Yeah they didn’t do either of them

Hey the library can be pretty nice star field is like watching plain white paint dry

@inuclearpickle8628 Yeah thats fair lol

You can add a lot of fixes and polish, but a rotten core is a rotten core no matter how shiny the waxjob on top.

It's more like an early access title, and the consumers end up being the game testers because Bethesda are too cheap to have game testers, honestly it sounds a little bit too much like Windows as an operating system these days, they release a buggy version of Windows and people all around the world who are using their program tell them how terrible it runs so then they do some more updates and it runs worse and then they do some more updates and then it runs worse and eventually people get sick and tired of Microsoft and their shit, and then they moved to Lenox and Linux isn't perfect either but at least the community there actually fucking tries to make things better and they don't spy on you. Going back to the topic of bethesda, they seem to run into the same cycle every time they release any game, they release it in a buggy broken mess, and they don't fix it for a while, this time however it seems a little bit different, but only because people are negative about the games reception and it's showing up and platform, and Bethesda can't just give up on their baby they created for the last decade straight, they have to go back to the drawing board and fix all the shit they fucked up, part of me feels like it's a scam, because normally when it's an early access game they don't ask for that much money, they ask for maybe $30 for an early access game some of them are 25 or $20 or maybe even 15, my point is they sold this game as if it was a full game but it's clearly An Early Access title, it's not finished and it's not going to be finished anytime soon, in my understanding it's false advertising to call it a full complete game and sell it as a full price title, they should give people back their money or they could give them half their money back, because this game right now in a state is not worth what they say it's worth in any shape or form, because it's an early access title game that is not finished and won't likely be finished roughly 3 to 5 years from now, I say 3 years because that's how long it took cyberpunk to fix their game to actually make it good, but because this is Bethesda and I know they take a fuck love longer to update their game, I say 5 years is more realistic.

Gaslighting is an epidemic in today's world. Whether the topic is politics or the game industry. Or in simple petty, personal conflicts with another person in your life. Gaslighting is the hottest trend right now. It's what all the cool kids are doing.

Also it would be cool if you could own a freighter ship and have that as a mobile base where you could also have all your ships docked in

I they get rid of the need for fast travel I will give the game a shot

@@takemeseriouslyplx2124 😂 I guess you’ll never play the game. It’s a dumpster fire that will take at least 4 years to put out

Starfield will never work like that, maybe Starfield 2 if that's ever a thing @@O.C.P_officer77

I don’t think they have the tech to straight up cut the load screens, but they should really figure out how to better mask them. Like, in Elite, jumps between star systems are actually a sort of load screen, but the transition between it and gameplay is seamless. If we could at least have seamless transition between player control and jump animations that would go a long way to make it feel less disruptive.

It was the crimson fleet not the raiders😅. Raiders are from borderlands 😊

TELL ME YOURE 12 YEARS OLD WITHOUT TELLING ME YOURE 12 YEARS OLD

why are you guys yelling?

​@@SobeCrunkMonster why be mean about this

SEX GIFS

@@SobeCrunkMonsteryeah man, with so much hatred in this world why be mean? I hope you grow to see how much a kind action can make an impact

Good point.

But men went to the moon, nothing was there, and definitely they weren't bored 😂

​@@sadarumhogai9337haha indeed. A comment for the ages to be sure.

it's flawed game design

Starfield is the game Bethesda fans deserve

@@daizenmarcurio yeah, shit sandwitch.