Their response to the criticism COMPLETELY kills any excitement I had for the next Elder Scrolls. Shows they really don't care or want to improve at all. Starfield showed it, and their response to the criticism confirmed it. Todd echoes this same sentiment, so it's not just these devs.

The one about astronauts on the moon not being bored had me in stitches. No fucking doubt, cause they were actually ON THE MOON.

“Never stop exploring!” sounds like a threat now

The responses were written by the NPCs in starfield. It has that aimless walking into walls soullessly vibe.

Starfield is THE ONLY game I've ever regretted buying and playing, I actually REGRET wasting my time on this shit, and especially my money.

I wouldn't be surprised if it's Todd Howard himself that is replying to those Steam users. It just sounds so much like him.

The responses from Bethesda are peak gaslighting delusional marketing BS. If you screwed up just say "Hey, we hear you and we could have done things better. Here's the upcoming updates we'd like to do to address some of this." But instead we are getting "Nuh uh YOU'RE the crazy one!"

I can’t believe the developers are trying to convince players that we’re not suffering through loading screens, we’re getting to experience the “grav-drive” system they implemented. “That’s not feces on your sandwich, it’s our patented awesome sauce!”

I actually think we should really be concerned, and maybe get a wellness check at Bethesda offices. Pretty sure there's a gas leak!

Pre ordered Starfield. Finished main story and a lot of side quests within 60hrs. Havent touched the game since. Edit - Im an idiot for pre-ordering

“…and they certainly weren’t bored”. The astronauts on the moon didn’t use loading screens to get there 😂😂

This is not just embarrassing and cringe, it's also very unprofessional, it's like a beginner's businessman mistake, you just NEVER antagonize dissatisfied clients even when they're wrong and especially when they're right which is the case here. If you messed up, apologize, offer compensations, fix the problem the best you can and do better the next time, that's business 101, maintaining good faith is the most important thing, if you f*cked up with your customers then spat on them when they complained, you're left with a customer that actively hates your guts, that will never buy again from you and that will never miss an opportunity to spread bad publicity... Bethesda are so arrogant and delusional that they think they can just wash away bad reviews by challenging them, if only they did it well, they're like debating their customers with the worst and the most laughable arguments ever when they should be focused on fixing the mess.

Im honestly suprised more people dont complain about the paradiso vs earth colonists mission mentioned in that one review. The captain of the colonist ship literally say. "Be our representive because we are ready to fight for our new home!" So you go down and speak to the corporate board. They give two options spend your own money to give them a grav drive or sell them into slavery. I chose the slavery option thinking. "Theres no way the colonists will agree to this, lets burn this resort down." I go back to the colonist ship and the captain goes. "Oh wow! Slavery sounds AWESOME!!!" so i just shrugged and brought the the materials to do it. The corporate a-holes wouldnt even shill out materials to give their new slaves homes, i had to do that! Worst written quest EVER.

Bro the “white or wheat” review was brutal😂

The “moon” quote was repeated by a few reviewers who got review code from Bethesda. I believed then that was their marketing line, and these robotic replies only strengthen my assumption

I can tell you exactly how this happens. Imagine yourself as a game developer named Dave working at Bethesda. Your boss Bob walks in and says, "Hey Dave I was just in a managers meeting and our director of quality control mentioned that there are a lot of negative reviews on Starfields Steam page. As one of the devs for the game can you hop in their and respond to them? You know show the community that we are paying attention to them? Thanks!" Then he walks off. As Dave you don't have time for this stuff. They have you working 60 hour weeks already and most of the complaints are about things you actually agree with. You don't have time to jump on a forum and put out flames you weren't responsible for! The problem is that your idiot bosses weren't listening during development and now they want you to take on the dirty work of smoothing things over. Who wants to jump into a comment section and blow corporate fluff to carry water for upper executives meddling. So you say screw that and just let chat GPT respond to some of the first complaints you look at on the front page. You show that to Bob so he can tell his bosses that it has been taken care of and the devs are responding to the customers. The end.

Imagine getting threatened with a second play-through of Starfield. One play-through is already horrific, a second deserves to be referred to Geneva.

Bethesda fanboy: “You have NO right to say my favorite game is bad! You only played for 900 hours? No way. You didn’t play long enough. You need to play 900:00:01 hours to comment!”

