I love your comment and I still like the song!

🎶and wash away the raaaiiinnn🎶

It's Black Whole Sun

Are you the one who commented "Teacher, leave the kids alone" on another short? 😂👌🏻

Well.. when you put it like that... 🤔😜

However, if I understand it correctly, the Proponent (Chris Cornell) envisioned not an infusion or absorption, but a complete replacement.

😂

.........won't you come?

Yankovic et. w. al. hypothesized an object called the α-hole offspring instead

🤣🤣🤣🤣

I laughed out loud

Just like me frfr

Lmao

That's what the FED said.

Bloody Black Hole ---- swallowed one of my socks. No matter where I look - it has completely vanished.

Big Dryer & Big Sock colluded to put µblack holes in dryers for bigger profits.

Rejoice then, because there aren't any primordial black holes.

Exactly, scary long term Fermi paradox here in fact: 1. Red dwarfs die fast (on cosmological timescales) so civilization can’t stay around them as the rest of the galaxy dies out 2. Tiny black holes with essentially undetectable mass potentially cloud interstellar space, potentially making interstellar flight much more difficult, as one might run into them and know nothing of it until their ship is destroyed.

@@gavinregier6177 There are no tiny black holes, and if they are as small as the one described in this video (less than a proton radius) they Hawking emit electrons, pions, perhaps protons,neutrons, antiprotons, antineutrons (depending on size) and gamma-rays like crazy from Hawking radiation. So we would detect them from antimatter annihilation signals. This is just not a plausible scenario, primordial black holes are forbidden in inflation.

@@annaclarafenyo8185 perhaps not, I was just giving essentially a scifi theory

@annaclarafenyo8185 you seem to know vastly more than phycisists with PhDs, to be ablo to say "they don't exist" so cavalierly

Anton has help.

I also love how non biased he's managed to stay all this time. He just presents the data. Doesn't add what he thinks. Doesn't try to interpret the data. He just reports on what's there and that's it.

​@@TheDestroyer144he is biased when is something that go against the core of standard model of particles or the lambda CDM model of cosmology.

@@douglaswilkinson5700from Jesus?

@@Atok595 Like many KZfaqrs -- e g. Isaac Arthur, Fraser Cain, etc. -- Anton has help from others creating his daily videos.

That's what big black hole wants you to think.

for a given value of "tiny", one the size of Bendu would last 10^19 years

any human scale one would, asteroid mass ones are massive compared to human society but are still “tiny”

Put it this way, a micro blackhole the mass of the moon would be around 133 um in size and take in as much CMB energy as it puts out, one the mass of the sun, well it'd be around 70 K, so downright frigid in astronomical terms. The lower the mass, the hotter it'd be, but also even smaller, so that eventually one ends up with a proton sized object that's brighter than the sun. Black hole math is basically the food of headaches. The mathematics and equations aren't all that complex, the numbers are well, numbers, what's going on and scale is where the head begins to hurt. As in, the mass of the moon in a black hole the size of the point of a sewing needle.

@@spvillano Black holes that small should have quantum effects, no?

19k views but 350k subs suspicious

It certainly could bump around some molecules in your brain and influence your thinking, but I think you may have misunderstood what information means here

Information in this case is "Shannon entropy." So, a subcategory of information in this context is genetic information. Entropy most broadly is the number of microstates a macrostate can be described by. A genome of 100 base pairs can be described as having 4^100 genetic states. Shannon Information is generally defined as coming in bits, so that Shannon Information content would be 2^200, I think? So, the information in your brain can, indeed, be described in terms of Shannon Information, but not with our present ability to map the brain. It's not easy to do since your brain is an analogue computer, not a digital computer, and the Connectosome project has shown theres a lot more relevant variables that strongly affect its computational functions and power, but it is hypothetically possible. The question here is, would a black hole somehow impart information to your brain, and in a way your brain can interpret, and the answer is.... no. Rather, the black hole will "remove" information from your brain. It won't be "translated" in a way that will make the black hole compute that info the same way your brain was doing, because a blackhole (almost undoubtedly) doesn't process information like your brain does. Consider it this way: an electrode in your brain can copy information from your brain to, say, a computer, a satellite dish, a wifi chip, a digital clock, etc., but that won't make these objects think like a person. They just experience a state change. Similarly, the black hole would experience a state change --- a popular idea is that as matter falls in, it causes tiny changes in the surface of the event horizon, (because each atom within the black hole won't be in the same location, so the result is similar to uneven mass within the earth --- the gravity well becomes "lumpy.") The "lumps" in the event horizon will effect what hawking radiation is produced where, which can create a kind of "rippling" across the surface of the black hole as the _hawking radiation patterns_ influence the event horizon's shape by tugging against it. I like to compare it to the surface of a lake. An object falls in, it "records" when and where as ripples across the surface. But note: this analogy also applies with the idea of information transcription between incompatable information processing regimes. If you drop a computer in, the lake won't run programs in the computer. It won't boot up windows. Similarly, the patterns of your neurons in your skull might be "imprinted" on the black holes surface as ripples, but the black hole won't simulate the future those neurons would experience without the black hole. The black hole ergo won't think human thoughts. And vice versa, information transcribed from the black hole to the human brain... somehow... won't make you experience "being a black hole," anymore than nucleotides and amino acids harvested from your food can be incorporated into your brain to make you experience what any animal it came from thought. The data is transcribed WITHOUT translation. An example of translation might be DNA to protein --- the ribosome has a computation system that translates from mRNA, (a message from the genome to be transcribed,) to protein.