Can Bethesda answer one thing ? Is it right that when your exploring different planets your finding the same locations (caves, science labs etc) that you’ve already seen elsewhere? Doesn’t that make the exploration pointless?

I know Bioware isn't what it used to be but Mass Effect 1 was released over 15 years ago, and that game did exploration better than Midfield. Even the original mako tank is amazing compared to having no vehicles.

Everything sounds like it was written by AI now. This is the future Kojima warned us about.

I feel like this is Bethesda saying they don’t give af.

I imagine Todd in his underwear angrily typing out these replies with the most passive aggressive salesmanship possible.

15:00 They say that they wanted to invoke a Nasapunk aesthetic but wild thing is that they not only failed to do that but don't understand the wild diversity of planetary bodies and that you can have them mirid different aspect to them. Thinking every planet thats not earthlike is barren rock is incredibly reductive and fails to acknowledge that planets even relatively barren ones can host a wild variety of different features that could make gameplay or interaction more interesting should you include them in a game. I mean there is literally a planet in our galaxy that rains diamonds they didn't think that planet or the planet that is literally just oceans should be included at all. I mean jesus Bethesda no mans sky is right there borrow what you need from them.

Their customer service is now procedurally generated. Hahahaha

What really blows my mind is like, you can't even fly your ship in space. Like, around planets. I could totally get when you hit atmosphere, a cutscene hiding a loading screen of a landing (make it real time cutscene so it shows the actual planet) and I'd be fine with that. But you can't like, fly AROUND planets, or to planets, through asteroid belts. It's just a multiplayer map for a dogfighting game. That's it. It's just nuts.

"astronauts went to the moon and weren't bored" is the most hilariously peak cope response imaginable

I was pretty convinced that at least half of Starfield was made with Chat GPT, so their review responses are oddly on brand...😅

Todd Howard mentioned that nearly 250 developers (or more than 50% of all Bethesda's employees) are still assigned to Starfield after the game's launch, and it is quite sad to see where a portion of their time is being assigned to!

I know for me, when it came to “there’s no vehicles” I hadn’t been concerned because every previous Bethesda game had been designed without them. I didn’t think they were hiding them or anything, I figured on foot exploration would feel like it always had. Because that’s how their games were always designed. Like sure there were horses in oblivion and Skyrim, but they weren’t necessities. But when it ended up being very spaced out, repeat procgen locations, I was floored. I put about 60 hours in, and I couldn’t believe that I had experienced almost everything in the game. I’m not happy that this game was a disappointment, and I really don’t like when people are all like “I told you so” because reveling in other’s sadness is kinda gross to me. I went into it expecting it to be a bit shallow compared to baldurs gate 3 (which I hadn’t realized I’d been waiting for 14 years for something to scratch my dragon age origins itch) but I was surprised at how much they just didn’t care about this game.

Its so strange. The disconnect between what Bethesda believes Starfield is and what Starfield actually is, is mind boggling. You would think Starfield has some BG3 levels of interaction and reactivity if you trusted these responses.

those responses from customer support are insane lmaoo

The dev reply comments to Steam reviews are completely TONE DEAF.

That was the first time I heard the 500 word essay on "cheating is bad" story. I laughed so hard I was in stitches. Congrats, that is one of the most absurdly funny things I've heard in a while.

There are a great many things the devs could have said to these critiques and still maintained some semblance of humility and respect... none of these were it.

Remember, Todd said it himself. There are things like all the load screen he thinks fans don't care about, but he and the company are finding out the fans do care and don't like load screens every two seconds.

I think the biggest thing that started the snowball effect on this game was in atmosphere ship exploration. Instead we got a loading screen. Just that side of adventure and manual exploration and manual docking would of nailed that side of adventure and the game didn't give that to us.

''oh great it's the same mine i've already explored 20 times already'' 😐 ''have you tried using a different character?'' 😀

It's kinda funny how future corporate responses will now always be easily suspected to be AI-Generated, because they really sound similar.

Nah, Starfield was an ambitious game developed by a studio without the tech to properly make that game fun, along with a lot of development decisions that added to that lack of fun (which likely stemmed from technical limitations). All of Todd's decisions on this one were absolutely wrong, and I find it really hard to believe that he or anyone at Bethesda played this game and were like, "This is the next Skyrim for us, we'll be remastering this one for the next five console generations too." Hell, IIRC last year there were reports that the ship flying bits weren't fun and they were struggling to make them fun...and over a year later they still suck balls. If Bethesda either seriously updates Creation Engine or switches over to a new engine, then they can get back to being industry leaders in building open games. But Starfield was just embarrassing on so many fronts. Technical, writing, gameplay, etc. All just hard misses for most people. The baffling part is that they actually had a prime example in what to do in No Man's Sky. Build a smaller version of that, with a bunch of hand crafted planets and a lot of the NMS features but with Bethesda writing (always lacking IMO but people seem to like it, so - shrug -), worldbuilding, etc and this easily would have bee a GOTY nominee.

It wasn't just AFTER launch either. I've been a big Space Sim fan for a while. Long before Starfield's launch, I kept asking how Bethesda was going to get performance out of the Creation Engine, that even Star Citizen doesn't have. No one...NO ONE TO DATE, has ever made a game, where you can go from the micro of being on a street in a city, to flying around a country, to orbiting a world, to traveling between Solar Systems, and made it ALL, big to small, engaging and fun. Hell, I don't think anyone's made a STATE or PROVINCE to that level yet. As soon as I heard "hundreds of planets" I knew Starfield was going to be another Bethesda Bungle. I don't think Bethesda even knows how irrelevant numbers are to a game anymore. No one CARES about the detail, or the size, or the number of somethings....people had fun with Vampire Survivors, Elden Ring, and Dishonored I and II....none of those games had to crow about a statistic or number.

It took some time but people turned on Starfield. The honeymoon phase is over, no more Bethesda glasses, Starfield is huge disappointment. I can't even see the upcoming mod-tools will be able to save it. It ain't Skyrim, it ain't Fallout. Elder Scrolls 6 is going to be another disappointment, Bethesda needs to layoff/remove all of the world building and story people that currently work there. Morrowind has amazing story, Oblivion has amazing story, Skyrim has great story, Fallout 3 has great story, but then came Fallout 4, which in my opinion has very weak story, worldbuilding was there but that is just because of the IP. Starfield has abysmal story and worldbuilding.

About the “astronauts weren’t bored when going to the moon bit”, and the fact that emptiness is realistic, I immediately thought of the Gabe Newell quote on the new half life documentary that released. “in the real world, I have to write up lists of stuff I have to go to the grocery store to buy. And I have never thought to myself that realism is fun. I go play games to have fun” While I believe there are degrees to realism that are fine, using realism as in empty planets is just a mistake. Using the phrase “planets are supposed to be empty” as an excuse for bad game design is just sad. I hope they learn from this. Starfield could have been soo much better…

What better way to win people over than by arguing with them in the comments under their reviews Also “that’s not boring” is crazy 💀

It's crazy that star citizen, elite dangerous, and no man's sky have all figured out how to have interesting visitable locations (maybe less so with elite dangerous) and they did that with zero load screens. They can still feel vast and empty, however there's still things to *do*.

The Bethesda of Skyrim, Oblivion, Fallout 3 & 4 is gone. It was killed off by the corporate vampires of Zenimax and the authoritarian focus of Todd Howard on HIS vision for Starfield. All of the creator who made all of those great Bethesda game have left and they work at other places. The post-creative Bethsda has so far chalked up Fallout 76, Redfall and now Starfield. Bethesda needs a big change, with a big influx of new talent, and that will have to start with Todd stepping aside. The truly baffling part is that Bethesda had procedurally generated No Man's Sky to use as a template and somehow managed to not copy any of the things that make it great. I remember people jokingly calling Starfield "No Man's Skyrim" as the expectation for the game was building. Something you could call "No Man's Skyrim" would have been factors better than what Starfield actually turned out to be: 75% of a game rushed to completion, with what is in place being poorly thought out.

Just FYI. They aren't just starting to do this now. I got a similar dev response to my review not long after the game came out. I think they are just trying to convince people reading these reviews that things aren't that bad. When they are.

“It is meant to be empty by design-But that’s not boring “he a bit confused but got the spirit

They didn’t abandon what they’re known for, but curated it into quests that are conveniently placed right in front of you. Once all the content is done, there’s no moment of “let me walk over here and see what I find” . I can still find new things on Skyrim today.