I might be overexplaining this lol but Shannon Information Theory has some very profound applications, and can explain all kinds of things.

Exactly where is physics stackexchange found?

How much mass is involved?

PBS did an episode on it a while ago.

He just mentioned it offhandedly I think. He does occasionally throw a bone to those who support fringe theories. There still remains no solid evidence for the existence of the mythical planet X or 9 or whatever some may call it.

It's not so much "shown false definitively," but rather, it's been shown the pattern can be explained by a survey bias. We could scrutinize the rest of the sky and find the pattern still held true --- wouldn't necessarily be likely --- or a similar but incidentally different pattern was there that showed there was another planet, even if in a different place and with different specs. For the time, though, the planet 9 hypothesis is dead in the water until more _even_ surveying can be performed.

He explains it in the video.

Check out Ken Wheeler magnetism and think about what he says ' if you wish.

Depends on if polar jetting is observed or not during star death, vs more spherical rebound of core collapse implosion. 260+ stellar mass stars are only conceived idea of internal devouring without noticeable spherical rebound, ending in massive polar jets and more of an external mass burn-off instead of traditional super nova. If this pattern was observed at smaller levels, then they’d more easily justify pre-emptive blackhole existence within the cores. Probabilistically not impossible, but evidence however is currently far too limited to even remotely justify something like that as a common feature though.

@@darylbrown8834Looked him up, very interesting. I’m curious what he’d say about Sagitarius A* mysteriously on its side though. But I suppose that might simply be a product of its current level of dormancy and not when sufficiently charged for AGN.🤔

Apparently not. But should it? I guess it's best to pay more heed to a man who believed in witchcraft, but, gradually, toward the end of his life became more skeptical about it..... Considering that even Bacon, who started out skeptical of witchcraft, but became convinced it was real because that was the solid 'consensus', Occam's progress may be more impressive than one might think.

Dark matter clouds DO cause lensing effects.

Curious how they could have done this. Discrimination of lensing can be very difficult, except under certain proximities or at extreme scales.🤔

@@stargazer5784 Not at the scales and frequencies that would be observed if black holes were responsible.

@@stargazer5784 but not in the way they would if they were black holes.

@@MarsStarcruiser I believe they used Andromeda. If black holes were the source of dark matter, then Andromeda would have all kinds of weird gravitational lensing that we could see, but do not.

Out that on the map

Out that on the map

Put that on the map

Out that on the map

Put that on the map

Does a black hole go dormant because there's no stars or gas to consume?

Try metamucil or prune juice 🤣

❤

Obviously you're as new to this channel as I am to the term "tautology", "redundantly redundant" was my prior goto, but now I like "a redundant tautology" Yes, Anton does thi a lot. But it's kinda wonderful, in other words, it grows on yah.

Welcome newcomer! Thank you for the new phrase "Redundant tautologies" to be added to my vocabulary!

@@ericwazhung As long as you're knowingly using "redundant tautology" ironically, I'll allow it ;-)

It would take a small asteroid quintillions of years to evaporate

I dont really geht what u mean. It would be the same gravitatinal affect as the sun + the mass of the black hole. If its smaller than an atom it would be those mantioned 70 mil Kg heavier

It's just counter space within that magnet.