People keep saying Bethesda's good at environmental story telling, I'm going be upfront: Don't think they are. Been playing Bethesda games for nearly 20 years now, not once do I pay close attention to the environments. They're usually bland and boring, there's no real challenge so I really don't have to watch out much and their games usually tell you exactly where to go so you don't have to figure it out on your own. Half the time when I do slow down and look at the world's and see the stories they're trying to tell, they make no sense. A skeleton of a little girl in an blown out Office building clutching a lunch-box filled with a plastic spoon and a nukacola? The hell story is that?

Bethesda is in the first stage of grief: denial

I was kinda stoked to find random survivors of crashes around the galaxy and figure out how to get them to join my crew rosters. (As seen in the gameplay trailers) Hundreds of hours later, I have still never encountered such a situation. Although I have run into “survivors” who are simply dying slowly awaiting my arrival with simple requests for something close by at hand to be given to them before they kick the bucket. Since they die anyways, I never give them what they ask for.

Luke will one day teach his grandchildren about how Starfield didn't have seemless space exploration

Great watch as always 👊🏿

Reviewer: I played this side quest and didn't like it. BethesdaBot: Hey, did you know there are side quests in this game?!

I remember I made a video 1 month before Starfield came out, and gave my full analysis, calling it "mid" at best, I gave it a 6.5/10 and the community had an outrage, I am glad but also sorry to see that I am not alone and that the community finally is waking up. Starfield deserves so much more.

Nooo Bethesda nooooo…. Please someone tell me that they got hacked holy crap 😂😂😂wow

I’ve heard Starfield gets good after 1,000 hours 😊 Jokes aside, if BGS can’t add actual space travel like NMS & Elite Dangerous (they def should btw!), then as a MINIMUM they should HIDE the loading screens with interactive animations - like they hid the loading screens via elevators in F04. Space travel could have you flying through wormholes / colourful Grav Jumps! It would add a lot more immersion & create the illusion you’re actually travelling from A to B

The most hilarious part is that they are LYING in their responses. Every single one has "click her to give feedback directly to the development team" or whatever. But when you click it, it's just a bug report and technical help form lmao.

I swear these sound like quotes from some of Todd’s interviews about the game. Especially the one about astronauts and the moon being empty but not boring. I wonder if they input the transcripts of all his media appearances into ChatGPT and this is the result? Microsoft does own a large stake in OpenAI.. 🤔 I prefer to believe that everyone at Bethesda has to carry around a book, the Word of Todd, and they have to study it whenever they have free time at work every day.

Interesting, I dont recall them bothering to do this during FO76's trainwreck launch. It wasnt on Steam, but they could have still respond elsewhere. Maybe Starfield figure is really that bad or they knew back then no amount of PR speak can defend FO76 lol

Starfield just didn’t get me engaged. The world felt so plain and empty. And I know that’s what they were going for… but why 😂

"Am I so out of touch? No, its the children who are wrong" - Seymour Skinner

I look forward to your monologues, Luke. Your thoughts are always interesting.

Is there a reason why starfield has so many directly copy and pasted interior cells? My understanding of the Creation engine is limited to my experience using the Creation Kit for Fallout 4, but it seemed like one of things that it did very well was allow folks to create new dungeons and poi with different layouts, appearances and litter them with environmental story-telling (via props and loot). For even somebody like me with limited technical knowledge it was a pretty simple process and a great creative outlet. I've been waiting to see what the mod tools look like before I buy, but I'm growing a little more concerned about what the failings of starfield in it's present state mean for it's potential.

I find it very odd that developers would think that replying to reviews like this would have any positive effect. First of all, if somebody played the game for dozens of hours and didn’t enjoy it, I doubt there is anything the developer is going to be able to say that will change their mind. I’m sure they’re also aware of other things they could do in the game. It’s just that they don’t want to. And secondly for people who are on the fence about the game, if it were me I would place more faith in the experience of someone who spent dozens of hours playing the game rather than someone who is being paid to market the game. My advice to developers would be that if you are going to react to a negative review, just say thank you for your feedback and leave it at that.

"The astronauts didn't mind!" The astronauts didn't buy your $70 POS looking to have fun. They were also being paid to do their job.

Man that first review of the video is EPIC!!! Fantastic! Kudos to the writer!

1000 planets implies that there’s gonna be a ton of stuff to find and do out there .. atleast it does to me .. I kinda feel like they should’ve leaned more into the simulation side of things .. and pasted the RPG story on top of it.. but that’s just my opinion

I feel like if they had used AI to respond the responses would be ironically much more unique. This is like they had a list of items in the game to use as talking points wrote a couple of quick answer paragraphs translated to another language and then translated it back to English.

The funniest thing about the uncredited "astronauts weren't bored on the moon" quote is it's a paraphrased quote from Todd Howard.

It's kinda funny how they say 3 seconds of load time is impressive - after a zillion menus - for their "expansive gameplay", while reality is systems are a bunch of small randomly generated and uninsteresting maps. Elite Dangerous also has system jumps as loading screens, and while it takes a bit longer, you can go to any planet in the system without any further loading, and the entire same planet is available for everyone

Day 2 after launch I put up my Steam review and got a response from a dev the next day. My main complaint in my review was the loading screens and how much it takes you out of the immersion. It was a lot of excuses in the response

Someone’s getting fired at Bethesda

In some ways this is kinda insane. I have no idea how management at a company can allow employees to just give unfettered feedback. I can’t imagine this is being done without management knowing about it, therefore it has to be a company mandate. Wild

I love it. We’ve been saying it since launch; Starfield is not good. It’s nice to be vindicated.

I’m really hurt as a Bethesda fan.. I was rooting for starfield up till now, we are all gas lighting our selfs that some dlc will change this careless mindset… rip Bethesda

It's an ok game, it's just nothing like what they hyped it up to be

Bethesda is so pathetic. I have rarely seen a developer become so noticeably arrogant about their own talents. Bethesda needs a huge dose of humility if they ever want to recapture their heyday.

"Hey Bethesda here! we talked to the ACTUAL people who went to the moon and asked them if it was boring. guess what! they all said NO it was not boring!! So you are all wrong and just dont get it! We are visionaries!"

I don’t think you need to fly the plane in order to make it feel like a real space craft, an example of this is the Normandy. The Normandy felt like a part of your crew since that was where you had meaningful interactions with your crew, sure you never got to fly it but it still felt like an important part of the story and your crew.

I wasn't gonna leave a negative review cause I felt the game was boring but not a complete waste of time but after seeing this I'm definitely leaving a negative review, this is insane I don't understand how can anybody think this is a good idea.

I'd say,Bethesda relied too much on Modders to fix their game and they seriously need to hire better Writers

I wanted to wander the ocean of space in my ship and come across solar systems, derelict stations, and pirate attacks at random.

Great video, I checked some of the reviews myself, and with how unprofessional they are being. I'm never getting a Bethesda game again, also its kinda weird how they only provide a response to negative reviews

Is procedurally generated content a cop out on making hand crafted content or pushing tech forward? Or both?

Exploring planets in Starfield made me miss the Mako.

I’ve never seen a company go out of their way to individually gaslight customers.

This game had me at the first 40+ hours. I purposefully spaced out which missions to take because of what peaked my interest at the time. After a while after 45 or so, i noticed that the same places ended up repeating themselves waaaayyyy too much... like almost every single time. This is NOT a traditional bethesda game which was my fault to think it would be considering the new systems they are pushing here. They said this is a game you can play for years, maybe mods will help but im burned out on this. I dont think i would come back to this even when preordering the delux equivalent version of this game. To end this on a good note, the sequal WILL be great. I think the team was overwhelmed creating systems and the lore. Now that is done, im hoping that this will help them add to this game and make this a true "Skryim in space" game

When talking about influencers and KZfaqrs that have a giant reach and ‘influence’ over an entire community that trusts them, one of my biggest pet peeves is seeing creators that make a professional living off this stuff do little to no research and make up or pour gasoline onto wrongheaded, outrageous claims for clicks and jinned up faux outrage. It’s genuinely disgusting and rage inducing!

Extremely well worded mate. No snarkiness, no sensationlism, just your take. Appreciate the breath of fresh air.

Luke getting a total victory lap for a video with this one xD

I was highly sceptical about CP 2077 and its setting, yet today it is a remarkably good game. From the get go I was sceptical about Starfield ..and all my gripes about the game have been warranted. It is fascinating how a single city can be more fun and engaging than 1000s of planets.... Thank you CDPR for a good modern game. When Bethesda games said “the game has 1000 planets”, it was more of a threat than a selling point. If I ever play this game, I hope I will be able to construct an X-Wing StarFighter or a Jedi star fighter.. I see the ships looks rather industrial, no distinction between airframe types, nor any consistency . Entering into atmosphere these blocks of metal will have the aerodynamic properties of a brick.... How do you Identify differing factions in space if all the ships look like huge unaerodynamic metal blobs? You aren’t able to fly in atmosphere, you can’t take off nor land on a planet in one fluid motion, it is a set cutscene ….. If different planets had differing atmospheres with different viscosities, there could have been storms/weather effects in atmosphere that caused a challenge whilst flying… but no…. flying in atmosphere is not even a possibility….for a ‘’Space exploration game’’… So the chunky unaerodynamic metal blobs are completely irrelevant. Why give us atmospheric flight , pod-racers or speeders on a planet if they can give us inter racial relationships with NPCs. I am a pilot…not Bob the builder, I want extensive spacecraft piloting…not the boring ‘’Build your own settlement..on a barren…empty…planet..’’ You are just a Michelin man running around on empty planets. This game is incredibly disappointing. Although The Serpents Jihad sounds very interesting… There are no cool factions, just the boring mining explorers vs pirates. To me factions are paramount in importance. Is there a Naval fleet/air arm ,patrolling and fighting in border disputes? And is there a police force that patrols everything in between , to uphold a sense of law and stability in the galaxy? ..or is it just a bunch of freelance miners and pirates all the time? The factions I have thus far seen are completely unalluring to me. In an entire galaxy ...ofcourse the factions are ‘’Murica in space ‘’... ‘’Cowboy Murica in space’’ and ‘’smuggler Murica in space’’….. Oh how the divercity….. Can’t wait for the DLC: ‘’Los Angeles Murica in space.’’ …. They scan your cargo for contraband when you request landing clearance…but can you have /smuggle contraband and if scanned and detected will the authorities send spacecraft to arrest you ? I really dislike the ‘’NASA PUNK’’ setting, it is so incredibly limiting. I love space as seen in Pre Disney woke cult Star Wars, with ships that look sleek and actually capable of flight, in space and in atmosphere. With clear factions and naval/airforces/space craft such as the beautiful Naboo N1 Star Fighter, the iconic X wing, the tie fighters , the Y wings, the Epic Jedi Star fighters and all the freighter and cruiser classes. Distinct designs that are tied to differing factions. Will Starfield have any such factions with recognizable spacecraft? At one point I saw a ship jump to lightspeed with a planet right in front of it… I was disappointed when the ship did not collide with the planet and disintegrate as a result thereof. Talking ballistics, I hope there will be some planets that have more intense gravitational pull. Causing projectile ballistic drop to be way more severe. Forcing you to compensate accordingly, taking distance, calibre and humidity into account. After all that, I highly doubt this will be the case. I have a horrid feeling that this game will just be vast… boring …..empty…space … separated by cutscenes. I am losing more and more enthusiasm for this game. Vast amounts of ‘’space’’...but an extremely limited amount of ..imagination. Imagionationless dev comment:''The Apollo astronauts went to the moon, it was barren and empty and they certainly weren't bored.'' Yes, but the Apollo astronauts had to guide their small dingy of a Lunar lander using maths, gravity and centripetal force; if they failed ,they would die. Each time I land an aircraft IRL , I get an immense sense of thrill, adrenaline and satisfaction because I know that if I don't succeed, I can die. To conduct the exact same mundane landing on a flight sim on pc does absolutely nothing to me, you can't even hope to compare the two experiences. ''The Apollo astronauts certainly weren't bored.'' Yeah and with Starfield you press a button to watch a boring repeatative cutscene...WOW PILOTING!!! Piloting an actual Lunar lander and watching a cutscene are WORLDS APART in comparison. Using such an excuse just shows how disconnected and imagionationless these corporate hacks truly are.

Xbox just can't get a win lmao 😂😂😂😂

This just makes me worried so much for the next Elder Scrolls and Fallout games. They had their peak with Skyrim and F4 in my opinion.

when they went to the moon, they were there for 21 hours, 36 minutes so is that the amount of time starfield is meant to hold our attention?

The important thing is always, a game should be FUN, if it’s not fun, it’s failing to be an entertaining product.

They didn’t need 1000 interesting planets! They could’ve hit us with 30 interesting planets and 970 bland ones and it would be fine. What we got was 100% bland .

They’re absolutely delusional.

No offense, but I’ve yet to see anyone properly defend starfield without sounding completely braindead